Was Flynn entrapped?

[Skylar]

The judge is going to throw out the charges, so there won't be any jail time, fool.

Says the soul so wildly ignorant about the law that he insisted that miranda rights have to be read to people who aren't in custody.

Yeah, your command of the topic really doesn't amount to much.

Why don't you bother these morons who believe a plea agreement constitutes valid evidence of something?

This idiot seems to have latched on the phrase "plea agreement" as if that means something in this context. That is an agreement between the accused and the prosecutor. The Court can be advised of it but his TESTIMONY is all the court is really concerned about. Testimony like "Yes your honor I am guilty and this is why and what I did"

Oh, Brit knows nothing. And he's proud of it. The thing to remember is that to conservatives, the law is whatever they FEEL it is. They don't actually care what the real law says, or how plea agreements work, or even what the Supreme Court rules.

They only care about how they FEEL the law should be. Which is what Brit is arguing.

Alas, the court's don't give a fiddler's fuck what some online hack FEELS about the law. Courts abide the actual law, the actual court rulings.

And in the actual plea agreement......Flynn accepted the Statement of Offense and signed his name and stipulates to its accuracy under the penalty of perjury.

Which they don't know.....because they refuse to look at the plea agreement. And then laughably argue that if they won't look at the agreement, then it doesn't have any evidence.

You can't fix stupid.

It's meaningless. the minute he's sentenced, the plea agreement is null and void.

Says you, citing your imagination.

Again, you don't know a thing about the law. You keep citing your imagination.....as if it has some relevance. You keep inventing 'requirements' of the federal authorities that simply don't exist. And the pseudo-legal gibberish you make up has no relevance in any court of law.

Back in reality, Flynn stipulated to the accuracy of the Statement of Offense under penalty of perjury.

 

[Skylar]

Says the soul so wildly ignorant about the law that he insisted that miranda rights have to be read to people who aren't in custody.

Yeah, your command of the topic really doesn't amount to much.

Why don't you bother these morons who believe a plea agreement constitutes valid evidence of something?

Its a sworn statement of Flynn's guilt. Again, take a look for yourself. Flynn admits to committing crimes:

Michael Flynn Plea Agreement Documents

Jump right to the point titled 'Defendant's Acceptance'. And pay special attention to Michael Flynn's signature.

Remember....and this point is fundemental, Brit: you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

It's what What Flynn agreed to with a gun held to his head. It is evidence of nothing.

Says you, citing your imagination. And the useless pseudo-legal idiocy that you tell yourself has no relevance to the actual law, the actual plea deal.

In the actual plea deal, Flynn stipulatesthat the Statement of Offense was accurate *under penalty of perjury*.

Its evidence in any court of law. That you pretend otherwise is meaningless. As you're nobody.

ROFL! That's why Mueller is a criminal. He forced Cohen to perjure himself. He should go to prison for that alone.

Mueller's a criminal....says you, citing your imagination. Mueller forced Cohen to perjure himself......says you, citing your imagination.

At every turn you just make shit up, backed by nothing. All while ignoring sworn testimony and plea agreements in which the defendant stipulates to the accuracy of the Statement of Offense under penalty of perjury.

Neither your imagination nor your willful ignorance have any relevance. As again.....you're nobody.

 

[Skylar]

Is this really it? Just you poor, hapless souls babbling incoherently about a topic you know nothing about and inventing pseudo-legal gibberish from your imaginations?

If so....that was easy.

 

[McRocket]

I highly doubt he was entrapped.

But if he was, that means that Trump is so useless as POTUS that he chose such a moronic/useless National Security Advisor who gets himself 'entrapped' in the first few weeks he even has the job.

It also makes one assume that Trump could not pick a good NSA if his life depended on it.

So entrapped or not - neither way paints a good picture for Trump.


Besides, I have faith that those in the upper echelons of the judicial department (such as the judge at Flynn's sentencing) are smart/wise enough to smell out an 'entrapment' a hundred miles away.

