We can't fully explain...

[CrusaderFrank]

Scientist can't fully explain why:

1. The Sun's corona is 200 times hotter that it's surface, it defies our understanding of physics that heat dissipates with distance from the source
2. Why the Earth has a magnetic field. The iron in the core is far too hot, therefore the magnetic field must be the result of some electric current within the Earth. Whats causing the electric current within the Earth? We'll get back to you on it
3. The Moon is there in the night sky. “The best explanation for the moon is observational error; the moon doesn’t exist.” – Irwin Shapiro; Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. It's still too big to be there in the first place. Worse yet, the more we learn about it, it's now apparent that it's made from the exact same material as the Earth, there's no evidence of any third party impactor.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Scientist can't fully explain why:

1. The Sun's corona is 200 times hotter that it's surface, it defies our understanding of physics that heat dissipates with distance from the source
2. Why the Earth has a magnetic field. The iron in the core is far too hot, therefore the magnetic field must be the result of some electric current within the Earth. Whats causing the electric current within the Earth? We'll get back to you on it
3. The Moon is there in the night sky. “The best explanation for the moon is observational error; the moon doesn’t exist.” – Irwin Shapiro; Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. It's still too big to be there in the first place. Worse yet, the more we learn about it, it's now apparent that it's made from the exact same material as the Earth, there's no evidence of any third party impactor.

The other one related to #2 is that by all laws of physics the core should be a lot cooler and our magnetic field decayed and gone by now if you use the timeline science accepts for our universe. The only alternative is that our universe is much much younger than previously believed.
Yet another step in science towards the Biblical account.

 

[Fenton Lum]

Scientist can't fully explain why:

1. The Sun's corona is 200 times hotter that it's surface, it defies our understanding of physics that heat dissipates with distance from the source
2. Why the Earth has a magnetic field. The iron in the core is far too hot, therefore the magnetic field must be the result of some electric current within the Earth. Whats causing the electric current within the Earth? We'll get back to you on it
3. The Moon is there in the night sky. “The best explanation for the moon is observational error; the moon doesn’t exist.” – Irwin Shapiro; Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. It's still too big to be there in the first place. Worse yet, the more we learn about it, it's now apparent that it's made from the exact same material as the Earth, there's no evidence of any third party impactor.

The other one related to #2 is that by all laws of physics the core should be a lot cooler and our magnetic field decayed and gone by now if you use the timeline science accepts for our universe. The only alternative is that our universe is much much younger than previously believed.
Yet another step in science towards the Biblical account.

Bullshit, the bible is fiction.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Scientist can't fully explain why:

1. The Sun's corona is 200 times hotter that it's surface, it defies our understanding of physics that heat dissipates with distance from the source
2. Why the Earth has a magnetic field. The iron in the core is far too hot, therefore the magnetic field must be the result of some electric current within the Earth. Whats causing the electric current within the Earth? We'll get back to you on it
3. The Moon is there in the night sky. “The best explanation for the moon is observational error; the moon doesn’t exist.” – Irwin Shapiro; Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. It's still too big to be there in the first place. Worse yet, the more we learn about it, it's now apparent that it's made from the exact same material as the Earth, there's no evidence of any third party impactor.

The other one related to #2 is that by all laws of physics the core should be a lot cooler and our magnetic field decayed and gone by now if you use the timeline science accepts for our universe. The only alternative is that our universe is much much younger than previously believed.
Yet another step in science towards the Biblical account.

Bullshit, the bible is fiction.

You obviously are totally unfamiliar with what the Bible says. History and philosophy are a majority of what is in it. There is more wisdom in the book of Proverbs than in all major universities combined.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

And it doesn't make anyone pause for a moment that there are major aspect of the Sun, Moon and Earth that defy our current understanding of science?

 

[Weatherman2020]

And it doesn't make anyone pause for a moment that there are major aspect of the Sun, Moon and Earth that defy our current understanding of science?

That's the problem. The left believe we know everything we can possibly know about science. Climate change, origins of the universe. They believe anything challenging the status quo is heresy and since they control academia they destroy the careers of anyone who dares challenge them.

 

[Votto]

Scientist can't fully explain why:

1. The Sun's corona is 200 times hotter that it's surface, it defies our understanding of physics that heat dissipates with distance from the source
2. Why the Earth has a magnetic field. The iron in the core is far too hot, therefore the magnetic field must be the result of some electric current within the Earth. Whats causing the electric current within the Earth? We'll get back to you on it
3. The Moon is there in the night sky. “The best explanation for the moon is observational error; the moon doesn’t exist.” – Irwin Shapiro; Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. It's still too big to be there in the first place. Worse yet, the more we learn about it, it's now apparent that it's made from the exact same material as the Earth, there's no evidence of any third party impactor.

Darwin dune it.

 

[mattyp]

And it doesn't make anyone pause for a moment that there are major aspect of the Sun, Moon and Earth that defy our current understanding of science?

I have never heard this thing about the moon before. I agree, it makes me scratch my head.

