Spare_change
Gold Member
- Jun 27, 2011
- 8,690
- 1,293
- 280
... and, then, they go off their wheels.Trump represents his republican base they both suffer from dementia.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
... and, then, they go off their wheels.Trump represents his republican base they both suffer from dementia.
Yes, you are clearly more biased. You call me biased for relating the opinion of doctors, while you reject it out of jand based on nothing but your preconceptions. Yes, it is you who are more biased.I just told you why you can make an exception.Why would I make an exception?
How is it any different than the republican that diagnosed Teri Shiavo from watching video?
And it's different because it is a mental health diagnosis, based on outward behavior. No blood tests required. No EEG or MRI required. No physical tests required.
The exception being, Trump is someone you don't like, so anything goes in getting him out of office.
Get him on a couch, with a respected doctor, and I'll buy your line.
Making a remote diagnosis?
You're confusing yourself. It's not "my line". It's the opinion of many doctors willing to sacrifice their own standing to break with the ethics rules of the APA.
And I dont scoff at your standard for being "100% convinced". But I do scoff at you rejecting it out of hand, which demonstrates that you are clearly the more biased of the two of us.
Hardly the more biased.
You want to find Trump crazy?
Go for it.
But don't convince me you can get a real diagnosis by remote control.
Is that your professional opinion, doctor? From what university did you obtain your PHD in psychology?Here ya go...
Step right up,
Step right up.
get Trump diagnosed,
just cost ya a nickel, 1/2 of a dime, 1/20th of a dollar.
and as reliable as anyone that claims they can diagnose him from watching tv
Putin? YesOnce again, we have to thank Jesus and Uncle Vlad for putting Trump in the White House and keeping Progressives Fascism at bay
Yes there have been other threads on this topic. Unfortunatly they have all fallaen by the wayside. Here are two:
New Bill Would Require Trump To Undergo Mental Health Evaluation
Why We Must Talk About Trump’s Mental Health
People have a short attention span and that is not good This is a subject that must not be ignored least we wake up to a once great nation the we no longer reccognize, or worse. Not convinced?? You might want to start with this:
Fortunatly, not all law makers are asleep at the switch on this:
Lawmaker Urges Trump's Cabinet To Have Him Undergo Mental Health Evaluation | HuffPost
A new resolution introduced in the House of Representatives would encourage the vice president and the Cabinet to have President Donald Trump undergo a physical and mental health exam to determine if he is stable enough to stay in office.Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) introduced the resolution on Friday. Should the results of said exam be unfavorable, the resolution calls for Vice President Mike Pence and members of the Cabinet to remove Trump from office.
The move would invoke the 25th Amendment, a rarely used constitutional provision that allows the vice president and a majority of Cabinet members to jointly remove the president from office and replace him with the vice president.
In April, A bill was introduced in the House to pt teeth in the 25th Amendment on Presidential Disability and Succession
Text - H.R.2093 - 115th Congress (2017-2018): Strengthening and Clarifying the 25th Amendment Act of 2017
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
April 14, 2017
Mr. Blumenauer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To provide for an alternative body to transmit a written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office in accordance with the provisions of the 25th Amendment of the Constitution.
Lawmakers are clearly concerned
And now...This just in:
Democrats Are Calling Psychologists To Talk About Trump's Mental Health
NO SANE OR RESPONSIBLE PERSON SHOULD WANT THIS MADNESS TO CONTINUE !member of the House Intelligence Committee is going where many of her colleagues have not: reaching out to people in the mental health field to talk about President Donald Trump.
“It’s one thing from my non-professional, non-clinical standpoint [to] believe that someone does not have the capacity to do the job, it’s another thing to talk to experts and [those] who can deal with mental psychosis on a daily basis, so I wanted to hear from them,” Rep. Jackie Speier, a California Democrat, told BuzzFeed News.
You're right .......
We should ignore the economy.
We should ignore healthcare.
We should ignore illegal immigration.
We should ignore North Korea.
We should ignore Pakistan's tacit support for terrorists.
We should ignore the increasing crisis between Pakistan and India.
We should ignore the attacks on our government and financial cyber systems
We should ignore onerous government regulations.
