Trump Defends Free Speech, Leftard Media Goes Ape

[BS Filter]

Who said the Left are fascists?

Both The New York Times and Washington Post blasted the free speech position taken by President Donald Trump last week.

World leaders, led by New Zealand, united around the Christchurch Call to demand stronger internet censorship. This followed the deadly Christchurch terror attack that killed 51 people. President Trump not only refused to sign on, but established a censorship reporting hotline.

That didn’t sit well with major liberal news outlets. Both The Washington Post and The New York Times have written scathing pieces blasting the Trump administration. The Post condemned Trump for waging an “evidence-free assault on social media sites for supposedly censoring conservative voices.”

Opinion writer at large Charlie Warzel wrote in The Times that while he understands that online content regulation can be a ”minefield of unintended consequences” he asserted that for Trump, “to turn one’s back on that commitment isn’t just lazy, its shameful.”

Much like Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accord, the liberal rhetoric on this has been schizophrenic. At the same time that they have stressed that this is a mere “ceremonial” or “informal international pact,” the media have expressed panic that Trump has refused to join.

Trump Defends Free Speech, Liberal Media Condemn Him

Private internet sites can censor anything they want

Even USMB

Yeah, you're all for it as long as it's the left censoring the right, huh.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Who said the Left are fascists?

Both The New York Times and Washington Post blasted the free speech position taken by President Donald Trump last week.

World leaders, led by New Zealand, united around the Christchurch Call to demand stronger internet censorship. This followed the deadly Christchurch terror attack that killed 51 people. President Trump not only refused to sign on, but established a censorship reporting hotline.

That didn’t sit well with major liberal news outlets. Both The Washington Post and The New York Times have written scathing pieces blasting the Trump administration. The Post condemned Trump for waging an “evidence-free assault on social media sites for supposedly censoring conservative voices.”

Opinion writer at large Charlie Warzel wrote in The Times that while he understands that online content regulation can be a ”minefield of unintended consequences” he asserted that for Trump, “to turn one’s back on that commitment isn’t just lazy, its shameful.”

Much like Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accord, the liberal rhetoric on this has been schizophrenic. At the same time that they have stressed that this is a mere “ceremonial” or “informal international pact,” the media have expressed panic that Trump has refused to join.

Trump Defends Free Speech, Liberal Media Condemn Him

Private internet sites can censor anything they want

Even USMB

That's the talking point, anyway. Seems pretty hypocritical, coming from those who rail against corporate influence over our political system and such.

/——/ The 1st Amendment only applies limits to the government not private industry or individuals.

 

[rightwinger]

Who said the Left are fascists?

Both The New York Times and Washington Post blasted the free speech position taken by President Donald Trump last week.

World leaders, led by New Zealand, united around the Christchurch Call to demand stronger internet censorship. This followed the deadly Christchurch terror attack that killed 51 people. President Trump not only refused to sign on, but established a censorship reporting hotline.

That didn’t sit well with major liberal news outlets. Both The Washington Post and The New York Times have written scathing pieces blasting the Trump administration. The Post condemned Trump for waging an “evidence-free assault on social media sites for supposedly censoring conservative voices.”

Opinion writer at large Charlie Warzel wrote in The Times that while he understands that online content regulation can be a ”minefield of unintended consequences” he asserted that for Trump, “to turn one’s back on that commitment isn’t just lazy, its shameful.”

Much like Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accord, the liberal rhetoric on this has been schizophrenic. At the same time that they have stressed that this is a mere “ceremonial” or “informal international pact,” the media have expressed panic that Trump has refused to join.

Trump Defends Free Speech, Liberal Media Condemn Him

Private internet sites can censor anything they want

Even USMB

That's the talking point, anyway. Seems pretty hypocritical, coming from those who rail against corporate influence over our political system and such.

They are no different than any other media outlet who can pick and choose their content

 

[rightwinger]

Who said the Left are fascists?

Both The New York Times and Washington Post blasted the free speech position taken by President Donald Trump last week.

