Discussion in 'Politics' started by antontoo, Sep 28, 2017.
It's called basic research of the issues, you should give it a try.
That chart could be used in any high school class as an example of a bad chart. The huge curve in the middle only accounts for 8% of the data. It is useless. It makes people believe in huge changes that are in fact almost minimal. I covers 100 years. Everything after today is pure projection.
That's why I have a degree! Putting rank amateurs in their place is easy!
You are an idiot and disputed exactly nothing.
The scale is appropriate to the range of changes in LFPR.
It means NOTHING! Your chart doesn't even say what it represents for "Participation Rate". That could be anything from answering questions in math class to using birth control.
It's bogus, and you should know that your research sucks!
jesus fucking christ...it is LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION RATE - LFPR is the acronym.
Have you NEVER seen LFPR data in your life? That's ok if didn't because macro economics was not something that interested you...but then please STFU about your degrees and rank amateurs.
Really? Where does it say that?
You are really are a moron. You claim to research and post bullshit like that.
The one good point is that you are very good at being a moron. keep up the good work!
You are 100% clueless, stop embarrassing yourself admiral.
To anyone that has EVER looked at LFPR it is very clear what is in that graph.
Here is 2002 study forecasting LFPR decline through to 2040s from BLS website:
Oh, I am the one who should be embarrassed after you corrected your error!
You libtards need to get together, maybe a couple of million or so and all donate your brains, so that scientists can use the one or two neurons that might still be functional in each of them so that at least one of you will have the functioning brain of a normal person.
I have yet to see anything posted from you that ever made sense to even the biggest dullard.
I get tired of reading your posts of utter bullshit and lousy reasoning.
There was no error on my part and no correction, there was only your very public ignorance and various fails at thought.
Then you should be able to easily point out the the words "labor participation" on the chart you posted.
Since it is not there, we will just attribute it to your pathetic attempts to assuage your self-esteem issues.
Have a nice life, loser!
Separate names with a comma.