We should ignore illegal activities by government employees.
We should ignore the intellectual and financial thefts of our productivity by the Chinese.
We should ignore faulty and ridiculous economic agreements.
We should ignore Iran and nuclear weapons.
We should ignore cities in revolt.
We should ignore the spiraling collapse of inner cities.
We should ignore an education system that creates dysfunctional idiots.
Let's focus on the President .... hmph! Get a clue.
Are you sure about that Bro?There is nothing wrong with Trump's mental health. Like millions of other people he's an asshole. He just happens to be an asshole who got elected president.
Yes there have been other threads on this topic. Unfortunatly they have all fallaen by the wayside. Here are two:
New Bill Would Require Trump To Undergo Mental Health Evaluation
Why We Must Talk About Trump’s Mental Health
People have a short attention span and that is not good This is a subject that must not be ignored least we wake up to a once great nation the we no longer reccognize, or worse. Not convinced?? You might want to start with this:
Fortunatly, not all law makers are asleep at the switch on this:
Lawmaker Urges Trump's Cabinet To Have Him Undergo Mental Health Evaluation | HuffPost
A new resolution introduced in the House of Representatives would encourage the vice president and the Cabinet to have President Donald Trump undergo a physical and mental health exam to determine if he is stable enough to stay in office.Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) introduced the resolution on Friday. Should the results of said exam be unfavorable, the resolution calls for Vice President Mike Pence and members of the Cabinet to remove Trump from office.
The move would invoke the 25th Amendment, a rarely used constitutional provision that allows the vice president and a majority of Cabinet members to jointly remove the president from office and replace him with the vice president.
In April, A bill was introduced in the House to pt teeth in the 25th Amendment on Presidential Disability and Succession
Text - H.R.2093 - 115th Congress (2017-2018): Strengthening and Clarifying the 25th Amendment Act of 2017
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
April 14, 2017
Mr. Blumenauer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To provide for an alternative body to transmit a written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office in accordance with the provisions of the 25th Amendment of the Constitution.
Lawmakers are clearly concerned
And now...This just in:
Democrats Are Calling Psychologists To Talk About Trump's Mental Health
NO SANE OR RESPONSIBLE PERSON SHOULD WANT THIS MADNESS TO CONTINUE !member of the House Intelligence Committee is going where many of her colleagues have not: reaching out to people in the mental health field to talk about President Donald Trump.
“It’s one thing from my non-professional, non-clinical standpoint [to] believe that someone does not have the capacity to do the job, it’s another thing to talk to experts and [those] who can deal with mental psychosis on a daily basis, so I wanted to hear from them,” Rep. Jackie Speier, a California Democrat, told BuzzFeed News.
You keep talking about it (cut and paste) all you want like the lying media fed parrot you are. You are a proven liar and got nothing except what treasonous media blows up your ass.
They're all quacks, eh? Haha...all doctors who give opinions you dont like are quacks, now. But no bias...no sir...Yes, you are clearly more biased. You call me biased for relating the opinion of doctors, while you reject it out of jand based on nothing but your preconceptions. Yes, it is you who are more biased.I just told you why you can make an exception.
And it's different because it is a mental health diagnosis, based on outward behavior. No blood tests required. No EEG or MRI required. No physical tests required.
The exception being, Trump is someone you don't like, so anything goes in getting him out of office.
Get him on a couch, with a respected doctor, and I'll buy your line.
Making a remote diagnosis?
You're confusing yourself. It's not "my line". It's the opinion of many doctors willing to sacrifice their own standing to break with the ethics rules of the APA.
And I dont scoff at your standard for being "100% convinced". But I do scoff at you rejecting it out of hand, which demonstrates that you are clearly the more biased of the two of us.
Hardly the more biased.
You want to find Trump crazy?
Go for it.
But don't convince me you can get a real diagnosis by remote control.
I don't listen to quacks..
and a doctor that claims to be able to diagnose someone from tv appearances is a
Sure.Is that your professional opinion, doctor? From what university did you obtain your PHD in psychology?Here ya go...
