Watching The Detectives

[The Original Tree]

Well, since this is still a free country, citizens are allowed to choose and support the candidate of their choice in an election. For a high paid attorney to write a check to his candidate or the party he supports is NOT a huge hill of beans. It is called freedom. Your people have no right to be using that as a reason for future employment in any capacity, including as investigators. Professionals actually don't base their findings on their own personal opinions. They go by the laws or rules of that field. In this case, the investigators know the rules and the laws backward and forward, and I have every confidence that they will apply those parameters to this investigation.
In other words, this argument is making you all look like a bunch of unprofessional, uneducated, biased liars trying desperately to squirm out of an investigation that you concurrently vow has no "there" there. If that's true, you've got nothing to worry about, so stop talking like a cheerleader for a dictator and let them reach the conclusion that your man is innocent.

If this was still a free country you sniveling Rats would accept the outcome of a fair election instead of trying to subvert the new administration for petty revenge. Mueller and his pack of jackals are about to get the bum's rush....another FAIL on the part of you dirtbags.

Tom. Russia's interference in the election is not seriously contested. Trump's campaign's intent to at least try to use the Russians as a weapon against Clinton isn't contested. Trump's definite pro-Russian stance isn't seriously contested. Your argument that the Russian investigation is revenge fails. So is your contention that the election was fair. In fact the fact that a hostile foreign power interfered makes it distinctly unfair. So does the fact that fair in the US entails that you can still lose despite the fact that you get over 2 million votes more than your rival.

Please tell us what Russia did to change the outcome of The Election.
And please provide verifiable proof that we can examine.

Sure. They hacked the DNC and delivered those hacks to Assange.Joint Statement from the Department Of Homeland Security and Office of the Director of National Intelligence on Election Security | Homeland Security Joint DHS, ODNI, FBI Statement on Russian Malicious Cyber Activity — FBI
They also had trolls target key states with fake news.The Russian troll army that helped swing the election for Trump
Woman who sued pro-Putin Russian 'troll factory' gets one rouble in damages
Oh and like I pointed out. The REPUBLICAN house and senate don't contest these facts neither does this guy.Trump counterterrorism adviser blames Russia for election hacks

Seth Rich calls anyone that says Russia Hacked The DNC a liar. We know the Pakistani Foreign Nationals hired as hackers actually stole data from THE DNC. Why does THE DNC need to hire hackers who were fired, and Clinton hires them along with Schultz when she got fired?

Assange said Seth Rich gave him the leaked emails, but these Pakistani Hackers did hack THE DNC server, and that is the only evidence of hacking there is. Wait, they DIDN'T HACK THE DNC SERVER.... You know why?

Because despite the fact they had criminal records they were given SUPER USER access and Admin passwords to The DNC server, which means they didn't have to hack shit, they were in control of the shit, even classified shit.

When is Mueller going to investigate that?

Trolls? So wait, what you do here every day on the USMB is illegal?
Dude, you better get a lawyer!

MUELLER IS COMING FOR YOU MAN!

 

[westwall]

Well, since this is still a free country, citizens are allowed to choose and support the candidate of their choice in an election. For a high paid attorney to write a check to his candidate or the party he supports is NOT a huge hill of beans. It is called freedom. Your people have no right to be using that as a reason for future employment in any capacity, including as investigators. Professionals actually don't base their findings on their own personal opinions. They go by the laws or rules of that field. In this case, the investigators know the rules and the laws backward and forward, and I have every confidence that they will apply those parameters to this investigation.
In other words, this argument is making you all look like a bunch of unprofessional, uneducated, biased liars trying desperately to squirm out of an investigation that you concurrently vow has no "there" there. If that's true, you've got nothing to worry about, so stop talking like a cheerleader for a dictator and let them reach the conclusion that your man is innocent.

If this was still a free country you sniveling Rats would accept the outcome of a fair election instead of trying to subvert the new administration for petty revenge. Mueller and his pack of jackals are about to get the bum's rush....another FAIL on the part of you dirtbags.

Tom. Russia's interference in the election is not seriously contested. Trump's campaign's intent to at least try to use the Russians as a weapon against Clinton isn't contested. Trump's definite pro-Russian stance isn't seriously contested. Your argument that the Russian investigation is revenge fails. So is your contention that the election was fair. In fact the fact that a hostile foreign power interfered makes it distinctly unfair. So does the fact that fair in the US entails that you can still lose despite the fact that you get over 2 million votes more than your rival.

Please tell us what Russia did to change the outcome of The Election.
And please provide verifiable proof that we can examine.

Sure. They hacked the DNC and delivered those hacks to Assange.Joint Statement from the Department Of Homeland Security and Office of the Director of National Intelligence on Election Security | Homeland Security Joint DHS, ODNI, FBI Statement on Russian Malicious Cyber Activity — FBI
They also had trolls target key states with fake news.The Russian troll army that helped swing the election for Trump
Woman who sued pro-Putin Russian 'troll factory' gets one rouble in damages
Oh and like I pointed out. The REPUBLICAN house and senate don't contest these facts neither does this guy.Trump counterterrorism adviser blames Russia for election hacks

What hack? There is zero evidence of a hack of the DNC. There is evidence that a whistleblower released the info, that there is evidence of, but the rest of your comment is a lie. And a knowing one at that.

