Warren Commission was correct........Oswald acted alone

Evidence?

55 years and you have yet to provide a shred of evidence that Oswald did not act alone
"According to a 2015 Politico report, newly declassified documents show that CIA director, John A. McCone, hid evidence from the Warren commission, set up by Lyndon Johnson to investigate JFK's assassination. According to a once-secret report written in 2013 by the CIA's top in-house historian, David Robarge, the CIA admits McCone and other senior CIA officials withheld 'incendiary' information from the Warren Commission thereby perverting the course of justice."

Nothing more has to be provided to you to prove the entire Oswald narrative was an invention of J. Edgar Hoover (among others) who, in recently declassified memos (already cited) was urging underlings, the very day after Oswald was killed,
that the public must be made to believe he (Oswald) was the lone responsible party for the death of JFK.

Did you get that? Not that we must show the people evidence of FBI informant Lee Harvey Oswald and just how he shot the president all by himself with his antiquated and badly malfunctioning rifle....but we must make the people believe!

Nobody has to prove a thing to you. Instead it's you who must demonstrate why the Warren Commission itself should
be trusted by a single thinking US citizen given all we know about their criminal coverup and lies.
Umm...nice try

Which provides ZERO evidence that Oswald did not act alone
 
First of all the state failed to protect Oswald....then without the benefit of a trial(there could be no trial because he was dead) then they declared him guilty without any proof he did it....all they have is conjecture, guess work, and opinions.

All of the so called evidence can be looked at several different ways.

What is needed here....and really about all we can do here is to look at the logic of the whole thing............aka who benefited from the murder of JFK?

1. Lyndon Johnson.
2. The CIA
3. The mafia

What motive did Oswald have to kill Kennedy.....none.

Oh there are those who claim he just wanted to be famous....then why did he deny it? There are some who claim due to his childhood etc. he was a angry person wanting to strike out at authority....well--of course just another theory that can never be proved.

Now look at all the redacted material in the files that have been released.....understand there is still a huge,huge amount of material relating to the case that has not been released and probably never will be released.

When you look at the totality of this tragedy.....it is all guess work.

The fact remains he could have been a patsy...and to deny that is just not being real.

And..........do not forget a mafia hitman confessed to being the guy on the grassy knoll who took the kill shot. James Files............look at his interview....very credible.

Now some claim Oswald was very intelligent and some say not so....yet he managed to get into the marines and into a technical field, travelled to russia, got a job there, married the daughter of a Russian Colonel who was involved in the field of intelligence. etc.

The bottom line he definitely had enough intelligence to know if he shot Kennedy from a window in the building where he worked that he would be in a world of trouble....thus it makes no sense to think he would do it from his workplace.

Thus when he realized what had happened he put 2 and 2 together and realized someone had set him up. Thus his frantic and illogical movements after the killing...he was terrified ...did not know where to go or what to do....and in this state of mind he unintentionally attracted attention.

If he did it just for the glory ....then it make no sense for him to deny it in such a vehement manner.

Common sense alone dictates that the truth of this matter will probably never come out. To arrogantly claim that Oswald did it...no doubt about it....utter stupidity.
 
I have found that if I wrap my head in tin foil (shiny side out ) I can detect body doubles
You aren't countering or disproving my citation of the historical use of body doubles. You are just ignoring it hoping if you pretend it doesn't exist the fact will go away.

That's what weak fucking idiots do.


Yes the use of doubles in politics and especially in the field of intelligence is well known...churchill had a double, Eisenhower did also....along with many others.

10 Body Doubles And Impersonators Used Throughout History - Listverse
 
Last edited:
First of all the state failed to protect Oswald....then without the benefit of a trial(there could be no trial because he was dead) then they declared him guilty without any proof he did it....all they have is conjecture, guess work, and opinions.

All of the so called evidence can be looked at several different ways.

What is needed here....and really about all we can do here is to look at the logic of the whole thing............aka who benefited from the murder of JFK?

1. Lyndon Johnson.
2. The CIA
3. The mafia

What motive did Oswald have to kill Kennedy.....none.

Oh there are those who claim he just wanted to be famous....then why did he deny it? There are some who claim due to his childhood etc. he was a angry person wanting to strike out at authority....well--of course just another theory that can never be proved.

Now look at all the redacted material in the files that have been released.....understand there is still a huge,huge amount of material relating to the case that has not been released and probably never will be released.

When you look at the totality of this tragedy.....it is all guess work.

The fact remains he could have been a patsy...and to deny that is just not being real.

And..........do not forget a mafia hitman confessed to being the guy on the grassy knoll who took the kill shot. James Files............look at his interview....very credible.

