Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Here's one example that shows 35% of the people purged from the registration list, were legally registered to vote.Link, please.
1) An internal analysis conducted by the Tennessee Democratic Party and the Democratic National Committee's voter protection team has found that more than 11,000 voters statewide, who are still active on the voter file, have had parts of their voting history disappear.
2) In new investigative research by BLACK BOX VOTING, examining what actually happens to voters wrongfully classified as "inactive", it was found that 35 percent of these were actually purged (cancelled from the voter rolls).
The problem is that 1,635 people did vote and were still purged off the record.In my state if you don't vote in the primary or general election, you are purged and have to re-register. That is the way it should be as it gives the election officials a fighting chance to have folks in the correct precinct and allows for better record keeping.
Earlier in this thread I posted the results of two studies on voter fraud. The conclusion is that a person is more likely to hit by lightening that voter fraud being committed.
The penalty for voter fraud are very stiff, $10,000 fine and jail time.
This voter fraud scare is a fraud within its self.
The League of Women's Voter estimates millions of legal voters will become disenfranchised. That is un-American.
I won't go back and read your studies. I've read most at one time or another and all one really needs to do is research the source to know what the study will say.
The fact remains is there may, or may not be a significant amount of people voting in place of others, living or dead. We will never really know seeing that dead people rarely bitch that somone has voted in their place.
Next, we have dozens of cases of ACORN, SEIU and others submitting thousands of fraudulent voter registrations. Yes many have been caught and many named culled, but do you really think all of the bad registrations have been removed from the rolls?. I'd bet less than half have been removed. So, these "non people" aren't going to be complaining either. There now becomes literally thousands of opportunities for fraudulent votes with zero chance of anyone being caught.
The only way we would even know someone voted fraudulently is if he was stupid enough to be voting in place of the poll worker's dead mother.
As to your LWV statistics, bullshit! Both Foxfire and I have covered that quite adequately. I suggest you go back a few pages and catch up.
XXXXX We dont elect these people,they are selected for us by the elite.FDR himself said that.Here are the facts related to voter fraud:
People seemingly voting after they've been dead for years. Drug kingpins buying votes from poor people to sway elections. Non-citizens being bussed to the polls and coached on how to vote. Stories of voting fraud are shocking, and states have been taking action to make sure that elections are secure. But the Justice Department, led by Attorney General Eric Holder, has blocked states at almost every turn.
This is the same Justice Department that*stopped a non-partisan election reform by arguing that if party affiliation were removed from a ballot, African-American voters wouldn't be able to identify and vote for the Democrats. Holder has continued to stoke the racial fires, calling a requirement for voters to produce photo identification a "poll tax." Heritage expert Hans von Spakovsky said this argument is merely political. "Holder continues to perpetuate the incendiary error to the public, knowing that the poll-tax assertion is a racially charged one that should not be used lightly," von Spakovsky said. He explained:
Even the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals—the most liberal appeals court in the country—did not buy the Holder poll tax claim when it reviewed Arizona's voter ID law. In Gonzalez v. Arizona (2012), the Ninth Circuit held that even though "obtaining the free identification required under [Arizona law] may have a cost," such immaterial costs are not a poll tax.
Holder is now "investigating" Pennsylvania's voter ID law, on the left's charge that it disenfranchises minorities.
Former Congressman Artur Davis, an African-American from Alabama who served in Congress as a Democrat from 2003 to 2011, finds this argument incredibly insulting. Speaking at The Heritage Foundation yesterday, Davis held up his driver's license and said, "This is not a billy club. It is not a fire hose. I used to represent Birmingham and Selma, Alabama, and I know something about fire hoses."
In states that have voter ID laws, the real-world results show that minorities have not been disenfranchised by any means. States that require ID to vote have offered free IDs to anyone who does not have one already. In Kansas, which allows any of nine different forms of ID as proof of identity to vote:
Out of a total of 1.713 million registered voters in Kansas, only 32 people had requested a free photo ID as of May 4, 2012. That represents only 0.002 percent of the registered voters in the state. Of those 32 voters, 80 percent were white, 10 percent were black, and the race or ethnicity of 10 percent was unknown. Thus, there is no evidence that minority voters were disproportionately affected.
Georgia, which has had voter ID since 2007, allows six different forms of ID to vote. And there has been no stampede of would-be voters who lack identification: "The number of photo IDs issued by Georgia to individuals who did not already have one of the forms of ID acceptable under state law is remarkably small, averaging less 0.05 percent in most years, and not even reaching three-tenths of 1 percent in a presidential election year."
What happened to minority voting after the law went into effect? In the 2008 presidential election, Hispanic voting in Georgia increased by 140 percent over the 2004 election. African-American voting increased by 42 percent. That is also a higher rate of increase than in other states without voter ID. Von Spakovsky notes:
The increase in turnout of both Hispanics and blacks in the 2008 presidential election after the voter ID law became effective is quite remarkable, particularly given the unproven and totally speculative claims of the Justice Department that the voter ID requirements of Texas and South Carolina will somehow have a discriminatory impact on Hispanic and black voters. In fact, Georgia had the largest turnout of minority voters in its history.