 

[forkup]

So you ask me for verifiable ino

Well, since this is still a free country, citizens are allowed to choose and support the candidate of their choice in an election. For a high paid attorney to write a check to his candidate or the party he supports is NOT a huge hill of beans. It is called freedom. Your people have no right to be using that as a reason for future employment in any capacity, including as investigators. Professionals actually don't base their findings on their own personal opinions. They go by the laws or rules of that field. In this case, the investigators know the rules and the laws backward and forward, and I have every confidence that they will apply those parameters to this investigation.
In other words, this argument is making you all look like a bunch of unprofessional, uneducated, biased liars trying desperately to squirm out of an investigation that you concurrently vow has no "there" there. If that's true, you've got nothing to worry about, so stop talking like a cheerleader for a dictator and let them reach the conclusion that your man is innocent.

If this was still a free country you sniveling Rats would accept the outcome of a fair election instead of trying to subvert the new administration for petty revenge. Mueller and his pack of jackals are about to get the bum's rush....another FAIL on the part of you dirtbags.

Tom. Russia's interference in the election is not seriously contested. Trump's campaign's intent to at least try to use the Russians as a weapon against Clinton isn't contested. Trump's definite pro-Russian stance isn't seriously contested. Your argument that the Russian investigation is revenge fails. So is your contention that the election was fair. In fact the fact that a hostile foreign power interfered makes it distinctly unfair. So does the fact that fair in the US entails that you can still lose despite the fact that you get over 2 million votes more than your rival.

Please tell us what Russia did to change the outcome of The Election.
And please provide verifiable proof that we can examine.

Sure. They hacked the DNC and delivered those hacks to Assange.Joint Statement from the Department Of Homeland Security and Office of the Director of National Intelligence on Election Security | Homeland Security Joint DHS, ODNI, FBI Statement on Russian Malicious Cyber Activity — FBI
They also had trolls target key states with fake news.The Russian troll army that helped swing the election for Trump
Woman who sued pro-Putin Russian 'troll factory' gets one rouble in damages
Oh and like I pointed out. The REPUBLICAN house and senate don't contest these facts neither does this guy.Trump counterterrorism adviser blames Russia for election hacks

Seth Rich calls anyone that says Russia Hacked The DNC a liar. We know the Pakistani Foreign Nationals hired as hackers actually stole data from THE DNC. Why does THE DNC need to hire hackers who were fired, and Clinton hires them along with Schultz when she got fired?

Assange said Seth Rich gave him the leaked emails, but these Pakistani Hackers did hack THE DNC server, and that is the only evidence of hacking there is. Wait, they DIDN'T HACK THE DNC SERVER.... You know why?

Because despite the fact they had criminal records they were given SUPER USER access and Admin passwords to The DNC server, which means they didn't have to hack shit, they were in control of the shit, even classified shit.

When is Mueller going to investigate that?

Trolls? So wait, what you do here every day on the USMB is illegal?
Dude, you better get a lawyer!

MUELLER IS COMING FOR YOU MAN!

So when you ask me verifiable information. And I give you press releases. You come back with Seth Rich? Trumpism simply functions as a religion. This is what they call false equivalence. Set Rich supposedly said something so the entire intelligence community, the GOP and members of the Trump administration are wrong. I once spend months talking too a young earth creationist, this was one of his favorite tactics too. Your trolls remark is the same thing. There is a BIG difference between going on a forum and talking politics with like minded people and being paid for going on strangers facebook page to deliberately and knowingly spread false information. The point is there is no chance you will accept anything that doesn't fit in your narrative.

 

[Tom Horn]

The point is there is no chance you will accept anything that doesn't fit in your narrative.

We don't need a "narrative"..that's your side trying to compensate for the hag getting her ass kicked by The Donald. We have no agenda either...we WON, you didn't. We find your claims comical at times, traitorous at other times. If you try a violent coup, you'll be massacred so disabuse yourself of that notion and settle down. In 4 years your life will be much better if you apply yourself to making it so...President Trump is making it easier for you to succeed whether you want to or not.

 

[Siete]

Well, since this is still a free country, citizens are allowed to choose and support the candidate of their choice in an election. For a high paid attorney to write a check to his candidate or the party he supports is NOT a huge hill of beans. It is called freedom. Your people have no right to be using that as a reason for future employment in any capacity, including as investigators. Professionals actually don't base their findings on their own personal opinions. They go by the laws or rules of that field. In this case, the investigators know the rules and the laws backward and forward, and I have every confidence that they will apply those parameters to this investigation.
In other words, this argument is making you all look like a bunch of unprofessional, uneducated, biased liars trying desperately to squirm out of an investigation that you concurrently vow has no "there" there. If that's true, you've got nothing to worry about, so stop talking like a cheerleader for a dictator and let them reach the conclusion that your man is innocent.