Now some claim Oswald was very intelligent and some say not so....yet he managed to get into the marines and into a technical field, travelled to russia, got a job there, married the daughter of a Russian Colonel who was involved in the field of intelligence. etc.

The bottom line he definitely had enough intelligence to know if he shot Kennedy from a window in the building where he worked that he would be in a world of trouble....thus it makes no sense to think he would do it from his workplace.

Thus when he realized what had happened he put 2 and 2 together and realized someone had set him up. Thus his frantic and illogical movements after the killing...he was terrified ...did not know where to go or what to do....and in this state of mind he unintentionally attracted attention.

If he did it just for the glory ....then it make no sense for him to deny it in such a vehement manner.

Common sense alone dictates that the truth of this matter will probably never come out. To arrogantly claim that Oswald did it...no doubt about it....utter stupidity.
Same can be said for Timothy McVeigh

What was his motive for OKC if he just denied it later? Maybe they turn chicken once they have done the deed

Overwhelming evidence that Oswald did it and ZERO evidence he had assistance

If the CIA, Mafia or LBJ helped him.......why was his escape plan 23 cents in bus fare and why use a $19.95 bolt action rifle?
 
Sorry...you were doing OK for a while

But once you went Oswald Body Double on us, you entered the realm of batshit crazy
You've yet to demonstrate how. You know nothing about all the reports of Lee Harvey Oswald in various places and times (like Lee in Mexico City looking for a visa to Cuba and the Soviet Union). And how they are at odds with the Lee Harvey Oswald known as the assassin in Dallas. Oswalds Visits to the Cuban and Soviet Embassies

Tell us......you are a 9-11 Truther aren’t ya?
I've never doubted the official accounts and aren't very interested in the issue. Just like you apparently know nothing
about the JFK coup.
 
Overwhelming evidence that Oswald did it and ZERO evidence he had assistance

If the CIA, Mafia or LBJ helped him.......why was his escape plan 23 cents in bus fare and why use a $19.95 bolt action rifle?
Perhaps, genius (and I use that term very ironically), because the CIA, Mafia and LBJ didn't want to "help" Oswald and his only use to the coup was as someone who everything could be blamed on.

Oswald called himself a "patsy" when the Dallas police brought him in and apparently by then he was aware he had been set up and used by the Intelligence community that he had been in for years. I wonder what else he had to say but, that was before FBI informant and mafia connected Jack Ruby pumped a bullet in his stomach silencing him forever.
How convenient. I hope Hoover, the Dulles Brothers, LBJ, Gerald Posner, Arlen Specter and all the other lying devils rot in hell forever.
 
Umm...nice try

Which provides ZERO evidence that Oswald did not act alone
Sure for a disingenuous liar like yourself. The Warren Commission's own memos detail how the CIA hid incriminating
evidence and perverted justice in this case and you still want to deny and pretend nothing is amiss?
That's just disgusting and no words are able to express how much I loath liars and quislings
such as yourself, and other sub humans I have placed on ignore.
 
First of all the state failed to protect Oswald....then without the benefit of a trial(there could be no trial because he was dead) then they declared him guilty without any proof he did it....all they have is conjecture, guess work, and opinions.

All of the so called evidence can be looked at several different ways.

What is needed here....and really about all we can do here is to look at the logic of the whole thing............aka who benefited from the murder of JFK?

1. Lyndon Johnson.
2. The CIA
3. The mafia

What motive did Oswald have to kill Kennedy.....none.

Oh there are those who claim he just wanted to be famous....then why did he deny it? There are some who claim due to his childhood etc. he was a angry person wanting to strike out at authority....well--of course just another theory that can never be proved.

Now look at all the redacted material in the files that have been released.....understand there is still a huge,huge amount of material relating to the case that has not been released and probably never will be released.

When you look at the totality of this tragedy.....it is all guess work.

The fact remains he could have been a patsy...and to deny that is just not being real.

And..........do not forget a mafia hitman confessed to being the guy on the grassy knoll who took the kill shot. James Files............look at his interview....very credible.

Now some claim Oswald was very intelligent and some say not so....yet he managed to get into the marines and into a technical field, travelled to russia, got a job there, married the daughter of a Russian Colonel who was involved in the field of intelligence. etc.

The bottom line he definitely had enough intelligence to know if he shot Kennedy from a window in the building where he worked that he would be in a world of trouble....thus it makes no sense to think he would do it from his workplace.

Thus when he realized what had happened he put 2 and 2 together and realized someone had set him up. Thus his frantic and illogical movements after the killing...he was terrified ...did not know where to go or what to do....and in this state of mind he unintentionally attracted attention.

