clevergirl
Gold Member
- Oct 22, 2009
- 2,721
- 554
- 153
Fine, let's assume what you say is true. Now, give us some "credible" proof to support your claim.
Solyndra scandal unraveling Obama's credibility | Washington Examiner
In fact, less than two weeks before Bush left office, the Energy Department's credit committee unanimously decided not to fund Solyndra.
douchenozzle.
The Washington Examiner is a wingnut tabloid publication. The following links, again, with supporting facts and sources, make you look like the fool that you are:
What The Press Is Getting Wrong About Solyndra | Media Matters for America
Exclusive Timeline: Bush Administration Advanced Solyndra Loan Guarantee for Two Years, Media Blow the Story | ThinkProgress
Your links only prove that indeed Solyndra belongs to Obama... can you not read your own links? Oh I get it you think that because you got it off your liberal rag sheet it must support your contention. They do try, I'll admit- but all they do is prove that Obama used the same committee that did not fund Solyndra under Bush. What they proved was that Obama made them loan the money in March under Obama's administration... Again proving this is Obama's boondoggle.