If this was still a free country you sniveling Rats would accept the outcome of a fair election instead of trying to subvert the new administration for petty revenge. Mueller and his pack of jackals are about to get the bum's rush....another FAIL on the part of you dirtbags.

Tom. Russia's interference in the election is not seriously contested. Trump's campaign's intent to at least try to use the Russians as a weapon against Clinton isn't contested. Trump's definite pro-Russian stance isn't seriously contested. Your argument that the Russian investigation is revenge fails. So is your contention that the election was fair. In fact the fact that a hostile foreign power interfered makes it distinctly unfair. So does the fact that fair in the US entails that you can still lose despite the fact that you get over 2 million votes more than your rival.

Please tell us what Russia did to change the outcome of The Election.
And please provide verifiable proof that we can examine.

Sure. They hacked the DNC and delivered those hacks to Assange.Joint Statement from the Department Of Homeland Security and Office of the Director of National Intelligence on Election Security | Homeland Security Joint DHS, ODNI, FBI Statement on Russian Malicious Cyber Activity — FBI
They also had trolls target key states with fake news.The Russian troll army that helped swing the election for Trump
Woman who sued pro-Putin Russian 'troll factory' gets one rouble in damages
Oh and like I pointed out. The REPUBLICAN house and senate don't contest these facts neither does this guy.Trump counterterrorism adviser blames Russia for election hacks

What hack? There is zero evidence of a hack of the DNC. There is evidence that a whistleblower released the info, that there is evidence of, but the rest of your comment is a lie. And a knowing one at that.

September 2015 - The FBI contacts the Democratic National Committee's help desk, cautioning the IT department that at least one computer has been compromised by Russian hackers. A technician scans the system and does not find anything suspicious.

November 2015 - The FBI reaches out to the DNC again, warning them that one of their computers is transmitting information back to Russia. DNC management later says that IT technicians failed to pass along the message that the system had been breached.

June 15, 2016 - A cybersecurity firm hired by the DNC posts a public notice on its website describing an attack on the political committee's computer network by two groups associated with Russian intelligence. According to the post, two Russian-backed groups called "Cozy Bear" and "Fancy Bear" tunneled into the committee's computer system. In response, a blogger called Guccifer 2.0 claims that he alone conducted the hack, not the Russians. As proof, he posts internal DNC memos and opposition research on Trump. Furthermore, Guccifer 2.0 claims to have passed along thousands of files to WikiLeaks. Trump offers his own theory on the origins of the attack: suggesting in a statement that the DNC hacked itself to distract from Clinton's email scandal

 

[westwall]

If this was still a free country you sniveling Rats would accept the outcome of a fair election instead of trying to subvert the new administration for petty revenge. Mueller and his pack of jackals are about to get the bum's rush....another FAIL on the part of you dirtbags.

Tom. Russia's interference in the election is not seriously contested. Trump's campaign's intent to at least try to use the Russians as a weapon against Clinton isn't contested. Trump's definite pro-Russian stance isn't seriously contested. Your argument that the Russian investigation is revenge fails. So is your contention that the election was fair. In fact the fact that a hostile foreign power interfered makes it distinctly unfair. So does the fact that fair in the US entails that you can still lose despite the fact that you get over 2 million votes more than your rival.

Please tell us what Russia did to change the outcome of The Election.
And please provide verifiable proof that we can examine.

Sure. They hacked the DNC and delivered those hacks to Assange.Joint Statement from the Department Of Homeland Security and Office of the Director of National Intelligence on Election Security | Homeland Security Joint DHS, ODNI, FBI Statement on Russian Malicious Cyber Activity — FBI
They also had trolls target key states with fake news.The Russian troll army that helped swing the election for Trump
Woman who sued pro-Putin Russian 'troll factory' gets one rouble in damages
Oh and like I pointed out. The REPUBLICAN house and senate don't contest these facts neither does this guy.Trump counterterrorism adviser blames Russia for election hacks

What hack? There is zero evidence of a hack of the DNC. There is evidence that a whistleblower released the info, that there is evidence of, but the rest of your comment is a lie. And a knowing one at that.

September 2015 - The FBI contacts the Democratic National Committee's help desk, cautioning the IT department that at least one computer has been compromised by Russian hackers. A technician scans the system and does not find anything suspicious.

November 2015 - The FBI reaches out to the DNC again, warning them that one of their computers is transmitting information back to Russia. DNC management later says that IT technicians failed to pass along the message that the system had been breached.

