Gunny
Gold Member
Dude, that's hilarious, but you've gotten enough rep out of me for one day.
I think almost all my rep points are from you and Eve
It's that sick sense of humor thing we have in common.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dude, that's hilarious, but you've gotten enough rep out of me for one day.
I think almost all my rep points are from you and Eve
If we attacked every country that made a baseless threat directed towards us, we would be attacking most of them.
Again, attack is unnecessary. Shutting this idiot down was necessary 15 years ago. Both Clinton and Bush failed in that regard. Obama appears set to do the same.
If the 16 years old 2 doors down threatens me with a .22, I should ignore him because I have a choice of calibers that will splatter his head off his shoulders? .22's can STILL kill, and I'm going to his house with a .45 and taking his .22 away from him BEFORE he gets a chance to use it.
Good point. However, with close monitoring, a missle launched from NK towards a US target can be shot out of the sky.
If someone shoots you with a .22, it is unlikely that you can stop the bullet before it reaches you.
They are planning a another missle test- possibly today
who knows when they will have nukes
and now they make direct threats of a 'showersotrm of nuclear attcks' against the U.S.
And we do nothing?
Why have we not taken out their nuclear facilities? Why have we not taken out their launch sites? Why have we not told them that one more laundch will result is a preemptive strike?
Why are we sitting on our thumbs?
They are planning a another missle test- possibly today
who knows when they will have nukes
and now they make direct threats of a 'showersotrm of nuclear attcks' against the U.S.
And we do nothing?
Why have we not taken out their nuclear facilities? Why have we not taken out their launch sites? Why have we not told them that one more laundch will result is a preemptive strike?
Why are we sitting on our thumbs?
Jesus buddy - they said that "threat" about how they would REACT if they were attacked.
You're talking about attacking them, they rightfully feel that the US could attack anyone it chooses, and so (based on a 3 second reading of recent history) know that they better be able to defend themselves if they want to keep from being liberated into that great gig in the sky.
And really, why can't they test missiles, doesn't every nation with nukes test them?
A test is far less scary than untested nuclear weapons.
ball ammo? You mean spherical ammunition? I thought we did away with that ages ago?
Ball ammunition is NATO and Geneva Convention approved. It's ammo that does nothing but penetrate. It is illegal to use "exotic" ammunition (ie hollowpoints, dum-dum, armor piercing) against individual enemy combatants.
I'm sure we are probably the only ones that adhere to the rules.
TO be more precise, ball ammo is a metal encased bullet. It cannot expand nor do anything but penetrate a target.
Bullies understand one thing: force.
ball ammo? You mean spherical ammunition? I thought we did away with that ages ago?
Ball ammunition is NATO and Geneva Convention approved. It's ammo that does nothing but penetrate. It is illegal to use "exotic" ammunition (ie hollowpoints, dum-dum, armor piercing) against individual enemy combatants.
I'm sure we are probably the only ones that adhere to the rules.
TO be more precise, ball ammo is a metal encased bullet. It cannot expand nor do anything but penetrate a target.
So, while our guys are getting shot with AKs and armor piercing rounds, skewered by booby traps, nailed with shrapnel, blown up by the dead dog on the side of the road, and ambushed by a bunch of guys hiding in houses next to families- we're supposed to make sure the bullet doesn't hurt the bastards too much?
I heard that our guys in Iraq would shoot some of these motherfuckers (hyped up on some drug they like) or or four times only to have the some of a bitch keep running at them, shooting his own damn weapon. WTF?!
We need bullets that put a man down and keep him down. If we're gonna send opur boys into combat, then why the fuck aren't we giving them the tools to win?
Tru, it's the motivation I was referring to... but yes, nothing can really stop a determined, lawless enemy who has more toys than you.
ball ammo? You mean spherical ammunition? I thought we did away with that ages ago?
Ball ammunition is NATO and Geneva Convention approved. It's ammo that does nothing but penetrate. It is illegal to use "exotic" ammunition (ie hollowpoints, dum-dum, armor piercing) against individual enemy combatants.
I'm sure we are probably the only ones that adhere to the rules.
TO be more precise, ball ammo is a metal encased bullet. It cannot expand nor do anything but penetrate a target.
So, while our guys are getting shot with AKs and armor piercing rounds, skewered by booby traps, nailed with shrapnel, blown up by the dead dog on the side of the road, and ambushed by a bunch of guys hiding in houses next to families- we're supposed to make sure the bullet doesn't hurt the bastards too much?
I heard that our guys in Iraq would shoot some of these motherfuckers (hyped up on some drug they like) or or four times only to have the some of a bitch keep running at them, shooting his own damn weapon. WTF?!
We need bullets that put a man down and keep him down. If we're gonna send opur boys into combat, then why the fuck aren't we giving them the tools to win?
ball ammo? You mean spherical ammunition? I thought we did away with that ages ago?
