Log in or Sign up

US media covers up American war crimes in Iraq

Discussion in 'Middle East - General' started by Theregular, Jul 17, 2005.

Page 1 of 2

Jul 17, 2005 #1

Offline
Theregular Member

Joined:

Jul 11, 2005

Messages:

55

Thanks Received:

0

Trophy Points:

6

Ratings:

+0

By Barry Grey
15 September 2004

Every day, US military forces in Iraq are attacking civilian populations in a calculated effort to drown a growing popular insurgency in blood. But one would hardly know the dimensions or brutality of the atrocities being carried out in the name of the American people from the sparse and sanitized coverage provided by the major press and broadcast outlets that purport to disseminate the news.

The US mediaowned and controlled by a handful of huge corporate conglomeratesplay an indispensable role in the mass murder of Iraqi men, women and children. Together with the Bush administration and the two major parties of US imperialismthe Democratic Party and its presidential candidate John Kerry, no less than their Republican rivalsthe media are complicit in a crime against humanity of immense proportions, one that dwarfs any crimes committed by the various political leaders who have been targeted for destruction by the American ruling elite in recent years: from Panamas Noriega, to Serbias Milosevic, to Saddam Hussein himself.

One can stare at the 24-hour cable news networks from sunup to sundown and get no sense of the carnage in towns and cities from Baghdad, to Fallujah, to Ramadi, to Hilla in the south and Tal Afar in the north that is left in the wake of US rockets, bombs, tank shells and sniper rounds. The evening news reports of the major networks provide at most a fleeting image of the death and destruction, inevitably hedged with absurd avowals from the US military that precision attacks were carried out against terrorist and anti-Iraqi targets.

As for the press, one days front-page report of US helicopter attacks on unarmed civilians or air strikes against urban centers is eclipsed the next day by the latest hurricane threat or new poll numbers on the upcoming electionan election in which no discussion of the legitimacy of the US subjugation of Iraq or the real war aims behind the bogus ones used to promote the war is permitted.

No countrys media is more cowardly, or more artful in churning out the official line and excluding any serious criticism or analysis, than that of the USA. It would be absurd to hold up the British media as a model of conscientious and objective reporting, but even there, articles occasionally appear that provide some insight into the reality of the situation in Iraq.

The Guardian newspaper, for example, on Tuesday carried an eyewitness account on its front page of the American helicopter attack on unarmed Iraqis that occurred Sunday in central Baghdad. Thirteen Iraqis were killed and dozens were wounded when US copters repeatedly fired rockets into a crowd that had gathered around a disabled American armored vehicle on Haifa Street, near the Green Zone that houses the US and British embassies and the offices of Washingtons puppet government.

For the benefit of our readers around the world, and especially in the US, we give here some excerpts from the chilling and tragic account provided by Guardian columnist Ghaith Abdul-Ahad, who was himself wounded while covering the US assault.

Abdul-Ahad describes at least four separate rocket strikes by American helicopters against the unarmed Iraqisdocumenting that the helicopters returned several times to fire on those seeking to remove the dead and wounded from the first missile strike.

When I was 50 m away I heard a couple of explosions and another cloud of dust rose across the street from where the first column of smoke was still climbing, he writes. People started running towards me in waves. A man wearing an orange overall was sweeping the street while others were running. A couple of helicopters in the sky overhead turned away.

He runs for cover, and then: A few seconds later, I heard people screaming and shoutingsomething must have happenedand I headed towards the sounds, still crouching behind a wall. Two newswire photographers were running in the opposite direction and we exchanged eye contact.

About 20 m ahead of me, I could see the American Bradley armoured vehicle, a huge monster with fire rising from within. It stood alone, its doors open, burning. I stopped, took a couple of photos and crossed the street towards a bunch of people. Some were lying in the street, others stood around them. The helicopters were still buzzing, but further off now.

The reporter continues: I felt uneasy and exposed in the middle of the street, but lots of civilians were around me. A dozen men formed a circle around five injured people, all of whom were screaming and wailing.

Abdul-Ahads belief that the presence of so many unarmed civilians afforded protection from a further US strike was shattered in short order. I had been standing there taking pictures for two or three minutes when we heard the helicopters coming back. Everyone started running, and I didnt look back to see what was happening to the injured men. We were all rushing towards the same place: a fence, a block of buildings and a prefab concrete cube used as a cigarette stall.

I had just reached the corner of the cube when I heard two explosions. I felt hot air blast my face and something burning on my head. I crawled to the cube and hid behind it. Six of us were squeezed into a space less than two metres wide. Blood started dripping on my camera but all that I could think about was how to keep the lens clean. A man in his 40s next to me was crying. He wasnt injured, he was just crying.

