- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,026
- 47,214
- 2,180
So again NO LAW was broken by the Russians buying ads, not a single law.
The snowflakes will never get that. Never.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So again NO LAW was broken by the Russians buying ads, not a single law.
Are you kidding. You are talking about Coats, Wray, Neilson, and Bolton who all just went on TV and spoke about the Russian threat. You think they are lying and playing games? You think they are Obama political hacks? You’re off your rockerI dunno. They probably are playing CYA in some fashion. Nothing these Intelligence agencies say can be believed. They are all infested with Obama political hacks. Obama started corrupting them the minute he was inaugurated.Simple question.... If they couldn’t verify it then why did they?How could they verify it if they don't have the server? Where's the fucking server? Do you actually expect anyone to take their say-so when the Intelligence agencies have become so thoroughlyYour not impressed because your not listening. I’m not talking about Obama appointed hacks. I’m talking about Trump appointed hacks, all of whom verify the Russian hacking narrative, all of whom have reviewed the evidence... you honestly think that they are all lying? And if so then why hasn’t Trump fired them? Why has Trump states that he trusts the intel. Why has Trump acknowledged hacking of the DNC?Some Obama appointed hacks said the Russians hackes the DNC servers when they never even examined it? tell me why I'm not impressed with your evidence?His appointed heads of multiple intel agencies certainly have access to evidence. These guys breif potus inbetween his fox and friends and his chicken n waffles... they have all made many public statements on their findings and Trump has said publicly that he believes them. What more do you want?
Your story makes zero sense
You mean all the hysterical leftwing douchebag snowflakes like you would agree. Rational people can see there's no basis for such claims. None.Interesting fact about the Steele dossierAccording to Sen. Grassley's memo, Hillary's cronies gave some of the dossier information to Steele. No way is Hillary or Obama clean in this.Hillary did not fabricate a dossier and never used any of the information in it. I did not see any ads about Trump and Golden Showers
Hillary Clinton Associates Fed Christopher Steele Information for the Dossier
It’s main claim was that Putin has damaging information on Trump and that Trump is compromised
Anyone who saw Trumps performance in Helsinki would agree
corrupt?
Furthermore, they didn't "verify" anything. That would require presenting some actual facts. All they did is make unsubstantiated assertions.
Are you kidding. You are talking about Coats, Wray, Neilson, and Bolton who all just went on TV and spoke about the Russian threat. You think they are lying and playing games? You think they are Obama political hacks? You’re off your rockerI dunno. They probably are playing CYA in some fashion. Nothing these Intelligence agencies say can be believed. They are all infested with Obama political hacks. Obama started corrupting them the minute he was inaugurated.Simple question.... If they couldn’t verify it then why did they?How could they verify it if they don't have the server? Where's the fucking server? Do you actually expect anyone to take their say-so when the Intelligence agencies have become so thoroughlyYour not impressed because your not listening. I’m not talking about Obama appointed hacks. I’m talking about Trump appointed hacks, all of whom verify the Russian hacking narrative, all of whom have reviewed the evidence... you honestly think that they are all lying? And if so then why hasn’t Trump fired them? Why has Trump states that he trusts the intel. Why has Trump acknowledged hacking of the DNC?Some Obama appointed hacks said the Russians hackes the DNC servers when they never even examined it? tell me why I'm not impressed with your evidence?
Your story makes zero sense
You mean all the hysterical leftwing douchebag snowflakes like you would agree. Rational people can see there's no basis for such claims. None.Interesting fact about the Steele dossierAccording to Sen. Grassley's memo, Hillary's cronies gave some of the dossier information to Steele. No way is Hillary or Obama clean in this.
Hillary Clinton Associates Fed Christopher Steele Information for the Dossier
It’s main claim was that Putin has damaging information on Trump and that Trump is compromised
Anyone who saw Trumps performance in Helsinki would agree
corrupt?
Furthermore, they didn't "verify" anything. That would require presenting some actual facts. All they did is make unsubstantiated assertions.