Ball ammunition is NATO and Geneva Convention approved. It's ammo that does nothing but penetrate. It is illegal to use "exotic" ammunition (ie hollowpoints, dum-dum, armor piercing) against individual enemy combatants.
I'm sure we are probably the only ones that adhere to the rules.
TO be more precise, ball ammo is a metal encased bullet. It cannot expand nor do anything but penetrate a target.
So, while our guys are getting shot with AKs and armor piercing rounds, skewered by booby traps, nailed with shrapnel, blown up by the dead dog on the side of the road, and ambushed by a bunch of guys hiding in houses next to families- we're supposed to make sure the bullet doesn't hurt the bastards too much?
I heard that our guys in Iraq would shoot some of these motherfuckers (hyped up on some drug they like) or or four times only to have the some of a bitch keep running at them, shooting his own damn weapon. WTF?!
We need bullets that put a man down and keep him down. If we're gonna send opur boys into combat, then why the fuck aren't we giving them the tools to win?
Bullies understand one thing: force.
Very true. No wonder so many nations are trying to get more 'force' in their arsenal... it's all they can do to protect themselves.
Ball ammunition is NATO and Geneva Convention approved. It's ammo that does nothing but penetrate. It is illegal to use "exotic" ammunition (ie hollowpoints, dum-dum, armor piercing) against individual enemy combatants.
I'm sure we are probably the only ones that adhere to the rules.
TO be more precise, ball ammo is a metal encased bullet. It cannot expand nor do anything but penetrate a target.
So, while our guys are getting shot with AKs and armor piercing rounds, skewered by booby traps, nailed with shrapnel, blown up by the dead dog on the side of the road, and ambushed by a bunch of guys hiding in houses next to families- we're supposed to make sure the bullet doesn't hurt the bastards too much?
I heard that our guys in Iraq would shoot some of these motherfuckers (hyped up on some drug they like) or or four times only to have the some of a bitch keep running at them, shooting his own damn weapon. WTF?!
We need bullets that put a man down and keep him down. If we're gonna send opur boys into combat, then why the fuck aren't we giving them the tools to win?
We're above that and don't want to ruin our image.
We know how they're going to fight. We have two optuions:
-Go to war and win
-Stay the fuck home
It's too late for the latter- if you put our sons and daughters in the line of fire,. then give them the tools they need to win- and let them fucking win. I'm sick and tired of Americans coming home in pieces and in boxes because some liberal baboon won't let them do what they need to do to survive and accomplish the objective. First you do what has to be done to win, then you worry about anything else.
Tru, it's the motivation I was referring to... but yes, nothing can really stop a determined, lawless enemy who has more toys than you.
Not more toys. Nobody has more "toys" than we do. RULES. The enemy has less rules than we do.
Ball ammunition is NATO and Geneva Convention approved. It's ammo that does nothing but penetrate. It is illegal to use "exotic" ammunition (ie hollowpoints, dum-dum, armor piercing) against individual enemy combatants.
I'm sure we are probably the only ones that adhere to the rules.
TO be more precise, ball ammo is a metal encased bullet. It cannot expand nor do anything but penetrate a target.
So, while our guys are getting shot with AKs and armor piercing rounds, skewered by booby traps, nailed with shrapnel, blown up by the dead dog on the side of the road, and ambushed by a bunch of guys hiding in houses next to families- we're supposed to make sure the bullet doesn't hurt the bastards too much?
I heard that our guys in Iraq would shoot some of these motherfuckers (hyped up on some drug they like) or or four times only to have the some of a bitch keep running at them, shooting his own damn weapon. WTF?!
We need bullets that put a man down and keep him down. If we're gonna send opur boys into combat, then why the fuck aren't we giving them the tools to win?
Well, when it's THEIR troops on OUR soil, use what you can, anything goes if you're defending your homes/family/land.
We know how they're going to fight. We have two optuions:
-Go to war and win
-Stay the fuck home
It's too late for the latter- if you put our sons and daughters in the line of fire,. then give them the tools they need to win- and let them fucking win. I'm sick and tired of Americans coming home in pieces and in boxes because some liberal baboon won't let them do what they need to do to survive and accomplish the objective. First you do what has to be done to win, then you worry about anything else.
So, while our guys are getting shot with AKs and armor piercing rounds, skewered by booby traps, nailed with shrapnel, blown up by the dead dog on the side of the road, and ambushed by a bunch of guys hiding in houses next to families- we're supposed to make sure the bullet doesn't hurt the bastards too much?
I heard that our guys in Iraq would shoot some of these motherfuckers (hyped up on some drug they like) or or four times only to have the some of a bitch keep running at them, shooting his own damn weapon. WTF?!
We need bullets that put a man down and keep him down. If we're gonna send opur boys into combat, then why the fuck aren't we giving them the tools to win?
Well, when it's THEIR troops on OUR soil, use what you can, anything goes if you're defending your homes/family/land.
Why do you have to wait until they are up our asses when a little foresight and common sense could preclude that?