Video Emerges of Black Lives Matter Activist Spray Painting Trump International Hotel in DC…

ROFL! Ah, yeah, they certainly do. That's what it means to be a crook: someone who breaks the law. Someone who obeys that law is by definition not a crook.

What definition are you using?

a person who is dishonest or a criminal (Oxford Dictionaries).

What law did it break?

Laws regarding fraud and using charity for personal gain.

Do not meander. I am not pulling out a federal lawbook for that.

It's not licensed in New York. It appears to be it's run out of Mara Lago in Florida.

False.

It is based in New York.

What "fraud" is that? Why hasn't it been prosecuted?

Telling people that the Trump foundation was a legitimate charity.

He is above the law. The only instances where he can be taken down is if he treads on the toes of a corporate entity with more money and influence than him.

You don't have to pay federal taxes if you aren't legally obligated to pay federal taxes.

Everyone is legally obligated to pay taxes.

He is not completely tax exempt. Explain to me in what nonexistent reality that would be possible for him without breaking the law.

What is the statute against "cronyism?" I'd like to see how it defines the term.

Simple. You have to do it over the table. Trump ignored the legal channels and funded a political opposition campaign under the table.

He's being sued, not arrested. Not a crime.

Seriously?

A lawsuit relates directly to the established law, whether it is about breaking a contract or violating other civil mandates.

Breaking a contract is not a crime. He has had numerous contract disputes. People claim he broke a contract. They have to prove it in a court of law.

Actually it is.

Contracts are enforced by the established law, which is why they are tried in a civil court, and enforced by the government.

Just admit now that you're a Hillary butthole sucking douche bag.

Square one.
 
Last edited:
And like patriarchy... they never have evidence of its existence. Kinda like their racist card, they just flip it out without any evidence.

Exploitation does not exist?

What dimension did I step into?
 
You applaud Wikileaks..

There seems to be a liberal movie on Edward Snowen, that is making him out to be a hero. In actuality, he is no different than any traitor that reveals classified information that puts lives at risk and compromises our national security.

With respect to the op, grafitti by a liberal is nothing new. I'm sure we will find it hailed as freedom of expression rather than vandalism - no surprise there either.


No, Snowden is indeed a "hero" and this military industrial complex/ corporate "gubermint" endangers not only national security but the lives of Americans when they purposely start wars and finance the very entities that we are supposed to be afraid and leery of.....they are POS and I have no respect or use for them at all. The stupid fucks that serve this corporate entity for a paycheck ARE the traitors.

No. Using your own judgment to establish some form of "personal gain" in releasing sensitive classified government information IS TREASON and no different than the those spies who used it to achieve some form of personal gain or power adrenalin kick.

He is NOT a hero and deserves the very same sentence as those who have done the same. You have this twisted mindset as if people have a right to government classified information to do as they please, they do not. There is no amount of entitlement that is above the law - period!

What "personal gain" did Snowden establish?


He was using a portion of the classified material that he became aware of, to place himself at a position of judge with the belief he was on a righteous cause. He had no authority to make any decision on the use of that government information in his hands, with no full understanding of the repercussions his actions would meant to others involved in his exposure as a result.

The use of Government information is not in the same context as discovering an OSHA violation or racial discrimination incident in the private sector. When you work for the Federal Government where sensitive information can be obtained, you go through a strict background check, and sign a document stating you understand the procedures and consequences associated with the handling sensitive materials.


So, the people of this country are being spied on, they are having their data scored and crunched and then having that data crunched, sent to the mega-data center in Utah and a threat matrix score is created based on your activity.......and you are fine with that? You are a good little commie. When you turn over your destiny to a corporate entity and then get pissed because someone exposed the fraud? That makes you one of the terminally stupid.
 
Good on him :thup:
ROFL! The Hillary butthole sucking douche bag applauds crime. Thanks for living up to expectations.
Butthole sucking douche bag? Typical Trump sheep discourse.
So if someone poured a bucket of styrene into your gas tank that would be ok also?
Wow that escalated quickly
How about an egg down your defroster?
 
ROFL! Ah, yeah, they certainly do. That's what it means to be a crook: someone who breaks the law. Someone who obeys that law is by definition not a crook.

What definition are you using?

a person who is dishonest or a criminal (Oxford Dictionaries).

What law did it break?

Laws regarding fraud and using charity for personal gain.

Do not meander. I am not pulling out a federal lawbook for that.

It's not licensed in New York. It appears to be it's run out of Mara Lago in Florida.

False.

It is based in New York.

What "fraud" is that? Why hasn't it been prosecuted?

Telling people that the Trump foundation was a legitimate charity.

He is above the law. The only instances where he can be taken down is if he treads on the toes of a corporate entity with more money and influence than him.

