bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,329
- 2,180
hating poor people will not win you any elections
No one hates poor people. They just hate freeloaders like you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
hating poor people will not win you any elections
hating poor people will not win you any elections
Ahhh.. TDM getting it wrong again
It is not hating 'poor people'.. it is hating people who think everyone else should pay for their shit while they do fucking nothing...
It is also hating people who like to be generous with other people's money while claiming moral superiority because of it
If you're trying to convince us that life on welfare is a sweetheart deal, you've got a long row to hoe.
It's hypocritical to demonize help from the government when we all get help from the government.
hating poor people will not win you any elections
It is the Dem's who hate the poor, by keeping them under control of the welfare programs that they keep passing.
Wanting our poor to be lifted out of poverty is not hating them.
We want programs that help them to become productive citizens by having a good education and programs that will help them to get out of the ghettos and horrible housing projects that the Dem's programs have created.
Listen to this welfare recipient ask why anyone would want to work in America with all the benefits they get from not working.
Click through to Cameron Harris: Welfare Recipient: "Why Would Anyone Want To Work In America" to see the video
You do know know people have to work for their welfare(if they are not in school) at below minimum wage.
Not exactly true. In California, all one has to do is participate in "job training" or "related activities" to get the dole. One can go FOUR YEARS without actually holding an actual job with no fear of loosing the handout and even after that, that person will continue to received assistance for each kid no matter what. In fact, California is one of the few states that will give welfare to families with kids even when the parents do not qualify for welfare, often because they're already receiving federal "disability" checks. Further, when welfare recipients are forced to work, it is often at a subsidized government part-time job...yep, even more taxpayer dollars.
So while your statement can be true in some cases, it's HIGHLY misleading to say "people have to work for their welfare".
Welfare is bad...except corporate
Like taxpayer money to solar panel companies? Or are you referring to Wall Street bailouts. Wall Street is in whose district again? Oh yea, Chucky Shumer.
Anyway, this libertarian thinks welfare, individual AND corporate is bad, counterproductive and inherently unfair.
hating poor people will not win you any elections
Ahhh.. TDM getting it wrong again
It is not hating 'poor people'.. it is hating people who think everyone else should pay for their shit while they do fucking nothing...
It is also hating people who like to be generous with other people's money while claiming moral superiority because of it
They do more for their pay check than Paul Ryan. It's hypocritical to demonize help from the government when we all get help from the government.
hating poor people will not win you any elections
Ahhh.. TDM getting it wrong again
It is not hating 'poor people'.. it is hating people who think everyone else should pay for their shit while they do fucking nothing...
It is also hating people who like to be generous with other people's money while claiming moral superiority because of it
They do more for their pay check than Paul Ryan. It's hypocritical to demonize help from the government when we all get help from the government.
You do know know people have to work for their welfare(if they are not in school) at below minimum wage.
Not exactly true. In California, all one has to do is participate in "job training" or "related activities" to get the dole. One can go FOUR YEARS without actually holding an actual job with no fear of loosing the handout and even after that, that person will continue to received assistance for each kid no matter what. In fact, California is one of the few states that will give welfare to families with kids even when the parents do not qualify for welfare, often because they're already receiving federal "disability" checks. Further, when welfare recipients are forced to work, it is often at a subsidized government part-time job...yep, even more taxpayer dollars.
So while your statement can be true in some cases, it's HIGHLY misleading to say "people have to work for their welfare".
Not misleading at all,job training is school.
Disability is counted toward their income requirements.
Welfare is bad...except corporate
Like taxpayer money to solar panel companies? Or are you referring to Wall Street bailouts. Wall Street is in whose district again? Oh yea, Chucky Shumer.
Anyway, this libertarian thinks welfare, individual AND corporate is bad, counterproductive and inherently unfair.
You mean TARP?
Wall streets district? Are you serious right now?
Listen to this welfare recipient ask why anyone would want to work in America with all the benefits they get from not working.
Click through to Cameron Harris: Welfare Recipient: "Why Would Anyone Want To Work In America" to see the video
You do know know people have to work for their welfare(if they are not in school) at below minimum wage.
If you're trying to convince us that life on welfare is a sweetheart deal, you've got a long row to hoe.
No, but due to the massive disincentive to thrive that welfare brings about , it does cause even more poverty, evidenced by the INCREASE in the rate of poverty over the last near half century despite a massive increase in entitlement programs.
Oops...
Like taxpayer money to solar panel companies? Or are you referring to Wall Street bailouts. Wall Street is in whose district again? Oh yea, Chucky Shumer.
Anyway, this libertarian thinks welfare, individual AND corporate is bad, counterproductive and inherently unfair.
You mean TARP?
Wall streets district? Are you serious right now?
I mean any corporate welfare and/or bailouts. I'm against them all. You?
And yes, Wall Street is in Shumer's district. Seriously.
The increase in poverty might be to good jobs going to China and Mexico
Against bailouts not against welfare...as a step
what difference does it make where Wall Street is located? I'm trying to figure out why you said it?
A new line of RW bumper stickers:
"Kill a homeless person today! Your country will thank you!"
"Have you hugged your AR-15 today?"
"Deport Jose and Juanita. The grape harvest is in".
"Buy a Glock. It would have been the choice of Jesus".
"Keep your sociolized medical plan away from my Medicare!"
"Impeach that black, commie, muslim, gay, Kenyan in the White house"
"We are not making war on women! We love Palin. We think we love Coulter, too, but would like to have her female credentials verified by a doctor, just in case".