The evidence that producing photo ID is a burden simply isn't there. "How can it be a burden to ask people to do something they do all the time?" asked Congressman Davis, who said he went to a news organization to do an interview on voter ID and had to produce his driver's license to enter the news organization.
The Justice Department requires ID from visitors as well.
..................................... Read more At.............................
Morning Bell: Justice Department Blocks Voter ID at Every Turn
Sorry. I don't consider obscure sources putting out Youtube opinion or Rachel Maddow to be credible sources. I want something other than strident partisan opinion please if you're going to make the charge.
I can find sources that will show Barack Obama is demon possessed if you're going to accept manufactured evidence as credible.
I know there is voter fraud committed all the time which is why I am in favor of tightening the procedures, including voter I.D., to deal with it.
Your charge was that the Romney camp committed voter fraud. I want to see real evidence, not manufactured youtube clips.
The "voter fraud" cry has been increasingly used to justify policies that suppress legitimate voters. But the cry is baseless; allegations of voter fraudespecially polling place impersonation fraudalmost always prove to be inflated or inaccurate. The Brennan Center carefully examines allegations of fraud to get at the truth behind the claims. The truth of the matter is that voter fraudvotes knowingly cast by ineligible individualsis exceedingly rare; one is more likely to be struck by lightning than to commit voter fraud.
Allegations of Voter Fraud | Brennan Center for Justice
Sorry. I don't consider obscure sources putting out Youtube opinion or Rachel Maddow to be credible sources. I want something other than strident partisan opinion please if you're going to make the charge.
I can find sources that will show Barack Obama is demon possessed if you're going to accept manufactured evidence as credible.
I know there is voter fraud committed all the time which is why I am in favor of tightening the procedures, including voter I.D., to deal with it.
Your charge was that the Romney camp committed voter fraud. I want to see real evidence, not manufactured youtube clips.
The issue isnt that fraud occurs, but that it so rarely occurs, in one case less than 0.0004 percent of the time, that laws restricting the fundamental right of voting, such as excessive ID requirements, arent justified.
The "voter fraud" cry has been increasingly used to justify policies that suppress legitimate voters. But the cry is baseless; allegations of voter fraudespecially polling place impersonation fraudalmost always prove to be inflated or inaccurate. The Brennan Center carefully examines allegations of fraud to get at the truth behind the claims. The truth of the matter is that voter fraudvotes knowingly cast by ineligible individualsis exceedingly rare; one is more likely to be struck by lightning than to commit voter fraud.
Brennan Center for Justice
Here's one example that shows 35% of the people purged from the registration list, were legally registered to vote.Link, please.
1) An internal analysis conducted by the Tennessee Democratic Party and the Democratic National Committee's voter protection team has found that more than 11,000 voters statewide, who are still active on the voter file, have had parts of their voting history disappear.
2) In new investigative research by BLACK BOX VOTING, examining what actually happens to voters wrongfully classified as "inactive", it was found that 35 percent of these were actually purged (cancelled from the voter rolls).
In my state if you don't vote in the primary or general election, you are purged and have to re-register. That is the way it should be as it gives the election officials a fighting chance to have folks in the correct precinct and allows for better record keeping.
Sorry. I don't consider obscure sources putting out Youtube opinion or Rachel Maddow to be credible sources. I want something other than strident partisan opinion please if you're going to make the charge.
I can find sources that will show Barack Obama is demon possessed if you're going to accept manufactured evidence as credible.
I know there is voter fraud committed all the time which is why I am in favor of tightening the procedures, including voter I.D., to deal with it.
Your charge was that the Romney camp committed voter fraud. I want to see real evidence, not manufactured youtube clips.
The issue isnt that fraud occurs, but that it so rarely occurs, in one case less than 0.0004 percent of the time, that laws restricting the fundamental right of voting, such as excessive ID requirements, arent justified.
The "voter fraud" cry has been increasingly used to justify policies that suppress legitimate voters. But the cry is baseless; allegations of voter fraudespecially polling place impersonation fraudalmost always prove to be inflated or inaccurate. The Brennan Center carefully examines allegations of fraud to get at the truth behind the claims. The truth of the matter is that voter fraudvotes knowingly cast by ineligible individualsis exceedingly rare; one is more likely to be struck by lightning than to commit voter fraud.
Allegations of Voter Fraud | Brennan Center for Justice
And the overwhelming evidence of voter fraud continues to mount....
What happens when 1,099 felons vote in an election that's decided by just 312 votes? Proof that voter fraud is realand a real problem.
York: When 1,099 felons vote in race won by 312 ballots | WashingtonExaminer.com
Why aren't they being challenged? They don't require picture id either
Is it because absentee ballots favor the Reps?
I think the motivation is obvious.
Why aren't they being challenged? They don't require picture id either
Is it because absentee ballots favor the Reps?
I think the motivation is obvious.