 

[Fenton Lum]

Scientist can't fully explain why:

1. The Sun's corona is 200 times hotter that it's surface, it defies our understanding of physics that heat dissipates with distance from the source
2. Why the Earth has a magnetic field. The iron in the core is far too hot, therefore the magnetic field must be the result of some electric current within the Earth. Whats causing the electric current within the Earth? We'll get back to you on it
3. The Moon is there in the night sky. “The best explanation for the moon is observational error; the moon doesn’t exist.” – Irwin Shapiro; Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. It's still too big to be there in the first place. Worse yet, the more we learn about it, it's now apparent that it's made from the exact same material as the Earth, there's no evidence of any third party impactor.

The other one related to #2 is that by all laws of physics the core should be a lot cooler and our magnetic field decayed and gone by now if you use the timeline science accepts for our universe. The only alternative is that our universe is much much younger than previously believed.
Yet another step in science towards the Biblical account.

Bullshit, the bible is fiction.

You obviously are totally unfamiliar with what the Bible says. History and philosophy are a majority of what is in it. There is more wisdom in the book of Proverbs than in all major universities combined.

Bullshit.

 

[abu afak]

Scientist can't fully explain why:

1. The Sun's corona is 200 times hotter that it's surface, it defies our understanding of physics that heat dissipates with distance from the source
2. Why the Earth has a magnetic field. The iron in the core is far too hot, therefore the magnetic field must be the result of some electric current within the Earth. Whats causing the electric current within the Earth? We'll get back to you on it
3. The Moon is there in the night sky. “The best explanation for the moon is observational error; the moon doesn’t exist.” – Irwin Shapiro; Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. It's still too big to be there in the first place. Worse yet, the more we learn about it, it's now apparent that it's made from the exact same material as the Earth, there's no evidence of any third party impactor.

Oh Look, another LOW IQ version of "God of the Gaps" http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/God_of_the_gaps

God of the gaps
(or a divine fallacy) is logical fallacy that occurs when Goddidit (or a variant) is invoked to explain some natural phenomena that science cannot (at the time of the argument). This concept is similar to what systems theorists refer to as an "explanatory principle."
"God of the gaps" is a bad argument not only on logical grounds, but on empirical grounds: there is a long history of "gaps" being filled and the gap for God thus getting smaller and smaller, suggesting "we don't know yet" as an alternative that works better in practice; naturalistic explanations for still-mysterious phenomena are always possible, especially in the future where more information may be uncovered.[1]

The God of the Gaps is a didit fallacy and an ad hoc fallacy, as well as an argument from incredulity or an argument from ignorance, and is thus an informal fallacy.".."​

ALL Gods (on which we have a verdict) which had Your Goofy Rationale (Sun, Lightning, Fertility, Fire, etc) have been shown to be False.
God has now been whittled don to a smaller and smaller Zoopernatural/"we don't know yet" box.
Not again!
`

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Scientist can't fully explain why:

1. The Sun's corona is 200 times hotter that it's surface, it defies our understanding of physics that heat dissipates with distance from the source
2. Why the Earth has a magnetic field. The iron in the core is far too hot, therefore the magnetic field must be the result of some electric current within the Earth. Whats causing the electric current within the Earth? We'll get back to you on it
3. The Moon is there in the night sky. “The best explanation for the moon is observational error; the moon doesn’t exist.” – Irwin Shapiro; Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. It's still too big to be there in the first place. Worse yet, the more we learn about it, it's now apparent that it's made from the exact same material as the Earth, there's no evidence of any third party impactor.

Oh Look, another LOW IQ version of "God of the Gaps" http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/God_of_the_gaps

God of the gaps
(or a divine fallacy) is logical fallacy that occurs when Goddidit (or a variant) is invoked to explain some natural phenomena that science cannot (at the time of the argument). This concept is similar to what systems theorists refer to as an "explanatory principle."
"God of the gaps" is a bad argument not only on logical grounds, but on empirical grounds: there is a long history of "gaps" being filled and the gap for God thus getting smaller and smaller, suggesting "we don't know yet" as an alternative that works better in practice; naturalistic explanations for still-mysterious phenomena are always possible, especially in the future where more information may be uncovered.[1]

The God of the Gaps is a didit fallacy and an ad hoc fallacy, as well as an argument from incredulity or an argument from ignorance, and is thus an informal fallacy.".."​

ALL Gods (on which we have a verdict) which had Your Goofy Rationale (Sun, Lightning, Fertility, Fire, etc) have been shown to be False.
God has now been whittled don to a smaller and smaller Zoopernatural/"we don't know yet" box.
Not again!
`

God is bigger than the Universe and gave us a solar system that's left science baffled

 

[Coloradomtnman]

Scientist can't fully explain why:

1. The Sun's corona is 200 times hotter that it's surface, it defies our understanding of physics that heat dissipates with distance from the source
2. Why the Earth has a magnetic field. The iron in the core is far too hot, therefore the magnetic field must be the result of some electric current within the Earth. Whats causing the electric current within the Earth? We'll get back to you on it
3. The Moon is there in the night sky. “The best explanation for the moon is observational error; the moon doesn’t exist.” – Irwin Shapiro; Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. It's still too big to be there in the first place. Worse yet, the more we learn about it, it's now apparent that it's made from the exact same material as the Earth, there's no evidence of any third party impactor.

