(R)IGHTeous 1
GOPROUD
- Thread starter
- #21
Anyone here besides ^^the for mentioned, pwned, spammer trolls^^ wanna actually respond?
Anyone seriously.........
Anyone seriously.........
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So his complaint is that this treaty doesn't allow us to unilaterally disarm?
F'in hilarious. The conservatarian mind is a diabolical one, indeed.
If you'd actually read, you'd see that aint true. But go head and cherry pick there buddy......
So his complaint is that this treaty doesn't allow us to unilaterally disarm?
F'in hilarious. The conservatarian mind is a diabolical one, indeed.
If you'd actually read, you'd see that aint true. But go head and cherry pick there buddy......
I did read, buddy - and that's exactly what he said.
Miller has been retired for quite awhile, the guy served in WWII! he's in his 90's. I'm sure he was a brilliant leader, but he's been out of the game for quite awhile.
Why is it that the Joint Chiefs of Staff and all the NATO Commanders who have access to current nuclear intelligence were for START but (R)IGHTeous wants to swear by Miller, who doesn't have current access to said intelligence?
If you'd actually read, you'd see that aint true. But go head and cherry pick there buddy......
I did read, buddy - and that's exactly what he said.
Miller, who helped prepare the National Strategic Target List and Single Integrated Operational Plan for waging nuclear war and later participated in arms control meetings with the Soviet government, expressed concern that START could leave the United States vulnerable to other emerging threats.
The treaty prohibits the conversion of an existing ballistic missile system into a missile defense system, said Miller. We might want to do that with a Trident or an ICBM sometime in the future, particularly if the Chinese alleged threat materializes.
Why? Why don't you people READ? Why don't you listen? Why do yall break down and run to troll land like Starkey who's undoubtedly posted some more amusing, stalker, flame spam by now?
Yall make this shit too easy. THOSE are Miller's real concerns, VALID, LEGIT, concerns.
Come clean, Righteous1 - you are a plant sent here from DemocraticUnderground to make conservatives look like morons....
and you are quite good at it.
I did read, buddy - and that's exactly what he said.
Miller, who helped prepare the National Strategic Target List and Single Integrated Operational Plan for waging nuclear war and later participated in arms control meetings with the Soviet government, expressed concern that START could leave the United States vulnerable to other emerging threats.
The treaty prohibits the conversion of an existing ballistic missile system into a missile defense system, said Miller. We might want to do that with a Trident or an ICBM sometime in the future, particularly if the Chinese alleged threat materializes.
Why? Why don't you people READ? Why don't you listen? Why do yall break down and run to troll land like Starkey who's undoubtedly posted some more amusing, stalker, flame spam by now?
Yall make this shit too easy. THOSE are Miller's real concerns, VALID, LEGIT, concerns.
You are too stupid to be granted access to the interwebs. If we want missile defense we can.....wait for it now....build it! Why would we remove our current stockpile?
Come clean, Righteous1 - you are a plant sent here from DemocraticUnderground to make conservatives look like morons....
and you are quite good at it.
interesting theory.
Come clean, Righteous1 - you are a plant sent here from DemocraticUnderground to make conservatives look like morons....
and you are quite good at it.