If he did it just for the glory ....then it make no sense for him to deny it in such a vehement manner.

Common sense alone dictates that the truth of this matter will probably never come out. To arrogantly claim that Oswald did it...no doubt about it....utter stupidity.
Same can be said for Timothy McVeigh

What was his motive for OKC if he just denied it later? Maybe they turn chicken once they have done the deed

Overwhelming evidence that Oswald did it and ZERO evidence he had assistance

If the CIA, Mafia or LBJ helped him.......why was his escape plan 23 cents in bus fare and why use a $19.95 bolt action rifle?

I do not think he did it....it makes no sense either that someone helped him...as in he obviously had no escape plan.

He was just the fall guy....and they did an excellent job of picking him.

No overwhelming evidence that he did it or did not do it.

Logic and common sense does dictate that if he did it....it makes no sense whatsoever.

Thus the majority of the American People reject the spiel put out by the Warren Commision and LBJ is known to be one of the biggest crooks ever to occupy the White House. A thoroughly corrupted character and one whom would have few scruples about getting rid of someone who had humilitated him.....and of course the spy E. Howard Hunt fingered him on his death bed.
 
I do not think he did it....it makes no sense either that someone helped him...as in he obviously had no escape plan.

He was just the fall guy....and they did an excellent job of picking him.

No overwhelming evidence that he did it or did not do it.

Logic and common sense does dictate that if he did it....it makes no sense whatsoever.

Thus the majority of the American People reject the spiel put out by the Warren Commision and LBJ is known to be one of the biggest crooks ever to occupy the White House. A thoroughly corrupted character and one whom would have few scruples about getting rid of someone who had humilitated him.....and of course the spy E. Howard Hunt fingered him on his death bed.
Somebody shot JFK in the head and the shot came from in front and not behind. A dozen trained ER physicians at Parkland hospital, well acquainted with gun shot wounds, all attested to the exit wound in the back of JFK's head. So did Oswald get help- though that presupposes he was the one in the TSBD shooting down at the president, which there is no actual evidence for- yes. He did, in that there was more than one shooter for absolutely sure!
 
Evidence?

55 years and you have yet to provide a shred of evidence that Oswald did not act alone
"According to a 2015 Politico report, newly declassified documents show that CIA director, John A. McCone, hid evidence from the Warren commission, set up by Lyndon Johnson to investigate JFK's assassination. According to a once-secret report written in 2013 by the CIA's top in-house historian, David Robarge, the CIA admits McCone and other senior CIA officials withheld 'incendiary' information from the Warren Commission thereby perverting the course of justice."

Nothing more has to be provided to you to prove the entire Oswald narrative was an invention of J. Edgar Hoover (among others) who, in recently declassified memos (already cited) was urging underlings, the very day after Oswald was killed,
that the public must be made to believe he (Oswald) was the lone responsible party for the death of JFK.

Did you get that? Not that we must show the people evidence of FBI informant Lee Harvey Oswald and just how he shot the president all by himself with his antiquated and badly malfunctioning rifle....but we must make the people believe!

Nobody has to prove a thing to you. Instead it's you who must demonstrate why the Warren Commission itself should
be trusted by a single thinking US citizen given all we know about their criminal coverup and lies.

"Several tests have been conducted over the years by other expert rifleman (including Simmon's team) attempting to duplicate Oswald's alleged feat. Many have been able to get off 3 rounds in 6 seconds with the Carcano, but most of these tests were at still targets. Few, if any, have been able to hit with any accuracy a moving target at the specified distances in the time required." Oswald and the Carcano rifle

Yes a lot more needs to be provided.

Yes government agencies are often jealous of each other and do not like to share information which reflects badly on them

This is not proof of an invented narrative

Many have in fact equaled or surpassed oswalds shooting with the same rifle you are simply wrong
 
I do not think he did it....it makes no sense either that someone helped him...as in he obviously had no escape plan.

He was just the fall guy....and they did an excellent job of picking him.

No overwhelming evidence that he did it or did not do it.

Logic and common sense does dictate that if he did it....it makes no sense whatsoever.

Thus the majority of the American People reject the spiel put out by the Warren Commision and LBJ is known to be one of the biggest crooks ever to occupy the White House. A thoroughly corrupted character and one whom would have few scruples about getting rid of someone who had humilitated him.....and of course the spy E. Howard Hunt fingered him on his death bed.
Somebody shot JFK in the head and the shot came from in front and not behind. A dozen trained ER physicians at Parkland hospital, well acquainted with gun shot wounds, all attested to the exit wound in the back of JFK's head. So did Oswald get help- though that presupposes he was the one in the TSBD shooting down at the president, which there is no actual evidence for- yes. He did, in that there was more than one shooter for absolutely sure!
Wrong Oswald shot him from behind as all the evidence proves.