June 15, 2016 - A cybersecurity firm hired by the DNC posts a public notice on its website describing an attack on the political committee's computer network by two groups associated with Russian intelligence. According to the post, two Russian-backed groups called "Cozy Bear" and "Fancy Bear" tunneled into the committee's computer system. In response, a blogger called Guccifer 2.0 claims that he alone conducted the hack, not the Russians. As proof, he posts internal DNC memos and opposition research on Trump. Furthermore, Guccifer 2.0 claims to have passed along thousands of files to WikiLeaks. Trump offers his own theory on the origins of the attack: suggesting in a statement that the DNC hacked itself to distract from Clinton's email scandal

And none of this so called evidence has been seen. It is merely reports from unnamed sources.

 

[Siete]

Tom. Russia's interference in the election is not seriously contested. Trump's campaign's intent to at least try to use the Russians as a weapon against Clinton isn't contested. Trump's definite pro-Russian stance isn't seriously contested. Your argument that the Russian investigation is revenge fails. So is your contention that the election was fair. In fact the fact that a hostile foreign power interfered makes it distinctly unfair. So does the fact that fair in the US entails that you can still lose despite the fact that you get over 2 million votes more than your rival.

Please tell us what Russia did to change the outcome of The Election.
And please provide verifiable proof that we can examine.

Sure. They hacked the DNC and delivered those hacks to Assange.Joint Statement from the Department Of Homeland Security and Office of the Director of National Intelligence on Election Security | Homeland Security Joint DHS, ODNI, FBI Statement on Russian Malicious Cyber Activity — FBI
They also had trolls target key states with fake news.The Russian troll army that helped swing the election for Trump
Woman who sued pro-Putin Russian 'troll factory' gets one rouble in damages
Oh and like I pointed out. The REPUBLICAN house and senate don't contest these facts neither does this guy.Trump counterterrorism adviser blames Russia for election hacks

What hack? There is zero evidence of a hack of the DNC. There is evidence that a whistleblower released the info, that there is evidence of, but the rest of your comment is a lie. And a knowing one at that.

September 2015 - The FBI contacts the Democratic National Committee's help desk, cautioning the IT department that at least one computer has been compromised by Russian hackers. A technician scans the system and does not find anything suspicious.

November 2015 - The FBI reaches out to the DNC again, warning them that one of their computers is transmitting information back to Russia. DNC management later says that IT technicians failed to pass along the message that the system had been breached.

June 15, 2016 - A cybersecurity firm hired by the DNC posts a public notice on its website describing an attack on the political committee's computer network by two groups associated with Russian intelligence. According to the post, two Russian-backed groups called "Cozy Bear" and "Fancy Bear" tunneled into the committee's computer system. In response, a blogger called Guccifer 2.0 claims that he alone conducted the hack, not the Russians. As proof, he posts internal DNC memos and opposition research on Trump. Furthermore, Guccifer 2.0 claims to have passed along thousands of files to WikiLeaks. Trump offers his own theory on the origins of the attack: suggesting in a statement that the DNC hacked itself to distract from Clinton's email scandal

And none of this so called evidence has been seen. It is merely reports from unnamed sources.

you and I know theres no evidence, its a witch hunt ...



thats why Trump wants to know if he can pardon himself and his family .....

 

[Freewill]

Like Butch said to Sundance, seeing they hadn't lost the posse chasing them: "Who are those guys?" Sheriff Mueller has hired some of the more notorious gators in the Swamp to take a chunk out of the President's butt:

For weeks, Republicans have publicly identified what they see as potential conflicts among Mr. Mueller’s team of more than a dozen investigators. In particular, they have cited thousands of dollars of political donations to Democrats, including former President Barack Obama, made by Andrew Weissmann, a former senior Justice Department official who has expertise in fraud and other financial crimes. News reports have revealed similar donations by other members of Mr. Mueller’s team, which Mr. Trump’s allies have cited as evidence of political bias. Another lawyer Mr. Mueller has hired, Jeannie Rhee, represented the Clinton Foundation.

So how can this continue with these and others who are obviously political enemies of the President? Here's how:

The Justice Department has explicit rules about what constitutes a conflict of interest. Prosecutors may not participate in investigations if they have “a personal or political relationship” with the subject of the case. Making campaign donations is not included on the list of things that would create a “political relationship.”

Huh?

BTW, Herr Mueller was indeed after his buddy and protege's seat as FBI Director:

“He was sitting in that chair,” Mr. Trump said during the Oval Office interview. “He was up here, and he wanted the job.”


Trump Aides, Seeking Leverage, Investigate Mueller’s Investigators

its so cute how treasonous rightwingnut losers root for the Russian puppet and not their own country.

losers.... if this was a dem, you'd be demanding their ouster, lying psychotic.

It is almost like they are treasonous enough to promise the Russians they would be more flexible, that is after they didn't need to give a crap what the voters think.

Treason like that should be prosecuted not ignored.

No state secrets went to the Russians there is nothing treasonous, except how the liberals are acting.

