Universities and colleges, how would the right make them less "liberal"?

[Anachronism]

"Ethics, morals, and values" are not "taught" in the sense one learns how to type. What you suggest honors suicide bombers who're taught by their family/society that what they do is good, moral and ethical (I suppose). In short, you have adopted ethical/moral relativism.

I totally disagree, Wry. I believe that those things ARE taught the same way that any other skill is. That's definitely the way that they were taught to ME in my younger years. I am most definitely NOT a moral relativist. I'm a moral absolutist, who believes there is only one proper set of morals and values.

Understand, ethics is part of every occupation, Professional, Skilled and Unskilled. The mortagage broker who 'sells' a loan to someone s/he knows will eventually default, but knows s/he can sell the mortgage to another before that happens makes a ethical/moral judgment as does someone who finds a wallet and returns it in full to the rightful owner.

You are correct that everyone makes moral and ethical judgements every day of their lives; both at work and in their personal lives. The ideals that I use to make those judgements do not come from anything I learned in school or college. Now in terms of business ethics, I'm a large believer in Caveat Emptor. Not that I think it's good for people to be unethical in business, but anything that sounds too good to be true, generally is.

 

[Baruch Menachem]

Privatize the lot of them.

College fees include a 1% tax on your AGI for the rest of your life. Make college income dependent on what they do for their graduates.

End intercollege athletics. NBA and NFL should pay for their own minor league systems like MLB does, rather than on the taxpayer dime.

 

[California Girl]

What I find interesting is that, yet again, Rdweeb takes one comment from one conservative and attributes it to a millions of other people.

When Rdean grows a brain, learns to think for himself and recognizes the thoughts of individuals, I might (might, not will) take his posts for something more that bullshit and bitching.

 

[Samson]

Privatize the lot of them.

College fees include a 1% tax on your AGI for the rest of your life. Make college income dependent on what they do for their graduates.

End intercollege athletics. NBA and NFL should pay for their own minor league systems like MLB does, rather than on the taxpayer dime.

Make college income dependent on what they do BEFORE they graduate: This Bullshit of educating 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18 year olds in Public High School so they can graduate and then go fuck off for 4-6 years before becomming employed is ridiculous.

They can join the Army Reserve when they're 15, train for three years, then qualify for college.

 

[Anachronism]

College fees include a 1% tax on your AGI for the rest of your life. Make college income dependent on what they do for their graduates.

In a system like that I wouldn't even CONSIDER attending college. I'd suggest trade and vocational schools to people. No need for me to be turning over 1% of my income to someone to "thank" them for something I paid for in the first place.

 

[Two Thumbs]

Privatize the lot of them.

College fees include a 1% tax on your AGI for the rest of your life. Make college income dependent on what they do for their graduates.

End intercollege athletics. NBA and NFL should pay for their own minor league systems like MLB does, rather than on the taxpayer dime.

The NBA and the NFL have a minor leagues.

But since they require a higher skill level, it's easy to tell you are not whatching a high level game.

 

[Momanohedhunter]

Quote from USMB Member:

"Because academia is overwhelmingly left. Thats to include college students. It just goes to show ya that when people begin to take responsibility for their own lives and get out of that academic atmosphere they wise up."

This is actually a very common comment from the Right on the USMB regarding "higher education". What is it saying about "education"? How would conservatives change that perspective, if it needed to be changed at all?

Look at a few of the more popular areas. Science. How would the right change the way "science" is taught to make it more "conservative" and still have it be called "science"?

Economics and "Trickle Down". When economics is taught, it's based on statistics, data and research. If the data shows something different than what conservatives want taught, should they ignore the data? Should conservative "notions" follow the same rigorous standard"?

What about history? What would be taught "differently"?

Psychology? Should it be taught that being "gay" is a "mental illness"? What would be the "cure"?

Would there be a course on "Physical Evidence Proving God's Existence"?

Would there be "morning prayer"?

I'm simply curious. How would the right change colleges and universities to make them more "acceptable"?

Burn them down and kill the administrators. I would then round up all of the students and put them in reeducation camps.

 

[rdean]

I would enforce the Constitutional right to free speech on equal terms.

Not this constant crap of putting liberal kids at the entrances and conservative ones in the "Free speech zones."

I would also sue any college that didn't allow all students the same chance to voice their views.

