Ukraine's Neo-Nazis Are the Most Dangerous in Europe

[ESay]

And? Why do you think it is good that the USSR collapsed?

 

[Sonc]

1) have more freedom
2) I do not like communism. Many of the previous generation were disappointed in it.
3) some republics did not really want to live with us. Their presence in the Soviet Union was a political issue. Long ago, it made sense. May be. Today I do not see the point in it.
4) Ukraine is a good example. She got a strong army, a lot of equipment, navy, air force. Where is it today? We paid the money for the rent of the Crimea. we sold them gas 2 times cheaper than market value. They still in the ass.
And as the republics of the USSR, this was a lot.

This is funny. They could receive free education a doctor or an engineer. Now everything honestly. They come here to clean up the streets. Repair of the apartment. Work in the stores. 80% of prostitutes in Moscow Ukrainian women =)
Why give money to those who do not like us?))) Let earn money as they can)

 

[ESay]

1) have more freedom

I think it won’t last long.

2) I do not like communism. Many of the previous generation were disappointed in it.

Communism? What in the USSR was communistic except of a name of the ruling party?

4) Ukraine is a good example. She got a strong army, a lot of equipment, navy, air force. Where is it today? We paid the money for the rent of the Crimea. we sold them gas 2 times cheaper than market value. They still in the ass.

It has been stolen.
And why did your ruler want to drag it into the Russian-led union?

 

[Sonc]

"It has been stolen."
How do you comment on that.
Sevastopol naval fortress in southern Russia. 1783.
http://dg52.mycdn.me/getImage?photoId=564706888343&photoType=0

 

[ESay]

"It has been stolen." When I wrote that I meant this

She got a strong army, a lot of equipment, navy, air force. Where is it today?

How do you comment on that.
Sevastopol naval fortress in southern Russia. 1783.
http://dg52.mycdn.me/getImage?photoId=564706888343&photoType=0

What comment? The link leads nowhere.

 

[Sonc]

"It has been stolen." When I wrote that I meant this

She got a strong army, a lot of equipment, navy, air force. Where is it today?

How do you comment on that.
Sevastopol naval fortress in southern Russia. 1783.
http://dg52.mycdn.me/getImage?photoId=564706888343&photoType=0

What comment?

This "Sevastopol naval fortress in southern Russia. 1783."

 

[Billo_Really]

It means something when comparing it to entering nations without invitation. One can agree or disagree with your comment, it in no way validates the way Russia enters neighboring nations by force of arms.

After what the US has done in Afghanistan and Iraq, you are one major fucking hypocrite, to criticize the Russians.

 

[ESay]

This "Sevastopol naval fortress in southern Russia. 1783."

Part of Russian Far East was a Chinese territory some time ago. And what is it supposed to mean?

 

[Sonc]

This "Sevastopol naval fortress in southern Russia. 1783."

Part of Russian Far East was a Chinese territory some time ago. And what is it supposed to mean?

This means that people living in this area - Russian. They were Russian 220 years.
In Ukraine, they lived for 20 years.
Question. Do you think these people consider themselves to be Russian or Ukrainian?

 

[Sonc]

It means something when comparing it to entering nations without invitation. One can agree or disagree with your comment, it in no way validates the way Russia enters neighboring nations by force of arms.

After what the US has done in Afghanistan and Iraq, you are one major fucking hypocrite, to criticize the Russians.

The war in Ukraine also provoked the United States.

 

[Roadrunner]

And who is backing the Nazis in Kiev? Of course it is the US gov, who instigated the coup and caused the unrest in Ukraine. They have claimed Russian backed rebels shot down a jetliner and that Russia has invaded Ukraine...without any supporting facts. They have imposed economic sanctions on Russia...and act of war, with a long history of causing wars.

Amazingly most of the western press has bought their lies.

Is WWIII around the corner?

Any Jew haters are Obama's friends, be they Ukrainian, ISIS, Taliban, AQ or what!

 

[ESay]

This means that people living in this area - Russian. They were Russian 220 years.
In Ukraine, they lived for 20 years.
Question. Do you think these people consider themselves to be Russian or Ukrainian?

Don’t forget about the Crimean Tatars. Since the Crimean Khanate was conquered by the Russians, the Cr Tatars were forced to leave the peninsula. This process lasted until the 1940-s when all the Cr Tatars were deported according to Stalin’s order. They began to come back in the late 1980-s. I think if Russia is an extremely fair state, its government must give them autonomy. What do you think?

 

[Roadrunner]

Who has ever invited you?