It's obvious to anyone not under the con artists spell.Nonsense. Don't try to pass opinion as fact.Trumps actions towards Putin show Steele was correctAnd yet NOT a single instance of it being true, no evidence, no supporting facts, no charges, no claims by Mueller, no court records NOTHING, just you and your lies. Remind me how it is ILLEGAL for an individual of any nationality to BUY ads on Facebook?Thats cause the Steele Dossier was all lies and IT WAS USED against Trump by the FBI. Meanwhile the info on Hillary and the DNC was ALL TRUE.Lot of nasty stuff in that dossier.......yet HIllary never used a word of it in her campaign
Yet Trump used Putin’s Wikileaks information on a weekly basis
Steele dossier said Putin has damaging information on Trump
What part of that is a lie?
In other words, it's totally baseless.It's obvious to anyone not under the con artists spell.Nonsense. Don't try to pass opinion as fact.Trumps actions towards Putin show Steele was correctAnd yet NOT a single instance of it being true, no evidence, no supporting facts, no charges, no claims by Mueller, no court records NOTHING, just you and your lies. Remind me how it is ILLEGAL for an individual of any nationality to BUY ads on Facebook?Thats cause the Steele Dossier was all lies and IT WAS USED against Trump by the FBI. Meanwhile the info on Hillary and the DNC was ALL TRUE.
Steele dossier said Putin has damaging information on Trump
What part of that is a lie?
Ummm...no.In other words, it's totally baseless.It's obvious to anyone not under the con artists spell.Nonsense. Don't try to pass opinion as fact.Trumps actions towards Putin show Steele was correctAnd yet NOT a single instance of it being true, no evidence, no supporting facts, no charges, no claims by Mueller, no court records NOTHING, just you and your lies. Remind me how it is ILLEGAL for an individual of any nationality to BUY ads on Facebook?Steele dossier said Putin has damaging information on Trump
What part of that is a lie?
...the goal was not to make people vote FOR Trump, though that may have happened... the goal was to get Bernie supporters to hate Hillary, and either not come out to vote, or to vote against her.... but it was primarily to suppress the Democratic voters from coming out to vote.... and it worked.
My eyes are wide open. Your claims are baseless. You and RightWinger certainly posted any reason to believe them.Ummm...no.In other words, it's totally baseless.It's obvious to anyone not under the con artists spell.Nonsense. Don't try to pass opinion as fact.Trumps actions towards Putin show Steele was correctAnd yet NOT a single instance of it being true, no evidence, no supporting facts, no charges, no claims by Mueller, no court records NOTHING, just you and your lies. Remind me how it is ILLEGAL for an individual of any nationality to BUY ads on Facebook?
Open your eyes.
Steel dossier?!? Where the fuck did that come from? You are the one who is now conflating because that hasn’t been part of this conversation at all. We were talking about Russian hacking.Are you kidding. You are talking about Coats, Wray, Neilson, and Bolton who all just went on TV and spoke about the Russian threat. You think they are lying and playing games? You think they are Obama political hacks? You’re off your rockerI dunno. They probably are playing CYA in some fashion. Nothing these Intelligence agencies say can be believed. They are all infested with Obama political hacks. Obama started corrupting them the minute he was inaugurated.Simple question.... If they couldn’t verify it then why did they?How could they verify it if they don't have the server? Where's the fucking server? Do you actually expect anyone to take their say-so when the Intelligence agencies have become so thoroughlyYour not impressed because your not listening. I’m not talking about Obama appointed hacks. I’m talking about Trump appointed hacks, all of whom verify the Russian hacking narrative, all of whom have reviewed the evidence... you honestly think that they are all lying? And if so then why hasn’t Trump fired them? Why has Trump states that he trusts the intel. Why has Trump acknowledged hacking of the DNC?
