Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 102,505
- 83,893
- 3,645
Sure. You just dont feel like saying why they are fallacious. We hear ya.You are the king of fallacious arguments, dude.That wasnt a deflection or a lie. You somehow know they are quacks, and you are obviously lying to state that the idea should be rejected out of hand for this. That is clearly not why you reject it. I doubt you even fool yourself with that hilariously transparent lie.They're all quacks, eh? Haha...all doctors who give opinions you dont like are quacks, now. But no bias...no sir...Yes, you are clearly more biased. You call me biased for relating the opinion of doctors, while you reject it out of jand based on nothing but your preconceptions. Yes, it is you who are more biased.
I don't listen to quacks..
and a doctor that claims to be able to diagnose someone from tv appearances is a
...all doctors who give opinions you dont like are quacks, now.
Didn't say that, did I?
I said doctors that make a diagnosis based on sound bytes and television appearances are quacks.
By your deflection, and lies, it's obvious you're running out of legs to stand on
Obviously, when so many trained prpfessionals speak out, they are not all incompetent quacks. And tge APA does not strictly disagree that certain disorders CAN, in fact, be diagnosed from afar. They just dont think it should be done, in order to keep their field from being polticized.
But, somehow, you know better than the APA and the doctors. Haha, no. You're a Trumpkins, and you will say literally ANYTHING to dismiss this historical amount of criticism. He has turned your brain to tapioca.