Tunguska disaster a nuclear explosion?

Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by whitehall, Sep 17, 2011.

  1. whitehall
    Offline

    whitehall Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    31,468
    Thanks Received:
    5,167
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    Western Va.
    Ratings:
    +15,250
    Pop history tells us that the explosion in a remote section of Siberia in 1908 was the result of a meteor which left no trace. The explosion left radiation residue and the blast was identical to 1945 American nuclear tests. Secietific geniuses were in no short supply in the late 1800's and a New Zealand scientist was experimenting in nuclear energy in the UK in the early 1900's. Nobody knows what was going on in the relatively closed society of Russia in the early 1900's and it is reasonabe to suspect that a nuclear test lab located in a remote area might have gone up in the first big one. It's a better theory than a meteor which conveniently picked remote Siberia instead of New York City and left no trace.
     
  2. uscitizen
    Offline

    uscitizen Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    45,941
    Thanks Received:
    4,790
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    My Shack
    Ratings:
    +4,808
    I was just showing off for some chicks. Never activate warp drive that close to the surface.
     
  3. daveman
    Offline

    daveman Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2010
    Messages:
    51,301
    Thanks Received:
    5,694
    Trophy Points:
    1,775
    Location:
    On the way to the Dark Tower.
    Ratings:
    +5,763
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. whitehall
    Offline

    whitehall Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    31,468
    Thanks Received:
    5,167
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    Western Va.
    Ratings:
    +15,250
    Ah . new research reveals.... Well I saw the planes crash into the World Trade Center and some people are trying to tell me that ...new research reveals something else happened. Research is sometimes like beauty. It's in the eye of the researcher. What's the chance of a comet hitting the most remote area on the globe? Pretty convenient and lucky.
     
  5. percysunshine
    Offline

    percysunshine Gold Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    19,164
    Thanks Received:
    2,514
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Sty
    Ratings:
    +8,861
    'Secietific geniuses were in no short supply in the late 1800's'

    Unquestionably.
     
  6. daveman
    Offline

    daveman Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2010
    Messages:
    51,301
    Thanks Received:
    5,694
    Trophy Points:
    1,775
    Location:
    On the way to the Dark Tower.
    Ratings:
    +5,763
    Well, given that there are more remote areas than heavily-populated areas, I'd say the chances are pretty good.
     
  7. Unkotare
    Offline

    Unkotare Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2011
    Messages:
    67,289
    Thanks Received:
    5,300
    Trophy Points:
    1,815
    Ratings:
    +14,614
    Hey, don't spoil the fun with rational thinking!
     
  8. Toddsterpatriot
    Offline

    Toddsterpatriot Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Messages:
    32,191
    Thanks Received:
    4,281
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings:
    +14,489
    Statistics are difficult for some people.
     
  9. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    53,240
    Thanks Received:
    5,551
    Trophy Points:
    1,850
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +6,406
    Exactly where was Oppenheimer and his buddies when this happened? Eots --we need you.
     
  10. daveman
    Offline

    daveman Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2010
    Messages:
    51,301
    Thanks Received:
    5,694
    Trophy Points:
    1,775
    Location:
    On the way to the Dark Tower.
    Ratings:
    +5,763
    Apparently.
     

Share This Page