Watching The Detectives

[Tom Horn]

Like Butch said to Sundance, seeing they hadn't lost the posse chasing them: "Who are those guys?" Sheriff Mueller has hired some of the more notorious gators in the Swamp to take a chunk out of the President's butt:

For weeks, Republicans have publicly identified what they see as potential conflicts among Mr. Mueller’s team of more than a dozen investigators. In particular, they have cited thousands of dollars of political donations to Democrats, including former President Barack Obama, made by Andrew Weissmann, a former senior Justice Department official who has expertise in fraud and other financial crimes. News reports have revealed similar donations by other members of Mr. Mueller’s team, which Mr. Trump’s allies have cited as evidence of political bias. Another lawyer Mr. Mueller has hired, Jeannie Rhee, represented the Clinton Foundation.

So how can this continue with these and others who are obviously political enemies of the President? Here's how:

The Justice Department has explicit rules about what constitutes a conflict of interest. Prosecutors may not participate in investigations if they have “a personal or political relationship” with the subject of the case. Making campaign donations is not included on the list of things that would create a “political relationship.”

Huh?

BTW, Herr Mueller was indeed after his buddy and protege's seat as FBI Director:

“He was sitting in that chair,” Mr. Trump said during the Oval Office interview. “He was up here, and he wanted the job.”


Trump Aides, Seeking Leverage, Investigate Mueller’s Investigators

 

[tinydancer]

I'm glad that the Trump camp is taking action to investigate the investigators.

My warning bells went off of course when I discovered all the D hitmen he'd hired BUT the biggie is that Mueller took three law partners from his firm to work with him on this Special Counsel.

It gets worse. Those four men are all law partners with Jamie Gorelick.

It gets worse. I almost went through the freaking roof a few months back when I learned that Jamie Gorelick was hired by Jared Kushner to represent him in the Russian probe. Aye carumba!!!!!!!!!!

A mega Clintonista and Kushner hires Gorelick who would be privy to all things related to Russia from the Trump camp.

Needless to say it didn't give me a warm and fuzzy at the time. But at this point I'm finding this most alarming. Because the buzz out there is that Kushner's lawyers released Jared's copies of the emails from Donald Jr. to the New York Times over the Russian meeting.

I'm not a happy camper here.

ETA: Gorelick has just after the email/Donald Jr. dump has recused herself from the Russia probe (how convenient) but is still his lawyer.

I really really don't like this.

 

[jillian]

Like Butch said to Sundance, seeing they hadn't lost the posse chasing them: "Who are those guys?" Sheriff Mueller has hired some of the more notorious gators in the Swamp to take a chunk out of the President's butt:

For weeks, Republicans have publicly identified what they see as potential conflicts among Mr. Mueller’s team of more than a dozen investigators. In particular, they have cited thousands of dollars of political donations to Democrats, including former President Barack Obama, made by Andrew Weissmann, a former senior Justice Department official who has expertise in fraud and other financial crimes. News reports have revealed similar donations by other members of Mr. Mueller’s team, which Mr. Trump’s allies have cited as evidence of political bias. Another lawyer Mr. Mueller has hired, Jeannie Rhee, represented the Clinton Foundation.

So how can this continue with these and others who are obviously political enemies of the President? Here's how:

The Justice Department has explicit rules about what constitutes a conflict of interest. Prosecutors may not participate in investigations if they have “a personal or political relationship” with the subject of the case. Making campaign donations is not included on the list of things that would create a “political relationship.”

Huh?

BTW, Herr Mueller was indeed after his buddy and protege's seat as FBI Director:

“He was sitting in that chair,” Mr. Trump said during the Oval Office interview. “He was up here, and he wanted the job.”


Trump Aides, Seeking Leverage, Investigate Mueller’s Investigators

its so cute how treasonous rightwingnut losers root for the Russian puppet and not their own country.

losers.... if this was a dem, you'd be demanding their ouster, lying psychotic.

 

[Tom Horn]

its so cute how treasonous rightwingnut losers root for the Russian puppet and not their own country.

losers.... if this was a dem, you'd be demanding their ouster, lying psychotic.

Go chew your cud.

 

[Tom Horn]

I'm glad that the Trump camp is taking action to investigate the investigators.

