- Thread starter
- #161
Coyote,
Your post was too long to quote.
In brief, you have provided no proof that disputes India's low ranking on rape index. Your opinion or the opinion of people who have too much time to post on Wikipedia does not matter much, at least to me. I have been through this song and dance with you before when we were discussing the rape crisis and pedophilia in UK.
Did you totally miss what I said?
1. Rape as a crime is defined differently under the law in different countries.
2. Rape is frequently under-reported - more so in countries where women hold a low status.
Answer this: HOW can rape statistics be meaningful given the above?
You are certainly allowed your opinion but your responses here, your inabillity to defend your stance or even address the points brought speaks more to you, as a debater than it does to any of us.
I'm not sure what your purpose is with this thread but it certainly doesn't seem to be a discussion on violence towards women. Like it or not - India does not fare well in that regard.
Let me repeat it one more time. The UN statistics does not go by the specific definition of a country. They exclude things like statutory rape unless girl is under 13. I have explained this to you many times. You keep parroting the same stuff.
You have explained nothing and either don't understand what I said or choose not to understand.
Where do the UN statistics get their data? Lets start with that.
A UN criteria is supplied to the authorities. Authorities along with UN officials gather data based on that criteria. I have explained this to you many times before but you seem to be more interested in parroting the same thing again and again.
Where does the data come from? Can't you at least provide a straight answer?
I did.