Trump continues to win. SCOTUS will not grant cert to review deportation of illegal immigrants!

[DarkFury]

Your affirmation, sparkle, so put up your evidence. Oh, you don't have any? That reminds of an earlier version before your reincarnation. I accept your admission of defeat.

A cute far left Progressive effort to deflect. It is impossible to prove a negative, which you know. I am simply asking you to prove a positive. You claim we have had this massive influx. Prove it or you are a liar.

To help with your memory, I'll post the request again.

Please show your source and link proving your point that there IS a "massive overflow of illegal immigrants through our airports and across the Canadian border".

If you cannot, at least admit you are lying.

And again, I wonder why RWNJs don't have access to Google and why they ALWAYS have to be spoon fed.

He asked you for a link and you have refused or at the very least UNABLE to back your smack. Your cowardice is duly noted.

DarkFury

No he didn't.
Your stupidity is duly noted.

Answer my question: why can't RWNJs ever educate themselves? Like YOU, for example. All you do is whine about how its black's and Hispanic's fault you're a failure, and lie about how Joe Arpaio is your BFF and he's going to give you the info you need to find me.

Grow up. If you're got a question, look it up.

And quit your constant whining and lying.

Retiring at 45 with an income is a failure? To be able to live and travel by motor home, 5th wheel or pull behind for OVER a decade is a failure? Having all my debt on auto pay so I can travel is failure?

Well, somebody has to live it.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Your affirmation, sparkle, so put up your evidence. Oh, you don't have any? That reminds of an earlier version before your reincarnation. I accept your admission of defeat.

A cute far left Progressive effort to deflect. It is impossible to prove a negative, which you know. I am simply asking you to prove a positive. You claim we have had this massive influx. Prove it or you are a liar.

To help with your memory, I'll post the request again.

Please show your source and link proving your point that there IS a "massive overflow of illegal immigrants through our airports and across the Canadian border".

If you cannot, at least admit you are lying.

And again, I wonder why RWNJs don't have access to Google and why they ALWAYS have to be spoon fed.

He asked you for a link and you have refused or at the very least UNABLE to back your smack. Your cowardice is duly noted.

DarkFury

No he didn't.
Your stupidity is duly noted.

Answer my question: why can't RWNJs ever educate themselves? Like YOU, for example. All you do is whine about how its black's and Hispanic's fault you're a failure, and lie about how Joe Arpaio is your BFF and he's going to give you the info you need to find me.

Grow up. If you're got a question, look it up.

And quit your constant whining and lying.

Retiring at 45 with an income is a failure? To be able to live and travel by motor home, 5th wheel or pull behind for OVER a decade is a failure? Having all my debt on auto pay so I can travel is failure? Well, somebody has to live it.

So you bankrupted and ran away. Yeah, live it. Admit you are lying.

 

[WaitingFor2020]

U.S. top court leaves intact ruling against Central America asylum seekers

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court sidestepped a turbulent debate over illegal immigration on Monday, turning away an appeal by a group of asylum-seeking Central American women and their children who aimed to clarify the constitutional rights of people who the government has prioritized for deportation.


The families, 28 women and 33 children ages 2 to 17 from El Salvador, Honduras and Guatemala, had hoped the justices would overturn a lower court's ruling preventing them from having their expedited removal orders reviewed by a federal judge.


That Philadelphia-based court said the status of the families, all apprehended in Texas and later held in Pennsylvania, was akin to non-citizens who are denied entry at the border and they were not entitled to a court hearing to challenge that decision.


Immigration has become an even hotter topic than usual in the United States since President Donald Trump took office in January. His administration has ordered construction of a border wall with Mexico intended to curb illegal immigration, and plans to expand the number of people targeted for expedited removal, a process that applies to non-citizens lacking valid entry documents.


The families have said they were escaping threats, violence and police authorities unable or unwilling to help in their home countries...


...The women challenged in federal court the rejection of their asylum claims, alleging a violation of their right to due process under the U.S. Constitution.


In August, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia said they may be treated the same way as non-citizens seeking initial admission to the United States, who do not have any constitutional rights of review if denied entry.


The women appealed to the Supreme Court.


There has been a 93 percent drop since December of parents and children caught trying to cross the Mexican border illegally into the United States, which U.S. officials attribute to the Trump administration's tough policies.

Thank God for President Trump and Justice Gorsuch!