World leaders, led by New Zealand, united around the Christchurch Call to demand stronger internet censorship. This followed the deadly Christchurch terror attack that killed 51 people. President Trump not only refused to sign on, but established a censorship reporting hotline.

That didn’t sit well with major liberal news outlets. Both The Washington Post and The New York Times have written scathing pieces blasting the Trump administration. The Post condemned Trump for waging an “evidence-free assault on social media sites for supposedly censoring conservative voices.”

Opinion writer at large Charlie Warzel wrote in The Times that while he understands that online content regulation can be a ”minefield of unintended consequences” he asserted that for Trump, “to turn one’s back on that commitment isn’t just lazy, its shameful.”

Much like Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accord, the liberal rhetoric on this has been schizophrenic. At the same time that they have stressed that this is a mere “ceremonial” or “informal international pact,” the media have expressed panic that Trump has refused to join.

Trump Defends Free Speech, Liberal Media Condemn Him

Private internet sites can censor anything they want

Even USMB

Yeah, you're all for it as long as it's the left censoring the right, huh.

Nobody is being censored
Private entities can make their own rules

Even USMB can ban you.....is that censorship?

 

[jc456]

he has a right to defend himself, you're in error as usual.

By threatening to bring the gumbint down on their heads b/c a skit hurt his feels!? lol.

it is about him? he isn't allowed to comment? yeah, ok. stupid is as stupid does for you.

President Trump is free to whine like a little bitch all he wants over a comedy skit. The fact he threatens them with retribution by the government is the very soul of being a pussy snowflake. Watching you twats embrace everything you claim to hate is as sad as it is funny.

it's still about him. we have laws on the books to protect slander. therefore, it isn't anything more then him protecting his rights as a citizen, per our laws.

My bad. I forgot SNL violated the Don’t Mock the Crown Act of 2019.

it's ok.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Who said the Left are fascists?

Both The New York Times and Washington Post blasted the free speech position taken by President Donald Trump last week.

World leaders, led by New Zealand, united around the Christchurch Call to demand stronger internet censorship. This followed the deadly Christchurch terror attack that killed 51 people. President Trump not only refused to sign on, but established a censorship reporting hotline.

That didn’t sit well with major liberal news outlets. Both The Washington Post and The New York Times have written scathing pieces blasting the Trump administration. The Post condemned Trump for waging an “evidence-free assault on social media sites for supposedly censoring conservative voices.”

Opinion writer at large Charlie Warzel wrote in The Times that while he understands that online content regulation can be a ”minefield of unintended consequences” he asserted that for Trump, “to turn one’s back on that commitment isn’t just lazy, its shameful.”

Much like Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accord, the liberal rhetoric on this has been schizophrenic. At the same time that they have stressed that this is a mere “ceremonial” or “informal international pact,” the media have expressed panic that Trump has refused to join.

Trump Defends Free Speech, Liberal Media Condemn Him

Private internet sites can censor anything they want

Even USMB

Yeah, you're all for it as long as it's the left censoring the right, huh.

/——/ Lib motto: You are free to agree with me.

 

[jc456]

Who said the Left are fascists?

Both The New York Times and Washington Post blasted the free speech position taken by President Donald Trump last week.

World leaders, led by New Zealand, united around the Christchurch Call to demand stronger internet censorship. This followed the deadly Christchurch terror attack that killed 51 people. President Trump not only refused to sign on, but established a censorship reporting hotline.

That didn’t sit well with major liberal news outlets. Both The Washington Post and The New York Times have written scathing pieces blasting the Trump administration. The Post condemned Trump for waging an “evidence-free assault on social media sites for supposedly censoring conservative voices.”

Opinion writer at large Charlie Warzel wrote in The Times that while he understands that online content regulation can be a ”minefield of unintended consequences” he asserted that for Trump, “to turn one’s back on that commitment isn’t just lazy, its shameful.”

Much like Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accord, the liberal rhetoric on this has been schizophrenic. At the same time that they have stressed that this is a mere “ceremonial” or “informal international pact,” the media have expressed panic that Trump has refused to join.

