Thanks to liberals the US is impotent against just about everything.
How many pirates did the Bush's and Reagan kill?
Were the pirates doing business during the Reagan and Bush 1 years?
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks to liberals the US is impotent against just about everything.
How many pirates did the Bush's and Reagan kill?
So now we do nothing in the face of the rights of somali pirates
The USA dealt with pirates before why cant we do it now?
The First Barbary War (18011805), also known as the Barbary Coast War or the Tripolitan War, was the first of two wars fought between the United States of America and the North African Muslim states known collectively as the Barbary States. These were the independent Sultanate of Morocco and Tripoli, which was a quasi-independent entity nominally belonging to the Ottoman Empire.
do yall really want to discuss this...then lets do it...
first the ships are in international waters and have very little protection...the ships are not set up to protect themselves..they prefer to insure the crew and cargo and let the insurance pay the ransoms....
put defensive crews on the ships....but wait that would cost the owners of the ships money.....
getting a better picture now?
do yall really want to discuss this...then lets do it...
first the ships are in international waters and have very little protection...the ships are not set up to protect themselves..they prefer to insure the crew and cargo and let the insurance pay the ransoms....
put defensive crews on the ships....but wait that would cost the owners of the ships money.....
getting a better picture now?
do yall really want to discuss this...then lets do it...
first the ships are in international waters and have very little protection...the ships are not set up to protect themselves..they prefer to insure the crew and cargo and let the insurance pay the ransoms....
put defensive crews on the ships....but wait that would cost the owners of the ships money.....
getting a better picture now?
It is a helluva lot of water to cover out there. It is not exactly Lake Gitcheegoome. Common sense would dictate (not that it does that much anymore) that recreational yachters, for now, need to stay the hell out of those waters (duhhh!).
you do realize the ships can take another route that is longer and more costly but prefer to run the risk of the shorter route....
stomach for what...being police for the world?
why arent you conservative for the individual ships doing what it takes to protect themselves....
noise cannons would be a good start...but suddenly yall are all for a nanny government to the world
do yall really want to discuss this...then lets do it...
first the ships are in international waters and have very little protection...the ships are not set up to protect themselves..they prefer to insure the crew and cargo and let the insurance pay the ransoms....
put defensive crews on the ships....but wait that would cost the owners of the ships money.....
getting a better picture now?
do yall really want to discuss this...then lets do it...
first the ships are in international waters and have very little protection...the ships are not set up to protect themselves..they prefer to insure the crew and cargo and let the insurance pay the ransoms....
put defensive crews on the ships....but wait that would cost the owners of the ships money.....
getting a better picture now?
Also, I think that's in violation of International Law.
do yall really want to discuss this...then lets do it...
first the ships are in international waters and have very little protection...the ships are not set up to protect themselves..they prefer to insure the crew and cargo and let the insurance pay the ransoms....
put defensive crews on the ships....but wait that would cost the owners of the ships money.....
getting a better picture now?
Also, I think that's in violation of International Law.
its a violation of international laws to defend your ship?
really?
no they can do noise cannons...not just small arms....
So now we do nothing in the face of the rights of somali pirates
The USA dealt with pirates before why cant we do it now?
do yall really want to discuss this...then lets do it...
first the ships are in international waters and have very little protection...the ships are not set up to protect themselves..they prefer to insure the crew and cargo and let the insurance pay the ransoms....
put defensive crews on the ships....but wait that would cost the owners of the ships money.....
getting a better picture now?
Also, I think that's in violation of International Law.
its a violation of international laws to defend your ship?
really?