 

[Skylar]

I highly doubt he was entrapped.

But if he was, that means that Trump is so useless as POTUS that he chose such a moronic/useless National Security Advisor that gets himself 'entrapped' in the first few weeks he even has the job.

It also makes one assume that Trump could not pick a good NSA if his life depended on it.

So entrapped or not - neither way paints a good picture for Trump.

C'mon....that train has already left the building. As per Trump, the 'best people' are 'lazy as hell' and 'dumb as a rock'. The best people are 'rats', and 'weak people'. The best people are theives, grifters, perjurers, liars, tax cheats, frauds, and even Conspirators against the United States.

These are the people that Trump surrounds himself with. These are the product of his judgment.

 

[Lesh]

It's meaningless. the minute he's sentenced, the plea agreement is null and void. If he testifies in another trial, he will be charged with perjury if he repeats the horseshit in his plea agreement. It's a lie.

WTF are you babbling about "counselor"?

Of course the agreement is meaningless once the accused is sentenced. However Prosecutors know that as well and usually leave other charges on the table in case the asshole tries to get cute.

Not to mention the fact that they usually only GO to sentencing once they have as much as they are going to get

You seem to be foaming at the mouth lately. Might I suggest you get some help?

 

[bripat9643]

Says the soul so wildly ignorant about the law that he insisted that miranda rights have to be read to people who aren't in custody.

Yeah, your command of the topic really doesn't amount to much.

Why don't you bother these morons who believe a plea agreement constitutes valid evidence of something?

This idiot seems to have latched on the phrase "plea agreement" as if that means something in this context. That is an agreement between the accused and the prosecutor. The Court can be advised of it but his TESTIMONY is all the court is really concerned about. Testimony like "Yes your honor I am guilty and this is why and what I did"

Oh, Brit knows nothing. And he's proud of it. The thing to remember is that to conservatives, the law is whatever they FEEL it is. They don't actually care what the real law says, or how plea agreements work, or even what the Supreme Court rules.

They only care about how they FEEL the law should be. Which is what Brit is arguing.

Alas, the court's don't give a fiddler's fuck what some online hack FEELS about the law. Courts abide the actual law, the actual court rulings.

And in the actual plea agreement......Flynn accepted the Statement of Offense and signed his name and stipulates to its accuracy under the penalty of perjury.

Which they don't know.....because they refuse to look at the plea agreement. And then laughably argue that if they won't look at the agreement, then it doesn't have any evidence.

You can't fix stupid.

It's meaningless. the minute he's sentenced, the plea agreement is null and void.

Says you, citing your imagination.

Again, you don't know a thing about the law. You keep citing your imagination.....as if it has some relevance. You keep inventing 'requirements' of the federal authorities that simply don't exist. And the pseudo-legal gibberish you make up has no relevance in any court of law.

Back in reality, Flynn stipulated to the accuracy of the Statement of Offense under penalty of perjury.

Of course, you can't prove otherwise. You're trying hard to defend the criminality of your scumbag hero, but it isn't going to work. The FBI entrapped Flynn, Mueller wiped Peter Strzok's phone clean the day he was taken off the case, and Mueller is extorting false confessions from his victims. There has never been this kind of corruption in the US government before now, but you're perfectly OK with it.

 

[bripat9643]

It's meaningless. the minute he's sentenced, the plea agreement is null and void. If he testifies in another trial, he will be charged with perjury if he repeats the horseshit in his plea agreement. It's a lie.

WTF are you babbling about "counselor"?

Of course the agreement is meaningless once the accused is sentenced. However Prosecutors know that as well and usually leave other charges on the table in case the asshole tries to get cute.

Not to mention the fact that they usually only GO to sentencing once they have as much as they are going to get

You seem to be foaming at the mouth lately. Might I suggest you get some help?