The ER doctors never turned him over and did not closely examine him

Not one of them saw an exit wound and none were expert pathologists
 
First of all the state failed to protect Oswald....then without the benefit of a trial(there could be no trial because he was dead) then they declared him guilty without any proof he did it....all they have is conjecture, guess work, and opinions.

All of the so called evidence can be looked at several different ways.

What is needed here....and really about all we can do here is to look at the logic of the whole thing............aka who benefited from the murder of JFK?

1. Lyndon Johnson.
2. The CIA
3. The mafia

What motive did Oswald have to kill Kennedy.....none.

Oh there are those who claim he just wanted to be famous....then why did he deny it? There are some who claim due to his childhood etc. he was a angry person wanting to strike out at authority....well--of course just another theory that can never be proved.

Now look at all the redacted material in the files that have been released.....understand there is still a huge,huge amount of material relating to the case that has not been released and probably never will be released.

When you look at the totality of this tragedy.....it is all guess work.

The fact remains he could have been a patsy...and to deny that is just not being real.

And..........do not forget a mafia hitman confessed to being the guy on the grassy knoll who took the kill shot. James Files............look at his interview....very credible.

Now some claim Oswald was very intelligent and some say not so....yet he managed to get into the marines and into a technical field, travelled to russia, got a job there, married the daughter of a Russian Colonel who was involved in the field of intelligence. etc.

The bottom line he definitely had enough intelligence to know if he shot Kennedy from a window in the building where he worked that he would be in a world of trouble....thus it makes no sense to think he would do it from his workplace.

Thus when he realized what had happened he put 2 and 2 together and realized someone had set him up. Thus his frantic and illogical movements after the killing...he was terrified ...did not know where to go or what to do....and in this state of mind he unintentionally attracted attention.

If he did it just for the glory ....then it make no sense for him to deny it in such a vehement manner.

Common sense alone dictates that the truth of this matter will probably never come out. To arrogantly claim that Oswald did it...no doubt about it....utter stupidity.
Same can be said for Timothy McVeigh

What was his motive for OKC if he just denied it later? Maybe they turn chicken once they have done the deed

Overwhelming evidence that Oswald did it and ZERO evidence he had assistance

If the CIA, Mafia or LBJ helped him.......why was his escape plan 23 cents in bus fare and why use a $19.95 bolt action rifle?

I do not think he did it....it makes no sense either that someone helped him...as in he obviously had no escape plan.

He was just the fall guy....and they did an excellent job of picking him.

No overwhelming evidence that he did it or did not do it.

Logic and common sense does dictate that if he did it....it makes no sense whatsoever.

Thus the majority of the American People reject the spiel put out by the Warren Commision and LBJ is known to be one of the biggest crooks ever to occupy the White House. A thoroughly corrupted character and one whom would have few scruples about getting rid of someone who had humilitated him.....and of course the spy E. Howard Hunt fingered him on his death bed.


Howard Hint did not do any such thing and in fact the evidence is overwhelming that Oswald did it.
 
I do not think he did it....it makes no sense either that someone helped him...as in he obviously had no escape plan.

He was just the fall guy....and they did an excellent job of picking him.

No overwhelming evidence that he did it or did not do it.

Logic and common sense does dictate that if he did it....it makes no sense whatsoever.

Thus the majority of the American People reject the spiel put out by the Warren Commision and LBJ is known to be one of the biggest crooks ever to occupy the White House. A thoroughly corrupted character and one whom would have few scruples about getting rid of someone who had humilitated him.....and of course the spy E. Howard Hunt fingered him on his death bed.
Somebody shot JFK in the head and the shot came from in front and not behind. A dozen trained ER physicians at Parkland hospital, well acquainted with gun shot wounds, all attested to the exit wound in the back of JFK's head. So did Oswald get help- though that presupposes he was the one in the TSBD shooting down at the president, which there is no actual evidence for- yes. He did, in that there was more than one shooter for absolutely sure!

 
I do not think he did it....it makes no sense either that someone helped him...as in he obviously had no escape plan.

He was just the fall guy....and they did an excellent job of picking him.

No overwhelming evidence that he did it or did not do it.

Logic and common sense does dictate that if he did it....it makes no sense whatsoever.

