What could happen if we just stopped oil? Six billion might die

[Dagosa]

Smarten up and discuss the actual topics.

Really, you spend your time making up shit and posting complete drivel then have whine about name calling to cover up your incompetence. Trump Humpers are babies.

 

[sparky]

Free markets still work;

View attachment 912335

Apparently the world's investors have had enough of the zero carbon fairytale....~S~

 

[Dagosa]

Apparently the world's investors have had enough of the zero carbon fairytale....~S~

Really ? This and we just enacted the biggest climate mitigation in the infrastructure package EVER.

How the 6 major oil companies have invested in renewable energy projects

Oil and gas is often painted as the dirtiest sector within the energy industry, but major companies have been investing heavily in renewable technologies

www.nsenergybusiness.com

 

[sparky]

Really ? This and we just enacted the biggest climate mitigation in the infrastructure package EVER.

How the 6 major oil companies have invested in renewable energy projects

Oil and gas is often painted as the dirtiest sector within the energy industry, but major companies have been investing heavily in renewable technologies

www.nsenergybusiness.com

That was 4 years ago Dag
~S~

 

[Dagosa]

That was 4 years ago Dag
~S~

The infrastructure package wasn’t.

 

[Robert W]

Really, you spend your time making up shit and posting complete drivel then have whine about name calling to cover up your incompetence. Trump Humpers are babies.

I said, discuss the topics. And stop accusing others.

 

[Dagosa]

I said, discuss the topics. And stop accusing others.

Geesus, you accuse others what you do all the time….

 

[Dagosa]

That was 4 years ago Dag
~S~

It’s on going….a plan that was started an$ continues….read it.

 

[Robert W]

Geesus, you accuse others what you do all the time….

I do discuss topics. That is the majority of my posts.

 

[Dagosa]

I do discuss topics. That is the majority of my posts.

That was 4 years ago Dag
~S~

Why we're investing $15 billion in a lower-carbon future | ExxonMobil

At ExxonMobil, we develop and deploy solutions that meet society’s needs. Today, that means taking a leading role in providing the products that enable modern life, reducing carbon emissions and developing needed technologies to advance a lower-carbon emissions future.

corporate.exxonmobil.com

 

[sparky]

How realistic is carbon capture?


A recent study found that after taking into account the energy used to capture and isolate CO2 from flue gas at a fossil fuel-burning industrial plant, the carbon capture system would reduce the plant's net emissions by only 10 to 11 percent, not the estimated 80 to 90 percent cited by proponents.Mar 19, 2023



&&&&


How much electricity does carbon capture use?

But doing so will require huge amounts of energy. It takes around 1,200 kilowatt-hours to remove a ton of carbon from the sky using direct air capture.Oct 21, 2022


&&&&

What is the success rate of carbon capture?

90%

Current CCS projects generally aim for 90% capture efficiency, but a number of current projects have failed to meet that goal. Opponents argue that carbon capture and storage is only a justification for indefinite fossil fuel usage disguised as marginal emission reductions.


~S~

 

[Crick]

How realistic is carbon capture?


A recent study found that after taking into account the energy used to capture and isolate CO2 from flue gas at a fossil fuel-burning industrial plant, the carbon capture system would reduce the plant's net emissions by only 10 to 11 percent, not the estimated 80 to 90 percent cited by proponents.Mar 19, 2023



&&&&


How much electricity does carbon capture use?

But doing so will require huge amounts of energy. It takes around 1,200 kilowatt-hours to remove a ton of carbon from the sky using direct air capture.Oct 21, 2022


&&&&

What is the success rate of carbon capture?

90%

Current CCS projects generally aim for 90% capture efficiency, but a number of current projects have failed to meet that goal. Opponents argue that carbon capture and storage is only a justification for indefinite fossil fuel usage disguised as marginal emission reductions.


~S~

How much power is generated producing that ton of CO2 per your unsourced information? Putting dates on your data items doesn't tell us where they came from. According to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the average across all energy sources is 0.86 lbs/kwh. So (2000/0.86) kwh was produced generating that ton of CO2. That's 2,326 kwh. That's suspiciously close to exactly twice the value you provide for the power required to remove it from the air. Also suspicious is your claim that capture will only remove 10-11% of the CO2 in a plant's exhaust when, in fact, CO2 makes up 10-11% of the gas in a power plant's exhaust.

How about repeating this post with some actual links to your sources?

 

[Dagosa]

How realistic is carbon capture?


A recent study found that after taking into account the energy used to capture and isolate CO2 from flue gas at a fossil fuel-burning industrial plant, the carbon capture system would reduce the plant's net emissions by only 10 to 11 percent, not the estimated 80 to 90 percent cited by proponents.Mar 19, 2023



&&&&


How much electricity does carbon capture use?