Ah, yes, Mueller's got this massive pile of secret evidence he's hiding. That's the secret hope of all the forum snowflakes.

 

[bripat9643]

Why don't you bother these morons who believe a plea agreement constitutes valid evidence of something?

Its a sworn statement of Flynn's guilt. Again, take a look for yourself. Flynn admits to committing crimes:

Michael Flynn Plea Agreement Documents

Jump right to the point titled 'Defendant's Acceptance'. And pay special attention to Michael Flynn's signature.

Remember....and this point is fundemental, Brit: you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

It's what What Flynn agreed to with a gun held to his head. It is evidence of nothing.

Says you, citing your imagination. And the useless pseudo-legal idiocy that you tell yourself has no relevance to the actual law, the actual plea deal.

In the actual plea deal, Flynn stipulatesthat the Statement of Offense was accurate *under penalty of perjury*.

Its evidence in any court of law. That you pretend otherwise is meaningless. As you're nobody.

ROFL! That's why Mueller is a criminal. He forced Cohen to perjure himself. He should go to prison for that alone.

Mueller's a criminal....says you, citing your imagination. Mueller forced Cohen to perjure himself......says you, citing your imagination.

At every turn you just make shit up, backed by nothing. All while ignoring sworn testimony and plea agreements in which the defendant stipulates to the accuracy of the Statement of Offense under penalty of perjury.

Neither your imagination nor your willful ignorance have any relevance. As again.....you're nobody.

I make up nothing. I report the published facts.

 

[bripat9643]

Why don't you bother these morons who believe a plea agreement constitutes valid evidence of something?

Its a sworn statement of Flynn's guilt. Again, take a look for yourself. Flynn admits to committing crimes:

Michael Flynn Plea Agreement Documents

Jump right to the point titled 'Defendant's Acceptance'. And pay special attention to Michael Flynn's signature.

Remember....and this point is fundemental, Brit: you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

It's what What Flynn agreed to with a gun held to his head. It is evidence of nothing.

Says you, citing your imagination. And the useless pseudo-legal idiocy that you tell yourself has no relevance to the actual law, the actual plea deal.

In the actual plea deal, Flynn stipulatesthat the Statement of Offense was accurate *under penalty of perjury*.

Its evidence in any court of law. That you pretend otherwise is meaningless. As you're nobody.

ROFL! That's why Mueller is a criminal. He forced Cohen to perjure himself. He should go to prison for that alone.

Mueller's a criminal....says you, citing your imagination. Mueller forced Cohen to perjure himself......says you, citing your imagination.

At every turn you just make shit up, backed by nothing. All while ignoring sworn testimony and plea agreements in which the defendant stipulates to the accuracy of the Statement of Offense under penalty of perjury.

Neither your imagination nor your willful ignorance have any relevance. As again.....you're nobody.

Almost everything you post is backed by nothing, dumbass. You were right about one thing. Other than that, you got bupkiss. "Sworn testimony" made with a gun to your head isn't worth jack shit.

 

[Skylar]

Its a sworn statement of Flynn's guilt. Again, take a look for yourself. Flynn admits to committing crimes:

Michael Flynn Plea Agreement Documents

Jump right to the point titled 'Defendant's Acceptance'. And pay special attention to Michael Flynn's signature.

Remember....and this point is fundemental, Brit: you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

It's what What Flynn agreed to with a gun held to his head. It is evidence of nothing.

Says you, citing your imagination. And the useless pseudo-legal idiocy that you tell yourself has no relevance to the actual law, the actual plea deal.

In the actual plea deal, Flynn stipulatesthat the Statement of Offense was accurate *under penalty of perjury*.

Its evidence in any court of law. That you pretend otherwise is meaningless. As you're nobody.

ROFL! That's why Mueller is a criminal. He forced Cohen to perjure himself. He should go to prison for that alone.

