Trump's sniveling "witch hunt" claim

[bill718]

After 12 months, Robert Mueller's investigation has already delivered indictments or guilty pleas involving 19 people and three companies. Members of Trump's inner circle express worries that the probe may yet ensnare more figures in Trump’s orbit, including family members. There is particularly worry about Trump’s eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., and Jared Kushner, his son-in-law and a senior adviser. President Trump combats the probe with bluster, disarray and defiance as he scrambles for survival. Trump gripes that he needs better “TV lawyers” to defend him on cable news.

Dear Trump supporters: "Witch hunts" don't yield indictments or guilty pleas involving 19 people and three companies! Every guilty plea, and every member of Trump's associates that flip give more and more legitimacy to Mueller's investigation. So stop sniveling like little girls about witch hunts and face the fact that your fearless leader and his little minions are just plain guilty.


‘Buckle up’: As Mueller probe enters second year, Trump and allies go on war footing

Trump Says There’s No Evidence of Collusion. There Is So Much Evidence Already.

Ex-Trump aide: Mueller is still 'really focused' on Russia collusion

Trump falsely says Comey memos exonerate him

 

[EvilCat Breath]

There is no evidence of any crime. All of the indictments are for process crimes arising from the investigation. The charges against the Russians are about to disappear since the judge ordered Mueller to produce evidence of a crime and he can't.

 

[whitehall]

You could find enough dirt to indict the freaking Pope if you looked hard enough. You could say that Obama and former A.G. Holder are guilty of manslaughter for their part in sending over 3,000 illegal weapons to Mexican drug cartels and the resulting hundreds of deaths of innocent Mexicans and at least one American Border Patrol Officer but there won't be an investigation. The stated intent of the Mueller witch hunt was to prove collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians and so far it seems the only collusion was between the Hillary campaign and the Russians and Barry Hussein authorized an illegal surveillance on a political opponent like some Banana Republic dictator.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

One is already serving prison time and there's ...

 

[JakeStarkey]

OP does stand tall, and any argument before it does fall.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Wow talk about sniveling....The left has been doing a hell of a lot of it and prosecuted ZERO collusion crimes involving Trump...

When are we going to start inditing democrats who we can prove colluded with foreign governments to influence our elections...

 

[JakeStarkey]

Stop the sniveling now and get ready for Mueller's release.

You will be able to snivel for years then, alt right.

 

[BULLDOG]

You could find enough dirt to indict the freaking Pope if you looked hard enough. You could say that Obama and former A.G. Holder are guilty of manslaughter for their part in sending over 3,000 illegal weapons to Mexican drug cartels and the resulting hundreds of deaths of innocent Mexicans and at least one American Border Patrol Officer but there won't be an investigation. The stated intent of the Mueller witch hunt was to prove collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians and so far it seems the only collusion was between the Hillary campaign and the Russians and Barry Hussein authorized an illegal surveillance on a political opponent like some Banana Republic dictator.

I guess that's why they spent more than 4 years on that Whitewater investigation that finally turned up Bill getting a blowjob. In another few years, you might have something to whine about, but for now, you crazy right wingers set the precident. Get over it.

 

[BULLDOG]

Wow talk about sniveling....The left has been doing a hell of a lot of it and prosecuted ZERO collusion crimes involving Trump...

When are we going to start inditing democrats who we can prove colluded with foreign governments to influence our elections...

You should immediately take any evidence of law breaking that you think you might have to the police. If you don't have any evidence, you should quit whining.

 

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,


1. The criminals run the DNC, (FACT) lots of pretend Republicans, and the justice department, FBI, CIA, Supreme Court,
2. When will some one find the flush handle?


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[Siete]

PSSSSSSSSSTTTTT- HELLOOOOOOOOOOOOO dumbshits

Mueller iSnt publishing a running account of his evidence OR anything else pertaining to the investigation. Exactly how many investigation reports has he made public ? - EXACTLY NOT A SINGLE ONE

everyone of you "no evidence" idiots have got to be the biggest fumbducks on the entire PLANET.

DDDDDUUUURRRRRRRR

 

[Andylusion]

After 12 months, Robert Mueller's investigation has already delivered indictments or guilty pleas involving 19 people and three companies. Members of Trump's inner circle express worries that the probe may yet ensnare more figures in Trump’s orbit, including family members. There is particularly worry about Trump’s eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., and Jared Kushner, his son-in-law and a senior adviser. President Trump combats the probe with bluster, disarray and defiance as he scrambles for survival. Trump gripes that he needs better “TV lawyers” to defend him on cable news.

Dear Trump supporters: "Witch hunts" don't yield indictments or guilty pleas involving 19 people and three companies! Every guilty plea, and every member of Trump's associates that flip give more and more legitimacy to Mueller's investigation. So stop sniveling like little girls about witch hunts and face the fact that your fearless leader and his little minions are just plain guilty.