Your story makes zero sense
You mean all the hysterical leftwing douchebag snowflakes like you would agree. Rational people can see there's no basis for such claims. None.Interesting fact about the Steele dossier
It’s main claim was that Putin has damaging information on Trump and that Trump is compromised
Anyone who saw Trumps performance in Helsinki would agree
corrupt?
Furthermore, they didn't "verify" anything. That would require presenting some actual facts. All they did is make unsubstantiated assertions.
The "Russian threat?" You mean the fact that Russia has always attempted to influence our elections? What does that have to do with the Steele "dossier?" Snowflake douchebags like you keep trying to conflate two things: Russian meddling and the Steel "dossier." One has nothing to do with the other.
It is against the law for a foreign gvt to interfere and meddle.... READ THE INDICTMENTIt is NOT illegal for someone to run ads not associated with a campaign in an election, you liar.Yes! It is illegal for a foreign government to interfere in our election process, and illegal for the Trump campaign to take the help of a foreign government, IF that did happen.So running ads is illegal? Since when?here are some links...
The BEST advertising investment in the history of mankind!
Russian Influence Reached 126 Million Through Facebook Alone ...
Russian Influence Reached 126 Million Through Facebook Alone
Oct 30, 2017 - Facebook, Google and Twitter disclosed more about Russian agents' ... about who is buying political ads and how much they are spending.
Facebook estimates 126 million people were served content from ...
https://money.cnn.com/2017/10/30/media/russia-facebook-126-million.../index.html
Oct 30, 2017 - Facebook will inform lawmakers this week that roughly 126 million Americans ... Facebook estimates 126 million people were served content from Russia-linked pages .... Facebook does not know, however, how many of those 126 million ... But the full, organic reach of content posted by the troll farm-linked ...
Russia-backed Facebook posts 'reached 126m Americans' during US ...
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/.../facebook-russia-fake-accounts-126-millio...
Oct 30, 2017 - Russia-backed content reached as many as 126 million Americans on ... were received by 29 million Americans directly, but reached a much ...
It is against the law for a foreign gvt to interfere and meddle.... READ THE INDICTMENT
What did Mexicans DO? Don't ask questions you don't want answers too. Mexicans have dispossessed poor Americans. Please, as far jobs Americans won't do? What a lie. Might have been true 30-40 years ago when illegals were a tiny minority that where a afterthought from Project Brazos. Now, the apple cart has been overturned. There's a bazillion of of these wankers now. And our entire blue collar lower income industries have been taken over by illegal aliens, lock stock and barrel. And millions of Americans have lost their jobs as a result. And their homes AND their families have been disrupted. The huge growth of homeless Americans as a result. Is it a coincidence we have a surge of American homeless along with giving sanctuary to illegals? I think not.
Steel dossier?!? Where the fuck did that come from? You are the one who is now conflating because that hasn’t been part of this conversation at all. We were talking about Russian hacking.Are you kidding. You are talking about Coats, Wray, Neilson, and Bolton who all just went on TV and spoke about the Russian threat. You think they are lying and playing games? You think they are Obama political hacks? You’re off your rockerI dunno. They probably are playing CYA in some fashion. Nothing these Intelligence agencies say can be believed. They are all infested with Obama political hacks. Obama started corrupting them the minute he was inaugurated.Simple question.... If they couldn’t verify it then why did they?How could they verify it if they don't have the server? Where's the fucking server? Do you actually expect anyone to take their say-so when the Intelligence agencies have become so thoroughly
You mean all the hysterical leftwing douchebag snowflakes like you would agree. Rational people can see there's no basis for such claims. None.
corrupt?
Furthermore, they didn't "verify" anything. That would require presenting some actual facts. All they did is make unsubstantiated assertions.
The "Russian threat?" You mean the fact that Russia has always attempted to influence our elections? What does that have to do with the Steele "dossier?" Snowflake douchebags like you keep trying to conflate two things: Russian meddling and the Steel "dossier." One has nothing to do with the other.