My warning bells went off of course when I discovered all the D hitmen he'd hired BUT the biggie is that Mueller took three law partners from his firm to work with him on this Special Counsel.

It gets worse. Those four men are all law partners with Jamie Gorelick.

It gets worse. I almost went through the freaking roof a few months back when I learned that Jamie Gorelick was hired by Jared Kushner to represent him in the Russian probe. Aye carumba!!!!!!!!!!

A mega Clintonista and Kushner hires Gorelick who would be privy to all things related to Russia from the Trump camp.

Needless to say it didn't give me a warm and fuzzy at the time. But at this point I'm finding this most alarming. Because the buzz out there is that Kushner's lawyers released Jared's copies of the emails from Donald Jr. to the New York Times over the Russian meeting.

I'm not a happy camper here.

ETA: Gorelick has just after the email/Donald Jr. dump has recused herself from the Russia probe (how convenient) but is still his lawyer.

I really really don't like this.

I replied to you in another thread about Gorelick.....she's as rotten as they come. Maybe Jared isn't as loyal an ally as the President believes. My father-in-law and I crossed swords many times...we were civil but we didn't like each other and that's not all that uncommon.

 

[OldLady]

Like Butch said to Sundance, seeing they hadn't lost the posse chasing them: "Who are those guys?" Sheriff Mueller has hired some of the more notorious gators in the Swamp to take a chunk out of the President's butt:

For weeks, Republicans have publicly identified what they see as potential conflicts among Mr. Mueller’s team of more than a dozen investigators. In particular, they have cited thousands of dollars of political donations to Democrats, including former President Barack Obama, made by Andrew Weissmann, a former senior Justice Department official who has expertise in fraud and other financial crimes. News reports have revealed similar donations by other members of Mr. Mueller’s team, which Mr. Trump’s allies have cited as evidence of political bias. Another lawyer Mr. Mueller has hired, Jeannie Rhee, represented the Clinton Foundation.

So how can this continue with these and others who are obviously political enemies of the President? Here's how:

The Justice Department has explicit rules about what constitutes a conflict of interest. Prosecutors may not participate in investigations if they have “a personal or political relationship” with the subject of the case. Making campaign donations is not included on the list of things that would create a “political relationship.”

Huh?

BTW, Herr Mueller was indeed after his buddy and protege's seat as FBI Director:

“He was sitting in that chair,” Mr. Trump said during the Oval Office interview. “He was up here, and he wanted the job.”


Trump Aides, Seeking Leverage, Investigate Mueller’s Investigators

Well, since this is still a free country, citizens are allowed to choose and support the candidate of their choice in an election. For a high paid attorney to write a check to his candidate or the party he supports is NOT a huge hill of beans. It is called freedom. Your people have no right to be using that as a reason for future employment in any capacity, including as investigators. Professionals actually don't base their findings on their own personal opinions. They go by the laws or rules of that field. In this case, the investigators know the rules and the laws backward and forward, and I have every confidence that they will apply those parameters to this investigation.
In other words, this argument is making you all look like a bunch of unprofessional, uneducated, biased liars trying desperately to squirm out of an investigation that you concurrently vow has no "there" there. If that's true, you've got nothing to worry about, so stop talking like a cheerleader for a dictator and let them reach the conclusion that your man is innocent.

 

[Tom Horn]

Well, since this is still a free country, citizens are allowed to choose and support the candidate of their choice in an election. For a high paid attorney to write a check to his candidate or the party he supports is NOT a huge hill of beans. It is called freedom. Your people have no right to be using that as a reason for future employment in any capacity, including as investigators. Professionals actually don't base their findings on their own personal opinions. They go by the laws or rules of that field. In this case, the investigators know the rules and the laws backward and forward, and I have every confidence that they will apply those parameters to this investigation.
In other words, this argument is making you all look like a bunch of unprofessional, uneducated, biased liars trying desperately to squirm out of an investigation that you concurrently vow has no "there" there. If that's true, you've got nothing to worry about, so stop talking like a cheerleader for a dictator and let them reach the conclusion that your man is innocent.

