Trump failed Bigly on North Korea

Watch this leading strategist of Nuclear Conflict explain the moves involved in a show-down with North Korea, and the North Korea objective (theory of Victory).

How do we know Trump failed? Because this strategist details and quotes other North East Asian alliance strategists, that North Korea wants to wedge apart the US alliance system, and show that the resolve of the alliance is less than sturdy.

The strategist explains Do not fly nuclear bombers by North Korea by ourselves.

That shows that the allies do not stand with the US in a Nuclear show down. The next step is for North Korea to pull apart the allies in bilateral talks (which is happening NOW).

The Trump-B2-Bomber mistake already happened.

This Strategist warned the US years before Trump became president, and Trump like an idiot failed miserably.


Thats funny because the Liberal President of South Korea thanked President Trump for forcing North Korea back to the negotiation table.
South Korean president credits Trump with bringing North Korea to the table

God damn it no he didn't.

Direct quote of his Korean transcript or shut the fuck up.
 
So in Hater-Bot world, North Korea requesting new talks with South Korea = 'Trump failed bigly?'

Yeah, my advice to Hater-Bots would be to lay off Democrat Fake News for awhile. It's far from being credible 'News' information.
 
Did Trump's North Korean policy fail? They haven't launched any missiles over Japan lately, they're hungry and freezing their asses off, they haven't made any recent threats, and are talking to South Korea over the Olympics.

Of course his North Korean policy was a success.
Do they need to launch missiles over Japan lately? They already know their ICBMs work, do we constantly fire ICBM tests over Russia?
 
So in Hater-Bot world, North Korea requesting new talks with South Korea = 'Trump failed bigly?'

Yeah, my advice to Hater-Bots would be to lay off Democrat Fake News for awhile. It's far from being credible 'News' information.
Yes, because they are bilateral talks between North and South Korea, without the US, and without any preconditions.

= FAIL
 
Bullies can't handle it when they get bullied. Un actually respects Trump now. A serious meaningful dialogue can now take place. More Trump winning. :thup:
Sure? I guess that's why North Korea continues to develop Nuclear Weapons. Winning.

Yet you're hatin on Trump for North Korea requesting new talks with South Korea. Y'all Hater-Bots are soo confused. :cuckoo:
 
So in Hater-Bot world, North Korea requesting new talks with South Korea = 'Trump failed bigly?'

Yeah, my advice to Hater-Bots would be to lay off Democrat Fake News for awhile. It's far from being credible 'News' information.
Yes, because they are bilateral talks between North and South Korea, without the US, and without any preconditions.

= FAIL

Anytime they talk, it's a positive. Koreans should solve Korean problems.
 
So in Hater-Bot world, North Korea requesting new talks with South Korea = 'Trump failed bigly?'

Yeah, my advice to Hater-Bots would be to lay off Democrat Fake News for awhile. It's far from being credible 'News' information.
Yes, because they are bilateral talks between North and South Korea, without the US, and without any preconditions.

= FAIL

Anytime they talk, it's a positive. Koreans should solve Korean problems.

So you think the South Koreans, with an appeaser 'liberal' President, with dissidents, with a huge network of North Korean spies, is going to be able to out negotiate the North Koreans?

LOL
 
Did Trump's North Korean policy fail? They haven't launched any missiles over Japan lately, they're hungry and freezing their asses off, they haven't made any recent threats, and are talking to South Korea over the Olympics.

Of course his North Korean policy was a success.
Do they need to launch missiles over Japan lately? They already know their ICBMs work, do we constantly fire ICBM tests over Russia?
Do you know what ICBM means little girl?
 
So in Hater-Bot world, North Korea requesting new talks with South Korea = 'Trump failed bigly?'

Yeah, my advice to Hater-Bots would be to lay off Democrat Fake News for awhile. It's far from being credible 'News' information.
Yes, because they are bilateral talks between North and South Korea, without the US, and without any preconditions.

= FAIL

Anytime they talk, it's a positive. Koreans should solve Korean problems.

So you think the South Koreans, with an appeaser 'liberal' President, with dissidents, with a huge network of North Korean spies, is going to be able to out negotiate the North Koreans?

LOL

Would you rather they not return to talks? See, you Hater-Bots really are very confused folks. Seriously, lay off the Democrat Fake News for awhile. You'll start thinking rationally again.
 
So in Hater-Bot world, North Korea requesting new talks with South Korea = 'Trump failed bigly?'

Yeah, my advice to Hater-Bots would be to lay off Democrat Fake News for awhile. It's far from being credible 'News' information.
Yes, because they are bilateral talks between North and South Korea, without the US, and without any preconditions.

= FAIL

Anytime they talk, it's a positive. Koreans should solve Korean problems.

So you think the South Koreans, with an appeaser 'liberal' President, with dissidents, with a huge network of North Korean spies, is going to be able to out negotiate the North Koreans?

LOL

Would you rather they not return to talks? See, you Hater-Bots really are very confused folks. Seriously, lay off the Democrat Fake News for awhile. You'll start thinking rationally again.
I already plainly answered this and it's also in this video:

Talks with preconditions and only with the allies present.

To you you just give up your wife first, before the negotiations even start.
 
Did Trump's North Korean policy fail? They haven't launched any missiles over Japan lately, they're hungry and freezing their asses off, they haven't made any recent threats, and are talking to South Korea over the Olympics.

Of course his North Korean policy was a success.
Do they need to launch missiles over Japan lately? They already know their ICBMs work, do we constantly fire ICBM tests over Russia?
Do you know what ICBM means little girl?
You're pathetic. It's established fact the North Koreans have successfully tested an ICBM.
 