 

[Siete]

Like Butch said to Sundance, seeing they hadn't lost the posse chasing them: "Who are those guys?" Sheriff Mueller has hired some of the more notorious gators in the Swamp to take a chunk out of the President's butt:

For weeks, Republicans have publicly identified what they see as potential conflicts among Mr. Mueller’s team of more than a dozen investigators. In particular, they have cited thousands of dollars of political donations to Democrats, including former President Barack Obama, made by Andrew Weissmann, a former senior Justice Department official who has expertise in fraud and other financial crimes. News reports have revealed similar donations by other members of Mr. Mueller’s team, which Mr. Trump’s allies have cited as evidence of political bias. Another lawyer Mr. Mueller has hired, Jeannie Rhee, represented the Clinton Foundation.

So how can this continue with these and others who are obviously political enemies of the President? Here's how:

The Justice Department has explicit rules about what constitutes a conflict of interest. Prosecutors may not participate in investigations if they have “a personal or political relationship” with the subject of the case. Making campaign donations is not included on the list of things that would create a “political relationship.”

Huh?

BTW, Herr Mueller was indeed after his buddy and protege's seat as FBI Director:

“He was sitting in that chair,” Mr. Trump said during the Oval Office interview. “He was up here, and he wanted the job.”


Trump Aides, Seeking Leverage, Investigate Mueller’s Investigators

its so cute how treasonous rightwingnut losers root for the Russian puppet and not their own country.

losers.... if this was a dem, you'd be demanding their ouster, lying psychotic.

It is almost like they are treasonous enough to promise the Russians they would be more flexible, that is after they didn't need to give a crap what the voters think.

Treason like that should be prosecuted not ignored.

No state secrets went to the Russians there is nothing treasonous, except how the liberals are acting.

DERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRP DERP DERP DERP

in that case Trump can pardon himself when they find him innocent of all charges ...

 

[Freewill]

Like Butch said to Sundance, seeing they hadn't lost the posse chasing them: "Who are those guys?" Sheriff Mueller has hired some of the more notorious gators in the Swamp to take a chunk out of the President's butt:

For weeks, Republicans have publicly identified what they see as potential conflicts among Mr. Mueller’s team of more than a dozen investigators. In particular, they have cited thousands of dollars of political donations to Democrats, including former President Barack Obama, made by Andrew Weissmann, a former senior Justice Department official who has expertise in fraud and other financial crimes. News reports have revealed similar donations by other members of Mr. Mueller’s team, which Mr. Trump’s allies have cited as evidence of political bias. Another lawyer Mr. Mueller has hired, Jeannie Rhee, represented the Clinton Foundation.

So how can this continue with these and others who are obviously political enemies of the President? Here's how:

The Justice Department has explicit rules about what constitutes a conflict of interest. Prosecutors may not participate in investigations if they have “a personal or political relationship” with the subject of the case. Making campaign donations is not included on the list of things that would create a “political relationship.”

Huh?

BTW, Herr Mueller was indeed after his buddy and protege's seat as FBI Director:

“He was sitting in that chair,” Mr. Trump said during the Oval Office interview. “He was up here, and he wanted the job.”


Trump Aides, Seeking Leverage, Investigate Mueller’s Investigators

its so cute how treasonous rightwingnut losers root for the Russian puppet and not their own country.

losers.... if this was a dem, you'd be demanding their ouster, lying psychotic.

It is almost like they are treasonous enough to promise the Russians they would be more flexible, that is after they didn't need to give a crap what the voters think.

Treason like that should be prosecuted not ignored.

No state secrets went to the Russians there is nothing treasonous, except how the liberals are acting.

DERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRP DERP DERP DERP

in that case Trump can pardon himself when they find him innocent of all charges ...

Petty funny how someone likes a post that makes no sense. I guess that is just liberals being liberal.

 

[jillian]

Like Butch said to Sundance, seeing they hadn't lost the posse chasing them: "Who are those guys?" Sheriff Mueller has hired some of the more notorious gators in the Swamp to take a chunk out of the President's butt:

For weeks, Republicans have publicly identified what they see as potential conflicts among Mr. Mueller’s team of more than a dozen investigators. In particular, they have cited thousands of dollars of political donations to Democrats, including former President Barack Obama, made by Andrew Weissmann, a former senior Justice Department official who has expertise in fraud and other financial crimes. News reports have revealed similar donations by other members of Mr. Mueller’s team, which Mr. Trump’s allies have cited as evidence of political bias. Another lawyer Mr. Mueller has hired, Jeannie Rhee, represented the Clinton Foundation.

So how can this continue with these and others who are obviously political enemies of the President? Here's how:

The Justice Department has explicit rules about what constitutes a conflict of interest. Prosecutors may not participate in investigations if they have “a personal or political relationship” with the subject of the case. Making campaign donations is not included on the list of things that would create a “political relationship.”

Huh?

BTW, Herr Mueller was indeed after his buddy and protege's seat as FBI Director:

“He was sitting in that chair,” Mr. Trump said during the Oval Office interview. “He was up here, and he wanted the job.”


Trump Aides, Seeking Leverage, Investigate Mueller’s Investigators

its so cute how treasonous rightwingnut losers root for the Russian puppet and not their own country.

losers.... if this was a dem, you'd be demanding their ouster, lying psychotic.