If this was still a free country you sniveling Rats would accept the outcome of a fair election instead of trying to subvert the new administration for petty revenge. Mueller and his pack of jackals are about to get the bum's rush....another FAIL on the part of you dirtbags.

 

[forkup]

Well, since this is still a free country, citizens are allowed to choose and support the candidate of their choice in an election. For a high paid attorney to write a check to his candidate or the party he supports is NOT a huge hill of beans. It is called freedom. Your people have no right to be using that as a reason for future employment in any capacity, including as investigators. Professionals actually don't base their findings on their own personal opinions. They go by the laws or rules of that field. In this case, the investigators know the rules and the laws backward and forward, and I have every confidence that they will apply those parameters to this investigation.
In other words, this argument is making you all look like a bunch of unprofessional, uneducated, biased liars trying desperately to squirm out of an investigation that you concurrently vow has no "there" there. If that's true, you've got nothing to worry about, so stop talking like a cheerleader for a dictator and let them reach the conclusion that your man is innocent.

If this was still a free country you sniveling Rats would accept the outcome of a fair election instead of trying to subvert the new administration for petty revenge. Mueller and his pack of jackals are about to get the bum's rush....another FAIL on the part of you dirtbags.

Tom. Russia's interference in the election is not seriously contested. Trump's campaign's intent to at least try to use the Russians as a weapon against Clinton isn't contested. Trump's definite pro-Russian stance isn't seriously contested. Your argument that the Russian investigation is revenge fails. So is your contention that the election was fair. In fact the fact that a hostile foreign power interfered makes it distinctly unfair. So does the fact that fair in the US entails that you can still lose despite the fact that you get over 2 million votes more than your rival.

 

[tinydancer]

Like Butch said to Sundance, seeing they hadn't lost the posse chasing them: "Who are those guys?" Sheriff Mueller has hired some of the more notorious gators in the Swamp to take a chunk out of the President's butt:

For weeks, Republicans have publicly identified what they see as potential conflicts among Mr. Mueller’s team of more than a dozen investigators. In particular, they have cited thousands of dollars of political donations to Democrats, including former President Barack Obama, made by Andrew Weissmann, a former senior Justice Department official who has expertise in fraud and other financial crimes. News reports have revealed similar donations by other members of Mr. Mueller’s team, which Mr. Trump’s allies have cited as evidence of political bias. Another lawyer Mr. Mueller has hired, Jeannie Rhee, represented the Clinton Foundation.

So how can this continue with these and others who are obviously political enemies of the President? Here's how:

The Justice Department has explicit rules about what constitutes a conflict of interest. Prosecutors may not participate in investigations if they have “a personal or political relationship” with the subject of the case. Making campaign donations is not included on the list of things that would create a “political relationship.”

Huh?

BTW, Herr Mueller was indeed after his buddy and protege's seat as FBI Director:

“He was sitting in that chair,” Mr. Trump said during the Oval Office interview. “He was up here, and he wanted the job.”


Trump Aides, Seeking Leverage, Investigate Mueller’s Investigators

its so cute how treasonous rightwingnut losers root for the Russian puppet and not their own country.

losers.... if this was a dem, you'd be demanding their ouster, lying psychotic.

Hillary sold her soul to many countries but the biggest during the election was her colluding with the Ukrainians. You hypocritical bitch don't have a problem with that though do you?

I'm glad the new FBI director is going to be looking at the Ukrainian interference though. It goes way farther than the ousting of Manafort.

 

[Tom Horn]

Tom. Russia's interference in the election is not seriously contested. Trump's campaign's intent to at least try to use the Russians as a weapon against Clinton isn't contested. Trump's definite pro-Russian stance isn't seriously contested. Your argument that the Russian investigation is revenge fails. So is your contention that the election was fair. In fact the fact that a hostile foreign power interfered makes it distinctly unfair. So does the fact that fair in the US entails that you can still lose despite the fact that you get over 2 million votes more than your rival.

The Russians had nothing to do with Podesta's email heist and had no hand in the outcome of the election. What were once 17 agencies saying they did was whittled down to 4 and 3 were signing on to the Brennan's CIA fairytale. As to the couple million votes Hillary won California by, at least half of those votes were from illegals and dead people.

