Washington Post Bans 'Redskins' From Editorials

Lakhota

Diamond Member
Jul 14, 2011
158,171
72,855
2,330
Native America
n-WASHINGTON-REDSKINS-large570.jpg


WASHINGTON (AP) — The Washington Post says it will stop calling Washington's football team the "Redskins" on its editorial page.

The paper's editorial board announced Friday that it will refrain from using the term that it says "unquestionably offends not only many Native Americans but many other Americans, too."

The board noted that it has been speaking out against the Redskins name since 1992. Redskins spokesman Tony Wyllie said the announcement was therefore "no surprise" to the team.

Several major newspapers have stopped using the name altogether.

Redskins owner Dan Snyder has vowed never to change the name, saying it honors Native Americans.

Washington Post Bans Redskins From Editorials

Most famously of all, Marshall was the last owner to accept a black player—fully 15 years after the ban was lifted. And his team drafted an African-American then (in 1961) only because it was forced to by the government—the then-new stadium that we call RFK Stadium today was built on Department of Interior land, which permitted the Kennedy administration to order the lessee (the team) to adhere to federal nondiscrimination policies. In other words, Marshall wasn’t merely a standard-issue racist of the time, like H.L. Mencken or countless others. He was diseased. He seethed with hatred of nonwhite people. And “Redskins” is his handiwork. Because “Braves” wasn’t quite descriptive enough.

The Racist Redskins - The Daily Beast

Progress is slow - but it's still progress. The man who named the Washington Redskins team, George Preston Marshall, was a diseased racist. His racist legacy should die.
 
Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins,Redskins, Redskins
Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins,Redskins, Redskins
Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins,Redskins, Redskins
Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins,Redskins, Redskins
Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins,Redskins, Redskins
Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins,Redskins, Redskins
Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins,Redskins, Redskins
Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins,Redskins, Redskins
Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins,Redskins, Redskins
Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins,Redskins, Redskins
 
n-WASHINGTON-REDSKINS-large570.jpg


WASHINGTON (AP) — The Washington Post says it will stop calling Washington's football team the "Redskins" on its editorial page.

The paper's editorial board announced Friday that it will refrain from using the term that it says "unquestionably offends not only many Native Americans but many other Americans, too."

The board noted that it has been speaking out against the Redskins name since 1992. Redskins spokesman Tony Wyllie said the announcement was therefore "no surprise" to the team.

Several major newspapers have stopped using the name altogether.

Redskins owner Dan Snyder has vowed never to change the name, saying it honors Native Americans.

Washington Post Bans Redskins From Editorials

Most famously of all, Marshall was the last owner to accept a black player—fully 15 years after the ban was lifted. And his team drafted an African-American then (in 1961) only because it was forced to by the government—the then-new stadium that we call RFK Stadium today was built on Department of Interior land, which permitted the Kennedy administration to order the lessee (the team) to adhere to federal nondiscrimination policies. In other words, Marshall wasn’t merely a standard-issue racist of the time, like H.L. Mencken or countless others. He was diseased. He seethed with hatred of nonwhite people. And “Redskins” is his handiwork. Because “Braves” wasn’t quite descriptive enough.

The Racist Redskins - The Daily Beast

Progress is slow - but it's still progress. The man who named the Washington Redskins team, George Preston Marshall, was a diseased racist. His racist legacy should die.

It's their newspaper, they can do what they want. I hope the Redskins respond by denying them access to the team
 
Snyder should ban all press passes to current and former Post writers.

Get the point people..... The name is not going to change. There is no threat you can make which will force Snyder to change the name.
 
n-WASHINGTON-REDSKINS-large570.jpg


WASHINGTON (AP) — The Washington Post says it will stop calling Washington's football team the "Redskins" on its editorial page.

The paper's editorial board announced Friday that it will refrain from using the term that it says "unquestionably offends not only many Native Americans but many other Americans, too."

The board noted that it has been speaking out against the Redskins name since 1992. Redskins spokesman Tony Wyllie said the announcement was therefore "no surprise" to the team.

Several major newspapers have stopped using the name altogether.

Redskins owner Dan Snyder has vowed never to change the name, saying it honors Native Americans.

Washington Post Bans Redskins From Editorials

Most famously of all, Marshall was the last owner to accept a black player—fully 15 years after the ban was lifted. And his team drafted an African-American then (in 1961) only because it was forced to by the government—the then-new stadium that we call RFK Stadium today was built on Department of Interior land, which permitted the Kennedy administration to order the lessee (the team) to adhere to federal nondiscrimination policies. In other words, Marshall wasn’t merely a standard-issue racist of the time, like H.L. Mencken or countless others. He was diseased. He seethed with hatred of nonwhite people. And “Redskins” is his handiwork. Because “Braves” wasn’t quite descriptive enough.

