Should this surprise anyone? It’s amazing the turn around since the time Donald J. Trump announced his candidacy for the presidency. What they wanted then, they now oppose.
Just going back to The Times, the newspaper had no problem exposing its own hypocrisy, if only to lambaste the president.
“Syria is a complex problem. But this plan seems poorly conceived, too dependent on military action and fueled by wishful thinking,” The Times wrote in a January 2018 editorial.
And here they are now:
Fast forward 11 months, however, and The Times editorial board was writing Thursday that “Jim Mattis Was Right” and wondering, “Who will protect America now?”
“It could also risk getting American soldiers killed or wounded for objectives their commanders had already abandoned,” The Times wrote about Trump’s decision to leave Syria.
More @ Trump Points Out Media Double Standard on Syria Withdrawal
Just going back to The Times, the newspaper had no problem exposing its own hypocrisy, if only to lambaste the president.
“Syria is a complex problem. But this plan seems poorly conceived, too dependent on military action and fueled by wishful thinking,” The Times wrote in a January 2018 editorial.
And here they are now:
Fast forward 11 months, however, and The Times editorial board was writing Thursday that “Jim Mattis Was Right” and wondering, “Who will protect America now?”
“It could also risk getting American soldiers killed or wounded for objectives their commanders had already abandoned,” The Times wrote about Trump’s decision to leave Syria.
More @ Trump Points Out Media Double Standard on Syria Withdrawal