"Interesting fact about the Steele dossier
It’s main claim was that Putin has damaging information on Trump and that Trump is compromised
Anyone who saw Trumps performance in Helsinki would agree"
It is against the law for a foreign gvt to interfere and meddle.... READ THE INDICTMENT
Not exactly, it's only illegal if you're Russian, it's no problem if the foreign government is Israel, Saudi Arabia or the UK
Don't you think it's a bit hypocritical that it's perfectly ok for the US government to meddle in foreign elections but if foreigners allegedly do the the same in the homeland it's suddenly the crime of the century?
nope, she actually did not... it was spurred and fueled by the Russian hacks and timed leaks and propaganda articles that tied in with the releases of the stolen merchandise.I've said it a thousand times for every time you right wingers make that stupid statement and if you had actually read the last indictment you would know this as well....It turned out that with Russian trolls pushing the facebook ads out ....100k in ads, wow if only we knew that so little could actually sway an election, we could stop spending months amassing millions for ads we don't need.OK...let me try
Russians hacked into the DNC server much like the Watergate break-in broke into DNC headquarters. It was a crime then, it is a crime now
They released that information through Wikileaks and Trump used that information in his campaign.
Russians also engaged in a propaganda smear campaign against Hilary to help the candidate they preferred. That propaganda was readily distributed including on USMB
They reached 126 MILLION people!!!! yes, 126,000,000 people!!!!
So 126,000,000 dems were influenced to vote Trump by some meme's and some facebook content?
Holy Fuck!!!!
You people really are stupid!!!
the goal was not to make people vote FOR Trump, though that may have happened... the goal was to get Bernie supporters to hate Hillary, and either not come out to vote, or to vote against her.... but it was primarily to suppress the Democratic voters from coming out to vote.... and it worked.
Hilary did that all on her own.
Good for right winger.... that was never a part of any discussion that I was engaged withSteel dossier?!? Where the fuck did that come from? You are the one who is now conflating because that hasn’t been part of this conversation at all. We were talking about Russian hacking.Are you kidding. You are talking about Coats, Wray, Neilson, and Bolton who all just went on TV and spoke about the Russian threat. You think they are lying and playing games? You think they are Obama political hacks? You’re off your rockerI dunno. They probably are playing CYA in some fashion. Nothing these Intelligence agencies say can be believed. They are all infested with Obama political hacks. Obama started corrupting them the minute he was inaugurated.Simple question.... If they couldn’t verify it then why did they?
Furthermore, they didn't "verify" anything. That would require presenting some actual facts. All they did is make unsubstantiated assertions.
The "Russian threat?" You mean the fact that Russia has always attempted to influence our elections? What does that have to do with the Steele "dossier?" Snowflake douchebags like you keep trying to conflate two things: Russian meddling and the Steel "dossier." One has nothing to do with the other.
rightwinger said: ↑
"Interesting fact about the Steele dossier
It’s main claim was that Putin has damaging information on Trump and that Trump is compromised
Anyone who saw Trumps performance in Helsinki would agree"
yep!It is against the law for a foreign gvt to interfere and meddle.... READ THE INDICTMENT
Not exactly, it's only illegal if you're Russian, it's no problem if the foreign government is Israel, Saudi Arabia or the UK
Don't you think it's a bit hypocritical that it's perfectly ok for the US government to meddle in foreign elections but if foreigners allegedly do the the same in the homeland it's suddenly the crime of the century?
I will be glad to compare the 'meddling'.
Russia broke American law to try to covertly and secretly disrupt the American Presidential election.
When was the last time that the United States did that to Israel? Or Saudi Arabia? Or the UK?
Even when Don the Con recently tried to influence the UK elections- he just voiced a preference- he didn't try to hack into British election systems.
I will be glad to compare the 'meddling'.
Russia broke American law to try to covertly and secretly disrupt the American Presidential election.
When was the last time that the United States did that to Israel? Or Saudi Arabia? Or the UK?
Even when Don the Con recently tried to influence the UK elections- he just voiced a preference- he didn't try to hack into British election systems.