So in Hater-Bot world, North Korea requesting new talks with South Korea = 'Trump failed bigly?'

Yeah, my advice to Hater-Bots would be to lay off Democrat Fake News for awhile. It's far from being credible 'News' information.
Yes, because they are bilateral talks between North and South Korea, without the US, and without any preconditions.

= FAIL

Anytime they talk, it's a positive. Koreans should solve Korean problems.

So you think the South Koreans, with an appeaser 'liberal' President, with dissidents, with a huge network of North Korean spies, is going to be able to out negotiate the North Koreans?

LOL

Would you rather they not return to talks? See, you Hater-Bots really are very confused folks. Seriously, lay off the Democrat Fake News for awhile. You'll start thinking rationally again.
I already plainly answered this and it's also in this video:

Talks with preconditions and only with the allies present.

To you you just give up your wife first, before the negotiations even start.

So you'd rather they not talk? Well, that's just misguided ignorance on your part. You're allowing your irrational hate for Trump to cloud your judgement on issues. It's sad.
 
Trump was handed the problem of a Nuclear Capable North Korea, the results of appeasement dating back to Carter and made worse by Clinton giving them nuclear reactors as a way to appease them. He was also left with a North Korea that was allowed to develop missile technology capable of reaching the US, ignored by a President who was too busy aiding and abetting terrorists, Iran, Mexican Drug cartels, Hezbollah, Human traffickers, MS13, violent illegals, and drug traffickers...

DAMN THAT TRUMP.

Bwuhahahaha..... :p
 
Trump was handed the problem of a Nuclear Capable North Korea, the results of appeasement dating back to Carter and made worse by Clinton giving them nuclear reactors as a way to appease them. He was also left with a North Korea that was allowed to develop missile technology capable of reaching the US, ignored by a President who was too busy aiding and abetting terrorists, Iran, Mexican Drug cartels, Hezbollah, Human traffickers, MS13, violent illegals, and drug traffickers...

DAMN THAT TRUMP.

Bwuhahahaha..... :p

Clinton gave them Light water reactors so that they didn't have the ability to enrich Uranium further in the fuel cycle needed to make Plutonium.
Don't act like you know your ass from a hole in the ground.
 
Trump was handed the problem of a Nuclear Capable North Korea, the results of appeasement dating back to Carter and made worse by Clinton giving them nuclear reactors as a way to appease them. He was also left with a North Korea that was allowed to develop missile technology capable of reaching the US, ignored by a President who was too busy aiding and abetting terrorists, Iran, Mexican Drug cartels, Hezbollah, Human traffickers, MS13, violent illegals, and drug traffickers...

DAMN THAT TRUMP.

Bwuhahahaha..... :p

Clinton gave them Light water reactors so that they didn't have the ability to enrich Uranium further in the fuel cycle needed to make Plutonium.
Don't act like you know your ass from a hole in the ground.
Says the guy who supposedly defends the hilarious notion that North Korea was never a threat until Trump was elected....

You DO know the Korean war never ended, right, that there is just an 'Armistice' - a 'time out', right?

So in the midst of a war Clinton gives them reactors.... Brilliant.
 
Watch this leading strategist of Nuclear Conflict explain the moves involved in a show-down with North Korea, and the North Korea objective (theory of Victory).

How do we know Trump failed? Because this strategist details and quotes other North East Asian alliance strategists, that North Korea wants to wedge apart the US alliance system, and show that the resolve of the alliance is less than sturdy.

The strategist explains Do not fly nuclear bombers by North Korea by ourselves.

That shows that the allies do not stand with the US in a Nuclear show down. The next step is for North Korea to pull apart the allies in bilateral talks (which is happening NOW).

The Trump-B2-Bomber mistake already happened.

This Strategist warned the US years before Trump became president, and Trump like an idiot failed miserably.


Thats funny because the Liberal President of South Korea thanked President Trump for forcing North Korea back to the negotiation table.
South Korean president credits Trump with bringing North Korea to the table

God damn it no he didn't.

Direct quote of his Korean transcript or shut the fuck up.


What!? The Washington Post is lying?
 
Do you know what an expert is?

"X" is an unknown quantity.

A "spurt" is a drip under pressure. So if you claim to be an expert, that's really an unknown drip under pressure!

That about sums up a bed wetting libturd, "an unknown" and a "spurt" that should have been swallowed or aborted.

 
Why do Democrats like to engage in TREASON / like to help our enemies so much?

The Korean War never ended - the united States and North Korea REMAINS AT WAR WITH NORTH KOREA.

*** The armistice is however only a cease-fire between military forces, rather than an agreement between governments. No peace treaty was signed which means that the Korean War has not officially ended.

Korean Armistice Agreement - Wikipedia


So WTF was Carter and Clinton doing appeasing North Korea. Why was Clinton giving them Reactors in the middle of a war?


(In the same way, while the US was fighting a war against the Taliban in Afghanistan why did Barak Obama release THE Top 5 Enemy Taliban Combat Commanders in an effort to try to keep a CAMPAIGN PROMISE?

In the same way, why did Mueller/Holder/Obama hide Russian crimes and help them buy Uranium One in 2009?

in the same way, why did Comey/Lynch/Obama hide Russian hacking, PsyOps programs in the US, and interfering in 2014 - 2016?

in the same way, why did Obama protect ISIS Black Market Oil facilities which funded terrorist ops like the attack on Paris?

In the same way why did Obama protect Hezbollah terrorist-financing illegal drug ops and give the $200 million on his last day in office...? )
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top