Trump sues Cohen

[WorldWatcher]

/----/ Seven years of this fucking circus all orchestrated by democRATs and the media.

I do believe the indictment for money laundering will present evidence it was orchestrated by Trump, Weisseilberg, Pecker, and Cohen.

WW

 

[beagle9]

I do believe the indictment for money laundering will present evidence it was orchestrated by Trump, Weisseilberg, Pecker, and Cohen.

WW

Biden's next..

 

[WorldWatcher]

Remember this when it's Biden's turn.

Biden's next..

Bill Clinton says "Hi".

WW

 

[beagle9]

Bill Clinton says "Hi".

WW

That's one lucky fella right there, because he came through during a time when the good ole boy's included republican's and democrat's alike. That's what gave rise to the rhino's..

Biden is in a tougher spot today, but I think no one really cares that much because American's don't want to go after senile old folks. That could change quickly if the bull shite keeps on getting ramped up in a hypocritical way and dangerous way.

 

[MagicMike]

If equal justice was a foot, then no one, and I mean no one would have a problem prosecuting anyone.

Equal justice is not what is going on here.

Black's have been raising hell about this kind of stuff forever, and they have had justice lean in their direction in order to assess itself about unequal justice being applied unequally, but here we have a prosecutor being a complete hypocrite basically forsaking the gain's made by black's on unequal justice, because he's trying to apply unequal justice against a former president, and he's doing so because it's Trump, and possibly because he's white.

Nope
He is doing so because Trump is a CRIMINAL.
You can BOO-HOO all you want but that doesn't change this fact.

 

[MagicMike]

Cohen is a serial liar.

So is Trump.

 

[beautress]

I do believe the indictment for money laundering will present evidence it was orchestrated by Trump, Weisseilberg, Pecker, and Cohen.

WW

President Trump does not "launder money," He did NOT collude with Russia, Russia, Russia, and quilt hoping you'll beat up Trump again with you and your associates' lies about one of the best Presidents we ever had because he kept his focus on making life more prosperous for Americans, and particularly for blacks who benefitted from higher paying jobs so they were cheerful about not ever having to go back on welfare rows again, because it wasn't near as beneficial as a great job gives, not to mention having pride in doing a good job and getting paid a bonus. The Dimriots didn't make the problems go away, but it increased the urgency and frequency for committing crimes against the people of their communities and the police in particular who were threatened with defunding their paychecks. The Democrats created one too many hellholes, and they're denying it like they always do when the screw America up really good.

 

[Delldude]

Bragg already did that to the grand jury, otherwise there would be no indictments.

Nope....that is the additional part he has to prove to tack on the felony, otherwise it stays a misdemeanor.

 

[Delldude]

So is Trump.

So is Biden......and he's worse.

 

[bodecea]

Must be why the founders put it into the constitution.

I agree....but the cool thing is, in a civil suit, the jury can infer from you taking the 5th that you are guilty.

 

[WorldWatcher]

President Trump does not "launder money,"...

Yet that was the basic idea behind his indictment for allegedly falsifying Trump Organization business records which was to launder the money.

The prosecution will try to show:

• Weisseilberg, Pecker, Trump, and Cohen created a scheme to hide the payments to Daniels.
• Cohen took out a personal loan against his house with the understanding he'd be paid back after the election
• Cohen created a shell corporation
• The money was deposited in the shell corporation
• Daniels was paid from the shell corporation account
• After the election the Trump Organization issued checks for false invoices
• Trump signed the checks

That is money laundering.

WW

 

[dudmuck]

Nope....that is the additional part he has to prove to tack on the felony, otherwise it stays a misdemeanor.

Its a 34-count felony indictment, but i dont know if all 34 are felonies, or one or more, but certainly at least one.

A grand jury is not responsible for determining whether the person being investigated is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, but only whether there is sufficient evidence of probable cause to justify bringing the that person to trial.

which means there is probable cause of Trump's felony.

then the court will then take care of the proof beyond reasonable doubt. But i'm sure the NY court systems has quite a backlog, and we'll likely know about the Fulton County crimes before the, and the crimes Jack Smith is working on before then.

 

[Delldude]

which means there is probable cause of Trump's felony.

No, the jury thinks there is probable cause. Now it'll be up to Bragg to prove it.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Its a 34-count felony indictment, but i dont know if all 34 are felonies, or one or more, but certainly at least one.

A grand jury is not responsible for determining whether the person being investigated is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, but only whether there is sufficient evidence of probable cause to justify bringing the that person to trial.

which means there is probable cause of Trump's felony.

then the court will then take care of the proof beyond reasonable doubt. But i'm sure the NY court systems has quite a backlog, and we'll likely know about the Fulton County crimes before the, and the crimes Jack Smith is working on before then.

/——-/ There were 3 payoffs, but 34 signature lines. That’s how Braggs got the number 34.

 

[Delldude]

/——-/ There were 3 payoffs, but 34 signature lines. That’s how Braggs got the number 34.

Bragg's trying to claim they were campaign contributions and reimbursing Cohen as legal expenses is the 'cover up' crime. Sounds like BS.

 

[MagicMike]

So is Biden......and he's worse.

Your clueless opinion is duly noted.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Bragg's trying to claim they were campaign contributions and reimbursing Cohen as legal expenses is the 'cover up' crime. Sounds like BS.

No that isn't what the charges are.

Cohen was convicted of illegal campaign contributions, that is a fact.

The indictment of Trump is for violation of state business record laws, not federal campaign finance violation laws.

WW

 

[dudmuck]

/——-/ There were 3 payoffs, but 34 signature lines. That’s how Braggs got the number 34.

Bragg told reporters on Tuesday, noting that Trump made "thirty-four false statements made to cover up other crimes."

 

[skews13]

Cohen has $500M?

No. Which in and of itself means Trump loses.

He's going to lose on every other reason also, but that's another thread.

What's amusing about it, is apparently the orange traitor didn't listen to his lawyers, because this opens him up to further discovery. With a case directly tied to the suit already making it's way through the courts. This only gives the prosecutor in that case even more opportunity for evidence to use against him.

 

[Delldude]

The indictment of Trump is for violation of state business record laws, not federal campaign finance violation laws.

He's implying they were campaign contributions that were falsely reported as legal expenses.
Why is he attempting go after Trump under federal law?

Bragg told reporters on Tuesday, noting that Trump made "thirty-four false statements made to cover up other crimes."

The 'other crimes' thing is what he's not talking about, yet.