Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
permanently lowered the growth of the world economy.
All of you who just can't help but turning to charts to explain everything are going to live this piece! Here's the 1st one:
I am certainly no expert on stuff like this but this piece seems to make a whole lot of sense to me. And, IMHO, this is going to make a bigger impact on the mid-terms than any of the constant hype we see in the media.
See all and READ the explanations @ Prison Planet.com 12 Charts That Show The Permanent Damage That Has Been Done To The U.S. Economy
Apparently conservatives don't grasp the idea that government is an industry. Like any other industry, labor is productive and adds to the nation's asset base.
Figure it out sometime.
dear, you are a liberal so please don't assert anything as if you have something to add.
Govt is a violent monopoly so has very little incentive to be efficient compared to corporate America which functions in a highly competitive worldwide market with no coercion.
China is a horrific ecomic model. .
When Republicans have this terrible attitude about government, then why do they want to elect people into office who do the very things they say they hate?
One party wants to compete with education and the other party wants to compete by abolishing the minimum wage and ending benefits.
Life must be such a mystery for you.
The precursor to the Internet was jumpstarted in the early days of computing history, in 1969 with the U.S. Defense Department's Advanced Research Projects Agency Network (ARPANET). ARPA-funded researchers developed many of the protocols used for Internet communication today.
Note that 2000 was actually the peak of the emp-pop ratio and that it's been declining since then.All of you who just can't help but turning to charts to explain everything are going to live this piece! Here's the 1st one:
I am certainly no expert on stuff like this but this piece seems to make a whole lot of sense to me. And, IMHO, this is going to make a bigger impact on the mid-terms than any of the constant hype we see in the media.
See all and READ the explanations @ Prison Planet.com 12 Charts That Show The Permanent Damage That Has Been Done To The U.S. Economy
The only jobs created under Obama have been government jobs. Not good.
I think the American economy should focus on a strong and dynamic growth. Creating new jobs in like focus on companies where the jobs is created. Subdized new companies and give them the oppurtunity to grow. I also think America should focus on creating more jobs with minimum wages.
America should focus on being strong and hold an economic growth. Free trade more with European Union, China and the undeveloped world. Focus also on economic growth in those countries and a peaceful development.
Life must be such a mystery for you.
You are talking about the ARPANet you are correct
However, it wasn't until 1973 when CIVILIAN ingenuity discovered how to make it into a world-wide operation where any and everyone could participate. Civilians had to take a system that was not user friendly into one that just about anyone can use.
So, what's the big deal about coming up with a system that just a small number of people can use - with great inconvenience?
When Republicans have this terrible attitude about government, then why do they want to elect people into office who do the very things they say they hate?
dear, they want to elect Republicans like Jefferson and Reagan who want office to limit the size of govt and defend America. Can you grasp the concept?
Apparently conservatives don't grasp the idea that government is an industry. Like any other industry, labor is productive and adds to the nation's asset base.
Figure it out sometime.
dear, you are a liberal so please don't assert anything as if you have something to add.
Govt is a violent monopoly so has very little incentive to be efficient compared to corporate America which functions in a highly competitive worldwide market with no coercion.
When Republicans have this terrible attitude about government, then why do they want to elect people into office who do the very things they say they hate?
Our government is elected by us. The people elected answer to us. They are accountable to us.
Reagan wasn't the only guy in DC??Then why did Reagan increase the govt. roles so mush?In economics, as in politics, there are two different "America's."
For Progressives/Liberals, job creation is job creation. If a job is created to fill a position in a newly-founded government agency, or if a city decides to hire one more policeman, or if a company is award a government contract and has to hire someone to fulfill that contract, it is a job that was created "by Government," and proof that Progressivism "works." To the Progressive, these jobs are in every way equal to the job created when a startup high-tech company has to hire someone to, say, train new clients on the use of their product.
The Progressive doesn't recognize the concept of value to the society and economy (or the lack of same).
We Conservatives see that new government (or contractor) job as a net NEGATIVE addition to the American economy. That government worker, or policeman, or contractor employee produces NOTHING OF VALUE, and the cost of the person must be paid (i.e., taken OUT of the economy) by the taxpayers. Those dollars are not available for buying a car or going out to dinner or investing in a 401k. And the cost of that one (1) new government worker runs in the MILLIONS OF DOLLARS, when you count a lifetime of wages, benefits, retirement payments, and so on.
The startup company, however, is CREATING WEALTH. The product or service that they pay is seen by the public as something they willingly pay for (otherwise the company goes out of business).
The values of those two jobs are not equal. Government policies should be laser-guided to promote the creation of private sector (non-government contractor) jobs, NOT more teachers, cops, firement, regulators, inspectors, TSA slugs, or whatever. Progressives just don't get it.
Don't take this little screed as a criticism of ALL government workers. There are vital functions carried out by Government workers every day, and God bless 'em if they do those jobs conscientiously. But seeing more and more government workers as a "good" thing is irresponsible and short sighted.
Apparently conservatives don't grasp the idea that government is an industry. Like any other industry, labor is productive and adds to the nation's asset base.
Figure it out sometime.
You have got to be kidding!
Explain just how government is "productive". Producing what? And, give us some examples of how it "adds to the asset base?"
totally stupid and totally 100% liberal. The USSR tried letting govt bureaucrats pick new products and did not produce one single consumer product innovation. Same for Red China. What does that teach you about deadly liberalism you libcommie freak?Did you know that the government was responsible for the initial development of the Internet?
totally stupid and totally 100% liberal. The USSR tried letting govt bureaucrats pick new products and did not produce one single consumer product innovation. Same for Red China. What does that teach you about deadly liberalism you libcommie freak?Did you know that the government was responsible for the initial development of the Internet?
Gawwwd you are a moron
Reagan wasn't the only guy in DC??Then why did Reagan increase the govt. roles so mush?In economics, as in politics, there are two different "America's."
For Progressives/Liberals, job creation is job creation. If a job is created to fill a position in a newly-founded government agency, or if a city decides to hire one more policeman, or if a company is award a government contract and has to hire someone to fulfill that contract, it is a job that was created "by Government," and proof that Progressivism "works." To the Progressive, these jobs are in every way equal to the job created when a startup high-tech company has to hire someone to, say, train new clients on the use of their product.
The Progressive doesn't recognize the concept of value to the society and economy (or the lack of same).
We Conservatives see that new government (or contractor) job as a net NEGATIVE addition to the American economy. That government worker, or policeman, or contractor employee produces NOTHING OF VALUE, and the cost of the person must be paid (i.e., taken OUT of the economy) by the taxpayers. Those dollars are not available for buying a car or going out to dinner or investing in a 401k. And the cost of that one (1) new government worker runs in the MILLIONS OF DOLLARS, when you count a lifetime of wages, benefits, retirement payments, and so on.
The startup company, however, is CREATING WEALTH. The product or service that they pay is seen by the public as something they willingly pay for (otherwise the company goes out of business).
The values of those two jobs are not equal. Government policies should be laser-guided to promote the creation of private sector (non-government contractor) jobs, NOT more teachers, cops, firement, regulators, inspectors, TSA slugs, or whatever. Progressives just don't get it.
Don't take this little screed as a criticism of ALL government workers. There are vital functions carried out by Government workers every day, and God bless 'em if they do those jobs conscientiously. But seeing more and more government workers as a "good" thing is irresponsible and short sighted.
So the Prez policy ISN'T number one determiner of the role of Gov't?
