Watch: The attack on Temple Mount caught on video

[Lipush]

In the first scene, the terrorists come from The Temple Mount, attacking the guards from behind, make it impossible for them to defend themselves.



In this second scene, you can clearly see one of the attackers rising up, in attempt to take the borderguards by surprise, tries running when noticing he has no chance of escaping, then shut down.



Another video offering the sight and hearing of the gun battle.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Could we keep all posts on the same subject on one thread?

Why start another thread about the same issue? Administration will only move it to the other one.

 

[aris2chat]

mount is closed till sunday

 

[aris2chat]

police killed were Druze

 

[IsaacNewton]

Reminds one of Dylan Roof, thank god they weren't as successful. How cowardly to ambush people from behind. It is what gang members do because they are too scared to face someone but want to feel tough.

 

[Tank]

Reminds one of Dylan Roof, thank god they weren't as successful.

Too bad these Muslim attacks are everyday and all over the world

 

[louie888]

IS THIS THE ONE WHERE THEY CHASED THEM OVER THERE PRIOR TO EXECUTING THEM?

THE SAME CRAP YOU ALREADY POSTED?

 

[louie888]

In the first scene, the terrorists come from The Temple Mount, attacking the guards from behind, make it impossible for them to defend themselves.



In this second scene, you can clearly see one of the attackers rising up, in attempt to take the borderguards by surprise, tries running when noticing he has no chance of escaping, then shut down.



Another video offering the sight and hearing of the gun battle.

And damn, that doesn't look completely completely staged to you?

 

[aris2chat]

 

[fanger]

why are you calling an attack on armed soldiers of occupation a "terrorist" attack ?

 

[Hossfly]

why are you calling an attack on armed soldiers of occupation a "terrorist" attack ?

They goddamned sure weren't using military tactics, hiding in a church and if the soldiers hadn't been there they would have shot civilians.

 

[montelatici]

why are you calling an attack on armed soldiers of occupation a "terrorist" attack ?

They goddamned sure weren't using military tactics, hiding in a church and if the soldiers hadn't been there they would have shot civilians.

You are a nutter. They attacked occupation militia. Traitorous occupation militia at that. The French Resistance did their best work against the French Milice (French police/militia that sided with the Germans) in Nazi Occupied France.

 

[Hossfly]

why are you calling an attack on armed soldiers of occupation a "terrorist" attack ?

They goddamned sure weren't using military tactics, hiding in a church and if the soldiers hadn't been there they would have shot civilians.

You are a nutter. They attacked occupation militia. Traitorous occupation militia at that. The French Resistance did their best work against the French Milice (French police/militia that sided with the Germans) in Nazi Occupied France.

Bullshit. If they are not fighting a declared war, then it's murder and a war crime. The Nazis vs. France was a declared war. Check it out.

 

[Hossfly]

Originally posted by Hossfly
They goddamned sure weren't using military tactics, hiding in a church and if the soldiers hadn't been there they would have shot civilians.

LOL...

Palestinians are terrorists when they attack civilians and terrorists when they attack soldiers.

Attacking the IDF is not enough.

They have to do it, wearing military uniforms, driving M1 Abrams and flying F-16's.

Damned if you do...

Another freaking war college professor spouts off.

 

[Lipush]

why are you calling an attack on armed soldiers of occupation a "terrorist" attack ?

For me, any attack on Israelis, because of their citizenship or loyalty, is terrorism.

And in that case, a coward terrorist attack.

One miserables and cowards attack their targets when he or she is with their back to them. Since they're cowards, they wouldn't have come from the front, knowing what the result will be.

Those are the people who the PA sees as "heroes". Laughable.

 

[Lipush]

Originally posted by Hossfly
They goddamned sure weren't using military tactics, hiding in a church and if the soldiers hadn't been there they would have shot civilians.

LOL...

Palestinians are terrorists when they attack civilians and terrorists when they attack soldiers.

Attacking the IDF is not enough.

They have to do it, wearing military uniforms, driving M1 Abrams and flying F-16's.

Damned if you do...

They don't. They come from behind, attacking when their victimes are with their backs at them.

What's wrong? not brave enough to come face to face with a cop?

Didn't think so.

 

[Lipush]

why are you calling an attack on armed soldiers of occupation a "terrorist" attack ?

Just so you know, borderguards are cops, they're police and their mission is not to confront the Palestinians if there is no need to. They protect the border and keep order. Those who come into Gaza to physically fight those Hamas psychos are IDF. The victims were police wing, not IDF.

Big difference.

 

[aris2chat]

Israeli police in Jerusalem, the capital of Israel, attacked from behind by palestinians coming from prayers.....

How is that not terrorism?

 

[Lipush]

Because it's totally normal for people, to praise God and then slaying his doings.

Don't you do that all the time?

 

[aris2chat]

Because it's totally normal for people, to praise God and then slaying his doings.

Don't you do that all the time?

shouting الله أكبر

Remind me where the peace is