 

[The Original Tree]

I've never seen anything like this in my life. Seriously, part of it is the established GOP going after Trump and trying to stop his agenda, and part of it, even more seriously are the subversives Obama populated the government with over the last 8 years.

He pretty much accomplished a soft coup in The Federal Government by filling it up with Marxist Socialist, and people not loyal to The Rule of Law.

This is nothing like Nixon where an actual crime was committed. They have been looking for a crime over the 18 months of illegal surveillance, and past 8 months of investigations conducted by 7 different parties.

How can you call that anything but a witch hunt and fishing expedition? If The Deep State is able to take down a president who has committed NO CRIME, then this is no Longer America.

Obama then won, when he said he was going to fundamentally change America in to The Soviet Union, making us a Marxist State!

Has there ever been a time in this Nation's History where people in Government are committing treason on a daily and weekly basis continually leaking classified information, and committing other subversive and illegal acts OPENLY and not getting prosecuted for them?

Real Crimes are being IGNORED.... While a Witch Hunt based on a fake dossier, and an accusation by a losing candidate.....goes on for two years now....with NOTHING to report.

 

[tinydancer]

Well, since this is still a free country, citizens are allowed to choose and support the candidate of their choice in an election. For a high paid attorney to write a check to his candidate or the party he supports is NOT a huge hill of beans. It is called freedom. Your people have no right to be using that as a reason for future employment in any capacity, including as investigators. Professionals actually don't base their findings on their own personal opinions. They go by the laws or rules of that field. In this case, the investigators know the rules and the laws backward and forward, and I have every confidence that they will apply those parameters to this investigation.
In other words, this argument is making you all look like a bunch of unprofessional, uneducated, biased liars trying desperately to squirm out of an investigation that you concurrently vow has no "there" there. If that's true, you've got nothing to worry about, so stop talking like a cheerleader for a dictator and let them reach the conclusion that your man is innocent.

If this was still a free country you sniveling Rats would accept the outcome of a fair election instead of trying to subvert the new administration for petty revenge. Mueller and his pack of jackals are about to get the bum's rush....another FAIL on the part of you dirtbags.

Tom. Russia's interference in the election is not seriously contested. Trump's campaign's intent to at least try to use the Russians as a weapon against Clinton isn't contested. Trump's definite pro-Russian stance isn't seriously contested. Your argument that the Russian investigation is revenge fails. So is your contention that the election was fair. In fact the fact that a hostile foreign power interfered makes it distinctly unfair. So does the fact that fair in the US entails that you can still lose despite the fact that you get over 2 million votes more than your rival.

Like Butch said to Sundance, seeing they hadn't lost the posse chasing them: "Who are those guys?" Sheriff Mueller has hired some of the more notorious gators in the Swamp to take a chunk out of the President's butt:

For weeks, Republicans have publicly identified what they see as potential conflicts among Mr. Mueller’s team of more than a dozen investigators. In particular, they have cited thousands of dollars of political donations to Democrats, including former President Barack Obama, made by Andrew Weissmann, a former senior Justice Department official who has expertise in fraud and other financial crimes. News reports have revealed similar donations by other members of Mr. Mueller’s team, which Mr. Trump’s allies have cited as evidence of political bias. Another lawyer Mr. Mueller has hired, Jeannie Rhee, represented the Clinton Foundation.

So how can this continue with these and others who are obviously political enemies of the President? Here's how:

The Justice Department has explicit rules about what constitutes a conflict of interest. Prosecutors may not participate in investigations if they have “a personal or political relationship” with the subject of the case. Making campaign donations is not included on the list of things that would create a “political relationship.”

Huh?

BTW, Herr Mueller was indeed after his buddy and protege's seat as FBI Director:

“He was sitting in that chair,” Mr. Trump said during the Oval Office interview. “He was up here, and he wanted the job.”