As it is now, only liberal ideals get heard constantly, conservative ones are moved out or shut down.

fyi; That's tyranny

"I would enforce the Constitutional right to free speech on equal terms."
Congress shall make no law...; Remember, the Free Speech Movement began at CAL


"Not this constant crap of putting liberal kids at the entrances and conservative ones in the "Free speech zones."" Huh? Evidence please

"I would also sue any college that didn't allow all students the same chance to voice thier views." You don't have standing to do so

"fyi; That's tyranny" You don't seem to have a clue as to what tyranny is

USATODAY.com - On campus: Free speech for you but not for me?

Academic Freedom and Conservative Speech on Campus | Penn News

Conservative Activism On Campus |

Want more?

Tyranny is an unrestrained use of power.

Shutting down conservative speech is tyranny.

Your links are a little odd.

The one from USA Today was the longest. While there was a lot of complaining about "leftist views" and "Conservatives not being allowed to speak", the examples were were few and far between.

But the students were able to achieve their objectives. For instance:

University of Minnesota, Twin Cities. A student group for Christians sued the school over its requirement that student groups sign a statement that they are open to all students regardless of religion, marital status or sexual orientation.

You see, the sued for the right to discriminate and won.

In June, administrators said they would drop some restrictions and pay $93,000 in attorneys' fees to settle a lawsuit by student abortion protesters.

While I'm not sure what Abortion has to do with college, right wingers still protested.

In the "Lesbian Conservative" the only real example is on "Climate Change". I wasn't aware that right wing scientists even had evidence the climate isn't changing.

And in the third link: Academic Freedom and Conservative Speech on Campus - I can't seem to figure out what the outcry is about. It looks like it could be not being able to protest abortion in the "Latin Grammar" class.

When it comes to colleges and universities, it's more than "free speech". You have to prove that you know what you are talking about. That includes "data" and "evidence". You can't just make "wild claims".

 

[rdean]

Quote from USMB Member:

"Because academia is overwhelmingly left. Thats to include college students. It just goes to show ya that when people begin to take responsibility for their own lives and get out of that academic atmosphere they wise up."

This is actually a very common comment from the Right on the USMB regarding "higher education". What is it saying about "education"? How would conservatives change that perspective, if it needed to be changed at all?

Look at a few of the more popular areas. Science. How would the right change the way "science" is taught to make it more "conservative" and still have it be called "science"?

Economics and "Trickle Down". When economics is taught, it's based on statistics, data and research. If the data shows something different than what conservatives want taught, should they ignore the data? Should conservative "notions" follow the same rigorous standard"?

What about history? What would be taught "differently"?

Psychology? Should it be taught that being "gay" is a "mental illness"? What would be the "cure"?

Would there be a course on "Physical Evidence Proving God's Existence"?

Would there be "morning prayer"?

I'm simply curious. How would the right change colleges and universities to make them more "acceptable"?

Burn them down and kill the administrators. I would then round up all of the students and put them in reeducation camps.

Typically that's what has happened in communist revolutions. That means Republicans would be safe.

 

[Two Thumbs]

"I would enforce the Constitutional right to free speech on equal terms."
Congress shall make no law...; Remember, the Free Speech Movement began at CAL


"Not this constant crap of putting liberal kids at the entrances and conservative ones in the "Free speech zones."" Huh? Evidence please

"I would also sue any college that didn't allow all students the same chance to voice thier views." You don't have standing to do so

"fyi; That's tyranny" You don't seem to have a clue as to what tyranny is

USATODAY.com - On campus: Free speech for you but not for me?

Academic Freedom and Conservative Speech on Campus | Penn News

Conservative Activism On Campus |

Want more?

Tyranny is an unrestrained use of power.

Shutting down conservative speech is tyranny.

Your links are a little odd.

The one from USA Today was the longest. While there was a lot of complaining about "leftist views" and "Conservatives not being allowed to speak", the examples were were few and far between.

But the students were able to achieve their objectives. For instance:

University of Minnesota, Twin Cities. A student group for Christians sued the school over its requirement that student groups sign a statement that they are open to all students regardless of religion, marital status or sexual orientation.

You see, the sued for the right to discriminate and won.

In June, administrators said they would drop some restrictions and pay $93,000 in attorneys' fees to settle a lawsuit by student abortion protesters.

While I'm not sure what Abortion has to do with college, right wingers still protested.

In the "Lesbian Conservative" the only real example is on "Climate Change". I wasn't aware that right wing scientists even had evidence the climate isn't changing.