Mueller's a criminal....says you, citing your imagination. Mueller forced Cohen to perjure himself......says you, citing your imagination.

At every turn you just make shit up, backed by nothing. All while ignoring sworn testimony and plea agreements in which the defendant stipulates to the accuracy of the Statement of Offense under penalty of perjury.

Neither your imagination nor your willful ignorance have any relevance. As again.....you're nobody.

I make up nothing. I report the published facts.

Oh, you make up shit constantly. Your imaginary version of the Miranda warnings, your blithering idiocy about Cohen never having been sworn in, your insistence that Flynn stipulating to the accuracy of the Statement of Offense under penalty of perjury isn't evidence, your made up nonsense that Mueller forced Cohen to perjure himself....

....all imaginary. All backed by nothing. All hopelessly irrelevant to any court proceeding.

Is that really it guys? Just you poor souls playing make believe?

 

[Skylar]

Its a sworn statement of Flynn's guilt. Again, take a look for yourself. Flynn admits to committing crimes:

Michael Flynn Plea Agreement Documents

Jump right to the point titled 'Defendant's Acceptance'. And pay special attention to Michael Flynn's signature.

Remember....and this point is fundemental, Brit: you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

It's what What Flynn agreed to with a gun held to his head. It is evidence of nothing.

Says you, citing your imagination. And the useless pseudo-legal idiocy that you tell yourself has no relevance to the actual law, the actual plea deal.

In the actual plea deal, Flynn stipulatesthat the Statement of Offense was accurate *under penalty of perjury*.

Its evidence in any court of law. That you pretend otherwise is meaningless. As you're nobody.

ROFL! That's why Mueller is a criminal. He forced Cohen to perjure himself. He should go to prison for that alone.

Mueller's a criminal....says you, citing your imagination. Mueller forced Cohen to perjure himself......says you, citing your imagination.

At every turn you just make shit up, backed by nothing. All while ignoring sworn testimony and plea agreements in which the defendant stipulates to the accuracy of the Statement of Offense under penalty of perjury.

Neither your imagination nor your willful ignorance have any relevance. As again.....you're nobody.

Almost everything you post is backed by nothing, dumbass.

Laughing....except the actual Miranda v. Arizona ruling which states that miranda warnings are required only when someone is in custody.

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)

Which you ignore.

And of course, the actual Flynn plea agreement where the Statement of Offenses lays out the exact lies that Flynn told to federal investigators and the exact violations of the law those lies created. With Flynn stipulating in his "Defendant's Acceptance" that the Statement of Offenses is accurate under penalty of perjury.

Michael Flynn Plea Agreement Documents

Which you refuse to read.

See, that's the difference between us. I'm citing the law and the actual plea agreements. You're just citing yourself.

You were right about one thing. Other than that, you got bupkiss. "Sworn testimony" made with a gun to your head isn't worth jack shit.

The 'gun to your head' is imaginary. Again, you keep making shit up, backed by nothing. While ignoring the actual evidence. Like.....Flynn's plea agreement. You still refuse to even look at it. And then laughably inisist that if you won't look at it, its not evidence.

Good luck with that.

 

[deanrd]

It's what What Flynn agreed to with a gun held to his head. It is evidence of nothing.

Says you, citing your imagination. And the useless pseudo-legal idiocy that you tell yourself has no relevance to the actual law, the actual plea deal.

In the actual plea deal, Flynn stipulatesthat the Statement of Offense was accurate *under penalty of perjury*.

Its evidence in any court of law. That you pretend otherwise is meaningless. As you're nobody.

ROFL! That's why Mueller is a criminal. He forced Cohen to perjure himself. He should go to prison for that alone.

Mueller's a criminal....says you, citing your imagination. Mueller forced Cohen to perjure himself......says you, citing your imagination.

At every turn you just make shit up, backed by nothing. All while ignoring sworn testimony and plea agreements in which the defendant stipulates to the accuracy of the Statement of Offense under penalty of perjury.

