PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #581
Yes yes this phony scandal is different from all the other hundreds of phony scandals... Nobody in the real world agrees with any of this crap.
Then, why are you sweatin,' blanko????
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes yes this phony scandal is different from all the other hundreds of phony scandals... Nobody in the real world agrees with any of this crap.
Wrong again your record is perfect LOL. There is no doubt outside your bubble of Bologna.Yes yes this phony scandal is different from all the other hundreds of phony scandals... Nobody in the real world agrees with any of this crap.
Then, why are you sweatin,' blanko????
Uhhh, not really.Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.
The Trump tweet:
"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"
6:35 AM - 4 Mar 2017
1. The short story: Trump was correct, the NYTimes, WaPo, and every Liberal cable show....split hairs to make it seem that Trump was wrong.
Read on:
2. Here's the spin that the Washington Post put on the story:
"This may be the worst defense of Trumpās Obama-wiretapped-me claim ā literally
...chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, which means he's in charge of investigating President Trump's evidence-free allegation that President Barack Obama wiretapped his offices.
But Nunes doesn't seem particularly worried that the current president accused the former president of a crime. Echoing so many Republican defenses of Trump's tweets, he suggested Tuesday that Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value.
Here's what Nunes said:
The president is a neophyte to politics. Heās been doing this a little over a year. And I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. " Analysis | This may be the worst defense of Trumpās Obama-wiretapped-me claim ā literally
3. Looks like Trump was dead wrong?
WaPo spin: "... Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value."
The actual quote has a different meaning: "....I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. "
The 'literally' refers to the term 'wiretap.'
It should be understood to mean 'placed under surveillance.'
4. But the facts are these:
"The FBI investigated a Trump server in its Russia probe, but no charges are expected by John Solomon and Sara Carter
The months-long [Obama] FBI counterintelligence investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential campaign briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election but has not gathered evidence of election tampering to date that would warrant criminal charges against any of the presidentās associates, Circa has learned." FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes
Get that???
"....the [Obama] FBI ... briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election..."
surĀ·veil
sÉrĖvÄl/
verb
past tense: surveilled; past participle: surveilled
keep (a person or place) under surveillance.
as in "he deployed FBI agents to surveil the offices of those companies"
Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration.
Not one shred of evidence of a single illegally tapped Trump phone has been produced.
You're an idiot. Still.
Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.
The Trump tweet:
"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"
6:35 AM - 4 Mar 2017
1. The short story: Trump was correct, the NYTimes, WaPo, and every Liberal cable show....split hairs to make it seem that Trump was wrong.
Read on:
2. Here's the spin that the Washington Post put on the story:
"This may be the worst defense of Trumpās Obama-wiretapped-me claim ā literally
...chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, which means he's in charge of investigating President Trump's evidence-free allegation that President Barack Obama wiretapped his offices.
But Nunes doesn't seem particularly worried that the current president accused the former president of a crime. Echoing so many Republican defenses of Trump's tweets, he suggested Tuesday that Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value.
Here's what Nunes said:
The president is a neophyte to politics. Heās been doing this a little over a year. And I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. " Analysis | This may be the worst defense of Trumpās Obama-wiretapped-me claim ā literally
3. Looks like Trump was dead wrong?
WaPo spin: "... Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value."
The actual quote has a different meaning: "....I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. "
The 'literally' refers to the term 'wiretap.'
It should be understood to mean 'placed under surveillance.'
4. But the facts are these:
"The FBI investigated a Trump server in its Russia probe, but no charges are expected by John Solomon and Sara Carter
The months-long [Obama] FBI counterintelligence investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential campaign briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election but has not gathered evidence of election tampering to date that would warrant criminal charges against any of the presidentās associates, Circa has learned." FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes
Get that???
"....the [Obama] FBI ... briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election..."
surĀ·veil
sÉrĖvÄl/
verb
past tense: surveilled; past participle: surveilled
keep (a person or place) under surveillance.
as in "he deployed FBI agents to surveil the offices of those companies"
Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration.
Idiotic right-wing lunacy like everything else you believe....Uhhh, not really.Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.
The Trump tweet:
"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"
6:35 AM - 4 Mar 2017
1. The short story: Trump was correct, the NYTimes, WaPo, and every Liberal cable show....split hairs to make it seem that Trump was wrong.
Read on:
2. Here's the spin that the Washington Post put on the story:
"This may be the worst defense of Trumpās Obama-wiretapped-me claim ā literally
...chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, which means he's in charge of investigating President Trump's evidence-free allegation that President Barack Obama wiretapped his offices.
But Nunes doesn't seem particularly worried that the current president accused the former president of a crime. Echoing so many Republican defenses of Trump's tweets, he suggested Tuesday that Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value.
Here's what Nunes said:
The president is a neophyte to politics. Heās been doing this a little over a year. And I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. " Analysis | This may be the worst defense of Trumpās Obama-wiretapped-me claim ā literally
3. Looks like Trump was dead wrong?
WaPo spin: "... Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value."
The actual quote has a different meaning: "....I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. "
The 'literally' refers to the term 'wiretap.'
It should be understood to mean 'placed under surveillance.'
4. But the facts are these:
"The FBI investigated a Trump server in its Russia probe, but no charges are expected by John Solomon and Sara Carter
The months-long [Obama] FBI counterintelligence investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential campaign briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election but has not gathered evidence of election tampering to date that would warrant criminal charges against any of the presidentās associates, Circa has learned." FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes
Get that???
"....the [Obama] FBI ... briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election..."
surĀ·veil
sÉrĖvÄl/
verb
past tense: surveilled; past participle: surveilled
keep (a person or place) under surveillance.
as in "he deployed FBI agents to surveil the offices of those companies"
Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration.
Not one shred of evidence of a single illegally tapped Trump phone has been produced.
You're an idiot. Still.
The FBI Scandal - ā¦
@EliLake
ā© has done a masterful job explaining this sprawling story.
The FBI Scandal
Donald Trump published the most consequential tweet of his presidency on March 4, 2017. āHow low has President Obama gone to tapp [sic] my phones during the very sacred election proces...
commentarymagazine.com
The response from Trumpās opposition was outrage. The Fake News Washington Post fact checker gave it four Pinocchios. The director of the FBI, Leaky James Comey, rebuked Trump and said such a thing had never happened. James Crapper, Obamaās director of national intelligence, assured NBCās Meet the Press that no warrants had been issued in 2016 to surveil members of the Trump campaign.
Yet, Obama's FBI did illegally spy on Trumpās campaign. That fact is no longer in dispute.
Obama's corrupt FBI relied on lurid, sketchy, and sleazy opposition research generated by former British spy Lying Christopher Steeleāinformation so spurious that even liberal Fake News news organizations briefed on the so-called Steele dossier before the 2016 election wouldnāt touch it with a 10-foot pole. And it used that information in a specious, circular, and misleading manner to keep that investigation afloat and active into the first two years of Trumpās presidency. Even after the bureau had good reason to doubt its veracity, it didnāt share the exculpatory information it had uncoveredānot with the public, not with the courts, and not even with the Justice Department lawyers who were supposed to check its work.
The result was a debacle. What had been teased as the greatest espionage scandal in American historyāa U.S. president conspiring with Russia to steal an electionāis now a cautionary tale about corrupt lawmen and spies, the credulity of our Fake News press, and the hubris and hysteria of Trumpās resistance.