True Interpretation of the 2nd Amendment

Discussion in 'US Constitution' started by luosT_tcR, Jun 16, 2016.

  1. luosT_tcR
    Offline

    luosT_tcR Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2016
    Messages:
    21
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Location:
    United States
    Ratings:
    +17
    True Interpretation of the 2nd Amendment in laments terms:

    The Right To Bear Arms

    Lets say YOU as a normal average person were to speak out against a Wealthy Person, I then get a Cartel or some sort of local Mafia involved to go to your house, tie you up, RAPE and Pillage your family as you watched.
    The very next day, YOU WOULD LEARN TO KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT.

    But here in the Untied States the Second Amendment has been misinterpreted so now all the Sheeple in this land have sophisticated firearms & modern weaponry equal to or greater than Cartel's & Mafia's, so now when I try to order them to go to your house to teach you a lesson, they will risk Serious Injury or even Death, this make it much more expensive to or even impossible to SHUT YOU UP.

    Yes the American Sheeple have the Right To Bear Arms, so if I was to tell the Cartel or Mafia guys to cut off your hands, they would have to do so at the base of your wrist, thus preserving YOUR arm.............. Thus the Right to Bear Arms, it doesn't say anything about Sheeple being allow to own sophisticated firearms & modern weaponry at all.

    This is why the confiscation of all Fire Arms from American Sheeple should be employed, and I say ALL guns including Flint Lock Muskets......... anything that can be used in self defense, because technically......... TECHNICALLY YOU DON'T HAVE THE RIGHT TO OWN GUNS.
     
    • Funny Funny x 9
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  2. SassyIrishLass
    Offline

    SassyIrishLass Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2009
    Messages:
    55,706
    Thanks Received:
    15,355
    Trophy Points:
    2,250
    Ratings:
    +96,545
    The Second says you're full of it
     
    • Winner x 4
    • Thank You! x 3
    • Agree x 1
    • Funny x 1
    • Funny and Agree!! x 1
  3. Fenton Lum
    Offline

    Fenton Lum BANNED

    Joined:
    May 7, 2016
    Messages:
    22,735
    Thanks Received:
    1,423
    Trophy Points:
    265
    Ratings:
    +8,858

    Well no. But I've seen just as ludicrous interpretations on the other extreme.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  4. couch protester
    Offline

    couch protester Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2015
    Messages:
    1,340
    Thanks Received:
    258
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Ratings:
    +1,086
    You must be a rapist or terrorist spreading propaganda to brainwash Americans so we won't protect ourselves from you Hannibal Lector.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  5. bear513
    Online

    bear513 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2012
    Messages:
    47,124
    Thanks Received:
    6,080
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Ratings:
    +31,060

    Stupid fucking moron...
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
  6. emilynghiem
    Offline

    emilynghiem Constitutionalist / Universalist Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    19,855
    Thanks Received:
    2,759
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    National Freedmen's Town District
    Ratings:
    +7,242
    Dear luosT_tcR in addition to the criminal oppression you describe
    our nation still faces the equivalent in terms of civil and corporate oppression.

    When media, political parties, and the LEGAL system of defense
    is monopolized by corporate interests buying out politicians, media and judges/courts
    then we have this going on with lack of equal legal defense to protect ourselves and representation, from "bigger bullies" such as in your scenario.

    I watched an entire community in a nationally registered historic landmark site
    bulldozed down to a few remaining churches because of corporate collusion and monopoly with local govt bought out by developer interests not treated equally as other citizens.

    None of us can acquire legal representation much less equal defense or time in court much less a win. Because of professional conflicts of interest both financially and politically between lawyers judges and govt.

    The "bigger bully" wins using means that are not checked by govt as abuses of power
    or public resources/authority, but are "legalized" by govt and lawyers who defend the source of bigger financial backing or tax revenues, while there is nothing to defend the interests and rights of regular working citizens (who also pay for the legal defense of city govts against us in lawsuits, if you can see the outrageous injustice in that)

    Where is equal protection of the laws between citizens and bigger corporate interests?

    If anything, instead of abolishing the 2nd amendment
    it should be EXPANDED to protect equal right to defense in ALL forms
    including LEGAL defense equal to oppressive threats by larger groups especially govt and corporations with unequal resources and influence,
    and mediation and consensus to defend political beliefs from infringement by equal creeds or beliefs of opponents.

    If Trump and Clinton took this on, we'd see real quick who is for equality and who is for continued monopoly, by which competing interests, on our democratic process, media and govt!!!
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    Last edited: Jun 16, 2016
  7. regent
    Online

    regent Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2012
    Messages:
    9,789
    Thanks Received:
    1,054
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,454
    Fortunately the framers gave us a second amendment that has room for interpretation, by the courts.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. martybegan
    Online

    martybegan Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Messages:
    43,657
    Thanks Received:
    6,168
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Ratings:
    +23,309
    [​IMG]
     
  9. luosT_tcR
    Offline

    luosT_tcR Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2016
    Messages:
    21
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Location:
    United States
    Ratings:
    +17
    You are talking some silly Nonsense.

    You just don't get it do you, GUNS are BAD, they prevent the wealthy from taking control of the American Sheeple Live Stock, and all live stock at some point needs to be Culled, you can Cull animals if they can fight back, in other words, the American Sheeple have TEETH, the TEETH are the GUNS in America, so before we can begin the Culling, we must first pull the teeth.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  10. emilynghiem
    Offline

    emilynghiem Constitutionalist / Universalist Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    19,855
    Thanks Received:
    2,759
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    National Freedmen's Town District
    Ratings:
    +7,242
    Why do we have to wait for conflicts to escalate to the point of threatening to use guns for defense?
    Is that the only choice of equalizer?

    Currently only the big corporations and interests that can afford to lobby and/or have leverage to sue and WIN in federal courts can get their way.
    It's not just guns alone that defend rights, but the fact that the NRA can AFFORD LAWYERS TO SUE -- IN FEDERAL COURT -- IF LINES GET CROSSED.

    The only thing that stopped Obamacare were lawsuits that WON in federal court.
    Who can afford that?

    So we don't have equal defense in this country.
    The feds can get into our pocketbooks and harass using the IRS.

    Taking up guns is not enough to stop the onslaught and oppression of rights.
    Look to the lawyers and lobbies that can afford legal defense.

    The day that the average person can go to a group and get the same defense for a complaint,
    maybe we'll have equality! Thank you luosT_tcR Keep posting and keep your mind well loaded!
     

Share This Page