You don't have to pay federal taxes if you aren't legally obligated to pay federal taxes.

Everyone is legally obligated to pay taxes.

He is not completely tax exempt. Explain to me in what nonexistent reality that would be possible for him without breaking the law.

What is the statute against "cronyism?" I'd like to see how it defines the term.

Simple. You have to do it over the table. Trump ignored the legal channels and funded a political opposition campaign under the table.

He's being sued, not arrested. Not a crime.

Seriously?

A lawsuit relates directly to the established law, whether it is about breaking a contract or violating basic civil law.

Breaking a contract is not a crime. He has had numerous contract disputes. People claim he broke a contract. They have to prove it in a court of law.

Actually it is.

Contracts are enforced by civil law, which is why are tried in a civil court, and enforced by the government.

Just admit now that you're a Hillary butthole sucking douche bag.

Square one.


Obligated to pay lawful taxes..........
 
Good on him :thup:
ROFL! The Hillary butthole sucking douche bag applauds crime. Thanks for living up to expectations.
Butthole sucking douche bag? Typical Trump sheep discourse.
So if someone poured a bucket of styrene into your gas tank that would be ok also?
Wow that escalated quickly
How about an egg down your defroster?
You coming on to me?

:badgrin:
 
The BLM is nailed. Watch all the douche bags defend them.

Video emerges of a heavy set black male vandalizing the Trump International Hotel and historic Post Office building in Washington DC. Reportedly by THIS MAN A Hillary Clinton team supporter.

Hillary supporter filmed painting graffiti on Trump hotel D.C.


Fantastic. Its about time they became more militant even though this is small time compared to hanging people.
 
Last edited:
Define "exploitation"

The action or fact of treating someone unfairly in order to benefit from their work (Oxford Dictionaries).

Oh, and an additional point about your "only communists use the word exploitation" nonsense, the origin of the word dates 45 years before Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels published The Communist Manifesto.
 
Obligated to pay lawful taxes..........

:confused-84:


Dude, it would take me too long to explain the fraud...too long to explain the acts, statutes and codes that do not actually apply to us...the deception and thievery has been so ingrained and the programming so successful that I find myself with too little patience to go through the spiel every day. Read the tax laws for yourself........are you an employee of USA.INC whose jurisdiction is only within the confines of the District of Columbia or one of their territories? Are you obligated to pay "Peter's pence"??? That is for you to decide.....but not one dime you pay in income tax from the bartering of your labor in one hour increments goes towards paying the day to day operations of the corporate "gubermint that is USA.INC.......
 
Define "exploitation"

The action or fact of treating someone unfairly in order to benefit from their work (Oxford Dictionaries).

Oh, and an additional point about your "only communists use the word exploitation" nonsense, the origin of the word dates 45 years before Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels published The Communist Manifesto.
Now youre just going to confuse bripat. He doesnt know what all that means.
 
Define "exploitation"

The action or fact of treating someone unfairly in order to benefit from their work (Oxford Dictionaries).

Of course, the definition of "unfair" is totally subjective, so your definition is totally subjective. IN other words, it's meaningless.

Oh, and an additional point about your "only communists use the word exploitation" nonsense, the origin of the word dates 45 years before Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels published The Communist Manifesto.

That doesn't alter the fact that only communists use it when commenting on economic subjects.
 
Define "exploitation"

The action or fact of treating someone unfairly in order to benefit from their work (Oxford Dictionaries).

Oh, and an additional point about your "only communists use the word exploitation" nonsense, the origin of the word dates 45 years before Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels published The Communist Manifesto.
Now youre just going to confuse bripat. He doesnt know what ll that means.


The Jesuits created communism and were the experts in exploitation......now YOU are confused..... (snicker)
 
Define "exploitation"

The action or fact of treating someone unfairly in order to benefit from their work (Oxford Dictionaries).

Oh, and an additional point about your "only communists use the word exploitation" nonsense, the origin of the word dates 45 years before Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels published The Communist Manifesto.
Now youre just going to confuse bripat. He doesnt know what ll that means.
You're the idiot who doesn't understand what it means. Neither does Onyx.
 
Fantastic. Its about time they became more militant even though this is small time compared to hanging people.

Do you listen to political punk or hip hop?
hip hop mostly

You ever listen to Paris?



He advocates militancy, especially in the black community. He blends techno elements in his beats, which is a music style based on African influences, so you might appreciate that too.
 
Fantastic. Its about time they became more militant even though this is small time compared to hanging people.

Do you listen to political punk or hip hop?
hip hop mostly

You ever listen to Paris?



He advocates militancy, especially in the black community. He blends techno elements in his beats, which is a music style based on African influences, so you might appreciate that too.

Oh yeah. Paris is from where I grew up.
 

Forum List

Back
Top