But doing so will require huge amounts of energy. It takes around 1,200 kilowatt-hours to remove a ton of carbon from the sky using direct air capture.Oct 21, 2022


&&&&

What is the success rate of carbon capture?

90%

Current CCS projects generally aim for 90% capture efficiency, but a number of current projects have failed to meet that goal. Opponents argue that carbon capture and storage is only a justification for indefinite fossil fuel usage disguised as marginal emission reductions.


~S~

First, a reduction of 10 to 11 % reduction in total CO2 in the atmosphere is HUGE and eventful….second, it’s just one approach of many. So wtf….

 

[sparky]

How about repeating this post with some actual links to your sources?

google is yer friend Crick....

how 'bout i 'link' to all the big oil subsidies going to their virtue signaling campaign?

First, a reduction of 10 to 11 % reduction in total CO2 in the atmosphere is HUGE and eventful….second, it’s just one approach of many. So wtf….

>>>>

What are the components of the air in the atmosphere?

Air is made up of 78.09% nitrogen, 20.95% oxygen, 0.93% argon, 0.04% carbon dioxide, and other gases in meagre amounts


10% of 0.04% is miniscule ,and will have no notable effect Dag

~S~

 

[ding]

First, a reduction of 10 to 11 % reduction in total CO2 in the atmosphere is HUGE and eventful….second, it’s just one approach of many. So wtf….

Don't be silly.

 

[Libby von H]

What could happen if we just stopped oil? ​

Six billion might die​

It's difficult to see how an immediate ban on fossil fuels will allow civilisation to continue and flourish​

What could happen if we just stopped oil? Six billion might die

It's difficult to see how an immediate ban on fossil fuels will allow civilisation to continue and flourish

www.telegraph.co.uk

"But what would happen if we literally just stopped oil tomorrow and did without the natural resources on which the world, its economies and populations depend? The answer: most likely six billion people would die within a year."


Commentary:
Just about everything we do in this world is tied to oil and gas. That's a fact. These people that haven't done squat to understand even a tiny morsel of that and just demand we stop oil and gas, have absolutely zero idea of what they're talking about or can even fathom what that really means. Oil and gas isn't perfect but you have to take the good with the bad in everything you do in life and I for one am more than fine with being onboard with oil and gas. Wind and solar is a cute little bolt on, nuclear just doesn't make sense in terms of risk reward (one issue that we possibly can't control could end up rendering 1/3 of the world uninhabitable..uh no), geothermal is intriguing but isn't every necessarily everywhere and is incredibly expensive even when abundant and readily available.

Seriously, Any fool should know that a total global economic collapse would probably only leave a couple of billion or less alive. Wars and rumors of wars being what they are. This would be a conservatives guess.
The expectation of using solar and wind power to create the needed electricity for the world is an impossible dream at present.
Then we have had so called experts that the oil well would run dry for over 60 years.
See:

We've Been Incorrectly Predicting Peak Oil For Over a Century

When the residents of Tulsa, Oklahoma buried a car in 1957 as part of an enormous time capsule, they included containers of gasoline. The good people of Tulsa reasoned that the folks of 2007 might not have any gas left to fill up the Plymouth Belvedere that they were interring for a fifty year...

gizmodo.com

The notion that oil is a "fossil" fuel is a pipe dream of John Rockefeller in the early 1900's to make the ubiquitous mineral known as oil seem scarce, unreplenishable, precious, and expensive. It is and was a marketing thing. 100 years ago, you could almost poke your pinky at the ground, and it'd erupt with a gusher. They are not decayed dinosaurs or even plankton or whatever. "depleted" oil wells refill themselves after time. Scientist have proven that as fact
See:

Radware Bot Manager Captcha

**********​

Rewriting the textbook on fossil fuels: New technologies help unravel nature's methane recipes

Experts say scientific understanding of deep hydrocarbons has been transformed, with new insights gained into the sources of energy that could have catalyzed and nurtured Earth's earliest forms of life.

phys.org

are you channeling Sen Kerry ????

Is ending fossil fuel finance “immoral”?​

Cutting off funding for such projects seems like an easy climate win for the administration. And it’s catching on with allies: In February, a group of senior European finance officials urged the World Bank to cut off finance for global fossil fuel projects. But in African countries with some of the world’s lowest rates of electricity access, there is an urgent need to grow and diversify the economy. Economists warn it’s too soon to pull the plug on all fossil fuels.

 

[dudmuck]

google is yer friend Crick....

how 'bout i 'link' to all the big oil subsidies going to their virtue signaling campaign?




What are the components of the air in the atmosphere?