#MAGA #Winning

Turning away desperate women and children, according to the case. How brave of Gorsuch. He wrote a book about banning abortion but he doesn't mind letting them die after they leave the womb.

 

[The Original Tree]

No US court should be having any hearings on any Illegals, concerning Illegals. They don't have Constitutional Rights.
Because The Constitution does not apply to Foreigners.

Phuck em. Get em out of here.

Illegals rob The Elderly and the Poor of much needed social spending dollars, and the Billions we spend on illegals every year could help with Social Security, Health care, Fixing our roads etc.

 

[JakeStarkey]

If they are living in the country, then SCOTUS says, "tough, TOT."

 

[BrokeLoser]

all of which has done nothing to stop the massive overflow of illegal immigrants through our airports and across the Canadian border

Nobody really cares about immigrants from New Zealand or Canada as most have class and a moral compass.
Our concern is with the filthy baby factories from the south.

 

[jc456]

U.S. top court leaves intact ruling against Central America asylum seekers

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court sidestepped a turbulent debate over illegal immigration on Monday, turning away an appeal by a group of asylum-seeking Central American women and their children who aimed to clarify the constitutional rights of people who the government has prioritized for deportation.


The families, 28 women and 33 children ages 2 to 17 from El Salvador, Honduras and Guatemala, had hoped the justices would overturn a lower court's ruling preventing them from having their expedited removal orders reviewed by a federal judge.


That Philadelphia-based court said the status of the families, all apprehended in Texas and later held in Pennsylvania, was akin to non-citizens who are denied entry at the border and they were not entitled to a court hearing to challenge that decision.


Immigration has become an even hotter topic than usual in the United States since President Donald Trump took office in January. His administration has ordered construction of a border wall with Mexico intended to curb illegal immigration, and plans to expand the number of people targeted for expedited removal, a process that applies to non-citizens lacking valid entry documents.


The families have said they were escaping threats, violence and police authorities unable or unwilling to help in their home countries...


...The women challenged in federal court the rejection of their asylum claims, alleging a violation of their right to due process under the U.S. Constitution.


In August, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia said they may be treated the same way as non-citizens seeking initial admission to the United States, who do not have any constitutional rights of review if denied entry.


The women appealed to the Supreme Court.


There has been a 93 percent drop since December of parents and children caught trying to cross the Mexican border illegally into the United States, which U.S. officials attribute to the Trump administration's tough policies.

Thank God for President Trump and Justice Gorsuch!

#MAGA #Winning

Imagine what would have happened if Hillary had won the election.

after the last 90 days, I'd say we would have been in knee deep in poop!

 

[jc456]

Dumb RWNJs distracted by non-issues just guaranteed there will never ever again be a legal, ethical election in the US.

You stupid fools. For the life of me, I will never understand why you want to be owned by the 1% or why you want Citizen's United to control our elections.

View attachment 122078

no such thing as fair in a libturd world.

 

[bripat9643]

all of which has done nothing to stop the massive overflow of illegal immigrants through our airports and across the Canadian border

Nobody really cares about immigrants from New Zealand or Canada as most have class and a moral compass.
Our concern is with the filthy baby factories from the south.

Mexico is a shit hole, and the reason it's a shit hole is the fact that its full of Mexicans. I can't imagine why anyone would want to import that kind of dysfunction into this country. However, snowflakes suffer from the same dysfunction.

 

[WaitingFor2020]

all of which has done nothing to stop the massive overflow of illegal immigrants through our airports and across the Canadian border

Nobody really cares about immigrants from New Zealand or Canada as most have class and a moral compass.
Our concern is with the filthy baby factories from the south.

Yeah but the problem with those Canadians is they won't mow our lawns

 

[WaitingFor2020]

all of which has done nothing to stop the massive overflow of illegal immigrants through our airports and across the Canadian border

Nobody really cares about immigrants from New Zealand or Canada as most have class and a moral compass.
Our concern is with the filthy baby factories from the south.

Mexico is a shit hole, and the reason it's a shit hole is the fact that its full of Mexicans. I can't imagine why anyone would want to import that kind of dysfunction into this country. However, snowflakes suffer from the same dysfunction.

Pigs like you used to say things like that about the Irish.

 

[WaitingFor2020]

all of which has done nothing to stop the massive overflow of illegal immigrants through our airports and across the Canadian border

Nobody really cares about immigrants from New Zealand or Canada as most have class and a moral compass.
Our concern is with the filthy baby factories from the south.

Dumbass. Illegals coming in from Canada are usually Muslims.