I was so scared I just wanted to squeeze myself against the wall. The helicopters wheeled overhead, and I realised that they were firing directly at us.

The helicopters moved away, and the reporter went back onto the street to record the carnage and help the wounded and dying. Then: More kids ventured into the street, looking with curiosity at the dead and injured. Then someone shouted Helicopters! and we ran. I turned and saw two small helicopters, black and evil. Frightened, I ran back to my shelter where I heard two more big explosions.... I reached a building entrance when someone grabbed my arm and took me inside. Theres an injured man. Take picturesshow the world the American democracy, he said.

It is hardly necessary to point out that no major US media outlet has taken note of the Guardians damning account of Sundays bloodletting in the center of Baghdad. Most US newspapers on Tuesday relegated to their inside pages news reports of yet another round of US air and artillery attacks on Fallujah, carried out Monday.

The Iraqi Health Ministry said 20 were killed and 39 wounded in the strikes. Aljazeera reported that those killed included the driver of an ambulance and six passengers, whose vehicle was struck by a jet-fired missile near the northern gate of the city. Every time we send out an ambulance, it gets targeted, the director of the Fallujah hospital told the Arab newspaper.

Aljazeera also reported that US missiles destroyed three homes in the citys al-Shurta neighborhood, American shells hit a market place, and US tanks fired on homes in the al-Jughaivi neighborhood near the citys northern gate.

The Washington Post, in a page-19 article, noted the attacks on Fallujah neighborhoods and the ambulance fatalities, but reported without comment the official US line that the attacks were directed against a suspected hideout of associates of Abu Musab Zarqawi. It printed the Goebbels-like handout from the US military: Based on the analysis of these [intelligence] reports, Iraqi Security Forces and multi-national forces effectively and accurately targeted these terrorists while protecting the lives of innocent civilians.

The New York Times ran a front-page commentary focused not on the death and suffering being inflicted on the Iraqi people, but rather on the danger that the US militarys bloodletting against insurgent towns could backfire. It warned of the classic dilemma faced by governments battling guerrilla movements: ease up, and the insurgency may grow; crack down, and risk losing the support of the population.

This description is itself a cynical deception, as the Times well knows. The very fact that the US feels obliged to step up the slaughter and target civilian populations testifies to the fact that Washington and its stooge government are hated and despised by the Iraqi masses. Talk of a risk of losing the support of the population is an attempt to maintain the myth that the anti-US resistance is the work of a small minority of Baathist hard-liners and foreign terrorists, and the equally absurd claim that the US is in Iraq to establish democracy.

In reality, the US medias disinformation operation is among the most striking and significant expressions of the collapse of American democracy.
Click to expand...

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2004/sep2004/medi-s15.shtml
Jul 17, 2005 #2

Offline
onedomino SCE to AUX

Joined:

Sep 14, 2004

Messages:

2,677

Thanks Received:

474

Trophy Points:

98

Ratings:

+476

Thanks for the anti-American propaganda from the "World Socialist Web Site." How thoughtful. "Theregular?" Regular what? Bowel Movement?

From the "about" section of the World Socialist Web Site:
"We anticipate enormous battles in every country against unemployment, low wages, austerity policies and violations of democratic rights. The World Socialist Web Site insists, however, that the success of these struggles is inseparable from the growth in the influence of a socialist political movement guided by a Marxist world outlook."
Jul 17, 2005 #3

Offline
007 Charter Member Supporting Member

Joined:

May 8, 2004

Messages:

39,666

Thanks Received:

8,118

Trophy Points:

1,330

Ratings:

+13,697

onedomino said:

"Theregular?" Regular what? Bowel Movement?
Click to expand...

"regular" MORON!
Jul 17, 2005 #4

Offline
pegwinn Top of the Food Chain

Joined:

Apr 17, 2004

Messages:

2,549

Thanks Received:

329

Trophy Points:

98

Location:

Texas

Ratings:

+329

The really sad fact is that the internet makes such bullshit freely available to people with no time, and no brains. How many dumbass idiots are actually going to take the time to debunk it. Not many. Just more protesters to beat up if they block traffic at the wrong moment.
Jul 17, 2005 #5

Offline
Gunny Gold Member

Joined:

Dec 27, 2004

Messages:

44,689

Thanks Received:

6,754

Trophy Points:

198

Location:

The Republic of Texas

Ratings:

+6,777
Theregular said:

By Barry Grey
15 September 2004

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2004/sep2004/medi-s15.shtml
Click to expand...