Air is made up of 78.09% nitrogen, 20.95% oxygen, 0.93% argon, 0.04% carbon dioxide, and other gases in meagre amounts


10% of 0.04% is miniscule ,and will have no notable effect Dag

~S~

Without carbon dioxide, Earth’s natural greenhouse effect would be too weak to keep the average global surface temperature above freezing. By adding more carbon dioxide to the atmosphere, people are supercharging the natural greenhouse effect, causing global temperature to rise. According to observations by the NOAA Global Monitoring Lab, in 2021 carbon dioxide alone was responsible for about two-thirds of the total heating influence of all human-produced greenhouse gases.

Another reason carbon dioxide is important in the Earth system is that it dissolves into the ocean like the fizz in a can of soda. It reacts with water molecules, producing carbonic acid and lowering the ocean's pH (raising its acidity). Since the start of the Industrial Revolution, the pH of the ocean's surface waters has dropped from 8.21 to 8.10. This drop in pH is called ocean acidification.

 

[luiza]

What could happen if we just stopped oil? ​

​

Could never happen because the 1% always need the Sheeple to provide them with wealth and continuing power .


It'is like the prospect of, No Wars .
The equivalent of suicide to the 1% .

End Of
And if you build through SOC ( Self Organising Communities ) and finally overthrow the 1% , it will be just a matter of time before a fresh 1% emerges .

 

[Crick]

Without carbon dioxide, Earth’s natural greenhouse effect would be too weak to keep the average global surface temperature above freezing. By adding more carbon dioxide to the atmosphere, people are supercharging the natural greenhouse effect, causing global temperature to rise. According to observations by the NOAA Global Monitoring Lab, in 2021 carbon dioxide alone was responsible for about two-thirds of the total heating influence of all human-produced greenhouse gases.

Another reason carbon dioxide is important in the Earth system is that it dissolves into the ocean like the fizz in a can of soda. It reacts with water molecules, producing carbonic acid and lowering the ocean's pH (raising its acidity). Since the start of the Industrial Revolution, the pH of the ocean's surface waters has dropped from 8.21 to 8.10. This drop in pH is called ocean acidification.

Is this an attempt to glorify increasing CO2 levels?

 

[Dagosa]

What could happen if we just stopped oil? ​

Six billion might die​

It's difficult to see how an immediate ban on fossil fuels will allow civilisation to continue and flourish​

What could happen if we just stopped oil? Six billion might die

It's difficult to see how an immediate ban on fossil fuels will allow civilisation to continue and flourish

www.telegraph.co.uk

"But what would happen if we literally just stopped oil tomorrow and did without the natural resources on which the world, its economies and populations depend? The answer: most likely six billion people would die within a year."


Commentary:
Just about everything we do in this world is tied to oil and gas. That's a fact. These people that haven't done squat to understand even a tiny morsel of that and just demand we stop oil and gas, have absolutely zero idea of what they're talking about or can even fathom what that really means. Oil and gas isn't perfect but you have to take the good with the bad in everything you do in life and I for one am more than fine with being onboard with oil and gas. Wind and solar is a cute little bolt on, nuclear just doesn't make sense in terms of risk reward (one issue that we possibly can't control could end up rendering 1/3 of the world uninhabitable..uh no), geothermal is intriguing but isn't every necessarily everywhere and is incredibly expensive even when abundant and readily available.

Seriously, Any fool should know that a total global economic collapse would probably only leave a couple of billion or less alive. Wars and rumors of wars being what they are. This would be a conservatives guess.
The expectation of using solar and wind power to create the needed electricity for the world is an impossible dream at present.
Then we have had so called experts that the oil well would run dry for over 60 years.
See:

We've Been Incorrectly Predicting Peak Oil For Over a Century

When the residents of Tulsa, Oklahoma buried a car in 1957 as part of an enormous time capsule, they included containers of gasoline. The good people of Tulsa reasoned that the folks of 2007 might not have any gas left to fill up the Plymouth Belvedere that they were interring for a fifty year...

gizmodo.com

The notion that oil is a "fossil" fuel is a pipe dream of John Rockefeller in the early 1900's to make the ubiquitous mineral known as oil seem scarce, unreplenishable, precious, and expensive. It is and was a marketing thing. 100 years ago, you could almost poke your pinky at the ground, and it'd erupt with a gusher. They are not decayed dinosaurs or even plankton or whatever. "depleted" oil wells refill themselves after time. Scientist have proven that as fact
See:

Radware Bot Manager Captcha

**********​

Rewriting the textbook on fossil fuels: New technologies help unravel nature's methane recipes

Experts say scientific understanding of deep hydrocarbons has been transformed, with new insights gained into the sources of energy that could have catalyzed and nurtured Earth's earliest forms of life.

phys.org

Delusional post.