Thus the majority of the American People reject the spiel put out by the Warren Commision and LBJ is known to be one of the biggest crooks ever to occupy the White House. A thoroughly corrupted character and one whom would have few scruples about getting rid of someone who had humilitated him.....and of course the spy E. Howard Hunt fingered him on his death bed.
Somebody shot JFK in the head and the shot came from in front and not behind. A dozen trained ER physicians at Parkland hospital, well acquainted with gun shot wounds, all attested to the exit wound in the back of JFK's head. So did Oswald get help- though that presupposes he was the one in the TSBD shooting down at the president, which there is no actual evidence for- yes. He did, in that there was more than one shooter for absolutely sure!


Well not you have two people claiming to have shot JFK

The fact is over 100 people have claimed to have been the shooter on the knoll.

None of them have any evidence whatsoever to corroborate their story.
 
Overwhelming evidence that Oswald did it and ZERO evidence he had assistance

If the CIA, Mafia or LBJ helped him.......why was his escape plan 23 cents in bus fare and why use a $19.95 bolt action rifle?
Perhaps, genius (and I use that term very ironically), because the CIA, Mafia and LBJ didn't want to "help" Oswald and his only use to the coup was as someone who everything could be blamed on.

Oswald called himself a "patsy" when the Dallas police brought him in and apparently by then he was aware he had been set up and used by the Intelligence community that he had been in for years. I wonder what else he had to say but, that was before FBI informant and mafia connected Jack Ruby pumped a bullet in his stomach silencing him forever.
How convenient. I hope Hoover, the Dulles Brothers, LBJ, Gerald Posner, Arlen Specter and all the other lying devils rot in hell forever.
They had to need his cooperation
His gun, his place of work

If JFK was worth killing, you would think they would have slipped him a more appropriate weapon

More importantly, dead men tell no tales
They would not want Oswald so easily captured
Take the bus Lee......that makes sense
 
I do not think he did it....it makes no sense either that someone helped him...as in he obviously had no escape plan.

He was just the fall guy....and they did an excellent job of picking him.

No overwhelming evidence that he did it or did not do it.

Logic and common sense does dictate that if he did it....it makes no sense whatsoever.

Thus the majority of the American People reject the spiel put out by the Warren Commision and LBJ is known to be one of the biggest crooks ever to occupy the White House. A thoroughly corrupted character and one whom would have few scruples about getting rid of someone who had humilitated him.....and of course the spy E. Howard Hunt fingered him on his death bed.
Somebody shot JFK in the head and the shot came from in front and not behind. A dozen trained ER physicians at Parkland hospital, well acquainted with gun shot wounds, all attested to the exit wound in the back of JFK's head. So did Oswald get help- though that presupposes he was the one in the TSBD shooting down at the president, which there is no actual evidence for- yes. He did, in that there was more than one shooter for absolutely sure!


Well not you have two people claiming to have shot JFK

The fact is over 100 people have claimed to have been the shooter on the knoll.

None of them have any evidence whatsoever to corroborate their story.


 
I have seen the James Files interview before. Whether he was the shooter or not someone likely from the Grassy Knoll area blew the brains out of JFK's skull. It wasn't Oswald (there is no evidence he actually shot anyone).
That much is certain.
 
I do not think he did it....it makes no sense either that someone helped him...as in he obviously had no escape plan.

He was just the fall guy....and they did an excellent job of picking him.

No overwhelming evidence that he did it or did not do it.

Logic and common sense does dictate that if he did it....it makes no sense whatsoever.

Thus the majority of the American People reject the spiel put out by the Warren Commision and LBJ is known to be one of the biggest crooks ever to occupy the White House. A thoroughly corrupted character and one whom would have few scruples about getting rid of someone who had humilitated him.....and of course the spy E. Howard Hunt fingered him on his death bed.
Somebody shot JFK in the head and the shot came from in front and not behind. A dozen trained ER physicians at Parkland hospital, well acquainted with gun shot wounds, all attested to the exit wound in the back of JFK's head. So did Oswald get help- though that presupposes he was the one in the TSBD shooting down at the president, which there is no actual evidence for- yes. He did, in that there was more than one shooter for absolutely sure!


Well not you have two people claiming to have shot JFK

The fact is over 100 people have claimed to have been the shooter on the knoll.

None of them have any evidence whatsoever to corroborate their story.



So which one are you claiming is correct?

They contradict each other so either one is telling the truth or none are
 
I have seen the James Files interview before. Whether he was the shooter or not someone likely from the Grassy Knoll area blew the brains out of JFK's skull. It wasn't Oswald (there is no evidence he actually shot anyone).
That much is certain.
That much is false

There is massive evidence that Oswald acted alone and no evidence that anyone else shot Kennedy
 

Forum List

Back
Top