Trump Defends Free Speech, Liberal Media Condemn Him

Private internet sites can censor anything they want

Even USMB

Yeah, you're all for it as long as it's the left censoring the right, huh.

/——/ Lib motto: You are free to agree with me.

iceberg dude thinks it's equal. he thinks the conservatives censor the left like the left censor the right. He really thinks that! he's amazing.

 

[22lcidw]

Who said the Left are fascists?

Both The New York Times and Washington Post blasted the free speech position taken by President Donald Trump last week.

World leaders, led by New Zealand, united around the Christchurch Call to demand stronger internet censorship. This followed the deadly Christchurch terror attack that killed 51 people. President Trump not only refused to sign on, but established a censorship reporting hotline.

That didn’t sit well with major liberal news outlets. Both The Washington Post and The New York Times have written scathing pieces blasting the Trump administration. The Post condemned Trump for waging an “evidence-free assault on social media sites for supposedly censoring conservative voices.”

Opinion writer at large Charlie Warzel wrote in The Times that while he understands that online content regulation can be a ”minefield of unintended consequences” he asserted that for Trump, “to turn one’s back on that commitment isn’t just lazy, its shameful.”

Much like Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accord, the liberal rhetoric on this has been schizophrenic. At the same time that they have stressed that this is a mere “ceremonial” or “informal international pact,” the media have expressed panic that Trump has refused to join.

Trump Defends Free Speech, Liberal Media Condemn Him

Private internet sites can censor anything they want

Even USMB

That's the talking point, anyway. Seems pretty hypocritical, coming from those who rail against corporate influence over our political system and such.

They are no different than any other media outlet who can pick and choose their content

Let us start with equality in broadcasting. We Non Progressives demean that you get an equal station in FOX news and we get two equal stations in CNN and MSNBC to start. We will make their broadcasts identical with different personnel doing the broadcasting. Do you agree? I know you won't.

 

[deanrd]

Democrats are very pro free-speech. They’re just against inciting violence.

 

[mdk]

Nothing screams defender of free speech like threatening sketch comedies and late night hosts with the FEC and FCC.

Bless your sycophantic hearts.

 

[jc456]

Nothing screams defender of free speech like threatening sketch comedies and late night hosts with the FEC and FCC.

Bless your sycophantic hearts.

how is that anything? not sure your point. it isn't censorship till they can't do their bits. and to date, well, they haven't been censored, so you're factually wrong as usual.

 

[mdk]

Nothing screams defender of free speech like threatening sketch comedies and late night hosts with the FEC and FCC.

Bless your sycophantic hearts.

how is that anything? not sure your point. it isn't censorship till they can't do their bits. and to date, well, they haven't been censored, so you're factually wrong as usual.

A defender of free speech doesn’t threaten to sic the government on them for hurting his feelings. The reason you can’t see this point is b/c you’re a submissive retard.

Instead of whining why don’t you entitled fucks start your own social media platforms? One would think that it would be an overnight success with ya’ll being so censored and whatnot on the internet.

 

[jc456]

Nothing screams defender of free speech like threatening sketch comedies and late night hosts with the FEC and FCC.

Bless your sycophantic hearts.

how is that anything? not sure your point. it isn't censorship till they can't do their bits. and to date, well, they haven't been censored, so you're factually wrong as usual.

A defender of free speech doesn’t threaten to sic the government on them for hurting his feelings. The reason you can’t see this point is b/c you’re a submissive retard.

Instead of whining why don’t you entitled fucks start your own social media platforms? One would think that it would be an overnight success with ya’ll being so censored and whatnot on the internet.

so you admit to censorship while crying about the president's use of his free speech. you all are hilarious.way to keep that hypocritical oath.

 

[impuretrash]

Who said the Left are fascists?

Both The New York Times and Washington Post blasted the free speech position taken by President Donald Trump last week.

