Was Electing Obama a Major D Error?

william the wie

Gold Member
Nov 18, 2009
16,667
2,402
280
Could a white, Asian or Hispanic D with a comparable record and ideology have been elected even with the meltdown and running against the McCain/Palin ticket?

1) A non-black Commie Crook from Chicago could not have gotten the D nomination. The D superdelegates would have exercised their veto against any non-black McGovern jr. so the answer was no.

2) A moderate Asian or Hispanic D would not have energized the D base and McCain would have been a one term president and be followed by a D one term wonder.

Would option 2 be worse for the D bench than Obama was?
 
Obama's race was merely a means to a political end.

Democrats are trying to stir racial animosity and victim hood to motivate voter turnout.
 
Could a white, Asian or Hispanic D with a comparable record and ideology have been elected even with the meltdown and running against the McCain/Palin ticket?

1) A non-black Commie Crook from Chicago could not have gotten the D nomination. The D superdelegates would have exercised their veto against any non-black McGovern jr. so the answer was no.

2) A moderate Asian or Hispanic D would not have energized the D base and McCain would have been a one term president and be followed by a D one term wonder.

Would option 2 be worse for the D bench than Obama was?

Dims hate Asians, this goes back to FDR.

Don't believe me? Tell me, what famous actor in Hollywood is Asian that is not some stereotypical karate guy?

Dims are the most racially focused people on earth, more so than Hitler ever was. All they do is talk about wanting to get more brown immigrants and how white America is dying.
 
Electing Obama was a huge mistake, that's how we ended up with Trump...

It's all on the Democrats for their social experiment that went terribly wrong.

.
 
Bojangles was a huge mistake. The GOP’s warmongering collaborationist would have been a bigger mistake
McCain was a warmongerer? Lol

He had been to war college so he did know, at least theoretically, how to run a war. That can certainly sound like warmongering even when it manifestly is not. Telling the most probable costs in blood and treasure of achieving the declared political goals in the most graphic ways possible is the accepted way for members of the military to ask the politicians, "Do you really want to do this?"

Fools and idiots believe that only good wars with good outcomes can be found but except for unavoidable wars nothing resembling a good war can be shown to have ever been fought.
 

Forum List

Back
Top