‘Buckle up’: As Mueller probe enters second year, Trump and allies go on war footing

Trump Says There’s No Evidence of Collusion. There Is So Much Evidence Already.

Ex-Trump aide: Mueller is still 'really focused' on Russia collusion

Trump falsely says Comey memos exonerate him

First off...... You blew up your own statement, when you said ""Witch hunts" don't yield indictments or guilty pleas". This shows how unbelievably ignorant you are. Do you know where the phrase "witch hunt" came from? The Salem Witch trials. There were tons of people who plead guilty and some were killed, because of that made up fabricated trial.

Point being..... there are always indictments and guilty pleas in witch hunts. ALWAYS. Read a book dude.

Second, there are two different things here.

One part of the investigation is, was there Russian interferrence. Answer: Yes. Russia is Russia. The original home of the world wide intelligence organizations, the KGB. They infamous. It would be more of a shocking news story, if Russia was NOT interfering.

I have no problem with that part of the investigation, except that thus far we have ZERO real hard evidence supporting it. Maybe Mueller has this evidence, and maybe he doesn't.

The second part of this investigation is about whether or not Trump had any collusion with Russia. There is NOTHING.... as in..... absolutely NOTHING, so far supporting this. Nothing. Absolutely Nothing.

I'm sorry, but I've read all the evidence that has been presented by everyone on this, and there is nothing there.

If Mueller has something to support his continuing investigation into Trump, he needs to show it, or shut it. At some point, it's not good to have a non-stop investigation that the only indictments you have are for making false statements, that don't have anything to do with the investigation. You have to show something eventually.

When Kenneth Starr put out the Star Report, he had hundreds of pages of hard evidence against Clinton. Mueller so far, has zero. At least he hasn't shown anything yet.

 

[Andylusion]

PSSSSSSSSSTTTTT- HELLOOOOOOOOOOOOO dumbshits

Mueller iSnt publishing a running account of his evidence OR anything else pertaining to the investigation. Exactly how many investigation reports has he made public ? - EXACTLY NOT A SINGLE ONE

everyone of you "no evidence" idiots have got to be the biggest fumbducks on the entire PLANET.

DDDDDUUUURRRRRRRR

Then you can't blame us for thinking it's all garbage. Because when Kenneth Star was investigating Bill Clinton, he had tons of dirt on him. Hundreds of pages of it. And we did know about it.

So I can't help but think that the reason Mueller hasn't show us anything worth investigating yet... is because he doesn't have anything.

By the way, if you want to be in an adult conversation, you should likely start talking more like an adult. You may find yourself ignored by everyone pretty soon, if you are going to talk like a 3-year-old who is still wearing diapers.

 

[Camp]

[

When Kenneth Starr put out the Star Report, he had hundreds of pages of hard evidence against Clinton. Mueller so far, has zero. At least he hasn't shown anything yet.

The hard evidence you claim is highly debatable and controversial, but even if your claim is given the benefit of the doubt, it should be noted that Starr took over the Special Counsel position from Robert Fiske in August of 1994 who had begun his investigation in January of that year. Hence, Starr took over an already half year plus investigation. The Starr Report, came out in early September 1998, almost a full four years after Starr took over the already 6 plus months investigation. So, you are comparing Mueller's special counsel status of just short of one year to Kenneth Starr's over four years of investigations. Starr = 4 years + 6 months Mueller = 1 year -1 week

 

[Andylusion]

[

When Kenneth Starr put out the Star Report, he had hundreds of pages of hard evidence against Clinton. Mueller so far, has zero. At least he hasn't shown anything yet.

The hard evidence you claim is highly debatable and controversial, but even if your claim is given the benefit of the doubt, it should be noted that Starr took over the Special Counsel position from Robert Fiske in August of 1994 who had begun his investigation in January of that year. Hence, Starr took over an already half year plus investigation. The Starr Report, came out in early September 1998, almost a full four years after Starr took over the already 6 plus months investigation. So, you are comparing Mueller's special counsel status of just short of one year to Kenneth Starr's over four years of investigations. Starr = 4 years + 6 months Mueller = 1 year -1 week

Only partially true. Yeah, he did take over for Robert Fiske. But the investigation was about the Whitewater scandal. We knew pretty quick what was going on.

As for the star report about Perjury, Witness Tampering, Obstruction of Justice, and everything else that surrounding the Monica scandal.... NO you are wrong.

Linda Tripp had recordings of the obstruction of justice, by the fall of 1997. The Drudge broke the story January of 1998, and Clinton was impeached that year, with most of the evidence against him, openly known.

It was months between criminal act, evidence collected, and charges brought. The Starr report was released in September of 98, not even a year later than the criminal act, and just months before impeachment. It was not 4 years. You are wrong.