It is almost like they are treasonous enough to promise the Russians they would be more flexible, that is after they didn't need to give a crap what the voters think.

Treason like that should be prosecuted not ignored.

No state secrets went to the Russians there is nothing treasonous, except how the liberals are acting.

DERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRP DERP DERP DERP

in that case Trump can pardon himself when they find him innocent of all charges ...

Petty funny how someone likes a post that makes no sense. I guess that is just liberals being liberal.

the sentence makes sense.

not surprising that a trumptard has no basic comprehension skills.

 

[Freewill]

Like Butch said to Sundance, seeing they hadn't lost the posse chasing them: "Who are those guys?" Sheriff Mueller has hired some of the more notorious gators in the Swamp to take a chunk out of the President's butt:

For weeks, Republicans have publicly identified what they see as potential conflicts among Mr. Mueller’s team of more than a dozen investigators. In particular, they have cited thousands of dollars of political donations to Democrats, including former President Barack Obama, made by Andrew Weissmann, a former senior Justice Department official who has expertise in fraud and other financial crimes. News reports have revealed similar donations by other members of Mr. Mueller’s team, which Mr. Trump’s allies have cited as evidence of political bias. Another lawyer Mr. Mueller has hired, Jeannie Rhee, represented the Clinton Foundation.

So how can this continue with these and others who are obviously political enemies of the President? Here's how:

The Justice Department has explicit rules about what constitutes a conflict of interest. Prosecutors may not participate in investigations if they have “a personal or political relationship” with the subject of the case. Making campaign donations is not included on the list of things that would create a “political relationship.”

Huh?

BTW, Herr Mueller was indeed after his buddy and protege's seat as FBI Director:

“He was sitting in that chair,” Mr. Trump said during the Oval Office interview. “He was up here, and he wanted the job.”


Trump Aides, Seeking Leverage, Investigate Mueller’s Investigators

its so cute how treasonous rightwingnut losers root for the Russian puppet and not their own country.

losers.... if this was a dem, you'd be demanding their ouster, lying psychotic.

It is almost like they are treasonous enough to promise the Russians they would be more flexible, that is after they didn't need to give a crap what the voters think.

Treason like that should be prosecuted not ignored.

No state secrets went to the Russians there is nothing treasonous, except how the liberals are acting.

DERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRP DERP DERP DERP

in that case Trump can pardon himself when they find him innocent of all charges ...

Petty funny how someone likes a post that makes no sense. I guess that is just liberals being liberal.

the sentence makes sense.

not surprising that a trumptard has no basic comprehension skills.

I am not the least bit surprised that nonsense makes sense to you.

 

[Siete]

Like Butch said to Sundance, seeing they hadn't lost the posse chasing them: "Who are those guys?" Sheriff Mueller has hired some of the more notorious gators in the Swamp to take a chunk out of the President's butt:

For weeks, Republicans have publicly identified what they see as potential conflicts among Mr. Mueller’s team of more than a dozen investigators. In particular, they have cited thousands of dollars of political donations to Democrats, including former President Barack Obama, made by Andrew Weissmann, a former senior Justice Department official who has expertise in fraud and other financial crimes. News reports have revealed similar donations by other members of Mr. Mueller’s team, which Mr. Trump’s allies have cited as evidence of political bias. Another lawyer Mr. Mueller has hired, Jeannie Rhee, represented the Clinton Foundation.

So how can this continue with these and others who are obviously political enemies of the President? Here's how:

The Justice Department has explicit rules about what constitutes a conflict of interest. Prosecutors may not participate in investigations if they have “a personal or political relationship” with the subject of the case. Making campaign donations is not included on the list of things that would create a “political relationship.”

Huh?

BTW, Herr Mueller was indeed after his buddy and protege's seat as FBI Director:

“He was sitting in that chair,” Mr. Trump said during the Oval Office interview. “He was up here, and he wanted the job.”


Trump Aides, Seeking Leverage, Investigate Mueller’s Investigators

its so cute how treasonous rightwingnut losers root for the Russian puppet and not their own country.

losers.... if this was a dem, you'd be demanding their ouster, lying psychotic.

It is almost like they are treasonous enough to promise the Russians they would be more flexible, that is after they didn't need to give a crap what the voters think.

Treason like that should be prosecuted not ignored.

No state secrets went to the Russians there is nothing treasonous, except how the liberals are acting.

DERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRP DERP DERP DERP

in that case Trump can pardon himself when they find him innocent of all charges ...

Petty funny how someone likes a post that makes no sense. I guess that is just liberals being liberal.

Trump says he innocent, dipshits say hes innocent, so naturally he's asking if he can pardon himself and his family.