Trump Aides, Seeking Leverage, Investigate Mueller’s Investigators

Well, since this is still a free country, citizens are allowed to choose and support the candidate of their choice in an election. For a high paid attorney to write a check to his candidate or the party he supports is NOT a huge hill of beans. It is called freedom. Your people have no right to be using that as a reason for future employment in any capacity, including as investigators. Professionals actually don't base their findings on their own personal opinions. They go by the laws or rules of that field. In this case, the investigators know the rules and the laws backward and forward, and I have every confidence that they will apply those parameters to this investigation.
In other words, this argument is making you all look like a bunch of unprofessional, uneducated, biased liars trying desperately to squirm out of an investigation that you concurrently vow has no "there" there. If that's true, you've got nothing to worry about, so stop talking like a cheerleader for a dictator and let them reach the conclusion that your man is innocent.

Cheerleader for a dictator? Seriously you need to switch to decaff. Considering Jared Kushner hired this law firm that Mueller and three other law partners are from should be a case enough for conflict of interest.

 

[tinydancer]

Tom. Russia's interference in the election is not seriously contested. Trump's campaign's intent to at least try to use the Russians as a weapon against Clinton isn't contested. Trump's definite pro-Russian stance isn't seriously contested. Your argument that the Russian investigation is revenge fails. So is your contention that the election was fair. In fact the fact that a hostile foreign power interfered makes it distinctly unfair. So does the fact that fair in the US entails that you can still lose despite the fact that you get over 2 million votes more than your rival.

The Russians had nothing to do with Podesta's email heist and had no hand in the outcome of the election. What were once 17 agencies saying they did was whittled down to 4 and 3 were signing on to the Brennan's CIA fairytale. As to the couple million votes Hillary won California by, at least half of those votes were from illegals and dead people.

And those 4 agencies still haven't examined the server. Yikes! We are expected to believe CrowdStrike a DNC employee.

 

[The Original Tree]

Well, since this is still a free country, citizens are allowed to choose and support the candidate of their choice in an election. For a high paid attorney to write a check to his candidate or the party he supports is NOT a huge hill of beans. It is called freedom. Your people have no right to be using that as a reason for future employment in any capacity, including as investigators. Professionals actually don't base their findings on their own personal opinions. They go by the laws or rules of that field. In this case, the investigators know the rules and the laws backward and forward, and I have every confidence that they will apply those parameters to this investigation.
In other words, this argument is making you all look like a bunch of unprofessional, uneducated, biased liars trying desperately to squirm out of an investigation that you concurrently vow has no "there" there. If that's true, you've got nothing to worry about, so stop talking like a cheerleader for a dictator and let them reach the conclusion that your man is innocent.

If this was still a free country you sniveling Rats would accept the outcome of a fair election instead of trying to subvert the new administration for petty revenge. Mueller and his pack of jackals are about to get the bum's rush....another FAIL on the part of you dirtbags.

Tom. Russia's interference in the election is not seriously contested. Trump's campaign's intent to at least try to use the Russians as a weapon against Clinton isn't contested. Trump's definite pro-Russian stance isn't seriously contested. Your argument that the Russian investigation is revenge fails. So is your contention that the election was fair. In fact the fact that a hostile foreign power interfered makes it distinctly unfair. So does the fact that fair in the US entails that you can still lose despite the fact that you get over 2 million votes more than your rival.

Please tell us what Russia did to change the outcome of The Election.
And please provide verifiable proof that we can examine.

 

[Tom Horn]

And those 4 agencies still haven't examined the server. Yikes! We are expected to believe CrowdStrike a DNC employee.

That's because it would take the FBI about an hour to discover there had been no intrusion and Podesta simply got phished.

 

[forkup]

Tom. Russia's interference in the election is not seriously contested. Trump's campaign's intent to at least try to use the Russians as a weapon against Clinton isn't contested. Trump's definite pro-Russian stance isn't seriously contested. Your argument that the Russian investigation is revenge fails. So is your contention that the election was fair. In fact the fact that a hostile foreign power interfered makes it distinctly unfair. So does the fact that fair in the US entails that you can still lose despite the fact that you get over 2 million votes more than your rival.

The Russians had nothing to do with Podesta's email heist and had no hand in the outcome of the election. What were once 17 agencies saying they did was whittled down to 4 and 3 were signing on to the Brennan's CIA fairytale. As to the couple million votes Hillary won California by, at least half of those votes were from illegals and dead people.