Neither your imagination nor your willful ignorance have any relevance. As again.....you're nobody.

Almost everything you post is backed by nothing, dumbass.

Laughing....except the actual Miranda v. Arizona ruling which states that miranda warnings are required only when someone is in custody.

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)

Which you ignore.

And of course, the actual Flynn plea agreement where the Statement of Offenses lays out the exact lies that Flynn told to federal investigators and the exact violations of the law those lies created. With Flynn stipulating in his "Defendant's Acceptance" that the Statement of Offenses is accurate under penalty of perjury.

Michael Flynn Plea Agreement Documents

Which you refuse to read.

See, that's the difference between us. I'm citing the law and the actual plea agreements. You're just citing yourself.

You were right about one thing. Other than that, you got bupkiss. "Sworn testimony" made with a gun to your head isn't worth jack shit.

The 'gun to your head' is imaginary. Again, you keep making shit up, backed by nothing. While ignoring the actual evidence. Like.....Flynn's plea agreement. You still refuse to even look at it. And then laughably inisist that if you won't look at it, its not evidence.

Good luck with that.

Breaking news, they’re releasing the memo that outlines Flynns crimes.

 

[bripat9643]

It's what What Flynn agreed to with a gun held to his head. It is evidence of nothing.

Says you, citing your imagination. And the useless pseudo-legal idiocy that you tell yourself has no relevance to the actual law, the actual plea deal.

In the actual plea deal, Flynn stipulatesthat the Statement of Offense was accurate *under penalty of perjury*.

Its evidence in any court of law. That you pretend otherwise is meaningless. As you're nobody.

ROFL! That's why Mueller is a criminal. He forced Cohen to perjure himself. He should go to prison for that alone.

Mueller's a criminal....says you, citing your imagination. Mueller forced Cohen to perjure himself......says you, citing your imagination.

At every turn you just make shit up, backed by nothing. All while ignoring sworn testimony and plea agreements in which the defendant stipulates to the accuracy of the Statement of Offense under penalty of perjury.

Neither your imagination nor your willful ignorance have any relevance. As again.....you're nobody.

I make up nothing. I report the published facts.

Oh, you make up shit constantly. Your imaginary version of the Miranda warnings, your blithering idiocy about Cohen never having been sworn in, your insistence that Flynn stipulating to the accuracy of the Statement of Offense under penalty of perjury isn't evidence, your made up nonsense that Mueller forced Cohen to perjure himself....

....all imaginary. All backed by nothing. All hopelessly irrelevant to any court proceeding.

Is that really it guys? Just you poor souls playing make believe?

It's not imaginary, you fat homosexual. Mueller was threatening Cohen with spending his entire life in prison if he didn't agree to the plea. Pleas are agreements made under threat of force. They aren't facts. Only a servile bootlicker like you fails to acknowledge that.

I love they way you lay low for months, and then pop out of the wood work to harass me if you manage to catch a single thing I say that isn't 100% correct. It's obvious that you're stalking me. You're mentally unbalanced. You are so engaged about all the times I hammered your stupid ass that your only goal in life is getting even.

Your "Russian collusion" scam and the inquisitor who is prosecuting it are going down, and you just can't stand it.

 

[Skylar]

Says you, citing your imagination. And the useless pseudo-legal idiocy that you tell yourself has no relevance to the actual law, the actual plea deal.

In the actual plea deal, Flynn stipulatesthat the Statement of Offense was accurate *under penalty of perjury*.

Its evidence in any court of law. That you pretend otherwise is meaningless. As you're nobody.

ROFL! That's why Mueller is a criminal. He forced Cohen to perjure himself. He should go to prison for that alone.

Mueller's a criminal....says you, citing your imagination. Mueller forced Cohen to perjure himself......says you, citing your imagination.