World leaders, led by New Zealand, united around the Christchurch Call to demand stronger internet censorship. This followed the deadly Christchurch terror attack that killed 51 people. President Trump not only refused to sign on, but established a censorship reporting hotline.

That didn’t sit well with major liberal news outlets. Both The Washington Post and The New York Times have written scathing pieces blasting the Trump administration. The Post condemned Trump for waging an “evidence-free assault on social media sites for supposedly censoring conservative voices.”

Opinion writer at large Charlie Warzel wrote in The Times that while he understands that online content regulation can be a ”minefield of unintended consequences” he asserted that for Trump, “to turn one’s back on that commitment isn’t just lazy, its shameful.”

Much like Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accord, the liberal rhetoric on this has been schizophrenic. At the same time that they have stressed that this is a mere “ceremonial” or “informal international pact,” the media have expressed panic that Trump has refused to join.

Trump Defends Free Speech, Liberal Media Condemn Him

Private internet sites can censor anything they want

Even USMB

That's the talking point, anyway. Seems pretty hypocritical, coming from those who rail against corporate influence over our political system and such.

They are no different than any other media outlet who can pick and choose their content

That has nothing to do with what I said. The normally anti-corporate left has turned into massive hypocrites on the subject of social media censorship.

 

[mdk]

Nothing screams defender of free speech like threatening sketch comedies and late night hosts with the FEC and FCC.

Bless your sycophantic hearts.

how is that anything? not sure your point. it isn't censorship till they can't do their bits. and to date, well, they haven't been censored, so you're factually wrong as usual.

A defender of free speech doesn’t threaten to sic the government on them for hurting his feelings. The reason you can’t see this point is b/c you’re a submissive retard.

Instead of whining why don’t you entitled fucks start your own social media platforms? One would think that it would be an overnight success with ya’ll being so censored and whatnot on the internet.

so you admit to censorship while crying about the president's use of his free speech. you all are hilarious.way to keep that hypocritical oath.

If only there was a way for someone to start a rival social media platform. If only...

 

[jc456]

Nothing screams defender of free speech like threatening sketch comedies and late night hosts with the FEC and FCC.

Bless your sycophantic hearts.

how is that anything? not sure your point. it isn't censorship till they can't do their bits. and to date, well, they haven't been censored, so you're factually wrong as usual.

A defender of free speech doesn’t threaten to sic the government on them for hurting his feelings. The reason you can’t see this point is b/c you’re a submissive retard.

Instead of whining why don’t you entitled fucks start your own social media platforms? One would think that it would be an overnight success with ya’ll being so censored and whatnot on the internet.

so you admit to censorship while crying about the president's use of his free speech. you all are hilarious.way to keep that hypocritical oath.

If only there was a way for someone to start a rival social media platform. If only...

if we live in a free speech nation, why would someone need to? unless someone wished to censor their opposition? BTW, there are conservative media platforms. don't worry your little ol self on that. you still can't stop admitting you love censorship. hahahahahahaha

 

[mdk]

Who said the Left are fascists?

Both The New York Times and Washington Post blasted the free speech position taken by President Donald Trump last week.

World leaders, led by New Zealand, united around the Christchurch Call to demand stronger internet censorship. This followed the deadly Christchurch terror attack that killed 51 people. President Trump not only refused to sign on, but established a censorship reporting hotline.

That didn’t sit well with major liberal news outlets. Both The Washington Post and The New York Times have written scathing pieces blasting the Trump administration. The Post condemned Trump for waging an “evidence-free assault on social media sites for supposedly censoring conservative voices.”

Opinion writer at large Charlie Warzel wrote in The Times that while he understands that online content regulation can be a ”minefield of unintended consequences” he asserted that for Trump, “to turn one’s back on that commitment isn’t just lazy, its shameful.”

Much like Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accord, the liberal rhetoric on this has been schizophrenic. At the same time that they have stressed that this is a mere “ceremonial” or “informal international pact,” the media have expressed panic that Trump has refused to join.