And in the third link: Academic Freedom and Conservative Speech on Campus - I can't seem to figure out what the outcry is about. It looks like it could be not being able to protest abortion in the "Latin Grammar" class.

When it comes to colleges and universities, it's more than "free speech". You have to prove that you know what you are talking about. That includes "data" and "evidence". You can't just make "wild claims".

The situations do exists.

If you have the time. Stossle covered it last night on his show on FBN.

You can see interviews and taped situations. Feel free to draw your own conclusion.

Don't get me wrong, it's not "rampant", it just happens.

 

[editec]

1. So all arts and humanities courses are a waste of time?

When they are the sole basis for an education that is supposed to prepare you for a CAREER and the ability to make a living, YES they are. As I commented about Wesleyan University in my hometown. The sole piece of necessary info out of that education is the phrase.... "Would you like fries with that?" because it's all that education qualifies you to do in my experience and opinion.

2. Oh, I see. You think all meaningful education is basically industrial arts education.

Industrial Arts, not necessarily. Career focused and oriented, DEFINITELY. College is the place to learn the skills and information necessary to provide the foundation for your career; whether that is in engineering, law, medicine, accounting, hotel & restaurant management, business, etc.... I believe that Elementary & Secondary Ed should be about providing the basic building blocks (or technical/trades for those not going on to college) and collegiate education should be about building the foundation for a career.

Well, given that you believe that FEUDALISM is the best structure of society, I suppose that makes sense.

Yes it does and thank you for seeing that.

Tell me Anachromism, what class would you be in, in your ideal society?

In the sort of society that I envision I'd be a tradesman or involved in the military/security sector. Definitely not a member of the ruling class or the business class but somewhere slightly above the unskilled laborers.

Sp dpon't you think that at least the ruling class would need that liberal arts education?

After all, the science of society is no less valid and uselful than the sciences of industrialism.

One needs to control the great unwashed masses in your ideal state, no?

Engineers and specialist of hard sciences aren't equipped to do that.

Errr...not very well at least.

There's much to be said (EVEN IN A FEUDAL SOCIETY) for the ruling classes understanding things like history, psychology, sociology, anthopology, etc.

And while I'm at it, consider what the world would be like with NO ARTS thrown into the mix.

Are we ANTS meant only to produce (reporduce) and die?

 

[Anachronism]

So don't you think that at least the ruling class would need that liberal arts education? After all, the science of society is no less valid and uselful than the sciences of industrialism. One needs to control the great unwashed masses in your ideal state, no? Engineers and specialist of hard sciences aren't equipped to do that. Errr...not very well at least.

I've never said that liberal arts shouldn't be taught, just that it should not be the basis for most degree programs. Then again I see Government as an extension of the Business environment, not sociology or psychology.

There's much to be said (EVEN IN A FEUDAL SOCIETY) for the ruling classes understanding things like history, psychology, sociology, anthopology, etc...

On the advisory level, yes. On the actual leadership level, HELL NO. With the exception of history (which I don't really consider a liberal art anyway).

And while I'm at it, consider what the world would be like with NO ARTS thrown into the mix.

Again, I've never said that art or the liberal arts shouldn't exist. If someone feels they can make a living at it, go right ahead. Just don't expect the government to pay you unemployment or to sponsor your work in any way to keep you from starving to death or being killed by exposure when you can't pay your rent.

Are we ANTS meant only to produce (reporduce) and die?

To a certain degree, YES.

Let's see if I can explain this better....

Let's look at my college degree (Associate of Science in Computer Aided Drafting). It's a two year program focused almost exclusively on the skills necessary to succeed in that business. It included one business elective and one humanities elective in addition to the four English classes, three Math classes, and Physics class we were required to take.

My first class Freshman year was a hardboard drafting class. 8am M-Th, every week for 11 weeks. If the school operated in the standard model, I wouldn't have seen a class related to my major until at least the second half of my Sophomore year. Instead I would have wasted a year and a half on classes that largely held no relevance to my chosen career path. Therefore it would have ended up being a 4 year program, costing at the very least twice what it did, and getting me no more prepared for my career.

 

[Bill O'Olberman]

Outlaw all "Greek" Societies. The frat/sorority system does nothing to improve college life. In fact it's a major detriment to the college experience of anyone who is there to actually get an education.

