danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #461
Where it implies, to not take the right wing too seriously, if they appeal to ignorance of it.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
True Interpretation of the 2nd Amendment
- Thread starter luosT_tcR
- Start date
- Mar 3, 2013
- 82,268
- 43,721
- 2,605
Where it implies, to not take the right wing too seriously, if they appeal to ignorance of it.The true interpretation of our Second Amendment is that well regulated militia of the People shall not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.
Where does the 2nd mention state or union?
still making up shit?
link it.
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #463
No, I actually know how to read.Where it implies, to not take the right wing too seriously, if they appeal to ignorance of it.The true interpretation of our Second Amendment is that well regulated militia of the People shall not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.
Where does the 2nd mention state or union?
still making up shit?
link it.
Well regulated militia of the whole and entire People, are declared Necessary and shall not be Infringed.
- Mar 3, 2013
- 82,268
- 43,721
- 2,605
No, I actually know how to read.Where it implies, to not take the right wing too seriously, if they appeal to ignorance of it.The true interpretation of our Second Amendment is that well regulated militia of the People shall not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.
Where does the 2nd mention state or union?
still making up shit?
link it.
Well regulated militia of the whole and entire People, are declared Necessary and shall not be Infringed.
Your interpretation.
NOT what it says
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #465
it is current practice in our Republic.No, I actually know how to read.Where it implies, to not take the right wing too seriously, if they appeal to ignorance of it.The true interpretation of our Second Amendment is that well regulated militia of the People shall not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.
Where does the 2nd mention state or union?
still making up shit?
link it.
Well regulated militia of the whole and entire People, are declared Necessary and shall not be Infringed.
Your interpretation.
NOT what it says
- Mar 3, 2013
- 82,268
- 43,721
- 2,605
it is current practice in our Republic.No, I actually know how to read.Where it implies, to not take the right wing too seriously, if they appeal to ignorance of it.Where does the 2nd mention state or union?
still making up shit?
link it.
Well regulated militia of the whole and entire People, are declared Necessary and shall not be Infringed.
Your interpretation.
NOT what it says
No.
the current practice is to allow ALL citizens, with a few legal exceptions, the right to keep and bear arms.
not just males between the ages of 16-45
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #467
this is the current practice I am referring to:it is current practice in our Republic.No, I actually know how to read.Where it implies, to not take the right wing too seriously, if they appeal to ignorance of it.
still making up shit?
link it.
Well regulated militia of the whole and entire People, are declared Necessary and shall not be Infringed.
Your interpretation.
NOT what it says
No.
the current practice is to allow ALL citizens, with a few legal exceptions, the right to keep and bear arms.
not just males between the ages of 16-45
(2) Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons. Pp. 54–56.
Well regulated militia have literal recourse to our Second Amendment and are exempt from paragraph (2), when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.
- Mar 3, 2013
- 82,268
- 43,721
- 2,605
this is the current practice I am referring to:it is current practice in our Republic.No, I actually know how to read.still making up shit?
link it.
Well regulated militia of the whole and entire People, are declared Necessary and shall not be Infringed.
Your interpretation.
NOT what it says
No.
the current practice is to allow ALL citizens, with a few legal exceptions, the right to keep and bear arms.
not just males between the ages of 16-45
(2) Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons. Pp. 54–56.
Well regulated militia have literal recourse to our Second Amendment and are exempt from paragraph (2), when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.
Obviously, you go out of your way to be silly.
"Well regulated militia have literal recourse to our Second Amendment and are exempt from paragraph (2), when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union."
no one is disputing that 'well regulated militia' don't have a right to keep and bear arms.
YOU are disputing that the PEOPLE have that same right.
As written in the 2nd Amendment.
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #469
However did you get that idea from me? I am a federalist. I already know natural and Individual rights are found in State Constitutions and available via Due Process.this is the current practice I am referring to:it is current practice in our Republic.No, I actually know how to read.
Well regulated militia of the whole and entire People, are declared Necessary and shall not be Infringed.
Your interpretation.
NOT what it says
No.
the current practice is to allow ALL citizens, with a few legal exceptions, the right to keep and bear arms.
not just males between the ages of 16-45
(2) Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons. Pp. 54–56.
