Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
your point?D&C 134Nobody would suggest that, not even me.Blaylock, are you insinuating an assassination attempt on Mrs. Clinton?
Be very clear in your answer.
that being said, I think it would be a terrible thing for someone to kill her, but if she were to become president I can assure you that even though I would still think it terrible due to the fact that she held the office at the time,, I would still be out buying drinks for everyone at the bar. Much like I would if the monkey was put down.
I just wont be involved in anyway with such an action, I would even go as far as to turn someone in should I find out they were planning it.
5 We believe that all men are bound to sustain and uphold the respective governments in which they reside, while protected in their inherent and inalienable rights by the laws of such governments; and that sedition and rebellionare unbecoming every citizen thus protected, and should be punished accordingly; and that all governments have a right to enact such laws as in their own judgments are best calculated to secure the public interest; at the same time, however, holding sacred the freedom of conscience.
6 We believe that every man should be honored in his station, rulers and magistrates as such, being placed for the protection of the innocent and the punishment of the guilty; and that to the laws all men owe respect and deference, as without them peace and harmony would be supplanted by anarchy and terror; human laws being instituted for the express purpose of regulating our interests as individuals and nations, between man and man; and divine laws given of heaven, prescribing rules on spiritual concerns, for faith and worship, both to be answered by man to his Maker.
Talk to Bob Blaylock, who is flatly refusing to follow his religious direction. The scripture is from the LDS Doctrine and Covenants, a Mormon book of scripture authored from the 1820s on. These verses give the LDS political philosophy. If Blaylock says he lives them then his middle name is Gadianton.your point? or, maybe you were just looking for any reason at all to use something you found somewhere?D&C 134Nobody would suggest that, not even me.Blaylock, are you insinuating an assassination attempt on Mrs. Clinton?
Be very clear in your answer.
that being said, I think it would be a terrible thing for someone to kill her, but if she were to become president I can assure you that even though I would still think it terrible due to the fact that she held the office at the time,, I would still be out buying drinks for everyone at the bar. Much like I would if the monkey was put down.
I just wont be involved in anyway with such an action, I would even go as far as to turn someone in should I find out they were planning it.
5 We believe that all men are bound to sustain and uphold the respective governments in which they reside, while protected in their inherent and inalienable rights by the laws of such governments; and that sedition and rebellionare unbecoming every citizen thus protected, and should be punished accordingly; and that all governments have a right to enact such laws as in their own judgments are best calculated to secure the public interest; at the same time, however, holding sacred the freedom of conscience.
6 We believe that every man should be honored in his station, rulers and magistrates as such, being placed for the protection of the innocent and the punishment of the guilty; and that to the laws all men owe respect and deference, as without them peace and harmony would be supplanted by anarchy and terror; human laws being instituted for the express purpose of regulating our interests as individuals and nations, between man and man; and divine laws given of heaven, prescribing rules on spiritual concerns, for faith and worship, both to be answered by man to his Maker.
maybe you should direct this to liberal sites considering they all have the desire to disrupt Americans while supporting socialist trash.
Talk to Bob Blaylock, who is flatly refusing to follow his religious direction. The scripture is from the LDS Doctrine and Covenants, a Mormon book of scripture authored from the 1820s on. These verses give the LDS political philosophy. If Blaylock says he lives them then his middle name is Gadianton.
How in the hell is Hitlery going to unite the country? She can't even unite her own party...
Wasserman Schultz booed off stage in Philadelphia
Bob Blaylock insinuates Hillary should be assassinated.
Korihor is his name.
Both parties are not united for a reason, whether Donald's or that of Hillary.
It is because we have people like [COLOR=#ff99cc][B]Bob Blaylock[/B][/COLOR] trying to pull this country down. Bob undoubtedly supports Putin's efforts to influence the election on behalf of Trump.
Yes, your writing was clearly insinuating you would approve of an assassination attempt, which violates the spirit of D&C 134.
Yes, both Korihor and Gadianton are relevant, because they operated secretly in combinations to overthrow lawful government. Some in the militia far right (some Mormons, by the by) are trying to do just that.
Now you are dissing Russian attempts, yet in the past you admitted admiration of the Russian strong man.
Yes, you did imply such a thing. Yes, the spirit of Korihor and the spirit of the Gadiantons rules the hearts and souls of the LDS on the far right like the Bundys et al. Now you are saying that you don't admire Putin. See, our Korihor Blaylock denies his insinuation. That's what secret enemies of government do.