Everywhere we have the bases you are talking about. The NATO countries are not forced to join. They ask to join. When they join they invite NATO facilities. Often they have restrictions about the size and uses of the facilities. Most recently the Baltic countries have invited US Air Force facilities with Air Force aircraft to operate in their territories as a security measure to counter Russian threats.
Are you aware of a nation that has a US military base that is there without agreement with the host country?

Invitation means nothing.

The US gov's constant military interventions and provocations will lead to war, which is exactly what they appear to want in Ukraine.

It is none of our business what goes on in E. Europe and interventions leading to war cause terrible death and suffering. One would think all Americans would know this after decades of war and failure.

It means something when comparing it to entering nations without invitation. One can agree or disagree with your comment, it in no way validates the way Russia enters neighboring nations by force of arms.

Russia has not invaded Ukraine...and the Crimean's were very happy to be annexed by Russia.

I suppose you think the USA does NOT enter nations by the force of arms.

I disagree with you on whether Russia invaded Crimea and whether Crimea was legally transferred to Russia. The international community, including the UN disagrees with you also. The Tatars, who have been there longer than both the Russians and Ukrainians disagree with you too. Even the Chinese refused to vote on the legitimacy of the sham election in Crimea. Many of the Crimean's that wanted to be annexed to Russia are already having buyers remorse. They are now suffering the second invasion. This one is not military, it is economic. The country is being overrun by "Moscow" carpetbaggers who are pushing many of the ethnic Russians who supported the annexation, to the side. By the way, Putin has admitted Russian troops and mercenaries participated in the take over of Crimea. The "Green" ,men running around armed with Russian weapons and armored vehicles, wearing Russian uniforms with the insignia's removed were Russian. The first mercenaries to take over the Ukrainian border post were member of a huge Russian so called motorcycle club or gang called the Wolves. They showed up well armed and backed up by Russian troops with tanks.

This same UN just said Israel is the most repressive country in the world in regard to women's rights.

Pretty much sums up how fucked up the UN is, right?

 

[Sonc]

Don’t forget about the Crimean Tatars.

10% These 10% were eligible to vote in a referendum.

What do you think?

I do not understand ... can you explain to me why the US government recognizes the President of Ukraine ... ... who was chosen against the Constitution?
Because the previous president was not removed by law.

But does not recognize the referendum, which was conducted legitimate parliament of the Crimea.
Which selects the population of Crimea .... including 10% of Tatars (about them no one has forgotten). Select up how there came the Russian troops.

Question 2. Why they did not fight in the Crimea?
If this is their land?

 

[Camp]

It means something when comparing it to entering nations without invitation. One can agree or disagree with your comment, it in no way validates the way Russia enters neighboring nations by force of arms.

After what the US has done in Afghanistan and Iraq, you are one major fucking hypocrite, to criticize the Russians.

How do I g

It means something when comparing it to entering nations without invitation. One can agree or disagree with your comment, it in no way validates the way Russia enters neighboring nations by force of arms.

After what the US has done in Afghanistan and Iraq, you are one major fucking hypocrite, to criticize the Russians.

How the heck do I get the blame or credit for Afghanistan and Iraq. Am I somehow more responsible than any other citizen? And anyhow, when you have to use the excuse that someone else did the same thing, it is an admission that your argument is a failure.

 

[Camp]

Everywhere we have the bases you are talking about. The NATO countries are not forced to join. They ask to join. When they join they invite NATO facilities. Often they have restrictions about the size and uses of the facilities. Most recently the Baltic countries have invited US Air Force facilities with Air Force aircraft to operate in their territories as a security measure to counter Russian threats.
Are you aware of a nation that has a US military base that is there without agreement with the host country?

Invitation means nothing.

The US gov's constant military interventions and provocations will lead to war, which is exactly what they appear to want in Ukraine.

It is none of our business what goes on in E. Europe and interventions leading to war cause terrible death and suffering. One would think all Americans would know this after decades of war and failure.

It means something when comparing it to entering nations without invitation. One can agree or disagree with your comment, it in no way validates the way Russia enters neighboring nations by force of arms.

Russia has not invaded Ukraine...and the Crimean's were very happy to be annexed by Russia.

I suppose you think the USA does NOT enter nations by the force of arms.