Pearls of elightenment from the moron sector. Have you ever REALLY questioned your personal worth to this planet? If not, now is a good time.
- Thank You! x 1
Jul 18, 2005 #6

Offline
Theregular Member

Joined:

Jul 11, 2005

Messages:

55

Thanks Received:

0

Trophy Points:

6

Ratings:

+0

Ok. so let me get this straight, anything or anyone who has an idea or an opinion that opposes yours is an idiot with no brains, typical american democracy I must say.

Next thing ill see someone saying, hey, america didnt do any war crimes in Vietnam, it was just some ones imagination, or, who says we killed 800,000 in Japan, thats just propaganda!
Jul 18, 2005 #7

Offline
Gunny Gold Member

Joined:

Dec 27, 2004

Messages:

44,689

Thanks Received:

6,754

Trophy Points:

198

Location:

The Republic of Texas

Ratings:

+6,777

Theregular said:

Ok. so let me get this straight, anything or anyone who has an idea or an opinion that opposes yours is an idiot with no brains, typical american democracy I must say.

Next thing ill see someone saying, hey, america didnt do any war crimes in Vietnam, it was just some ones imagination, or, who says we killed 800,000 in Japan, thats just propaganda!
Click to expand...

Unsupported ideals or opinions are indicative of a mindless mouthpiece not intelligent enough to think to for himself. I have seen no ideals from you, just unsupported opinions and lies.

So yeah, you're an idiot with no brains. But by all means continue on. You are doing a damned good job of proving to those apologista Americans who refuse to accept what those of us who have been there say about the Arab mindset. I couldn't ask for better evidence than your posts.
Jul 19, 2005 #8

Offline
Theregular Member

Joined:

Jul 11, 2005

Messages:

55

Thanks Received:

0

Trophy Points:

6

Ratings:

+0

GunnyL said:

Unsupported ideals or opinions are indicative of a mindless mouthpiece not intelligent enough to think to for himself. I have seen no ideals from you, just unsupported opinions and lies.

So yeah, you're an idiot with no brains. But by all means continue on. You are doing a damned good job of proving to those apologista Americans who refuse to accept what those of us who have been there say about the Arab mindset. I couldn't ask for better evidence than your posts.
Click to expand...

Your forgetting that its not me who wrote this article??!! so its not just my ideas, very clever i must say
Jul 19, 2005 #9

Offline
kurtsprincess Active Member

Joined:

Jul 15, 2005

Messages:

683

Thanks Received:

112

Trophy Points:

28

Location:

in my hammock

Ratings:

+112

Theregular said:

Your forgetting that its not me who wrote this article??!! so its not just my ideas, very clever i must say
Click to expand...

However, Regular, you ARE propagating the ideals even if you are not the author of it. And, I don't think you'll find many who feel they are any where near "clever". They are just proof that there are crazy people in the world everywhere willing to write crap to get their names published.

Just what is your intent when you post these creative writing articles you are so fond of? Are you posting them as support for your own ideals and belief system, or just trying to stir the pot. :bangheads

BTW, Reg, did you know that gullible is not in the dictionary?
Jul 19, 2005 #10

Offline
-Cp Senior Member

Joined:

Sep 23, 2004

Messages:

2,911

Thanks Received:

360

Trophy Points:

48

Location:

Earth

Ratings:

+363

kurtsprincess said:

However, Regular, you ARE propagating the ideals even if you are not the author of it. And, I don't think you'll find many who feel they are any where near "clever". They are just proof that there are crazy people in the world everywhere willing to write crap to get their names published.

Just what is your intent when you post these creative writing articles you are so fond of? Are you posting them as support for your own ideals and belief system, or just trying to stir the pot. :bangheads

BTW, Reg, did you know that gullible is not in the dictionary?
Click to expand...

You'll have to forgive TheRegular - he's in the Middle east - near Amman - the middle of Palestine and in the middle of the brain-washing area of the world...

(You must log in or sign up to reply here.)

Page 1 of 2

Share This Page

Active Topics

Apple discontinues iPod and Shuffle
IsaacNewton posted Jul 29, 2017 at 6:12 AM
health care dialogue
MarkClaude posted Jul 29, 2017 at 6:08 AM
The Death Of Obamacare
DarkFury posted Jul 29, 2017 at 5:52 AM
The Forgotten History of...
longknife posted Jul 29, 2017 at 5:12 AM
President Trump “Securing” the...
longknife posted Jul 29, 2017 at 5:11 AM
The fall back position of...
there4eyeM posted Jul 29, 2017 at 5:01 AM
The California Police State
TheGreatGatsby posted Jul 29, 2017 at 4:22 AM
25 CRAZY LAWS You Wouldn’t...
ScienceRocks posted Jul 29, 2017 at 4:03 AM

Loading...

Search