The point is simple: you implied you were alright and expected an assassination attempt on Hillary. Fact.I don't think I ever said that I do nor that I do not admire Putin. If you can find any posting in which I clearly said so either way, show us a link to it. But at this point, you seem to be falling so far into delusions, hallucinations, and madness, that I don't expect to see anything from you that makes any rational sense.Yes, you did imply such a thing. Yes, the spirit of Korihor and the spirit of the Gadiantons rules the hearts and souls of the LDS on the far right like the Bundys et al. Now you are saying that you don't admire Putin. See, our Korihor Blaylock denies his insinuation. That's what secret enemies of government do.
The point is simple: you implied you were alright [sic] and expected an assassination attempt on Hillary. Fact.
Such mind disease politically is out of step with verses 5 and 6 D&C 134 to honor and respect your rulers and government.
You have the heart of Gadianton and the spirit of Korihor. I am sure your priesthood file leadership realize that you off step, but don't know yet. But I bet they will. The LDS leadership is always on the outlook for deviancy.
Malnutrition is not hunger. Not even close. Many of those malnourished are also obese. The nutrition is there but the food that is easy to get and cheap to have as much as you want is horrible for you. It is no surprise that so many chose to eat in that manner.No offense, but you have no business being in this thread, as you obviously have NO idea about how things are in America. The only and I mean ONLY hungry people in this country are the ones who simply choose to be hungry. Food stamps simply could not be easier to qualify for AND by the way, we do have social security, and a myriad of welfare programs too boot.its not the guns that are the problem its people who are starving that just want something to eat, and in the usa that means they have to commit a crime, cause theydon t have social security, they are starving got a gun and no social security. obviouse solution : i don t want to starve i rob you
Also, most of the shootings in this country are by drug dealing thugs who have PLENTY of money.
Now, go away.
Red:
Les Miserables' theme and present day "Jean Valjeans" do exist regardless of whether you recognize the fact that they do.
Blue:
That you don't recognize that such individuals do exist, and that you construe their plight as you've noted above, is testament to just how much of an accurate idea you lack about "how things are in America." That you think some ~50M people are voluntarily hungry is pure absurdity. Hunger, unlike having shelter, is not something living creatures routinely and/or chronically do because they just want to. 50M people do not desire to starve or go hungry.
Were that many people willfully hungry, we'd call it a "hunger strike" and we'd be aware of the sociopolitical purpose for which they are striking. Do you realize just how many people ~50M million are? The 2012 election was won with ~62M votes over ~59M votes.
Other:
So, no, you go away. With any luck on the part of the rest of us, where you'll go is a library so you can gather better information than that to which you've thus far been exposed.
Please post a few examples of people in America who are starving.... Our national standard of hunger is "went more than 4 hours without a snack"
I provided one in the post to which you replied. I guess you didn't read it. Now you're asking for more. For what? So you can not read them too?
The interpretations of your religion are your bizarre understanding of it that somehow permits you to wish for and hope HRC is murdered. That is Gadianton and Korihor in your heart and soul.The point is simple: you implied you were alright [sic] and expected an assassination attempt on Hillary. Fact.
No, I did not imply any such thing. The only one who has said anything in this thread about any notion of assassinating Mrs. Clinton is you.
Your bizarre interpretations of my religion are irrelevant.Such mind disease politically is out of step with verses 5 and 6 D&C 134 to honor and respect your rulers and government.
You have the heart of Gadianton and the spirit of Korihor. I am sure your priesthood file leadership realize that you off step, but don't know yet. But I bet they will. The LDS leadership is always on the outlook for deviancy.
Many of those malnourished are also obese. The nutrition is there but the food that is easy to get and cheap to have as much as you want is horrible for you.
Again, that is food 'insecurity.'Many of those malnourished are also obese. The nutrition is there but the food that is easy to get and cheap to have as much as you want is horrible for you.
But it's worth noting that obesity and hunger can and do coexist for the same reason.
At first, the relationship between food insecurity and obesity was considered counterintuitive and labeled a paradox. This was due, in part, to our limited understanding of the causes and consequences of food insecurity. But now, with a more extensive research base and comprehensive conceptual framework, researchers conclude that the “coexistence of food insecurity and obesity is expected given that both are consequences of economic and social disadvantage” (Frongillo & Bernal, 2014).
Relationship Between Hunger and Obesity « Food Research & Action Center
Again, that is food 'insecurity.'