 

[bripat9643]

all of which has done nothing to stop the massive overflow of illegal immigrants through our airports and across the Canadian border

Nobody really cares about immigrants from New Zealand or Canada as most have class and a moral compass.
Our concern is with the filthy baby factories from the south.

Mexico is a shit hole, and the reason it's a shit hole is the fact that its full of Mexicans. I can't imagine why anyone would want to import that kind of dysfunction into this country. However, snowflakes suffer from the same dysfunction.

Pigs like you used to say things like that about the Irish.

I am half Irish, and people who said that about the Irish when they were new immigrants were largely correct. The Irish were drunken brawlers.

Irish immigrants adopted American culture and values. Mexican immigrants want us to adopt their culture and values. That's the difference.

 

[JakeStarkey]

all of which has done nothing to stop the massive overflow of illegal immigrants through our airports and across the Canadian border

Nobody really cares about immigrants from New Zealand or Canada as most have class and a moral compass.
Our concern is with the filthy baby factories from the south.

Mexico is a shit hole, and the reason it's a shit hole is the fact that its full of Mexicans. I can't imagine why anyone would want to import that kind of dysfunction into this country. However, snowflakes suffer from the same dysfunction.

Pigs like you used to say things like that about the Irish.

I am half Irish, and people who said that about the Irish when they were new immigrants were largely correct. The Irish were drunken brawlers. Irish immigrants adopted American culture and values. Mexican immigrants want us to adopt their culture and values. That's the difference.

What a stupid thing to say. Prove it.

 

[washamericom]

hasn't there? of course there has and you can't prove differently

it was your thoughtful claim. you make a sweeping statement then say well isn't it ? better sharpen your pencil trotsky.

 

[washamericom]

U.S. top court leaves intact ruling against Central America asylum seekers

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court sidestepped a turbulent debate over illegal immigration on Monday, turning away an appeal by a group of asylum-seeking Central American women and their children who aimed to clarify the constitutional rights of people who the government has prioritized for deportation.


The families, 28 women and 33 children ages 2 to 17 from El Salvador, Honduras and Guatemala, had hoped the justices would overturn a lower court's ruling preventing them from having their expedited removal orders reviewed by a federal judge.


That Philadelphia-based court said the status of the families, all apprehended in Texas and later held in Pennsylvania, was akin to non-citizens who are denied entry at the border and they were not entitled to a court hearing to challenge that decision.


Immigration has become an even hotter topic than usual in the United States since President Donald Trump took office in January. His administration has ordered construction of a border wall with Mexico intended to curb illegal immigration, and plans to expand the number of people targeted for expedited removal, a process that applies to non-citizens lacking valid entry documents.


The families have said they were escaping threats, violence and police authorities unable or unwilling to help in their home countries...


...The women challenged in federal court the rejection of their asylum claims, alleging a violation of their right to due process under the U.S. Constitution.


In August, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia said they may be treated the same way as non-citizens seeking initial admission to the United States, who do not have any constitutional rights of review if denied entry.


The women appealed to the Supreme Court.


There has been a 93 percent drop since December of parents and children caught trying to cross the Mexican border illegally into the United States, which U.S. officials attribute to the Trump administration's tough policies.

Thank God for President Trump and Justice Gorsuch!

#MAGA #Winning

Imagine what would have happened if Hillary had won the election.

They'd be moving into your house about now as "guests by executive order".

the forgotten third amendment.

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

 

[bripat9643]

U.S. top court leaves intact ruling against Central America asylum seekers

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court sidestepped a turbulent debate over illegal immigration on Monday, turning away an appeal by a group of asylum-seeking Central American women and their children who aimed to clarify the constitutional rights of people who the government has prioritized for deportation.


The families, 28 women and 33 children ages 2 to 17 from El Salvador, Honduras and Guatemala, had hoped the justices would overturn a lower court's ruling preventing them from having their expedited removal orders reviewed by a federal judge.


That Philadelphia-based court said the status of the families, all apprehended in Texas and later held in Pennsylvania, was akin to non-citizens who are denied entry at the border and they were not entitled to a court hearing to challenge that decision.


Immigration has become an even hotter topic than usual in the United States since President Donald Trump took office in January. His administration has ordered construction of a border wall with Mexico intended to curb illegal immigration, and plans to expand the number of people targeted for expedited removal, a process that applies to non-citizens lacking valid entry documents.


