Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Was a general comment...………….and you know that...……...Jag officers can want power and fame just like anyone else...……….and the political motives were there to appease the politics in Afghanistan...……….I have a real hard time believing some of these folks who claim to have actually served.When you were in the military, were you taught you were sent there to kill unarmed people? I wasn't. In fact, I was taught that was murder.
An unarmed terrorist is still a terrorist.
That's as simple-minded as your previous post, which asked us to assume soldiers were sent there to kill unarmed men. There's a reason they were convicted. Trump can pardon them, but the UCMJ is there for a purpose, and it's not related to support-the-troops talking points.
I have not, btw.
So they threw these guys under a Greyhound bus for politics...……...nothing more and nothing less.
The military isn't supposed to be the POLICE...……..they shouldn't have to call a jag officer for permission to fire as they did over there in the Middle East...…………..They make snap decisions on the battlefield...…….and then get thrown under the bus by political hacks FROM THE CHEAP SEATS...…...
It's not the Cheap Seats that die when it goes wrong...…..or their people die for making the wrong decision...……….
Why anyone wants to serve under this BS is beyond me anymore.
Is there any question - from pardons to impeachment - that you guys can't address without smearing a character or impugning motives? Power and fame for a JAG Officer! What's his name again?
Lol, seriously?Jag officers can want power and fame just like anyone else
LOL...……...General means some of them...…...non specific...………..and I served 10 years....Lol, seriously?Jag officers can want power and fame just like anyone else
Did this guy get famous or powerful? Do you even know who he is?
You've talked with everybody and know for a fact that no one thinks this is will be a plus for American credibility?Everybody.Pardoning convicted war criminals damages US credibility.
With who?
Look out guys! He's backing up!LOL...……...General means some of them...…...non specific...………..and I served 10 years....Lol, seriously?Jag officers can want power and fame just like anyone else
Did this guy get famous or powerful? Do you even know who he is?
They are not above being corrupt...………...
Again...……….Trump was right on this.
Yes.You've talked with everybody and know for a fact that no one thinks this is will be a plus for American credibility?Everybody.Pardoning convicted war criminals damages US credibility.
With who?
Was a general comment...………….and you know that...……...Jag officers can want power and fame just like anyone else...……….and the political motives were there to appease the politics in Afghanistan...……….I have a real hard time believing some of these folks who claim to have actually served.An unarmed terrorist is still a terrorist.
That's as simple-minded as your previous post, which asked us to assume soldiers were sent there to kill unarmed men. There's a reason they were convicted. Trump can pardon them, but the UCMJ is there for a purpose, and it's not related to support-the-troops talking points.
I have not, btw.
So they threw these guys under a Greyhound bus for politics...……...nothing more and nothing less.
The military isn't supposed to be the POLICE...……..they shouldn't have to call a jag officer for permission to fire as they did over there in the Middle East...…………..They make snap decisions on the battlefield...…….and then get thrown under the bus by political hacks FROM THE CHEAP SEATS...…...
It's not the Cheap Seats that die when it goes wrong...…..or their people die for making the wrong decision...……….
Why anyone wants to serve under this BS is beyond me anymore.
Is there any question - from pardons to impeachment - that you guys can't address without smearing a character or impugning motives? Power and fame for a JAG Officer! What's his name again?
They are not above corruption...…….the movies about them are a stinking lie...…….
My point on agreeing with these pardons stands...………...My only complaint on it ……..What took so fing long to do it.
The uninvolved. Like you? Let the experts determine the ROE. They know and what's more understand the objectives and what they need to achieve them.I have a real hard time believing some of these folks who claim to have actually served.When you were in the military, were you taught you were sent there to kill unarmed people? I wasn't. In fact, I was taught that was murder.
An unarmed terrorist is still a terrorist.
That's as simple-minded as your previous post, which asked us to assume soldiers were sent there to kill unarmed men. There's a reason they were convicted. Trump can pardon them, but the UCMJ is there for a purpose, and it's not related to support-the-troops talking points.