Well regulated militia have literal recourse to our Second Amendment and are exempt from paragraph (2), when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.
Obviously, you go out of your way to be silly.
"Well regulated militia have literal recourse to our Second Amendment and are exempt from paragraph (2), when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union."
no one is disputing that 'well regulated militia' don't have a right to keep and bear arms.
YOU are disputing that the PEOPLE have that same right.
As written in the 2nd Amendment.
- Mar 3, 2013
- 82,268
- 43,721
- 2,605
However did you get that idea from me? I am a federalist. I already know natural and Individual rights are found in State Constitutions and available via Due Process.this is the current practice I am referring to:it is current practice in our Republic.Your interpretation.
NOT what it says
No.
the current practice is to allow ALL citizens, with a few legal exceptions, the right to keep and bear arms.
not just males between the ages of 16-45
(2) Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons. Pp. 54–56.
Well regulated militia have literal recourse to our Second Amendment and are exempt from paragraph (2), when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.
Obviously, you go out of your way to be silly.
"Well regulated militia have literal recourse to our Second Amendment and are exempt from paragraph (2), when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union."
no one is disputing that 'well regulated militia' don't have a right to keep and bear arms.
YOU are disputing that the PEOPLE have that same right.
As written in the 2nd Amendment.
because you keep referring to Militias, State Constitutions, etc...
instead of the 2nd Amendment?
A State Constitution covers ONE state.
the 2nd covers the country
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #471
apples and oranges.However did you get that idea from me? I am a federalist. I already know natural and Individual rights are found in State Constitutions and available via Due Process.this is the current practice I am referring to:it is current practice in our Republic.
No.
the current practice is to allow ALL citizens, with a few legal exceptions, the right to keep and bear arms.
not just males between the ages of 16-45
(2) Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons. Pp. 54–56.
Well regulated militia have literal recourse to our Second Amendment and are exempt from paragraph (2), when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.
Obviously, you go out of your way to be silly.
"Well regulated militia have literal recourse to our Second Amendment and are exempt from paragraph (2), when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union."
no one is disputing that 'well regulated militia' don't have a right to keep and bear arms.
YOU are disputing that the PEOPLE have that same right.
As written in the 2nd Amendment.
because you keep referring to Militias, State Constitutions, etc...
instead of the 2nd Amendment?
A State Constitution covers ONE state.
the 2nd covers the country
Due Process covers it, not our Second Amendment.
What State are you from?
- Moderator
- #472
The true interpretation of our Second Amendment is that well regulated militia of the People shall not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.
Except that is not what is written. They founding fathers intentionally used the word "militia" in the first clause and "people" in the second clause.
Because that is what they meant.
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #473
The People are the militia; you are either, well regulated or you are not.The true interpretation of our Second Amendment is that well regulated militia of the People shall not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.
Except that is not what is written. They founding fathers intentionally used the word "militia" in the first clause and "people" in the second clause.
Because that is what they meant.
- Moderator
- #474
The People are the militia; you are either, well regulated or you are not.The true interpretation of our Second Amendment is that well regulated militia of the People shall not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.
Except that is not what is written. They founding fathers intentionally used the word "militia" in the first clause and "people" in the second clause.
Because that is what they meant.
The people will become the militia when they are needed. Just as they had done in the war that they had just finished fighting when they wrote the US Constitution. Do a little research. Look up "Citizen Soldier" or perhaps "Minutemen".
BTW, the term "Minuteman" means more than just your sexual abilities, Daniel.
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #475
that is simply, appealing to ignorance of what the militia is.The People are the militia; you are either, well regulated or you are not.The true interpretation of our Second Amendment is that well regulated militia of the People shall not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.
Except that is not what is written. They founding fathers intentionally used the word "militia" in the first clause and "people" in the second clause.
Because that is what they meant.
The people will become the militia when they are needed. Just as they had done in the war that they had just finished fighting when they wrote the US Constitution. Do a little research. Look up "Citizen Soldier" or perhaps "Minutemen".
BTW, the term "Minuteman" means more than just your sexual abilities, Daniel.