FROM WHAT DERP, BEING INNOCENT ?


well shitfire, if you aint stupid

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Like Butch said to Sundance, seeing they hadn't lost the posse chasing them: "Who are those guys?" Sheriff Mueller has hired some of the more notorious gators in the Swamp to take a chunk out of the President's butt:

For weeks, Republicans have publicly identified what they see as potential conflicts among Mr. Mueller’s team of more than a dozen investigators. In particular, they have cited thousands of dollars of political donations to Democrats, including former President Barack Obama, made by Andrew Weissmann, a former senior Justice Department official who has expertise in fraud and other financial crimes. News reports have revealed similar donations by other members of Mr. Mueller’s team, which Mr. Trump’s allies have cited as evidence of political bias. Another lawyer Mr. Mueller has hired, Jeannie Rhee, represented the Clinton Foundation.

So how can this continue with these and others who are obviously political enemies of the President? Here's how:

The Justice Department has explicit rules about what constitutes a conflict of interest. Prosecutors may not participate in investigations if they have “a personal or political relationship” with the subject of the case. Making campaign donations is not included on the list of things that would create a “political relationship.”

Huh?

BTW, Herr Mueller was indeed after his buddy and protege's seat as FBI Director:

“He was sitting in that chair,” Mr. Trump said during the Oval Office interview. “He was up here, and he wanted the job.”


Trump Aides, Seeking Leverage, Investigate Mueller’s Investigators

That idiotic photo gives a whole new meaning to "all hat, no cattle".

What an ass he is.

[emoji849]


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Like Butch said to Sundance, seeing they hadn't lost the posse chasing them: "Who are those guys?" Sheriff Mueller has hired some of the more notorious gators in the Swamp to take a chunk out of the President's butt:

For weeks, Republicans have publicly identified what they see as potential conflicts among Mr. Mueller’s team of more than a dozen investigators. In particular, they have cited thousands of dollars of political donations to Democrats, including former President Barack Obama, made by Andrew Weissmann, a former senior Justice Department official who has expertise in fraud and other financial crimes. News reports have revealed similar donations by other members of Mr. Mueller’s team, which Mr. Trump’s allies have cited as evidence of political bias. Another lawyer Mr. Mueller has hired, Jeannie Rhee, represented the Clinton Foundation.

So how can this continue with these and others who are obviously political enemies of the President? Here's how:

The Justice Department has explicit rules about what constitutes a conflict of interest. Prosecutors may not participate in investigations if they have “a personal or political relationship” with the subject of the case. Making campaign donations is not included on the list of things that would create a “political relationship.”

Huh?

BTW, Herr Mueller was indeed after his buddy and protege's seat as FBI Director:

“He was sitting in that chair,” Mr. Trump said during the Oval Office interview. “He was up here, and he wanted the job.”


Trump Aides, Seeking Leverage, Investigate Mueller’s Investigators

its so cute how treasonous rightwingnut losers root for the Russian puppet and not their own country.

losers.... if this was a dem, you'd be demanding their ouster, lying psychotic.

And they've been against their own country for a long while one.

[emoji37]


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

 

[forkup]

So you ask me for verifiable ino

If this was still a free country you sniveling Rats would accept the outcome of a fair election instead of trying to subvert the new administration for petty revenge. Mueller and his pack of jackals are about to get the bum's rush....another FAIL on the part of you dirtbags.

Tom. Russia's interference in the election is not seriously contested. Trump's campaign's intent to at least try to use the Russians as a weapon against Clinton isn't contested. Trump's definite pro-Russian stance isn't seriously contested. Your argument that the Russian investigation is revenge fails. So is your contention that the election was fair. In fact the fact that a hostile foreign power interfered makes it distinctly unfair. So does the fact that fair in the US entails that you can still lose despite the fact that you get over 2 million votes more than your rival.

Please tell us what Russia did to change the outcome of The Election.
And please provide verifiable proof that we can examine.

Sure. They hacked the DNC and delivered those hacks to Assange.Joint Statement from the Department Of Homeland Security and Office of the Director of National Intelligence on Election Security | Homeland Security Joint DHS, ODNI, FBI Statement on Russian Malicious Cyber Activity — FBI
They also had trolls target key states with fake news.The Russian troll army that helped swing the election for Trump
Woman who sued pro-Putin Russian 'troll factory' gets one rouble in damages
Oh and like I pointed out. The REPUBLICAN house and senate don't contest these facts neither does this guy.Trump counterterrorism adviser blames Russia for election hacks

Seth Rich calls anyone that says Russia Hacked The DNC a liar. We know the Pakistani Foreign Nationals hired as hackers actually stole data from THE DNC. Why does THE DNC need to hire hackers who were fired, and Clinton hires them along with Schultz when she got fired?

Assange said Seth Rich gave him the leaked emails, but these Pakistani Hackers did hack THE DNC server, and that is the only evidence of hacking there is. Wait, they DIDN'T HACK THE DNC SERVER.... You know why?

Because despite the fact they had criminal records they were given SUPER USER access and Admin passwords to The DNC server, which means they didn't have to hack shit, they were in control of the shit, even classified shit.

When is Mueller going to investigate that?