The families have said they were escaping threats, violence and police authorities unable or unwilling to help in their home countries...


...The women challenged in federal court the rejection of their asylum claims, alleging a violation of their right to due process under the U.S. Constitution.


In August, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia said they may be treated the same way as non-citizens seeking initial admission to the United States, who do not have any constitutional rights of review if denied entry.


The women appealed to the Supreme Court.


There has been a 93 percent drop since December of parents and children caught trying to cross the Mexican border illegally into the United States, which U.S. officials attribute to the Trump administration's tough policies.

Thank God for President Trump and Justice Gorsuch!

#MAGA #Winning

Imagine what would have happened if Hillary had won the election.

They'd be moving into your house about now as "guests by executive order".

the forgotten third amendment.

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

It's the only one the federal government still observes.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

U.S. top court leaves intact ruling against Central America asylum seekers

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court sidestepped a turbulent debate over illegal immigration on Monday, turning away an appeal by a group of asylum-seeking Central American women and their children who aimed to clarify the constitutional rights of people who the government has prioritized for deportation.


The families, 28 women and 33 children ages 2 to 17 from El Salvador, Honduras and Guatemala, had hoped the justices would overturn a lower court's ruling preventing them from having their expedited removal orders reviewed by a federal judge.


That Philadelphia-based court said the status of the families, all apprehended in Texas and later held in Pennsylvania, was akin to non-citizens who are denied entry at the border and they were not entitled to a court hearing to challenge that decision.


Immigration has become an even hotter topic than usual in the United States since President Donald Trump took office in January. His administration has ordered construction of a border wall with Mexico intended to curb illegal immigration, and plans to expand the number of people targeted for expedited removal, a process that applies to non-citizens lacking valid entry documents.


The families have said they were escaping threats, violence and police authorities unable or unwilling to help in their home countries...


...The women challenged in federal court the rejection of their asylum claims, alleging a violation of their right to due process under the U.S. Constitution.


In August, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia said they may be treated the same way as non-citizens seeking initial admission to the United States, who do not have any constitutional rights of review if denied entry.


The women appealed to the Supreme Court.


There has been a 93 percent drop since December of parents and children caught trying to cross the Mexican border illegally into the United States, which U.S. officials attribute to the Trump administration's tough policies.

Thank God for President Trump and Justice Gorsuch!

#MAGA #Winning

Imagine what would have happened if Hillary had won the election.

They'd be moving into your house about now as "guests by executive order".

the forgotten third amendment.

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

Illegals are not soldiers.

 

[washamericom]

all of which has done nothing to stop the massive overflow of illegal immigrants through our airports and across the Canadian border

Nobody really cares about immigrants from New Zealand or Canada as most have class and a moral compass.
Our concern is with the filthy baby factories from the south.

Mexico is a shit hole, and the reason it's a shit hole is the fact that its full of Mexicans. I can't imagine why anyone would want to import that kind of dysfunction into this country. However, snowflakes suffer from the same dysfunction.

the sad part is that it doesn't have to be, the problem isn't mexicans, the problem is leadership.
mexico is the very definition of corrupt government.

and as i've said about this country: why does a country like the united states even have debt?

why do we have a neighbor, like mexico, that has natural resources, brilliant people, sunshine tourism, and corruption to the top.

however... it's the mexican people that allow it to continue generation after generation.

canada and mexico should have the bomb. heh

 

[bripat9643]

all of which has done nothing to stop the massive overflow of illegal immigrants through our airports and across the Canadian border

Nobody really cares about immigrants from New Zealand or Canada as most have class and a moral compass.
Our concern is with the filthy baby factories from the south.

Mexico is a shit hole, and the reason it's a shit hole is the fact that its full of Mexicans. I can't imagine why anyone would want to import that kind of dysfunction into this country. However, snowflakes suffer from the same dysfunction.

the sad part is that it doesn't have to be, the problem isn't mexicans, the problem is leadership. mexico is the very definition of corrupt government. and as i've said about this country:why does a country like our have debt? why do we have a neighbor like mexico, that has natural resources, brilliant people, sunshine tourism, and corruption to the top. however...it's the mexican people that allow it to continue generation after generation. canada and mexico should have the bomb. heh

Countries have corrupt leadership because the populace allows it. That's exactly why our government has been growing more and more corrupt as time goes buy. The "something for nothing" mentality votes in politicians who promise them whatever they want. These politicians are invariably corrupt. Mexico has the government the people wanted.