Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yeah...if you had a straight popular vote, you'd get even less of a nationwide campaign than we have now. I estimate 45 states would never see a commercial addressing their concerns.Except they don't run nationwide campaigns... They run campaigns in whatever the swing states are.
I live in IL. Because Biden was so far ahead there in the polling, I didn't see any election commercials.
Yes, all by myself. I've never been a Trump fan, but do not believe that imprisonment by political opponents should be a bar to running for office.wow. the above scholar no doubt came up with the incredibly apt trump-mandela comparison all by itself..
what's next? gandhi?
Yeah...if you had a straight popular vote, you'd get even less of a nationwide campaign than we have now. I estimate 45 states would never see a commercial addressing their concerns.
It would be great for the political left, by the way, since the large cities that would be targeted would dominate.
Actually, if you had a straight up national vote, we'd have a national campaign...
It would definitely help the Democrats. So there is some logic behind it--it would be good for America. But there is no reason for the candidates to ever campaign anywhere except the large population areas.
This would start a Revolution, I dare them to try it…States can choose to keep his name off of ballots.
Congress can choose to not count his electors.
The Republican Party may soon nominate an individual for the presidency who is ineligible, under constitutional law, to serve in the presidency. The U.S. needs at least two viable political parties, and one may be about to commit elective seppuku.
You are very confused if you imagine that respected constitutional scholars conservative J. Michael Luttig and progressive Laurence Tribe espouse Soviet-style marxism, Tinker Bell.Hey Shiplap, you live in America, this is not a former Soviet country, oh I almost forgot who / what I was replying to…
The Republican Party may soon nominate an individual for the presidency who is ineligible, under constitutional law, to serve in the presidency. The U.S. needs at least two viable political parties, and one may be about to commit elective seppuku.
You do realize that even your federalist society is saying he can't be president, right?We've already got a precedent, dumbfuck. Briben was nominated after taking $50 million in bribes.
6 hours of algorithmic vote switching and a few days to manufacture millions of ballots and the bed-shitting shut-in was installed as a POTUS..... right?
View attachment 817005
They could. But they won't. Can you imagine any republican telling Joe Bob, "You really don't need 150 guns."? LOLOr the Republicans can start tailoring their message to be less crazy and appeal to more people. That would be a good thing.
If thats the case, it used to encourage the Democrats to be that party; at least in states that wanted to be white dominated again. For example...The problem with the EC is that it encourages the GOP to be the party of white grievance by giving extra voting power to white dominated states.
This would start a Revolution, I dare them to try it…
Hey, thanks for the tip. Republican states can keep Biden off the ballot.States can choose to keep his name off of ballots.
Congress can choose to not count his electors.
It's a sad state of affairs in the GOP when the party's ambitious politicians refuse to stand up for democratic elections and the rule of law.Do they have any eligible candidates at all? As far as I remember every one of them has spoken in support of the insurrection at one time or another.
Hey, thanks for the tip. Republican states can keep Biden off the ballot.
Neither does the left with Trump, other than their interpretations.Of course they could, but they'd have no constitutional grounds to stand on.
Neither does the left with Trump, other than their interpretations.
He didn't do any of that. It is in your imagination.Of course we do... providing aid and comfort to a rebellion against our own government while performing their constitutional duty to certify the winner of a presidential election. That's a violation of the 14th Amendment which bans Trump from running for office. States can choose to keep him off their ballots, for that reason, if they so choose.
He didn't do any of that. It is in your imagination.