Trump Defends Free Speech, Liberal Media Condemn Him

Private internet sites can censor anything they want

Even USMB

That's the talking point, anyway. Seems pretty hypocritical, coming from those who rail against corporate influence over our political system and such.

They are no different than any other media outlet who can pick and choose their content

That has nothing to do with what I said. The normally anti-corporate left has turned into massive hypocrites on the subject of social media censorship.

And the normally anti-regulation, free market loving right is now clamoring for government intervention and a fairness doctrine for social media platforms. Massive hypocrites indeed.

 

[mdk]

Nothing screams defender of free speech like threatening sketch comedies and late night hosts with the FEC and FCC.

Bless your sycophantic hearts.

how is that anything? not sure your point. it isn't censorship till they can't do their bits. and to date, well, they haven't been censored, so you're factually wrong as usual.

A defender of free speech doesn’t threaten to sic the government on them for hurting his feelings. The reason you can’t see this point is b/c you’re a submissive retard.

Instead of whining why don’t you entitled fucks start your own social media platforms? One would think that it would be an overnight success with ya’ll being so censored and whatnot on the internet.

so you admit to censorship while crying about the president's use of his free speech. you all are hilarious.way to keep that hypocritical oath.

If only there was a way for someone to start a rival social media platform. If only...

if we live in a free speech nation, why would someone need to? unless someone wished to censor their opposition? BTW, there are conservative media platforms. don't worry your little ol self on that. you still can't stop admitting you love censorship. hahahahahahaha

I support the right of businesses to associate with whomever they please. You do as well until the second *you* feel slighted and than your true statist self is revealed. You blind partisans have never been much for consistency.

 

[jc456]

how is that anything? not sure your point. it isn't censorship till they can't do their bits. and to date, well, they haven't been censored, so you're factually wrong as usual.

A defender of free speech doesn’t threaten to sic the government on them for hurting his feelings. The reason you can’t see this point is b/c you’re a submissive retard.

Instead of whining why don’t you entitled fucks start your own social media platforms? One would think that it would be an overnight success with ya’ll being so censored and whatnot on the internet.

so you admit to censorship while crying about the president's use of his free speech. you all are hilarious.way to keep that hypocritical oath.

If only there was a way for someone to start a rival social media platform. If only...

if we live in a free speech nation, why would someone need to? unless someone wished to censor their opposition? BTW, there are conservative media platforms. don't worry your little ol self on that. you still can't stop admitting you love censorship. hahahahahahaha

I support the right of businesses to associate with whomever they please. You do as well until the second *you* feel slighted and than your true statist self is revealed. You blind partisans have never been much for consistency.

dude, I give two shits what a company does with their clientele, just call it what it is. facebook and twitter don't. all of those people have is a different point of view, and within the scope of the business, why would they use the excuse they didn't follow rules. Call it out,state that they don't want opposition talk on their platform. that's all.

 

[mdk]

A defender of free speech doesn’t threaten to sic the government on them for hurting his feelings. The reason you can’t see this point is b/c you’re a submissive retard.

Instead of whining why don’t you entitled fucks start your own social media platforms? One would think that it would be an overnight success with ya’ll being so censored and whatnot on the internet.

so you admit to censorship while crying about the president's use of his free speech. you all are hilarious.way to keep that hypocritical oath.

If only there was a way for someone to start a rival social media platform. If only...

if we live in a free speech nation, why would someone need to? unless someone wished to censor their opposition? BTW, there are conservative media platforms. don't worry your little ol self on that. you still can't stop admitting you love censorship. hahahahahahaha

I support the right of businesses to associate with whomever they please. You do as well until the second *you* feel slighted and than your true statist self is revealed. You blind partisans have never been much for consistency.

dude, I give two shits what a company does with their clientele, just call it what it is. facebook and twitter don't. all of those people have is a different point of view, and within the scope of the business, why would they use the excuse they didn't follow rules. Call it out,state that they don't want opposition talk on their platform. that's all.

Not to worry. The state is going to come your rescue. After all, they are here to help.