 

[SmokeALib]

The worthless leftists are just upset because Trump is president. That means no more free shit and more personal responsibility.
You worthless leftists make me sick.

 

[Camp]

[

When Kenneth Starr put out the Star Report, he had hundreds of pages of hard evidence against Clinton. Mueller so far, has zero. At least he hasn't shown anything yet.

The hard evidence you claim is highly debatable and controversial, but even if your claim is given the benefit of the doubt, it should be noted that Starr took over the Special Counsel position from Robert Fiske in August of 1994 who had begun his investigation in January of that year. Hence, Starr took over an already half year plus investigation. The Starr Report, came out in early September 1998, almost a full four years after Starr took over the already 6 plus months investigation. So, you are comparing Mueller's special counsel status of just short of one year to Kenneth Starr's over four years of investigations. Starr = 4 years + 6 months Mueller = 1 year -1 week

Only partially true. Yeah, he did take over for Robert Fiske. But the investigation was about the Whitewater scandal. We knew pretty quick what was going on.

As for the star report about Perjury, Witness Tampering, Obstruction of Justice, and everything else that surrounding the Monica scandal.... NO you are wrong.

Linda Tripp had recordings of the obstruction of justice, by the fall of 1997. The Drudge broke the story January of 1998, and Clinton was impeached that year, with most of the evidence against him, openly known.

It was months between criminal act, evidence collected, and charges brought. The Starr report was released in September of 98, not even a year later than the criminal act, and just months before impeachment. It was not 4 years. You are wrong.

My dates are correct. You can wiggle them around with diversions about Linda Tripp or other witnesses, but the facts are what I posted. Starr took over the investigation from Fiske and made his report four years later. He spent four years investigating with a six month head start from Fiske. You guys are following Trump orders and demanding the Mueller investigation be brought to an end after less than a year. And unlike Ken Starr, Mueller already has a load of indictments and guilty pleas. He even has one guy in prison doing a sentence.

 

[Camp]

The worthless leftists are just upset because Trump is president. That means no more free shit and more personal responsibility.
You worthless leftists make me sick.

Stop your whining snowflake. It makes you more annoying and makes you look like a dumber a-hole than usual.

 

[Andylusion]

[

When Kenneth Starr put out the Star Report, he had hundreds of pages of hard evidence against Clinton. Mueller so far, has zero. At least he hasn't shown anything yet.

The hard evidence you claim is highly debatable and controversial, but even if your claim is given the benefit of the doubt, it should be noted that Starr took over the Special Counsel position from Robert Fiske in August of 1994 who had begun his investigation in January of that year. Hence, Starr took over an already half year plus investigation. The Starr Report, came out in early September 1998, almost a full four years after Starr took over the already 6 plus months investigation. So, you are comparing Mueller's special counsel status of just short of one year to Kenneth Starr's over four years of investigations. Starr = 4 years + 6 months Mueller = 1 year -1 week

Only partially true. Yeah, he did take over for Robert Fiske. But the investigation was about the Whitewater scandal. We knew pretty quick what was going on.

As for the star report about Perjury, Witness Tampering, Obstruction of Justice, and everything else that surrounding the Monica scandal.... NO you are wrong.

Linda Tripp had recordings of the obstruction of justice, by the fall of 1997. The Drudge broke the story January of 1998, and Clinton was impeached that year, with most of the evidence against him, openly known.

It was months between criminal act, evidence collected, and charges brought. The Starr report was released in September of 98, not even a year later than the criminal act, and just months before impeachment. It was not 4 years. You are wrong.

My dates are correct. You can wiggle them around with diversions about Linda Tripp or other witnesses, but the facts are what I posted. Starr took over the investigation from Fiske and made his report four years later. He spent four years investigating with a six month head start from Fiske. You guys are following Trump orders and demanding the Mueller investigation be brought to an end after less than a year. And unlike Ken Starr, Mueller already has a load of indictments and guilty pleas. He even has one guy in prison doing a sentence.

Ah yes, the typical left-wing "la la la I can't hear you" routine.

I'll say it again..... your dates are irrelevant. The Starr report which I referenced was about the Monica Scandal. That started with the taping of conversations about perjury and obstruction of justice, in the fall of 1997. The story broke in early 1998. The Starr report came out in September of 1998. Bill was impeached December of 1998.

The amount of time between crime, and report, and impeachment was mere months. Not 4 years.

Now you can either accept the facts, or you have proven yourself not mentally competent to be discussing this topic.

You tell me which it is. Is what I said fact, and true? Or are you the Forest Gump of partisanship? You tell me.

 

[SmokeALib]

The worthless leftists are just upset because Trump is president. That means no more free shit and more personal responsibility.
You worthless leftists make me sick.

Stop your whining snowflake. It makes you more annoying and makes you look like a dumber a-hole than usual.

Keep on cryin' and keep them hands out ya worthless leftist reject.