Weather Whether Creed From Nomian Or Non Nomian Religion Should Prevail

[Monk-Eye]

" Weather Whether Creed From Nomian Or Non Nomian Religion Should Prevail "

* Introduction Of Motivation *

This thread seeks to add definition and clarity with lexicon and vernacular about abrahamic religions and its geopolitical contexts .


* Principles Of Violence And Non Violence *

Illegitimate aggression against individual liberty is violence by definition according to individualism .

Not all aggression is illegitimate and self defense is expected , thus aggression against illegitimate aggression is legitimate .

A description of individual liberty includes the elements of individualism and being self ownership ( free roam , free association , progeny ) and self determination ( private property , willful intents - contracts ) .


" Not Knot A Distinction Between Religion And Creed "

There is not a distinction between religion and creed and an exception would not exist in us first amendment for a creed of religion with tenets or edicts seeking to implement illegitimate aggression ( violence ) against individual liberty .

It is valid to contest conjecture for there is to be an exception for a creed of a religion with tenets or edicts which expect illegitimate aggression against individual liberties .

A measure of validity for a creed would be consistency with non violence principles with respect to individualism and its elements of individual liberty .


* Perspectivism Measuring Validity Of Disparate Subjective Truths *

Directives for illegitimate aggression against individual liberty were implemented throughout history and are necessarily inherent from antiquities under titles similar with manifest destiny and call it fate .

Militant pogroms to establish a religious polity of torahnism does not presume that its edicts or tenets of creed must or should be applied outside of israel , which means that violent directives to implement torahnism would be limited to the geographic delineations for a city state of israel .

Militant pogroms to establish a religious polity of qurayshism would not presume that its edicts or tenets of creed must or should be applied outside of hejaz , which means that violent directives to implement qurayshism would be limited to the geographic delineations for the city state of hejaz .

It is fictional ishmaelism which presumes that qurayshism applies universally outside of hejaz that significantly extends the scope of opportunity for violence inferred by implicit directives to establish either qurayshism or fictional ishmaelism .

The universality for the nomianism of torahnism was challenged by the non nomianism of christianity and dispatched ; and , the universality for the nomianism of qurayshism is equally dispatched .


* Non Nomian Validity Of Common Law *

As safety and security roles of citizens will seek to ensure that individual liberty is nurtured from activists lauding democracy for its tyranny by majority while covertly deriding individual liberty and non violence principles through its facility , as numbers translate into votes and into political policy , sojourning and cultural exchange should be entreated while extensions for citizenship should be guarded with bias against creed that expects illegitimate aggression against individual liberty and non violence principles .


* 'From Many One' 'From One Many' 'Many From One' 'Many One From' 'One From Many' 'One Many From' *

Consider individual liberty and E pluribus unum - Wikipedia .

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Once again, we see, that although a theorem holds that an infinite number of monkeys at an infinite number of keyboards will produce copies of all the known literature, a single monkey at a single keyboard just produced meaningless nonsense.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Grinning Four Aggregation While Coaxing Two Response "

* A Par Rent Floss Back On Focus Off Lexicon Front *

Once again, we see, that although a theorem holds that an infinite number of monkeys at an infinite number of keyboards will produce copies of all the known literature, a single monkey at a single keyboard just produced meaningless nonsense.

Such a heuristic perspective would be applicable through empirical deduction for induction of a paradox .

Paradox - Wikipedia
A paradox, also known as an antinomy, is a logically self-contradictory statement or a statement that runs contrary to one's expectation.[1][2] It is a statement that, despite apparently valid reasoning from true premises, leads to a seemingly self-contradictory or a logically unacceptable conclusion.[3][4] A paradox usually involves contradictory-yet-interrelated elements—that exist simultaneously and persist over time.[5][6][7]

* Contradictions Confounding Paradoxical Utopia *

As antinomianism is denoted by a label of antinomian it is a nomian creed and therefore a religion and nomian ; however , by definition , antinomianism does not seek to implement expectations for nomianism as public policy .

More secular as an edict of or a tenet for antinomianism is an expectation of its adherents to remove all definitions of legal valuation in collective public policy as a criteria for measuring the validity of truth against a utopian condition of a hue mammon social constructs .

Thus Those seeking to implement law are acting contrary with antinomian expectations , as antinomian expectations pursue a utopia to remove all legalism and consequently expects a dystopia along with its implementation .

Some acclaim that suffering dystopia with good graces towards an absence of legalism also equates with a natural reflex of double entendre through charity and forgiveness for debts .

Antinomianism - Wikipedia
Antinomianism (from the Greek: , "against" + "law") is any view which rejects laws or legalism and argues against moral, religious or social norms (Latin: mores), or is at least considered to do so.[1] The term has both religious and secular meanings.

* Vernacular Enablement Of Utilitarianism *

Those pragmatic from the nomian extremes of antinomianism preclude non violence principles and individualism as valuations of truth where the philosophical golden mean of individualism is *i and and the philosophical golden mean of collectivism is *c in a given means and extremes in a philosophical paradigm where individualism I and collectivism C denote the opposite extremes .

Perspectivism - Wikipedia
There are many possible conceptual schemes, or perspectives in which judgment of truth or value can be made. This is often taken to imply that no way of seeing the world can be taken as definitively "true", but does not necessarily entail that all perspectives are equally valid.