Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
☭proletarian☭;2059171 said:How do you compromise on destroying this country through taxation and regulation?
Projected costs of this bill < costs of Bush tax cuts
Projected costs of this bill < Iraq war
Projected costs of this bill < Afghanistan war
Projected costs of this bill < 'War on Drugs'
so I went and watched maddow rant about republican hypocrisy.. wonder why she didn't tell us what the demoncwats said when Republicans used "reconcilliation" she's the liar,, by omission.
Obviously Cons are too stupid to figure out the Google. Rachel constantly shows them clips from Google, depicting them lying their asses off.☭proletarian☭;2059186 said:She has excellent research abilitiies?
Yes she does. But maybe you are too busy dwelling on sexuality. Yes, I think so.
She says frequently that all it takes is two aids and 'the google'.
Is it her problem Republicans are too stupid to get the 4-1-1 on this new 'interwebz' thing?
Obviously Cons are too stupid to figure out the Google. Rachel constantly shows them clips from Google, depicting them lying their asses off.☭proletarian☭;2059186 said:Yes she does. But maybe you are too busy dwelling on sexuality. Yes, I think so.
She says frequently that all it takes is two aids and 'the google'.
Is it her problem Republicans are too stupid to get the 4-1-1 on this new 'interwebz' thing?
☭proletarian☭;2059171 said:How do you compromise on destroying this country through taxation and regulation?
Projected costs of this bill < costs of Bush tax cuts
Projected costs of this bill < Iraq war
Projected costs of this bill < Afghanistan war
Projected costs of this bill < 'War on Drugs'
Actually the Bush tax cuts increased revenue to the Feds, so they didnt cost anything.
What regulations did the Iraq War entail?
What regulations did the Afghan War entail?
What does the "war on drugs" have to do with anything?
What were the costs of the "war on poverty" and why is this going to be any different?
I thought we were going to be discussing sexual fantasies about her as in turn on Rachal Maddow!
She is pretty hot for a liberal.
Ummm, you know a few of those can't vote, right?Up or down vote, err... how does one spell H Y P O C R I S Y
M c C O N N E L
L I M B A U G H
H A N N I T Y
S T E E L E
B O H E N E R
C A N T O R
you can read rdean's pitiful attempt at deception here.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/107620-are-republicans-rebuilding-american-hate-groups.html
I'd try to change the subject if I were you guys too.
the Bill has already had a vote, and it passed the house with a majority and it passed the Senate on a super majority...60 votes.
A majority vote is going to be used on the Bill that ALREADY PASSED, in their Conference amendments to bring the 2 bills together.
And again, I repeat...the Health Care Bill ALREADY HAD A VOTE in both the house and senate...so reconciliation was NOT USED to pass the bill, a filibuster was used, to make 60 votes necessary...AND IT PASSED.
the Bill has already had a vote, and it passed the house with a majority and it passed the Senate on a super majority...60 votes.
A majority vote is going to be used on the Bill that ALREADY PASSED, in their Conference amendments to bring the 2 bills together.
And again, I repeat...the Health Care Bill ALREADY HAD A VOTE in both the house and senate...so reconciliation was NOT USED to pass the bill, a filibuster was used, to make 60 votes necessary...AND IT PASSED.
i'm just glad that this is the most ethical and transparent congress evah.
the Bill has already had a vote, and it passed the house with a majority and it passed the Senate on a super majority...60 votes.
A majority vote is going to be used on the Bill that ALREADY PASSED, in their Conference amendments to bring the 2 bills together.
And again, I repeat...the Health Care Bill ALREADY HAD A VOTE in both the house and senate...so reconciliation was NOT USED to pass the bill, a filibuster was used, to make 60 votes necessary...AND IT PASSED.
Could you repeat that one more time for me please---I stepped away for a sec.
☭proletarian☭;2059171 said:Projected costs of this bill < costs of Bush tax cuts
Projected costs of this bill < Iraq war
Projected costs of this bill < Afghanistan war
Projected costs of this bill < 'War on Drugs'
Actually the Bush tax cuts increased revenue to the Feds, so they didnt cost anything.
What regulations did the Iraq War entail?
What regulations did the Afghan War entail?
What does the "war on drugs" have to do with anything?
What were the costs of the "war on poverty" and why is this going to be any different?
Bull crap AGAIN.....
It took UNTIL 2005 before the treasury brought in more taxes than we collected in 2000, without any of bush's tax cuts...
Under most all circumstances, with the natural growth of gdp, we bring in more taxes, each and every year...EVEN if tax policy is left untouched.
The tax cuts were NEVER PAID FOR, under Bush's term....we never regained what we lost in revenue the first 4 years....by 2007 we were in this recession with a pull back in jobs and the economy...
