Trump treated like any other criminal defendant.

Because Jimmy Carter still has security
The Law states that all former Presidents have life long security. There is no one that is more of an extremely dishonorable pedophile than Clinton. If they want to remove Trump's security, frequent island flyer/blow job Bill needs to be first in line. Then there is the Biden Crime Family who works for China while pretending to work in our best interest. Let China provide security for Biden. They are the one's that benefit from him, not us...
 
It is good to see that some of our patriots in Congress are preparing for the future.
Many people have pointed out the various logistical challenges of putting our national orange menace in prison if and when he is finally convicted on any one (or more) of his numerous felony charges.
Now Bennie Thompson and other dems have come up with a solution.
Just treat him like anybody else once he's convicted.
BRILLIANT!

“It is regrettable that it has come to this, but this previously unthought-of scenario could become our reality,” the Mississippi lawmaker said. “Therefore, it is necessary for us to be prepared and update the law so the American people can be assured that protective status does not translate into special treatment —and that those who are sentenced to prison will indeed serve the time required of them.”

He named his bill the Denying Infinite Security and Government Resources Allocated toward Convicted and Extremely Dishonorable Former Protectees Act — or the DISGRACED Former Protectees Act.



That's a brilliant idea!!
 
Clinton claimed he didn't have sex with Monica Lewinski and the result was impeachment.

Donald Trump claimed he didn't have sex with Stormy Daniels, and nothing.
No, there's something.
Lewinski saved Clinton's DNA on her little blue dress. Trump, on the other hand, has a letter from his "victim" that says, IT NEVER HAPPENED.
 
Queesboro, if convicted in New York, or Pensacola Federal Prison Camp on Federal Charges.
 
No, there's something.
Lewinski saved Clinton's DNA on her little blue dress. Trump, on the other hand, has a letter from his "victim" that says, IT NEVER HAPPENED.
Actually Trump has a letter from "Stormy Daniels" an alias, Just like Trump alias of "David Denison".
That statement, claimed to have been made under duress, may carry no legal weight, because of the lack of legal signatures from the NDA.
 
Bill Clinton didn't incite an insurrection.
Or commit espionage.
Or violate campaign finance laws.
Neither did Trump.
Trump gives a speech and you claim he committed insurrection.
I don't know where your fucking espionage claims come from....but just having his personal documents in a secure location under secret service protection isn't espionage, you fucking tool.
And Trump supposedly paid his lawyer and his lawyer claims he made the hush money payments.
But the fact is his lawyer was boning Stormy Daniels, not Trump.
 
Last edited:
It is good to see that some of our patriots in Congress are preparing for the future.
Many people have pointed out the various logistical challenges of putting our national orange menace in prison if and when he is finally convicted on any one (or more) of his numerous felony charges.
Now Bennie Thompson and other dems have come up with a solution.
Just treat him like anybody else once he's convicted.
BRILLIANT!

“It is regrettable that it has come to this, but this previously unthought-of scenario could become our reality,” the Mississippi lawmaker said. “Therefore, it is necessary for us to be prepared and update the law so the American people can be assured that protective status does not translate into special treatment —and that those who are sentenced to prison will indeed serve the time required of them.”

He named his bill the Denying Infinite Security and Government Resources Allocated toward Convicted and Extremely Dishonorable Former Protectees Act — or the DISGRACED Former Protectees Act.



Have you lost any weight from consuming all these nothingburgers?
 
I don't know where you're fucking espionage claims come from....but just having his personal documents in a secure location under secret service protection isn't espionage, you fucking tool.
The problem with your "personal" documents argument, is that anything marked with government classification markings can't be "personal" documents.
We have the case of a college student who wrote a paper on how to make an "A-bomb", that he compiled from non-classified sources, yet the final product was "classified" under


An underachieving Princeton student wrote a term paper describing how to make a nuclear bomb. It was seized by the FBI
 
Never in the history of the US has a presidential candidate been indicted for a fictitious crime in order to keep him off the campaign trail. So no… No one has ever been treated like this before.

Not in the United States, anyway. Plenty of Third World countries treat opposition leaders exactly like this.
 
It is good to see that some of our patriots in Congress are preparing for the future.
Many people have pointed out the various logistical challenges of putting our national orange menace in prison if and when he is finally convicted on any one (or more) of his numerous felony charges.
Now Bennie Thompson and other dems have come up with a solution.
Just treat him like anybody else once he's convicted.
BRILLIANT!

“It is regrettable that it has come to this, but this previously unthought-of scenario could become our reality,” the Mississippi lawmaker said. “Therefore, it is necessary for us to be prepared and update the law so the American people can be assured that protective status does not translate into special treatment —and that those who are sentenced to prison will indeed serve the time required of them.”

He named his bill the Denying Infinite Security and Government Resources Allocated toward Convicted and Extremely Dishonorable Former Protectees Act — or the DISGRACED Former Protectees Act.



Go piss up a rope you Stalinist political slut.
 
The way Rats are treating President Trump is disgusting!

Under these thugs Justice is dead.



1713567448020.png
 
Never in the history of the US has a presidential candidate been indicted for a fictitious crime in order to keep him off the campaign trail. So no… No one has ever been treated like this before.

Not in the United States, anyway. Plenty of Third World countries treat opposition leaders exactly like this.

You have it backwards. This is my favorite post on it.


Rather than legal cases intended to interfere in a candidacy.
We have a candidacy intended to interfere with criminal cases.
IMHO
 
Never in the history of the US has a presidential candidate been indicted for a fictitious crime in order to keep him off the campaign trail. So no… No one has ever been treated like this before.

Not in the United States, anyway. Plenty of Third World countries treat opposition leaders exactly like this.



Second that.
 

Forum List

Back
Top