Trolls? So wait, what you do here every day on the USMB is illegal?
Dude, you better get a lawyer!

MUELLER IS COMING FOR YOU MAN!

So when you ask me verifiable information. And I give you press releases. You come back with Seth Rich? Trumpism simply functions as a religion. This is what they call false equivalence. Set Rich supposedly said something so the entire intelligence community, the GOP and members of the Trump administration are wrong. I once spend months talking too a young earth creationist, this was one of his favorite tactics too. Your trolls remark is the same thing. There is a BIG difference between going on a forum and talking politics with like minded people and being paid for going on strangers facebook page to deliberately and knowingly spread false information. The point is there is no chance you will accept anything that doesn't fit in your narrative.

Oh so "There is no proof of Russian hacks", "Trump doesn't do anything wrong" isn't a narrative? It's literally used by all Trump supporters.The left has a narrative "Trump is bad" but the right doesn't? That statement in itself proves you support Trump in a religious way. The hallmark of religion is unquestionable faith. You feel you don't have a narrative simply the truth.

 

[forkup]

Tom. Russia's interference in the election is not seriously contested. Trump's campaign's intent to at least try to use the Russians as a weapon against Clinton isn't contested. Trump's definite pro-Russian stance isn't seriously contested. Your argument that the Russian investigation is revenge fails. So is your contention that the election was fair. In fact the fact that a hostile foreign power interfered makes it distinctly unfair. So does the fact that fair in the US entails that you can still lose despite the fact that you get over 2 million votes more than your rival.

Please tell us what Russia did to change the outcome of The Election.
And please provide verifiable proof that we can examine.

Sure. They hacked the DNC and delivered those hacks to Assange.Joint Statement from the Department Of Homeland Security and Office of the Director of National Intelligence on Election Security | Homeland Security Joint DHS, ODNI, FBI Statement on Russian Malicious Cyber Activity — FBI
They also had trolls target key states with fake news.The Russian troll army that helped swing the election for Trump
Woman who sued pro-Putin Russian 'troll factory' gets one rouble in damages
Oh and like I pointed out. The REPUBLICAN house and senate don't contest these facts neither does this guy.Trump counterterrorism adviser blames Russia for election hacks

What hack? There is zero evidence of a hack of the DNC. There is evidence that a whistleblower released the info, that there is evidence of, but the rest of your comment is a lie. And a knowing one at that.

September 2015 - The FBI contacts the Democratic National Committee's help desk, cautioning the IT department that at least one computer has been compromised by Russian hackers. A technician scans the system and does not find anything suspicious.

November 2015 - The FBI reaches out to the DNC again, warning them that one of their computers is transmitting information back to Russia. DNC management later says that IT technicians failed to pass along the message that the system had been breached.

June 15, 2016 - A cybersecurity firm hired by the DNC posts a public notice on its website describing an attack on the political committee's computer network by two groups associated with Russian intelligence. According to the post, two Russian-backed groups called "Cozy Bear" and "Fancy Bear" tunneled into the committee's computer system. In response, a blogger called Guccifer 2.0 claims that he alone conducted the hack, not the Russians. As proof, he posts internal DNC memos and opposition research on Trump. Furthermore, Guccifer 2.0 claims to have passed along thousands of files to WikiLeaks. Trump offers his own theory on the origins of the attack: suggesting in a statement that the DNC hacked itself to distract from Clinton's email scandal

And none of this so called evidence has been seen. It is merely reports from unnamed sources.

Woman who sued pro-Putin Russian 'troll factory' gets one rouble in damages
This woman is named. As for the hacks. You are implying that because the public isn't privy to all the ways the intelligence community has in gathering intel, it is therefore fake? You know what I find interesting. Horn said he finds claims the left makes treasonous at times, but neither you nor him finds it at all problematic to question the integrity of those charged with protecting you all from those wishing harm to the US, a mandate these agencies have in some cases sacrificed lives for. All intelligence gathering agencies in the US agree. The GOP agrees. Yet here you are pushing the narrative that there was no Russian hacks. A narrative that Horn claims you guys don't have, but is repeated by each and every one of you, regardless of facts.

 

[John Shaw]

Tom. Russia's interference in the election is not seriously contested. Trump's campaign's intent to at least try to use the Russians as a weapon against Clinton isn't contested. Trump's definite pro-Russian stance isn't seriously contested. Your argument that the Russian investigation is revenge fails. So is your contention that the election was fair. In fact the fact that a hostile foreign power interfered makes it distinctly unfair. So does the fact that fair in the US entails that you can still lose despite the fact that you get over 2 million votes more than your rival.

The Russians had nothing to do with Podesta's email heist and had no hand in the outcome of the election. What were once 17 agencies saying they did was whittled down to 4 and 3 were signing on to the Brennan's CIA fairytale. As to the couple million votes Hillary won California by, at least half of those votes were from illegals and dead people.

Nice. Doesn't realize illegal immigrants can't vote. Let alone millions of them. Thanks for tipping me off that you're not to be taken seriously.