"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
- Moderator
- #476
that is simply, appealing to ignorance of what the militia is.The People are the militia; you are either, well regulated or you are not.The true interpretation of our Second Amendment is that well regulated militia of the People shall not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.
Except that is not what is written. They founding fathers intentionally used the word "militia" in the first clause and "people" in the second clause.
Because that is what they meant.
The people will become the militia when they are needed. Just as they had done in the war that they had just finished fighting when they wrote the US Constitution. Do a little research. Look up "Citizen Soldier" or perhaps "Minutemen".
BTW, the term "Minuteman" means more than just your sexual abilities, Daniel.
No, that is looking at the context in which the 2nd was written.
- Moderator
- #477
apples and oranges.However did you get that idea from me? I am a federalist. I already know natural and Individual rights are found in State Constitutions and available via Due Process.this is the current practice I am referring to:No.
the current practice is to allow ALL citizens, with a few legal exceptions, the right to keep and bear arms.
not just males between the ages of 16-45
(2) Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons. Pp. 54–56.
Well regulated militia have literal recourse to our Second Amendment and are exempt from paragraph (2), when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.
Obviously, you go out of your way to be silly.
"Well regulated militia have literal recourse to our Second Amendment and are exempt from paragraph (2), when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union."
no one is disputing that 'well regulated militia' don't have a right to keep and bear arms.
YOU are disputing that the PEOPLE have that same right.
As written in the 2nd Amendment.
because you keep referring to Militias, State Constitutions, etc...
instead of the 2nd Amendment?
A State Constitution covers ONE state.
the 2nd covers the country
Due Process covers it, not our Second Amendment.
What State are you from?
Due Process does not cover anything specifically named in the US Constitution. State laws and constitutions cannot, despite your claims, overrule the US Constitution.
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #478
"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."that is simply, appealing to ignorance of what the militia is.The People are the militia; you are either, well regulated or you are not.The true interpretation of our Second Amendment is that well regulated militia of the People shall not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.
Except that is not what is written. They founding fathers intentionally used the word "militia" in the first clause and "people" in the second clause.
Because that is what they meant.
The people will become the militia when they are needed. Just as they had done in the war that they had just finished fighting when they wrote the US Constitution. Do a little research. Look up "Citizen Soldier" or perhaps "Minutemen".
BTW, the term "Minuteman" means more than just your sexual abilities, Daniel.
No, that is looking at the context in which the 2nd was written.
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #479
dude; nobody on the left takes the right wing seriously about the law, Constitutional or otherwise.apples and oranges.However did you get that idea from me? I am a federalist. I already know natural and Individual rights are found in State Constitutions and available via Due Process.this is the current practice I am referring to:
Well regulated militia have literal recourse to our Second Amendment and are exempt from paragraph (2), when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.
Obviously, you go out of your way to be silly.
"Well regulated militia have literal recourse to our Second Amendment and are exempt from paragraph (2), when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union."
no one is disputing that 'well regulated militia' don't have a right to keep and bear arms.
YOU are disputing that the PEOPLE have that same right.
As written in the 2nd Amendment.
because you keep referring to Militias, State Constitutions, etc...
instead of the 2nd Amendment?
A State Constitution covers ONE state.
the 2nd covers the country
Due Process covers it, not our Second Amendment.
What State are you from?
Due Process does not cover anything specifically named in the US Constitution. State laws and constitutions cannot, despite your claims, overrule the US Constitution.
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
- Moderator
- #480
"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."that is simply, appealing to ignorance of what the militia is.The People are the militia; you are either, well regulated or you are not.Except that is not what is written. They founding fathers intentionally used the word "militia" in the first clause and "people" in the second clause.
Because that is what they meant.
The people will become the militia when they are needed. Just as they had done in the war that they had just finished fighting when they wrote the US Constitution. Do a little research. Look up "Citizen Soldier" or perhaps "Minutemen".
BTW, the term "Minuteman" means more than just your sexual abilities, Daniel.
No, that is looking at the context in which the 2nd was written.
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
And so the "people's" right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Except for a few public officials.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 128
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 8
- Views
- 229
- Replies
- 19
- Views
- 497
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 15
- Views
- 49
- Replies
- 6
- Views
- 55
- Replies
- 109
- Views
- 4K
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8279
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 476
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-