Well the only thing I can say to someone who is perfectly willing to repeat things that the entire GOP and even the Trump people gave up trying to say is. You are a zealot and there is absolutely no point in trying to have a rational conversation with zealots. You probably are a decent person. But someone who still insist on the fat guy behind a computer theory and the voter fraud theory is not rational when it comes to Trump.

 

[The Original Tree]

Tom. Russia's interference in the election is not seriously contested. Trump's campaign's intent to at least try to use the Russians as a weapon against Clinton isn't contested. Trump's definite pro-Russian stance isn't seriously contested. Your argument that the Russian investigation is revenge fails. So is your contention that the election was fair. In fact the fact that a hostile foreign power interfered makes it distinctly unfair. So does the fact that fair in the US entails that you can still lose despite the fact that you get over 2 million votes more than your rival.

The Russians had nothing to do with Podesta's email heist and had no hand in the outcome of the election. What were once 17 agencies saying they did was whittled down to 4 and 3 were signing on to the Brennan's CIA fairytale. As to the couple million votes Hillary won California by, at least half of those votes were from illegals and dead people.

And those 4 agencies still haven't examined the server. Yikes! We are expected to believe CrowdStrike a DNC employee.

And not only that, they disagree with each other. They don't even come to the same conclusions. And it's not even concrete. They use terms like "likely" "possibly" "potentially"
The only hacking we knew took place was by Obama hacking in to thousands of election systems and failing "according to him".

Did he really fail? How do we know he didn't try to plant evidence like they attempted with Russia Alpha Bank and Trump Tower Server with the false beacon pings?

BTW. Anyone who feels like finding out how Google is censoring information, do side by side searches with Google vs. DuckDuckGo, especially if you are a Conservative Researcher.

And can someone tell me why The DNC and Hillary Clinton employed a team of Pakistani Hackers, some who had criminal records to work on The Clinton Campaign?

Trump Tower Server Ping Set Up By US Based Hacker

Russia's Alfa Bank Confirms Hackers Attempting To Plant Trump Evidence - Tsarizm

"A Russian bank has reported to U.S. authorities that mysterious communications resumed recently between one of its computers and an email server tied to President’s business empire, and it has developed evidence the new activity may be the work of a hacker trying to create a political hoax." • r/The_Donald

 

[westwall]

Like Butch said to Sundance, seeing they hadn't lost the posse chasing them: "Who are those guys?" Sheriff Mueller has hired some of the more notorious gators in the Swamp to take a chunk out of the President's butt:

For weeks, Republicans have publicly identified what they see as potential conflicts among Mr. Mueller’s team of more than a dozen investigators. In particular, they have cited thousands of dollars of political donations to Democrats, including former President Barack Obama, made by Andrew Weissmann, a former senior Justice Department official who has expertise in fraud and other financial crimes. News reports have revealed similar donations by other members of Mr. Mueller’s team, which Mr. Trump’s allies have cited as evidence of political bias. Another lawyer Mr. Mueller has hired, Jeannie Rhee, represented the Clinton Foundation.

So how can this continue with these and others who are obviously political enemies of the President? Here's how:

The Justice Department has explicit rules about what constitutes a conflict of interest. Prosecutors may not participate in investigations if they have “a personal or political relationship” with the subject of the case. Making campaign donations is not included on the list of things that would create a “political relationship.”

Huh?

BTW, Herr Mueller was indeed after his buddy and protege's seat as FBI Director:

“He was sitting in that chair,” Mr. Trump said during the Oval Office interview. “He was up here, and he wanted the job.”


Trump Aides, Seeking Leverage, Investigate Mueller’s Investigators

its so cute how treasonous rightwingnut losers root for the Russian puppet and not their own country.

losers.... if this was a dem, you'd be demanding their ouster, lying psychotic.

Why do you not utter the same vitriol towards hilary and her now well known collusion with Ukraine?

 

[forkup]

Well, since this is still a free country, citizens are allowed to choose and support the candidate of their choice in an election. For a high paid attorney to write a check to his candidate or the party he supports is NOT a huge hill of beans. It is called freedom. Your people have no right to be using that as a reason for future employment in any capacity, including as investigators. Professionals actually don't base their findings on their own personal opinions. They go by the laws or rules of that field. In this case, the investigators know the rules and the laws backward and forward, and I have every confidence that they will apply those parameters to this investigation.
In other words, this argument is making you all look like a bunch of unprofessional, uneducated, biased liars trying desperately to squirm out of an investigation that you concurrently vow has no "there" there. If that's true, you've got nothing to worry about, so stop talking like a cheerleader for a dictator and let them reach the conclusion that your man is innocent.