At every turn you just make shit up, backed by nothing. All while ignoring sworn testimony and plea agreements in which the defendant stipulates to the accuracy of the Statement of Offense under penalty of perjury.

Neither your imagination nor your willful ignorance have any relevance. As again.....you're nobody.

Almost everything you post is backed by nothing, dumbass.

Laughing....except the actual Miranda v. Arizona ruling which states that miranda warnings are required only when someone is in custody.

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)

Which you ignore.

And of course, the actual Flynn plea agreement where the Statement of Offenses lays out the exact lies that Flynn told to federal investigators and the exact violations of the law those lies created. With Flynn stipulating in his "Defendant's Acceptance" that the Statement of Offenses is accurate under penalty of perjury.

Michael Flynn Plea Agreement Documents

Which you refuse to read.

See, that's the difference between us. I'm citing the law and the actual plea agreements. You're just citing yourself.

You were right about one thing. Other than that, you got bupkiss. "Sworn testimony" made with a gun to your head isn't worth jack shit.

The 'gun to your head' is imaginary. Again, you keep making shit up, backed by nothing. While ignoring the actual evidence. Like.....Flynn's plea agreement. You still refuse to even look at it. And then laughably inisist that if you won't look at it, its not evidence.

Good luck with that.

Breaking news, they’re releasing the memo that outlines Flynns crimes.

The plea agreement already does that. And takes 6 pages to do it.

 

[bripat9643]

It's what What Flynn agreed to with a gun held to his head. It is evidence of nothing.

Says you, citing your imagination. And the useless pseudo-legal idiocy that you tell yourself has no relevance to the actual law, the actual plea deal.

In the actual plea deal, Flynn stipulatesthat the Statement of Offense was accurate *under penalty of perjury*.

Its evidence in any court of law. That you pretend otherwise is meaningless. As you're nobody.

ROFL! That's why Mueller is a criminal. He forced Cohen to perjure himself. He should go to prison for that alone.

Mueller's a criminal....says you, citing your imagination. Mueller forced Cohen to perjure himself......says you, citing your imagination.

At every turn you just make shit up, backed by nothing. All while ignoring sworn testimony and plea agreements in which the defendant stipulates to the accuracy of the Statement of Offense under penalty of perjury.

Neither your imagination nor your willful ignorance have any relevance. As again.....you're nobody.

Almost everything you post is backed by nothing, dumbass.

Laughing....except the actual Miranda v. Arizona ruling which states that miranda warnings are required only when someone is in custody.

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)

Which you ignore.

And of course, the actual Flynn plea agreement where the Statement of Offenses lays out the exact lies that Flynn told to federal investigators and the exact violations of the law those lies created. With Flynn stipulating in his "Defendant's Acceptance" that the Statement of Offenses is accurate under penalty of perjury.

Michael Flynn Plea Agreement Documents

Which you refuse to read.

See, that's the difference between us. I'm citing the law and the actual plea agreements. You're just citing yourself.

You were right about one thing. Other than that, you got bupkiss. "Sworn testimony" made with a gun to your head isn't worth jack shit.

The 'gun to your head' is imaginary. Again, you keep making shit up, backed by nothing. While ignoring the actual evidence. Like.....Flynn's plea agreement. You still refuse to even look at it. And then laughably inisist that if you won't look at it, its not evidence.

Good luck with that.

Apparently I only have to endure the next 1000 times you post on that subject.

 

[Skylar]

Says you, citing your imagination. And the useless pseudo-legal idiocy that you tell yourself has no relevance to the actual law, the actual plea deal.

In the actual plea deal, Flynn stipulatesthat the Statement of Offense was accurate *under penalty of perjury*.

Its evidence in any court of law. That you pretend otherwise is meaningless. As you're nobody.

ROFL! That's why Mueller is a criminal. He forced Cohen to perjure himself. He should go to prison for that alone.

Mueller's a criminal....says you, citing your imagination. Mueller forced Cohen to perjure himself......says you, citing your imagination.