I wholeheartedly disagree with this sentiment. The pillars of my fraternity and cornerstones of the ritual of my fraternity are scholarship, leadership, fellowship and service. I am proud to say that at the college I attended Greeks did more community service, raised more money for philanthropy, had a higher average GPA and occupied more positions of student leadership than did non-greeks. If anything greek life enhances a young adults college experience to the their betterment (apparently it was not for you).

 

[Anachronism]

I wholeheartedly disagree with this sentiment. The pillars of my fraternity and cornerstones of the ritual of my fraternity are scholarship, leadership, fellowship and service. I am proud to say that at the college I attended Greeks did more community service, raised more money for philanthropy, had a higher average GPA and occupied more positions of student leadership than did non-greeks. If anything greek life enhances a young adults college experience to the their betterment (apparently it was not for you).

There was no Greek society allowed ON CAMPUS where I went to school, when I went there. They'd been banished from all organized school activities for disciplinary issues two years earlier and wouldn't end up being allowed back onto the campus until the late 1998 or so.

I just want to get this straight.... On Friday & Saturday nights your frat brothers and you could be found with your noses dilligently in your textbooks more often than not. That's what you're telling me, right?

 

[Bill O'Olberman]

I wholeheartedly disagree with this sentiment. The pillars of my fraternity and cornerstones of the ritual of my fraternity are scholarship, leadership, fellowship and service. I am proud to say that at the college I attended Greeks did more community service, raised more money for philanthropy, had a higher average GPA and occupied more positions of student leadership than did non-greeks. If anything greek life enhances a young adults college experience to the their betterment (apparently it was not for you).

There was no Greek society allowed ON CAMPUS where I went to school, when I went there. They'd been banished from all organized school activities for disciplinary issues two years earlier and wouldn't end up being allowed back onto the campus until the late 1998 or so.

I just want to get this straight.... On Friday & Saturday nights your frat brothers and you could be found with your noses dilligently in your textbooks more often than not. That's what you're telling me, right?

Uh no, generally on Friday and Saturday and often times on Thursday nights after I got off work I was doing some kind of act of debauchery. Are you trying to tell me that more often than not non greeks can be found with their noses dilligently in their textbooks on Friday and Saturday night? I will say we did have study hours system in place (the lower your GPA the more time you had to spend in study hall to remain an active brother). What I am telling you is that it is possible for a college student to effectively balance their academic, extracurricular activities, and social life. I am also telling you that being in a fraternity can have many positive impacts on a young adults college experience.

 

[Intense]

Quote from USMB Member:

"Because academia is overwhelmingly left. Thats to include college students. It just goes to show ya that when people begin to take responsibility for their own lives and get out of that academic atmosphere they wise up."

This is actually a very common comment from the Right on the USMB regarding "higher education". What is it saying about "education"? How would conservatives change that perspective, if it needed to be changed at all?

Look at a few of the more popular areas. Science. How would the right change the way "science" is taught to make it more "conservative" and still have it be called "science"?

Economics and "Trickle Down". When economics is taught, it's based on statistics, data and research. If the data shows something different than what conservatives want taught, should they ignore the data? Should conservative "notions" follow the same rigorous standard"?

What about history? What would be taught "differently"?

Psychology? Should it be taught that being "gay" is a "mental illness"? What would be the "cure"?

Would there be a course on "Physical Evidence Proving God's Existence"?

Would there be "morning prayer"?

I'm simply curious. How would the right change colleges and universities to make them more "acceptable"?

By teaching Perceived Fact as Perceived Fact, Perceived Truth as Perceived Truth, Perceived Ideal, Value, Perspective, Ideology, at face value, nothing more, nothing less. Remove the spin, present what is known and when relevant, allow for independent thought, discussion, and conclusion. Should the goal be indoctrination or growth. If we find ourselves on a blind path in need of Guides, why blind them before preparing them for what is to come? Why limit them in that way? Why should our stumbling blocks be theirs?

Intense, your post is confusing. You seem to suggest "the right" would change colleges by adopting a liberal arts curriculum?

A typical liberal arts course would, for example, explore a topic, such as capital punishment or abortion or racism. Lectures would include the history of the topic and a general description of authors and other artist's (poets, lyrics in popular culture, painters, photographers, etc.) opinions on the issue. Students would discuss and share their opinions in class and then be required to write a ten-page paper on the issue or answer an open ended question on blue book exam; both would require the student to describe what they learned and from whom as well as their own opinon and why.

Which they should not be penalized for by the Left or Right, on position, but merit, content, and quality. The Truth is where you find it. How many centuries do we continue to pursue and punish the Messenger??? When is enough, enough??? What is Preconceived Notion to Reality, besides an embarrassment???