If this was still a free country you sniveling Rats would accept the outcome of a fair election instead of trying to subvert the new administration for petty revenge. Mueller and his pack of jackals are about to get the bum's rush....another FAIL on the part of you dirtbags.

Tom. Russia's interference in the election is not seriously contested. Trump's campaign's intent to at least try to use the Russians as a weapon against Clinton isn't contested. Trump's definite pro-Russian stance isn't seriously contested. Your argument that the Russian investigation is revenge fails. So is your contention that the election was fair. In fact the fact that a hostile foreign power interfered makes it distinctly unfair. So does the fact that fair in the US entails that you can still lose despite the fact that you get over 2 million votes more than your rival.

Please tell us what Russia did to change the outcome of The Election.
And please provide verifiable proof that we can examine.

Sure. They hacked the DNC and delivered those hacks to Assange.Joint Statement from the Department Of Homeland Security and Office of the Director of National Intelligence on Election Security | Homeland Security Joint DHS, ODNI, FBI Statement on Russian Malicious Cyber Activity — FBI
They also had trolls target key states with fake news.The Russian troll army that helped swing the election for Trump
Woman who sued pro-Putin Russian 'troll factory' gets one rouble in damages
Oh and like I pointed out. The REPUBLICAN house and senate don't contest these facts neither does this guy.Trump counterterrorism adviser blames Russia for election hacks

 

[tinydancer]

Well, since this is still a free country, citizens are allowed to choose and support the candidate of their choice in an election. For a high paid attorney to write a check to his candidate or the party he supports is NOT a huge hill of beans. It is called freedom. Your people have no right to be using that as a reason for future employment in any capacity, including as investigators. Professionals actually don't base their findings on their own personal opinions. They go by the laws or rules of that field. In this case, the investigators know the rules and the laws backward and forward, and I have every confidence that they will apply those parameters to this investigation.
In other words, this argument is making you all look like a bunch of unprofessional, uneducated, biased liars trying desperately to squirm out of an investigation that you concurrently vow has no "there" there. If that's true, you've got nothing to worry about, so stop talking like a cheerleader for a dictator and let them reach the conclusion that your man is innocent.

If this was still a free country you sniveling Rats would accept the outcome of a fair election instead of trying to subvert the new administration for petty revenge. Mueller and his pack of jackals are about to get the bum's rush....another FAIL on the part of you dirtbags.

Tom. Russia's interference in the election is not seriously contested. Trump's campaign's intent to at least try to use the Russians as a weapon against Clinton isn't contested. Trump's definite pro-Russian stance isn't seriously contested. Your argument that the Russian investigation is revenge fails. So is your contention that the election was fair. In fact the fact that a hostile foreign power interfered makes it distinctly unfair. So does the fact that fair in the US entails that you can still lose despite the fact that you get over 2 million votes more than your rival.

Please tell us what Russia did to change the outcome of The Election.
And please provide verifiable proof that we can examine.

Sure. They hacked the DNC and delivered those hacks to Assange.Joint Statement from the Department Of Homeland Security and Office of the Director of National Intelligence on Election Security | Homeland Security Joint DHS, ODNI, FBI Statement on Russian Malicious Cyber Activity — FBI
They also had trolls target key states with fake news.The Russian troll army that helped swing the election for Trump
Woman who sued pro-Putin Russian 'troll factory' gets one rouble in damages
Oh and like I pointed out. The REPUBLICAN house and senate don't contest these facts neither does this guy.Trump counterterrorism adviser blames Russia for election hacks

And when did those agencies examine the DNC server? I'll be waiting.

You have to be kidding that fake news was only Russian? Put down the freaking bong. Any one of us can slam the shit out of you with listings of all the fake news the left spewed about Trump and his campaign.

And continue to publish fake news. That boat won't float. That's a freaking joke to blame fake news on Hillary losing.