At every turn you just make shit up, backed by nothing. All while ignoring sworn testimony and plea agreements in which the defendant stipulates to the accuracy of the Statement of Offense under penalty of perjury.

Neither your imagination nor your willful ignorance have any relevance. As again.....you're nobody.

I make up nothing. I report the published facts.

Oh, you make up shit constantly. Your imaginary version of the Miranda warnings, your blithering idiocy about Cohen never having been sworn in, your insistence that Flynn stipulating to the accuracy of the Statement of Offense under penalty of perjury isn't evidence, your made up nonsense that Mueller forced Cohen to perjure himself....

....all imaginary. All backed by nothing. All hopelessly irrelevant to any court proceeding.

Is that really it guys? Just you poor souls playing make believe?

It's not imaginary, you fat homosexual.

Its all imaginary. You're literally offering us a story, backed by nothing. Who says that Mueller 'forced' Cohen to 'perjure' himself. You do. Citing your imagination.

Mueller doesn't. Cohen doesn't. Even Trump doesn't. Its just a silly imaginary story you made up and repeat to yourself over and over. But you have *nothing* to back it up.

You poor souls have reached the limits of the hapless, pseudo-legal nonsense you tell each other. And that limit is the actual court room, the actual convictions, the actual plea deals, the actual evidence.

It doesn't matter what stories you imagine, Brit. Again, you're nobody. Close your eyes all you'd like.....the world doesn't disappear.

Mueller was threatening Cohen with spending his entire life in prison if he didn't agree to the plea. Pleas are agreements made under threat of force. They aren't facts. Only a servile bootlicker like you fails to acknowledge that.

A confession is most definitely evidence. And we have both Flynn and Cohen admitting to committing very serious crimes.

You ignore them both and then play pretend, making up childish little stories backed by nothing but your imagination. And then sit, confused and dumbfounded, when neither the judges nor the prosecutors will abide your imagination.

Get used to that feeling.

 

[Skylar]

Says you, citing your imagination. And the useless pseudo-legal idiocy that you tell yourself has no relevance to the actual law, the actual plea deal.

In the actual plea deal, Flynn stipulatesthat the Statement of Offense was accurate *under penalty of perjury*.

Its evidence in any court of law. That you pretend otherwise is meaningless. As you're nobody.

ROFL! That's why Mueller is a criminal. He forced Cohen to perjure himself. He should go to prison for that alone.

Mueller's a criminal....says you, citing your imagination. Mueller forced Cohen to perjure himself......says you, citing your imagination.

At every turn you just make shit up, backed by nothing. All while ignoring sworn testimony and plea agreements in which the defendant stipulates to the accuracy of the Statement of Offense under penalty of perjury.

Neither your imagination nor your willful ignorance have any relevance. As again.....you're nobody.

Almost everything you post is backed by nothing, dumbass.

Laughing....except the actual Miranda v. Arizona ruling which states that miranda warnings are required only when someone is in custody.

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)

Which you ignore.

And of course, the actual Flynn plea agreement where the Statement of Offenses lays out the exact lies that Flynn told to federal investigators and the exact violations of the law those lies created. With Flynn stipulating in his "Defendant's Acceptance" that the Statement of Offenses is accurate under penalty of perjury.

Michael Flynn Plea Agreement Documents

Which you refuse to read.

See, that's the difference between us. I'm citing the law and the actual plea agreements. You're just citing yourself.

You were right about one thing. Other than that, you got bupkiss. "Sworn testimony" made with a gun to your head isn't worth jack shit.

The 'gun to your head' is imaginary. Again, you keep making shit up, backed by nothing. While ignoring the actual evidence. Like.....Flynn's plea agreement. You still refuse to even look at it. And then laughably inisist that if you won't look at it, its not evidence.

Good luck with that.

Apparently I only have to endure the next 1000 times you post on that subject.

