Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Let me guess, you think Bush was behind 9/11 too?
Yes 10%. Maybe a little bit more. Thanks to Russia which has done everything it can to force them away from their land. And they overwhelmingly decided not to vote on the referendum because it was illegal in their opinion.10% These 10% were eligible to vote in a referendum.
According to Ukrainian law, the parliament of Crimea didn’t have a right to hold a referendum. A question of changing borders is matter only of an all-Ukrainian referendum.But does not recognize the referendum, which was conducted legitimate parliament of the Crimea.
Even your beloved international community knows Crimea wanted to leave Ukraine and join Russia. The vote clearly reflects this.Please, do you really believe it when a totalitarian state claims they got over 90% of a vote? Did you miss all the media coverage about Ukrainian citizens being beaten in the streets or found floating in rivers before the sham election? Many fled as soon as the Russians showed up. These are some of the reasons the international community rejected the election. I am very certain I have better resources for accurate information than you assume.Your first mistake is believing anything from the international community, which would explain your lack of understanding.I disagree with you on whether Russia invaded Crimea and whether Crimea was legally transferred to Russia. The international community, including the UN disagrees with you also. The Tatars, who have been there longer than both the Russians and Ukrainians disagree with you too. Even the Chinese refused to vote on the legitimacy of the sham election in Crimea. Many of the Crimean's that wanted to be annexed to Russia are already having buyers remorse. They are now suffering the second invasion. This one is not military, it is economic. The country is being overrun by "Moscow" carpetbaggers who are pushing many of the ethnic Russians who supported the annexation, to the side. By the way, Putin has admitted Russian troops and mercenaries participated in the take over of Crimea. The "Green" ,men running around armed with Russian weapons and armored vehicles, wearing Russian uniforms with the insignia's removed were Russian. The first mercenaries to take over the Ukrainian border post were member of a huge Russian so called motorcycle club or gang called the Wolves. They showed up well armed and backed up by Russian troops with tanks.Russia has not invaded Ukraine...and the Crimean's were very happy to be annexed by Russia.
I suppose you think the USA does NOT enter nations by the force of arms.
I guess you do not believe in democracy, but instead chose to believe whatever the global elite tell you.
March 16 marks one year since the Crimean peninsula seceded from Ukraine and became a part of Russia after more than 96 percent of local voters supported the move in a referendum. The West refused to recognize Crimea’s reunification with Russia claiming it violated Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, and introduced several waves of sanctions targeting the country’s economy and certain individuals.
Disputed Crimea Referendum Sees 96.8 Percent Vote to Join Russia - NBC News
Those beaten and shot in the streets where done so primarily by the Nazis in the Kiev government. Just as they shot down the Malaysian jet liner in a false flag effort to implicate Russia, they are doing all they can to implicate Russia for their heinous acts. Have you failed to notice that the US Gov has not produced ANY evidence that Russia had anything to do with the shoot down? Yet they continue to claim it as does their lackeys in the western press.
rofl
The dumbest people in America are the weak-minded "libertarian" conspiracy theorists.
Let me guess, you think Bush was behind 9/11 too?
My question still stands. Does Russia give them autonomy?
Lol=)Thanks to Russia which has done everything it can to force them away from their land
Of Course. After the United States will give autonomy Alkaid, Russia will give autonomy to the Crimean Tatars.My question still stands. Does Russia give them autonomy?
Approximately 9,000 Crimean Tatars, mostly men served, worked or collaborated with the Germans during 1942 and 1943. Stalin used that as an excuse to arrest all Taters, men, women and children, over a quarter million of them, and shipped them off to the far east where well over 100,000 were starved to death within a year after the forced deportation from there homeland. The population of Tatars were replaced with Russians who continued the colonization of Crimea that is continuing to this very day, just as the arrest of Tatars continues to this day. Putin is following the book on long term colonization that was instigated by Lenin, perfected by Stalin and bolstered by Communist leaders that followed.My question still stands. Does Russia give them autonomy?
