RetiredGySgt
Diamond Member
Par for the course, make shit up as you go along, kinda like how you admit Obama spending money twice as fast as Bush is just fine with you.
What exactly have I made up? I believe I've cited all my claims of fact in dispute. In contrast, you've cited none of yours (in a contemporaneous thread) and haven't defended those that I've disputed.
And please let me know where I admitted that Obama spending money twice as fast as Bush is fine with me. He's not (File:Revenue and Expense to GDP Chart 1993 - 2008.png - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia), and it wouldn't be.
Suggesting that I admitted a claim of yours I didn't specifically contest is a bit presumptuous at the best of times. Moreso when I labeled your post as a whole largely false.
You stated that what Obama spends money is fine with you and that his deficit is ok but Bush's was not. And Obama is on track to raise the deficit by 6.2 trillion at the end of 2012. Or are you one of those idiots that claims his 2009 stimulus was somehow not his? Or counts what was spent in 2001 as Bush but not Obama's in 2009?