Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Murica hasn't had one of those for over a century, so what model do we have to compare against?So you just don't think America's Constitutional Republic is all that good.
Begging the question fallacy.You don't think having rights is all that necessary, and you don't like the idea of a small government with limited powers. You're not fond of a system of checks and balances, by which no single human has too much power.
None and none.What's a better form of government and how much power should it have?
Laws and Constitutions are only as good as those willing to abide by them and enforce them.So you just don't think America's Constitutional Republic is all that good. You don't think having rights is all that necessary, and you don't like the idea of a small government with limited powers. You're not fond of a system of checks and balances, by which no single human has too much power.
What's a better form of government and how much power should it have?
What Form Of Government Is Better Than A Constitutional Republic?
Whoever knew parliamentary constitutional monarchists were Marxist revolutionaries?You won't get any prog replies to a thread like this because the only possible answers they can honestly give would expose them as the Marxist revolutionaries they are.
Whoever knew parliamentary constitutional monarchists were Marxist revolutionaries?
TIL.
Laws and Constitutions are only as good as those willing to abide by them and enforce them.
Followed by Iceland, a Unitary parliamentary republic. Then Switzerland with a Federal assembly-independent directorial republic with elements of a direct democracy.
Since when is our government small?So you just don't think America's Constitutional Republic is all that good. You don't think having rights is all that necessary, and you don't like the idea of a small government with limited powers. You're not fond of a system of checks and balances, by which no single human has too much power.
What's a better form of government and how much power should it have?
Perhaps if you had the slightest concept or knowledge of the rest of the world one could maybe take you a tiny bit seriously.None of those countries would last two minutes on their own. They all currently exist under the umbrella of a super power and its 'Pax Romana' of the last 75+ years, soon to to be dismantled and leaving all these fat dumb and happy Euros at the mercy of some very bad nasty dictators and police states.
Perhaps if you had the slightest concept or knowledge of the rest of the world one could maybe take you a tiny bit seriously.
What a pity...
It's quite obvious from your comment you either didn't bother finding out the 10 happiest countries or know nothing about them.Too bad your idiot opinions are always stupid.
The original intent of the Founding Fathers was that the Federal Government was to be limited. It's power and scope was to be limited to specific goals and purposes. Never did the Founders intend for the Federal Government to grab so much power from the States and "We The People." So our current form of government is not a reflection of our Founder's vision.Since when is our government small?
We haven't had a small government since before WWII and republicans have increased government at every turn just like democrats.
S0 to answer your question the change we need to make is to actually put power in the hands of the people not in the hands of the few powerful people and corporations that actually have control