Step right up,
Step right up.
get Trump diagnosed,
just cost ya a nickel, 1/2 of a dime, 1/20th of a dollar.
and as reliable as anyone that claims they can diagnose him from watching tv
CSU
They're all quacks, eh? Haha...all doctors who give opinions you dont like are quacks, now. But no bias...no sir...Yes, you are clearly more biased. You call me biased for relating the opinion of doctors, while you reject it out of jand based on nothing but your preconceptions. Yes, it is you who are more biased.The exception being, Trump is someone you don't like, so anything goes in getting him out of office.
Get him on a couch, with a respected doctor, and I'll buy your line.
Making a remote diagnosis?
You're confusing yourself. It's not "my line". It's the opinion of many doctors willing to sacrifice their own standing to break with the ethics rules of the APA.
And I dont scoff at your standard for being "100% convinced". But I do scoff at you rejecting it out of hand, which demonstrates that you are clearly the more biased of the two of us.
Hardly the more biased.
You want to find Trump crazy?
Go for it.
But don't convince me you can get a real diagnosis by remote control.
I don't listen to quacks..
and a doctor that claims to be able to diagnose someone from tv appearances is a
...all doctors who give opinions you dont like are quacks, now.
Sure.Is that your professional opinion, doctor? From what university did you obtain your PHD in psychology?Here ya go...
Step right up,
Step right up.
get Trump diagnosed,
just cost ya a nickel, 1/2 of a dime, 1/20th of a dollar.
and as reliable as anyone that claims they can diagnose him from watching tv
CSU
You're an uneducated moron if you don't know the connections between fascism and progressivism.Putin? YesOnce again, we have to thank Jesus and Uncle Vlad for putting Trump in the White House and keeping Progressives Fascism at bay
Jesus? Give me a fucking break!
Progressive Fascism ? What the fuck are you talking about??
That wasnt a deflection or a lie. You somehow know they are quacks, and you are obviously lying to state that the idea should be rejected out of hand for this. That is clearly not why you reject it. I doubt you even fool yourself with that hilariously transparent lie.They're all quacks, eh? Haha...all doctors who give opinions you dont like are quacks, now. But no bias...no sir...Yes, you are clearly more biased. You call me biased for relating the opinion of doctors, while you reject it out of jand based on nothing but your preconceptions. Yes, it is you who are more biased.You're confusing yourself. It's not "my line". It's the opinion of many doctors willing to sacrifice their own standing to break with the ethics rules of the APA.
And I dont scoff at your standard for being "100% convinced". But I do scoff at you rejecting it out of hand, which demonstrates that you are clearly the more biased of the two of us.
Hardly the more biased.
You want to find Trump crazy?
Go for it.
But don't convince me you can get a real diagnosis by remote control.
I don't listen to quacks..
and a doctor that claims to be able to diagnose someone from tv appearances is a
...all doctors who give opinions you dont like are quacks, now.
Didn't say that, did I?
I said doctors that make a diagnosis based on sound bytes and television appearances are quacks.
By your deflection, and lies, it's obvious you're running out of legs to stand on
You are the king of fallacious arguments, dude.That wasnt a deflection or a lie. You somehow know they are quacks, and you are obviously lying to state that the idea should be rejected out of hand for this. That is clearly not why you reject it. I doubt you even fool yourself with that hilariously transparent lie.They're all quacks, eh? Haha...all doctors who give opinions you dont like are quacks, now. But no bias...no sir...Yes, you are clearly more biased. You call me biased for relating the opinion of doctors, while you reject it out of jand based on nothing but your preconceptions. Yes, it is you who are more biased.Hardly the more biased.
You want to find Trump crazy?
Go for it.
But don't convince me you can get a real diagnosis by remote control.
I don't listen to quacks..
and a doctor that claims to be able to diagnose someone from tv appearances is a
...all doctors who give opinions you dont like are quacks, now.
Didn't say that, did I?
I said doctors that make a diagnosis based on sound bytes and television appearances are quacks.
By your deflection, and lies, it's obvious you're running out of legs to stand on
Obviously, when so many trained prpfessionals speak out, they are not all incompetent quacks. And tge APA does not strictly disagree that certain disorders CAN, in fact, be diagnosed from afar. They just dont think it should be done, in order to keep their field from being polticized.