I have not, btw.
Neither have I, but I am philosophically opposed to rules of engagement devised by the uninvolved that restrict our capacity to fulfill a mission.
My chosen career has had me associating with current and ex military personnel for decades, and I can assure you that you are correct.I have a real hard time believing some of these folks who claim to have actually served.When you were in the military, were you taught you were sent there to kill unarmed people? I wasn't. In fact, I was taught that was murder.
An unarmed terrorist is still a terrorist.
That's as simple-minded as your previous post, which asked us to assume soldiers were sent there to kill unarmed men. There's a reason they were convicted. Trump can pardon them, but the UCMJ is there for a purpose, and it's not related to support-the-troops talking points.
I have not, btw.
I have, but it was over 45 years ago. I don't think the rules against killing the civilian population have changed.
That's nice kid, you run along now.My chosen career has had me associating with current and ex military personnel for decades, and I can assure you that you are correct.I have a real hard time believing some of these folks who claim to have actually served.An unarmed terrorist is still a terrorist.
That's as simple-minded as your previous post, which asked us to assume soldiers were sent there to kill unarmed men. There's a reason they were convicted. Trump can pardon them, but the UCMJ is there for a purpose, and it's not related to support-the-troops talking points.
I have not, btw.
I have, but it was over 45 years ago. I don't think the rules against killing the civilian population have changed.
Refuse collection hardly counts as forming associations with clients.
------------------------ an American Soldiers is meant to kill the enemy no matter what you were taught . Are you just another 'soy boy' on the board JMiller ??Pardoning convicted war criminals damages US credibility.
With who?
With the Afghans who thought the US was punishing a murderer of unarmed men, among others We do still have troops there.
We go to war to kill enemies. While there, kill them. Don't punish the troops for doing what they were sent to do.
When you were in the military, were you taught you were sent there to kill unarmed people? I wasn't. In fact, I was taught that was murder.
------------------------------------ the ones you reference are simply 'perfumed princes' and are in it as a career and for the money like 'mrobama' Crep .The uninvolved. Like you? Let the experts determine the ROE. They know and what's more understand the objectives and what they need to achieve them.I have a real hard time believing some of these folks who claim to have actually served.When you were in the military, were you taught you were sent there to kill unarmed people? I wasn't. In fact, I was taught that was murder.
An unarmed terrorist is still a terrorist.
That's as simple-minded as your previous post, which asked us to assume soldiers were sent there to kill unarmed men. There's a reason they were convicted. Trump can pardon them, but the UCMJ is there for a purpose, and it's not related to support-the-troops talking points.
I have not, btw.
Neither have I, but I am philosophically opposed to rules of engagement devised by the uninvolved that restrict our capacity to fulfill a mission.
Yeah...nope.------------------------------------ the ones you reference are simply 'perfumed princes' and are in it as a career and for the money like 'mrobama' Crep .The uninvolved. Like you? Let the experts determine the ROE. They know and what's more understand the objectives and what they need to achieve them.I have a real hard time believing some of these folks who claim to have actually served.An unarmed terrorist is still a terrorist.
That's as simple-minded as your previous post, which asked us to assume soldiers were sent there to kill unarmed men. There's a reason they were convicted. Trump can pardon them, but the UCMJ is there for a purpose, and it's not related to support-the-troops talking points.
I have not, btw.
Neither have I, but I am philosophically opposed to rules of engagement devised by the uninvolved that restrict our capacity to fulfill a mission.
Pardoning convicted war criminals damages US credibility.
With who?
With the Afghans who thought the US was punishing a murderer of unarmed men, among others We do still have troops there.
We go to war to kill enemies. While there, kill them. Don't punish the troops for doing what they were sent to do.
When you were in the military, were you taught you were sent there to kill unarmed people? I wasn't. In fact, I was taught that was murder.
With who?
With the Afghans who thought the US was punishing a murderer of unarmed men, among others We do still have troops there.
