Doc91678
Rookie
- Banned
- #1
by Ed Morrissey
January 23, 2013
What difference does it make? an angry Hillary Clinton retorted when Senator Ron Johnson pressed her on why the administration pushed the false narrative on Benghazi. Ive already responded, but in case thats not enough, CBS News reporter Sharyl Attkisson has a thought on that question:
The Washington Posts Erik Wemple explains why:
National Reviews Eliana Johnson points out that it mattered to the White House when they could blame it on a YouTube video:
***snip***
Continue reading: ---->
WaPo and CBS reporters: Yeah, actually, it makes a difference, Hillary « The Greenroom
January 23, 2013
What difference does it make? an angry Hillary Clinton retorted when Senator Ron Johnson pressed her on why the administration pushed the false narrative on Benghazi. Ive already responded, but in case thats not enough, CBS News reporter Sharyl Attkisson has a thought on that question:
The Washington Posts Erik Wemple explains why:
No matter your view of the medias role in Benghazi; no matter your take on whether U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice leveled with the country on the Sept. 16 talk shows; no matter your view of Fox Newss Benghazi campaign, it surely does make a difference whether it was because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided theyd go kill some Americans. It makes a difference to the media, the public, the government, everyone.
The trustworthiness of the administrations version of events even the early one makes a difference. Whether it was hard-core terrorism or a spontaneous attack or something else that makes a difference too, with strong implications for intelligence accountability. Goodness gracious, in her very own statement, Clinton herself even seems to acknowledge that it makes a difference, when she says, It is our job to figure out what happened
At one point in the proceedings, Clinton stated, Maybe we didnt do a good enough job of explaining that we didnt have a good picture. Yes, that would have helped.
The trustworthiness of the administrations version of events even the early one makes a difference. Whether it was hard-core terrorism or a spontaneous attack or something else that makes a difference too, with strong implications for intelligence accountability. Goodness gracious, in her very own statement, Clinton herself even seems to acknowledge that it makes a difference, when she says, It is our job to figure out what happened
At one point in the proceedings, Clinton stated, Maybe we didnt do a good enough job of explaining that we didnt have a good picture. Yes, that would have helped.
National Reviews Eliana Johnson points out that it mattered to the White House when they could blame it on a YouTube video:
No matter your view of the medias role in Benghazi; no matter your take on whether U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice leveled with the country on the Sept. 16 talk shows; no matter your view of Fox Newss Benghazi campaign, it surely does make a difference whether it was because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided theyd go kill some Americans. It makes a difference to the media, the public, the government, everyone.
***snip***
Continue reading: ---->
WaPo and CBS reporters: Yeah, actually, it makes a difference, Hillary « The Greenroom