 

[Publius1787]

Quote from USMB Member:

"Because academia is overwhelmingly left. Thats to include college students. It just goes to show ya that when people begin to take responsibility for their own lives and get out of that academic atmosphere they wise up."

This is actually a very common comment from the Right on the USMB regarding "higher education". What is it saying about "education"? How would conservatives change that perspective, if it needed to be changed at all?

Look at a few of the more popular areas. Science. How would the right change the way "science" is taught to make it more "conservative" and still have it be called "science"?

Economics and "Trickle Down". When economics is taught, it's based on statistics, data and research. If the data shows something different than what conservatives want taught, should they ignore the data? Should conservative "notions" follow the same rigorous standard"?

What about history? What would be taught "differently"?

Psychology? Should it be taught that being "gay" is a "mental illness"? What would be the "cure"?

Would there be a course on "Physical Evidence Proving God's Existence"?

Would there be "morning prayer"?

I'm simply curious. How would the right change colleges and universities to make them more "acceptable"?

Will a government funded scientist in a college that depends on research for funding who is paid to prove the existence of global warming conclude that their is no global warming? Will a liberal professor over estimate the money multiplier of government spending or neglect to teach his students about "crowding out?" Which economic outlook is tought in American schools? Demand side or supply side? I can tell you that it is most certainly not both! Who's point of view is taught more in economics Keynes or Hyek? In my history class I had two textbooks. Western Civ I with a picture of Thomas Moore on the cover and Western Civ II with a picture of Simone de Bouvier on the cover. If it weren't enough that both of these people were communists the Teachers edition had a picture of Karl Marx on the cover. I remember when a black student called the police for a hate crime because there was an authentic slave advertisement on the history club board. Do you think your taught the crimes of Mao, Stalin, Castro, Che, or any other leftist in college? Think again! Do you think that Harvard University requires you to study Constitutional Law in order to get a law degree? Think again. Constitutional Law is an elective while international law is a requirement. You can thank elana kagan for that one. Well I'm rambling and I could go on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on ...... But maybe this video will help.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EU7_Ju5QTyY]YouTube - ‪Indoctrinate U Part-1‬‏[/ame]

What are the chances that out of all of the hundreds of thousands of famous people that has existed in the history Western Civilisation, pearson textbooks accedentaly chose three communists for their western civ 1, 2, and teachers edition books?

.

 

[Mr.Nick]

Quote from USMB Member:

"Because academia is overwhelmingly left. Thats to include college students. It just goes to show ya that when people begin to take responsibility for their own lives and get out of that academic atmosphere they wise up."

This is actually a very common comment from the Right on the USMB regarding "higher education". What is it saying about "education"? How would conservatives change that perspective, if it needed to be changed at all?

Look at a few of the more popular areas. Science. How would the right change the way "science" is taught to make it more "conservative" and still have it be called "science"?

Economics and "Trickle Down". When economics is taught, it's based on statistics, data and research. If the data shows something different than what conservatives want taught, should they ignore the data? Should conservative "notions" follow the same rigorous standard"?

What about history? What would be taught "differently"?

Psychology? Should it be taught that being "gay" is a "mental illness"? What would be the "cure"?

Would there be a course on "Physical Evidence Proving God's Existence"?

Would there be "morning prayer"?

I'm simply curious. How would the right change colleges and universities to make them more "acceptable"?

How about teach kids facts instead of brainwashing them with opinions....

My uncle is a professor at a prestigious college and he routinely gets skull fucked by me in debate because he believes everything is just a matter of opinion - not a matter of fact...

He always loses because he believes his opinion overrides fact..

When you have professors teaching their liberal opinion instead of facts you're going to have problems..

My uncle believes because hes a fucking professor his opinion is fact....

Oh and when he gets his ass handed to him with actual facts he throws a fit like a child..

 

[Intense]

Quote from USMB Member:

"Because academia is overwhelmingly left. Thats to include college students. It just goes to show ya that when people begin to take responsibility for their own lives and get out of that academic atmosphere they wise up."

This is actually a very common comment from the Right on the USMB regarding "higher education". What is it saying about "education"? How would conservatives change that perspective, if it needed to be changed at all?

Look at a few of the more popular areas. Science. How would the right change the way "science" is taught to make it more "conservative" and still have it be called "science"?