We go to war to kill enemies. While there, kill them. Don't punish the troops for doing what they were sent to do.
When you were in the military, were you taught you were sent there to kill unarmed people? I wasn't. In fact, I was taught that was murder.
An unarmed terrorist is still a terrorist.
That's as simple-minded as your previous post, which asked us to assume soldiers were sent there to kill unarmed men. There's a reason they were convicted. Trump can pardon them, but the UCMJ is there for a purpose, and it's not related to support-the-troops talking points.
He has the right to pardon whoever he pleases, I have no problem with pardoning soldiers for taking out muslim scum...…..Trump signed an executive order to grant clemency to US Army 1st Lt. Clint Lorance, who was convicted of ordering soldiers to engage three unarmed Afghan men on a motorcycle, killing two of them in July 2012. Lorance served six years of his 19-year sentence.
Trump also signed an executive order to grant clemency to US Army Maj. Mathew Golsteyn, whose trial has yet to begin. Golsteyn stands accused of killing an unarmed Afghan man in 2010, and later disposing the body in a trash pit.
US Navy Special Warfare Operator 1st Class Edward Gallagher, a Navy SEAL who was demoted after a military trial found him guilty of posing in a picture with the corpse of an Islamic State militant, had his rank reinstated to Chief Petty Officer.
I object to “convicted war criminal” for Edit Gallagher. He was reduced in grade for posing with the body of a dead terrorist after a jury of his peers found him not guilty of ridiculous charges.
Lorance can’t get back the 6 years he lost but will be able to stand straight in front of the world.
Military leadership has been whining that this “degrades the military justice system.” These men were framed during the Obozo anti-military years and I’m glad to see this president set things right.
They're taught to be killers and then sent out with the heavy yoke of ignorant Rules of Engagement. And, let them do their assignments to the best of their ability, some desk jokey decides to punish them for it.
God Bless President Trump for doing this!
From @ Trump just overruled his top military officials in controversial war crimes pardons
Military leaders are worried that Trump pardoning troops accused of war crimes will impair the justice system and undermine overseas bases @ Military leaders are worried that Trump pardoning troops accused of war crimes will impair the justice system and undermine overseas bases
The war crimes Obama committed was also him killing Islamic scum....so are they really war crimes??Pardoning convicted war criminals damages US credibility.
It's a dumb idea.
A “war criminal”? LOL. When will Obama be charged?
These guys were heroes that killed Islamic scum.
Trump signed an executive order to grant clemency to US Army 1st Lt. Clint Lorance, who was convicted of ordering soldiers to engage three unarmed Afghan men on a motorcycle, killing two of them in July 2012. Lorance served six years of his 19-year sentence.
Trump also signed an executive order to grant clemency to US Army Maj. Mathew Golsteyn, whose trial has yet to begin. Golsteyn stands accused of killing an unarmed Afghan man in 2010, and later disposing the body in a trash pit.
US Navy Special Warfare Operator 1st Class Edward Gallagher, a Navy SEAL who was demoted after a military trial found him guilty of posing in a picture with the corpse of an Islamic State militant, had his rank reinstated to Chief Petty Officer.
I object to “convicted war criminal” for Edit Gallagher. He was reduced in grade for posing with the body of a dead terrorist after a jury of his peers found him not guilty of ridiculous charges.
Lorance can’t get back the 6 years he lost but will be able to stand straight in front of the world.
Military leadership has been whining that this “degrades the military justice system.” These men were framed during the Obozo anti-military years and I’m glad to see this president set things right.
They're taught to be killers and then sent out with the heavy yoke of ignorant Rules of Engagement. And, let them do their assignments to the best of their ability, some desk jokey decides to punish them for it.
God Bless President Trump for doing this!
From @ Trump just overruled his top military officials in controversial war crimes pardons
Military leaders are worried that Trump pardoning troops accused of war crimes will impair the justice system and undermine overseas bases @ Military leaders are worried that Trump pardoning troops accused of war crimes will impair the justice system and undermine overseas bases