The Racist Redskins - The Daily Beast

Progress is slow - but it's still progress. The man who named the Washington Redskins team, George Preston Marshall, was a diseased racist. His racist legacy should die.

It's their newspaper, they can do what they want. I hope the Redskins respond by denying them access to the team
That's a ridiculous thing to 'hope.'

Indeed, the right's response to this non-issue has been overall ridiculous and inane.
 
Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins,Redskins, Redskins
Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins,Redskins, Redskins
Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins,Redskins, Redskins
Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins,Redskins, Redskins
Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins,Redskins, Redskins
Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins,Redskins, Redskins
Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins,Redskins, Redskins
Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins,Redskins, Redskins
Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins,Redskins, Redskins
Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins,Redskins, Redskins
Childish and inane.
 
n-WASHINGTON-REDSKINS-large570.jpg


WASHINGTON (AP) — The Washington Post says it will stop calling Washington's football team the "Redskins" on its editorial page.

The paper's editorial board announced Friday that it will refrain from using the term that it says "unquestionably offends not only many Native Americans but many other Americans, too."

The board noted that it has been speaking out against the Redskins name since 1992. Redskins spokesman Tony Wyllie said the announcement was therefore "no surprise" to the team.

Several major newspapers have stopped using the name altogether.

Redskins owner Dan Snyder has vowed never to change the name, saying it honors Native Americans.

Washington Post Bans Redskins From Editorials

Most famously of all, Marshall was the last owner to accept a black player—fully 15 years after the ban was lifted. And his team drafted an African-American then (in 1961) only because it was forced to by the government—the then-new stadium that we call RFK Stadium today was built on Department of Interior land, which permitted the Kennedy administration to order the lessee (the team) to adhere to federal nondiscrimination policies. In other words, Marshall wasn’t merely a standard-issue racist of the time, like H.L. Mencken or countless others. He was diseased. He seethed with hatred of nonwhite people. And “Redskins” is his handiwork. Because “Braves” wasn’t quite descriptive enough.

The Racist Redskins - The Daily Beast

Progress is slow - but it's still progress. The man who named the Washington Redskins team, George Preston Marshall, was a diseased racist. His racist legacy should die.

It's their newspaper, they can do what they want. I hope the Redskins respond by denying them access to the team
That's a ridiculous thing to 'hope.'

Indeed, the right's response to this non-issue has been overall ridiculous and inane.

It is no such thing, and PS I'm not "on the right" such childish labels.

You're correct. This is a non issue that "the left" is trying to turn into one. It's high time those who the left is constantly trying to tell what they must they do with their own property start telling the left to shove it.

Losing access to the Redskins team would certainly hurt the Post far worse than not being called the Redskins in editorial pieces would hurt the Redskins
 
Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins,Redskins, Redskins
Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins,Redskins, Redskins
Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins,Redskins, Redskins
Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins,Redskins, Redskins
Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins,Redskins, Redskins
Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins,Redskins, Redskins
Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins,Redskins, Redskins
Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins,Redskins, Redskins
Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins,Redskins, Redskins
Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins, Redskins,Redskins, Redskins
Childish and inane.
No more so than a newspaper refusing to us the name of sports team a newspaper which highly doubt has a single American Indian on it's payroll.
 


Yep, reminds me a few years back when the NCAA had a bunch of people crying that Florida State needed to change their nickname because it offended local tribes, and it turns out the local Native Americans SUPPORT the Florida State Seminoles and like being associated with them. LOL
 
Conservatives and their myth of 'political correctness.'

Not to mention the hypocrisy of the right, where private businesses should be allowed to 'do what they want' except when private businesses do something conservatives don't like.
 
Conservatives and their myth of 'political correctness.'

Not to mention the hypocrisy of the right, where private businesses should be allowed to 'do what they want' except when private businesses do something conservatives don't like.

Can you point me to "the right" saying in this thread that the Post should not do this? we'll laugh at them together
 
Conservatives and their myth of 'political correctness.'

Not to mention the hypocrisy of the right, where private businesses should be allowed to 'do what they want' except when private businesses do something conservatives don't like.

So true. Then the NaziCons whine like babies.
 
Conservatives and their myth of 'political correctness.'

Not to mention the hypocrisy of the right, where private businesses should be allowed to 'do what they want' except when private businesses do something conservatives don't like.

So true. Then the NaziCons whine like babies.


Link to anyone whining about the Post doing this?
 
Conservatives and their myth of 'political correctness.'

Not to mention the hypocrisy of the right, where private businesses should be allowed to 'do what they want' except when private businesses do something conservatives don't like.

So true. Then the NaziCons whine like babies.


Link to anyone whining about the Post doing this?

I know you're a dumbass, but I believe C_Clayton_Jones was making a general statement. Try to keep up.
 

Forum List

Back
Top