Economics and "Trickle Down". When economics is taught, it's based on statistics, data and research. If the data shows something different than what conservatives want taught, should they ignore the data? Should conservative "notions" follow the same rigorous standard"?

What about history? What would be taught "differently"?

Psychology? Should it be taught that being "gay" is a "mental illness"? What would be the "cure"?

Would there be a course on "Physical Evidence Proving God's Existence"?

Would there be "morning prayer"?

I'm simply curious. How would the right change colleges and universities to make them more "acceptable"?

Will a government funded scientist in a college that depends on research for funding who is paid to prove the existence of global warming conclude that their is no global warming? Will a liberal professor over estimate the money multiplier of government spending or neglect to teach his students about "crowding out?" Which economic outlook is tought in American schools? Demand side or supply side? I can tell you that it is most certainly not both! Who's point of view is taught more in economics Keynes or Hyek? In my history class I had two textbooks. Western Civ I with a picture of Thomas Moore on the cover and Western Civ II with a picture of Simone de Bouvier on the cover. If it weren't enough that both of these people were communists the Teachers edition had a picture of Karl Marx on the cover. I remember when a black student called the police for a hate crime because there was an authentic slave advertisement on the history club board. Do you think your taught the crimes of Mao, Stalin, Castro, Che, or any other leftist in college? Think again! Do you think that Harvard University requires you to study Constitutional Law in order to get a law degree? Think again. Constitutional Law is an elective while international law is a requirement. You can thank elana kagan for that one. Well I'm rambling and I could go on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on ...... But maybe this video will help.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EU7_Ju5QTyY]YouTube - ‪Indoctrinate U Part-1‬‏[/ame]

What are the chances that out of all of the hundreds of thousands of famous people that has existed in the history Western Civilisation, pearson textbooks accedentaly chose three communists for their western civ 1, 2, and teachers edition books?

If you truly want solutions beyond your comprehension, do you chose to teach or indoctrinate???

 

[Publius1787]

Quote from USMB Member:

"Because academia is overwhelmingly left. Thats to include college students. It just goes to show ya that when people begin to take responsibility for their own lives and get out of that academic atmosphere they wise up."

This is actually a very common comment from the Right on the USMB regarding "higher education". What is it saying about "education"? How would conservatives change that perspective, if it needed to be changed at all?

Look at a few of the more popular areas. Science. How would the right change the way "science" is taught to make it more "conservative" and still have it be called "science"?

Economics and "Trickle Down". When economics is taught, it's based on statistics, data and research. If the data shows something different than what conservatives want taught, should they ignore the data? Should conservative "notions" follow the same rigorous standard"?

What about history? What would be taught "differently"?

Psychology? Should it be taught that being "gay" is a "mental illness"? What would be the "cure"?

Would there be a course on "Physical Evidence Proving God's Existence"?

Would there be "morning prayer"?

I'm simply curious. How would the right change colleges and universities to make them more "acceptable"?

Will a government funded scientist in a college that depends on research for funding who is paid to prove the existence of global warming conclude that their is no global warming? Will a liberal professor over estimate the money multiplier of government spending or neglect to teach his students about "crowding out?" Which economic outlook is tought in American schools? Demand side or supply side? I can tell you that it is most certainly not both! Who's point of view is taught more in economics Keynes or Hyek? In my history class I had two textbooks. Western Civ I with a picture of Thomas Moore on the cover and Western Civ II with a picture of Simone de Bouvier on the cover. If it weren't enough that both of these people were communists the Teachers edition had a picture of Karl Marx on the cover. I remember when a black student called the police for a hate crime because there was an authentic slave advertisement on the history club board. Do you think your taught the crimes of Mao, Stalin, Castro, Che, or any other leftist in college? Think again! Do you think that Harvard University requires you to study Constitutional Law in order to get a law degree? Think again. Constitutional Law is an elective while international law is a requirement. You can thank elana kagan for that one. Well I'm rambling and I could go on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on ...... But maybe this video will help.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EU7_Ju5QTyY]YouTube - ‪Indoctrinate U Part-1‬‏[/ame]

What are the chances that out of all of the hundreds of thousands of famous people that has existed in the history Western Civilisation, pearson textbooks accedentaly chose three communists for their western civ 1, 2, and teachers edition books?

If you truly want solutions beyond your comprehension, do you chose to teach or indoctrinate???

Higher education is designed to teach people to think for themselves. Not what to think. Good luck getting a fair shot outside of a community college if your a conservative.