I disagree with you on whether Russia invaded Crimea and whether Crimea was legally transferred to Russia. The international community, including the UN disagrees with you also. The Tatars, who have been there longer than both the Russians and Ukrainians disagree with you too. Even the Chinese refused to vote on the legitimacy of the sham election in Crimea. Many of the Crimean's that wanted to be annexed to Russia are already having buyers remorse. They are now suffering the second invasion. This one is not military, it is economic. The country is being overrun by "Moscow" carpetbaggers who are pushing many of the ethnic Russians who supported the annexation, to the side. By the way, Putin has admitted Russian troops and mercenaries participated in the take over of Crimea. The "Green" ,men running around armed with Russian weapons and armored vehicles, wearing Russian uniforms with the insignia's removed were Russian. The first mercenaries to take over the Ukrainian border post were member of a huge Russian so called motorcycle club or gang called the Wolves. They showed up well armed and backed up by Russian troops with tanks.

This same UN just said Israel is the most repressive country in the world in regard to women's rights.

Pretty much sums up how fucked up the UN is, right?

I am seeing some lame ass responses. You are giving a defense that because of an action taken by the UN regarding Israel the Russian invasion of Ukraine is valid.

 

[Billo_Really]

How the heck do I get the blame or credit for Afghanistan and Iraq. Am I somehow more responsible than any other citizen?

No, you're not. I am just as guilty as you.

And anyhow, when you have to use the excuse that someone else did the same thing, it is an admission that your argument is a failure.

My argument is that you're a major fucking hypocrite criticizing the Russians for the same thing you supported when this nation did it.

The argument is valid.

 

[Toro]

It means something when comparing it to entering nations without invitation. One can agree or disagree with your comment, it in no way validates the way Russia enters neighboring nations by force of arms.

Russia has not invaded Ukraine...and the Crimean's were very happy to be annexed by Russia.

I suppose you think the USA does NOT enter nations by the force of arms.

I disagree with you on whether Russia invaded Crimea and whether Crimea was legally transferred to Russia. The international community, including the UN disagrees with you also. The Tatars, who have been there longer than both the Russians and Ukrainians disagree with you too. Even the Chinese refused to vote on the legitimacy of the sham election in Crimea. Many of the Crimean's that wanted to be annexed to Russia are already having buyers remorse. They are now suffering the second invasion. This one is not military, it is economic. The country is being overrun by "Moscow" carpetbaggers who are pushing many of the ethnic Russians who supported the annexation, to the side. By the way, Putin has admitted Russian troops and mercenaries participated in the take over of Crimea. The "Green" ,men running around armed with Russian weapons and armored vehicles, wearing Russian uniforms with the insignia's removed were Russian. The first mercenaries to take over the Ukrainian border post were member of a huge Russian so called motorcycle club or gang called the Wolves. They showed up well armed and backed up by Russian troops with tanks.

Your first mistake is believing anything from the international community, which would explain your lack of understanding.

I guess you do not believe in democracy, but instead chose to believe whatever the global elite tell you.
March 16 marks one year since the Crimean peninsula seceded from Ukraine and became a part of Russia after more than 96 percent of local voters supported the move in a referendum. The West refused to recognize Crimea’s reunification with Russia claiming it violated Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, and introduced several waves of sanctions targeting the country’s economy and certain individuals.
Disputed Crimea Referendum Sees 96.8 Percent Vote to Join Russia - NBC News

Please, do you really believe it when a totalitarian state claims they got over 90% of a vote? Did you miss all the media coverage about Ukrainian citizens being beaten in the streets or found floating in rivers before the sham election? Many fled as soon as the Russians showed up. These are some of the reasons the international community rejected the election. I am very certain I have better resources for accurate information than you assume.

Even your beloved international community knows Crimea wanted to leave Ukraine and join Russia. The vote clearly reflects this.

Those beaten and shot in the streets where done so primarily by the Nazis in the Kiev government. Just as they shot down the Malaysian jet liner in a false flag effort to implicate Russia, they are doing all they can to implicate Russia for their heinous acts. Have you failed to notice that the US Gov has not produced ANY evidence that Russia had anything to do with the shoot down? Yet they continue to claim it as does their lackeys in the western press.

rofl

The dumbest people in America are the weak-minded "libertarian" conspiracy theorists.

Let me guess, you think Bush was behind 9/11 too?

 

[Sonc]

My argument is that you're a major fucking hypocrite criticizing the Russians for the same thing you supported when this nation did it.
The argument is valid.

Russia does not do the same that made the US.
Why Ukraine has not fought in the Crimea, if this is their territory?
Simple logic. That's what happens with the occupiers

Why do the same thing does not happen in the Crimea with Russian soldiers?

 

[Toro]

And? Why do you think it is good that the USSR collapsed?

Because the USSR was an evil empire that was morally, intellectually and economically bankrupt.

You lost. Get over it.

But, fear not, American "libertarians" are on your side because they have an irrational pathological hatred of the US government, and are willing to believe any two-bit autocrat if it supports their ridiculous worldview.