BrokeLoser
Diamond Member
Would you support such an aggressive action?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You talking illegal search and seizure?Would you support such an aggressive action?
You kids just wanna burn the whole Constitution don't you.Would you support such an aggressive action?
No, he's saying "your papers please".You talking illegal search and seizure?Would you support such an aggressive action?
You talking illegal search and seizure?Would you support such an aggressive action?
Under a National Emergency declaration? No, he could not.
Under martial law? Yes, he could.
I would prefer to see an internal situation legislated that would force the illegals to leave under their own steam.
Guess what? Every time I'm pulled over by a cop I show ID. No question.
After checking me out they just say "Have a good day, Mr. Kinetta." and off I go.
Under a National Emergency declaration? No, he could not.
Under martial law? Yes, he could.
I would prefer to see an internal situation legislated that would force the illegals to leave under their own steam.
Guess what? Every time I'm pulled over by a cop I show ID. No question.
After checking me out they just say "Have a good day, Mr. Kinetta." and off I go.
Weird how stand-up legitimate folks who respect law and order have no problem interacting with law enforcement huh?
No, he's not. He's talking about REASONABLE search and seizure, done with PROBABLE CAUSE.You talking illegal search and seizure?
Maybe the Constitution as you would interpret it, yeah. Burn that.You kids just wanna burn the whole Constitution don't you.
Well except for the current incarnation of the second amendment.
Would you support such an aggressive action?
Would you support such an aggressive action?
Oh damn. I don’t think anyone would go for that, and those that are okay with it would not be okay with it if they were stopped and identified. I wouldn’t like to have to do that on the whim of some federal agent. No I wouldn’t support that.
I don't think he said he supports it. He is asking if you support it.You kids just wanna burn the whole Constitution don't you.
Well except for the current incarnation of the second amendment.
Would you support such an aggressive action?
Oh damn. I don’t think anyone would go for that, and those that are okay with it would not be okay with it if they were stopped and identified. I wouldn’t like to have to do that on the whim of some federal agent. No I wouldn’t support that.
Do you fellas see any other method working to identify, arrest and deport 12-40 million people?
Cut off all social services. Crack down on employers.Do you fellas see any other method working to identify, arrest and deport 12-40 million people?
I don't think he said he supports it. He is asking if you support it.You kids just wanna burn the whole Constitution don't you.
Well except for the current incarnation of the second amendment.
I do NOT support such action, even though I have no problem talking to cops. I can see nothing but the potential for serious abuse. '
I am a liberty first guy. I don't want to sacrifice liberty for a mere facade of security.
I don't think he said he supports it. He is asking if you support it.You kids just wanna burn the whole Constitution don't you.
Well except for the current incarnation of the second amendment.
I do NOT support such action, even though I have no problem talking to cops. I can see nothing but the potential for serious abuse. '
I am a liberty first guy. I don't want to sacrifice liberty for a mere facade of security.
Think of it like this,
“No worries sir, me and my partner are just doing a stop and identify” won’t take a minute sir do you mind? Sir, is that a firearm on your seat?