The Crimeans frequently mounted raids into the Danubian principalities, Poland-Lithuania, and Muscovy to enslave people whom they could capture; for each captive, the khan received a fixed share (savğa) of 10% or 20%. These campaigns by Crimean forces were either sefers ("sojourns), officially declared military operations led by the khans themselves, or çapuls (despoiling), raids undertaken by groups of noblemen, sometimes illegally because they contravened treaties concluded by the khans with neighbouring rulers.
....
For a long time, until the early 18th century, the khanate maintained a massive slave trade with the Ottoman Empire and the Middle East, exporting about 2 million slaves from Russia and Poland-Lithuania over the period 1500–1700.[8]
Lol=)Thanks to Russia which has done everything it can to force them away from their land
Of Course. After the United States will give autonomy Alkaid, Russia will give autonomy to the Crimean Tatars.My question still stands. Does Russia give them autonomy?
ps
In 1944, the remains of the population of Tatars were deported. Because fought on the side of the Nazis.
The Crimeans frequently mounted raids into the Danubian principalities, Poland-Lithuania, and Muscovy to enslave people whom they could capture; for each captive, the khan received a fixed share (savğa) of 10% or 20%. These campaigns by Crimean forces were either sefers ("sojourns), officially declared military operations led by the khans themselves, or çapuls (despoiling), raids undertaken by groups of noblemen, sometimes illegally because they contravened treaties concluded by the khans with neighbouring rulers.
....
For a long time, until the early 18th century, the khanate maintained a massive slave trade with the Ottoman Empire and the Middle East, exporting about 2 million slaves from Russia and Poland-Lithuania over the period 1500–1700.[8]
It gives a right to Russian rulers to deport innocent women and children from their land?In 1944, the remains of the population of Tatars were deported. Because fought on the side of the Nazis.
I think you have the same Google as I do. Try to use it properly.Lol=)
So you think that the US is an exemplar for you? Then why do you think that you are any better?Of Course. After the United States will give autonomy Alkaid, Russia will give autonomy to the Crimean Tatars.
How much people were killed during the Stalin’s rule?Stalin did not need excuses. This is a fact.
And why has the Russian government not declared him as a culprit?If you explore the history you will see that Russian under Stalin killed more than other nationalities.
I think your previous answer is stupid also?I think your question stupid.
Try to read my previous question once more.Better than anyone?
It is correct to deport innocent people and children? What difference is between you and a fascist then?I understand that this is correct in terms of military tactics.
Of course you are happy. Because you are very glad to keep a low profile while somebody else has to take such decisions.I am very happy that I will never make such decisions.
Neocons and Neoprogressives who run US foreign policy (for the benefit of the western oligarchy), see foreign interventions as a good thing. They think dethroning dictators and rulers they disagree with, as the right thing to do. I suppose there are examples where their intervention as succeeded, but in many cases the consequences of US intervention has been horrific, such as in Iraq, Syria, Libya, Ukraine.Before the rise of ISIS, the West was warned that there were extremist elements in the Free Syrian Army but toppling the Assad regime was made a priority, thus creating conditions for the emergence of the Islamic State. The West may be repeating the same mistake in Ukraine.
Many were shocked when Kiev openly admitted that neo-Nazis are part of the Ukrainian armed forces, that they are controlled by Kiev and that without them "the Russian army" could not be stopped. Most of the Western media have completely ignored this scandalous statement.
According to Western politicians and media there is no real danger of Ukrainian nationalistic extremists taking over power or influencing politics in Ukraine. On the contrary, influential US neo-cons including professional Russophobe Anne Applebaum argues that the West must support Ukrainian nationalism: "Nationalism is exactly what Ukraine needs now." Ukraine s Neo-Nazis Are the Most Dangerous in Europe - Russia Insider
Hera comes new Reich, we should be afraid
Yet you never left. Why?Good bye, my friend.
What should I?Yet you never left. Why?
See this wonderful post from 2015. You could learn so much from me.What should I?