The other one related to #2 is that by all laws of physics the core should be a lot cooler and our magnetic field decayed and gone by now if you use the timeline science accepts for our universe. The only alternative is that our universe is much much younger than previously believed.
Yet another step in science towards the Biblical account.

Please, just stop. Mixing one's non-scientific beliefs with unbiased observations and analysis has never revealed any accurate information about the physical universe and never will; but has instead led to misinformation and ignorance on a wide scale.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Science probably doesn't understand everything quite yet, but I highly extremely doubt some 2,000+ year old men knew it even at half.

 

[abu afak]

God is bigger than the Universe and gave us a solar system that's left science baffled

What "god" is that?
Which/WITCH "god is that?
Proof? Evidence?
Your posts are always LOW IQ nonsense.

And let me save you some time. Perhaps years. (it's already been)
There is NO logical argument for god. PERIOD.
You are wasting your time trying to make one. You can't win such an argument.
'god/gods' is/are about FAITH, not Fact.
Smarter believers (most) accept that is the case/personal Faith: dumber ones keep making asses of themselves when there is No logical case to be made.
`

 

[Old Rocks]

No logical case for the existence of non-existence of a Deity. Comrade Frankie boi has many funny ideas.

 

[yiostheoy]

Scientist can't fully explain why:

1. The Sun's corona is 200 times hotter that it's surface, it defies our understanding of physics that heat dissipates with distance from the source
2. Why the Earth has a magnetic field. The iron in the core is far too hot, therefore the magnetic field must be the result of some electric current within the Earth. Whats causing the electric current within the Earth? We'll get back to you on it
3. The Moon is there in the night sky. “The best explanation for the moon is observational error; the moon doesn’t exist.” – Irwin Shapiro; Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. It's still too big to be there in the first place. Worse yet, the more we learn about it, it's now apparent that it's made from the exact same material as the Earth, there's no evidence of any third party impactor.

1 - we will need to send a space probe to the Sun to figure this out. Best time for it to land there will be at night.

2 - when I pet my cat it causes static electricity. There must be something similar going on with the swirling molten metals inside the Earth.

3 - an early collision between the Earth and Moon with re-accretion by both explains both the similar materials and the synchronous rotations.

Hypothesizing is not hard. Testing the hypotheses is the hard part.

 

[yiostheoy]

And it doesn't make anyone pause for a moment that there are major aspect of the Sun, Moon and Earth that defy our current understanding of science?

Why must we assume that we ourselves must understand everything?

Our pale reason is clouded by the doors of perception.

 

[yiostheoy]

Scientist can't fully explain why:

1. The Sun's corona is 200 times hotter that it's surface, it defies our understanding of physics that heat dissipates with distance from the source
2. Why the Earth has a magnetic field. The iron in the core is far too hot, therefore the magnetic field must be the result of some electric current within the Earth. Whats causing the electric current within the Earth? We'll get back to you on it
3. The Moon is there in the night sky. “The best explanation for the moon is observational error; the moon doesn’t exist.” – Irwin Shapiro; Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. It's still too big to be there in the first place. Worse yet, the more we learn about it, it's now apparent that it's made from the exact same material as the Earth, there's no evidence of any third party impactor.

Oh Look, another LOW IQ version of "God of the Gaps" http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/God_of_the_gaps

God of the gaps
(or a divine fallacy) is logical fallacy that occurs when Goddidit (or a variant) is invoked to explain some natural phenomena that science cannot (at the time of the argument). This concept is similar to what systems theorists refer to as an "explanatory principle."
"God of the gaps" is a bad argument not only on logical grounds, but on empirical grounds: there is a long history of "gaps" being filled and the gap for God thus getting smaller and smaller, suggesting "we don't know yet" as an alternative that works better in practice; naturalistic explanations for still-mysterious phenomena are always possible, especially in the future where more information may be uncovered.[1]

The God of the Gaps is a didit fallacy and an ad hoc fallacy, as well as an argument from incredulity or an argument from ignorance, and is thus an informal fallacy.".."​

ALL Gods (on which we have a verdict) which had Your Goofy Rationale (Sun, Lightning, Fertility, Fire, etc) have been shown to be False.
God has now been whittled don to a smaller and smaller Zoopernatural/"we don't know yet" box.
Not again!
`

So abu afak how is Afak?

And is he an atheist too?

Like father like son, usually.

This is why the Quran is still popular.

 

[yiostheoy]

No logical case for the existence of non-existence of a Deity. Comrade Frankie boi has many funny ideas.

I put him on my ignore list some time ago.

Can't remember why.

But I must have had a good reason.

Probably due to unabated violations of the fallacy list:

List of fallacies - Wikipedia

 

[yiostheoy]

Science is a delightful exercise which was born of the philosophers and then finally invented by mathematicians like Copernicus and geniuses like Galileo.

You should never confuse Science with its two bigger brothers Philosophy and Religion.

Religion is ancient for reasons that we do not know. Were the ancients all superstitious? Or did civilization apostatize from a more perfect Faith?

Philosophy is greater than all other things combined.