As you've demonstrated repeatedly, you can just ignore the Miranda ruling and Flynn's plea agrement and make up whatever you'd like in the wasteland of your imagination.

But alas, your imaginary version of Miranda isn't what the courts follow. They follow the *actual* ruling. And your imaginary version of Flynn's plea agreement isn't what the court's follow. They follow the *actual* plea agreement.

The bug of your imagination keeps hitting the windshield of reality. And the collision isn't pretty.

 

[bripat9643]

ROFL! That's why Mueller is a criminal. He forced Cohen to perjure himself. He should go to prison for that alone.

Mueller's a criminal....says you, citing your imagination. Mueller forced Cohen to perjure himself......says you, citing your imagination.

At every turn you just make shit up, backed by nothing. All while ignoring sworn testimony and plea agreements in which the defendant stipulates to the accuracy of the Statement of Offense under penalty of perjury.

Neither your imagination nor your willful ignorance have any relevance. As again.....you're nobody.

I make up nothing. I report the published facts.

Oh, you make up shit constantly. Your imaginary version of the Miranda warnings, your blithering idiocy about Cohen never having been sworn in, your insistence that Flynn stipulating to the accuracy of the Statement of Offense under penalty of perjury isn't evidence, your made up nonsense that Mueller forced Cohen to perjure himself....

....all imaginary. All backed by nothing. All hopelessly irrelevant to any court proceeding.

Is that really it guys? Just you poor souls playing make believe?

It's not imaginary, you fat homosexual.

Its all imaginary. You're literally offering us a story, backed by nothing. Who says that Mueller 'forced' Cohen to 'perjure' himself. You do. Citing your imagination.

ROFL! Mueller admits it. The alternative was a long prison sentence. Please refrain from ever claiming you are capable of committing logic. Your claim that a plea of guilty is a plea of guilty was positively hysterical, and now your claim that Cohen plead guilty without any threats of coercion from Meuller a pegging the idiot meter.

Mueller doesn't. Cohen doesn't. Even Trump doesn't. Its just a silly imaginary story you made up and repeat to yourself over and over. But you have *nothing* to back it up.

You poor souls have reached the limits of the hapless, pseudo-legal nonsense you tell each other. And that limit is the actual court room, the actual convictions, the actual plea deals, the actual evidence.

Mueller doesn't what? You're babbling incoherently.

It doesn't matter what stories you imagine, Brit. Again, you're nobody. Close your eyes all you'd like.....the world doesn't disappear.

Mueller was threatening Cohen with spending his entire life in prison if he didn't agree to the plea. Pleas are agreements made under threat of force. They aren't facts. Only a servile bootlicker like you fails to acknowledge that.

A confession is most definitely evidence. And we have both Flynn and Cohen admitting to committing very serious crimes.

You ignore them both and then play pretend, making up childish little stories backed by nothing but your imagination. And then sit, confused and dumbfounded, when neither the judges nor the prosecutors will abide your imagination.

Get used to that feeling.

A confession is voluntary. A plea is not a confession. That's why they have a different word for it. Once again you're spouting pure nonsense but claiming to be the smart guy in the room. You're making up a story, moron - something you claim to loath.

 

[Lesh]

It's meaningless. the minute he's sentenced, the plea agreement is null and void. If he testifies in another trial, he will be charged with perjury if he repeats the horseshit in his plea agreement. It's a lie.

WTF are you babbling about "counselor"?

Of course the agreement is meaningless once the accused is sentenced. However Prosecutors know that as well and usually leave other charges on the table in case the asshole tries to get cute.

Not to mention the fact that they usually only GO to sentencing once they have as much as they are going to get

You seem to be foaming at the mouth lately. Might I suggest you get some help?

Ah, yes, Mueller's got this massive pile of secret evidence he's hiding. That's the secret hope of all the forum snowflakes.

There was no real secret about all those boxes of evidence being carried out of Cohen's office