But, somehow, you know better than the APA and the doctors. Haha, no. You're a Trumpkins, and you will say literally ANYTHING to dismiss this historical amount of criticism. He has turned your brain to tapioca.
Yes there have been other threads on this topic. Unfortunatly they have all fallaen by the wayside. Here are two:
New Bill Would Require Trump To Undergo Mental Health Evaluation
Why We Must Talk About Trump’s Mental Health
People have a short attention span and that is not good This is a subject that must not be ignored least we wake up to a once great nation the we no longer reccognize, or worse. Not convinced?? You might want to start with this:
Fortunatly, not all law makers are asleep at the switch on this:
Lawmaker Urges Trump's Cabinet To Have Him Undergo Mental Health Evaluation | HuffPost
A new resolution introduced in the House of Representatives would encourage the vice president and the Cabinet to have President Donald Trump undergo a physical and mental health exam to determine if he is stable enough to stay in office.Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) introduced the resolution on Friday. Should the results of said exam be unfavorable, the resolution calls for Vice President Mike Pence and members of the Cabinet to remove Trump from office.
The move would invoke the 25th Amendment, a rarely used constitutional provision that allows the vice president and a majority of Cabinet members to jointly remove the president from office and replace him with the vice president.
In April, A bill was introduced in the House to pt teeth in the 25th Amendment on Presidential Disability and Succession
Text - H.R.2093 - 115th Congress (2017-2018): Strengthening and Clarifying the 25th Amendment Act of 2017
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
April 14, 2017
Mr. Blumenauer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To provide for an alternative body to transmit a written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office in accordance with the provisions of the 25th Amendment of the Constitution.
Lawmakers are clearly concerned
And now...This just in:
Democrats Are Calling Psychologists To Talk About Trump's Mental Health
NO SANE OR RESPONSIBLE PERSON SHOULD WANT THIS MADNESS TO CONTINUE !member of the House Intelligence Committee is going where many of her colleagues have not: reaching out to people in the mental health field to talk about President Donald Trump.
“It’s one thing from my non-professional, non-clinical standpoint [to] believe that someone does not have the capacity to do the job, it’s another thing to talk to experts and [those] who can deal with mental psychosis on a daily basis, so I wanted to hear from them,” Rep. Jackie Speier, a California Democrat, told BuzzFeed News.
That wasnt a deflection or a lie. You somehow know they are quacks, and you are obviously lying to state that the idea should be rejected out of hand for this. That is clearly not why you reject it. I doubt you even fool yourself with that hilariously transparent lie.They're all quacks, eh? Haha...all doctors who give opinions you dont like are quacks, now. But no bias...no sir...Yes, you are clearly more biased. You call me biased for relating the opinion of doctors, while you reject it out of jand based on nothing but your preconceptions. Yes, it is you who are more biased.Hardly the more biased.
You want to find Trump crazy?
Go for it.
But don't convince me you can get a real diagnosis by remote control.
I don't listen to quacks..
and a doctor that claims to be able to diagnose someone from tv appearances is a
...all doctors who give opinions you dont like are quacks, now.
Didn't say that, did I?
I said doctors that make a diagnosis based on sound bytes and television appearances are quacks.
By your deflection, and lies, it's obvious you're running out of legs to stand on
Obviously, when so many trained prpfessionals speak out, they are not all incompetent quacks. And tge APA does not strictly disagree that certain disorders CAN, in fact, be diagnosed from afar. They just dont think it should be done, in order to keep their field from being polticized.
But, somehow, you know better than the APA and the doctors. Haha, no. You're a Trumpkins, and you will say literally ANYTHING to dismiss this historical amount of criticism. He has turned your brain to tapioca.
That is clearly not why you reject it.
I doubt you even fool yourself with that hilariously transparent lie.
Obviously, smarter than youThey just dont think it should be done, in order to keep their field from being politicized.
You're a Trumpkins, and you will say literally ANYTHING to dismiss this historical amount of criticism.
He has turned your brain to tapioca.