Trouble For Obama: WH Must Provide Congress A 'Priviledge Log' For Hidden Documents

Hell. Shitting Bull has left the building.

Just another Dem Bootlicker who doesn't even know why he or she is defending this terrible travesty. All they know is, the DNC Talking Points tell them to. These people are so lost. I don't get such loyal Bootlicking. What has the Democratic Party really ever done for them? Why sell your soul and defend them on awful stuff like this? Their Bot-like loyalty is so bizarre.
 
hmmmmm.....

C-SPAN video says 'under the leadership of the President'...


but then we have this...
Obama Denies Knowledge of Controversial Fed Operation Smuggling Guns Into Mexico | TheBlaze.com
Now under increasing fire for the controversial operation, the Obama administration is denying having authorized the mission. During an interview with Univision this week, President Obama said neither he nor Attorney General Eric Holder knew of the operation, now called “Operation Fast and Furious.”

Responding to reports that the Mexican government has complained about the U.S. operation that allowed guns to illegally cross the international border, Obama said he didn’t inform Mexican President Felipe Calderon because he — the president of the United States — wasn’t informed either.

Ditching the old presidential moniker “The Buck Stops Here,” Obama responded that the U.S. government “a pretty big government” with “a lot of moving parts”:


Obama is boned.

He needs to be impeached. The proof he lied is evident.
 
This goes from Homeland Security to the Attorney General to the Secretary of State to the President. It's all of them, no wonder he wants to invoke executive privilege.
 
This will put Obama on the spot and back him into a corner. What a smart move by Chuck Grassley. A “Privilege Log” details what hidden Fast & Furious documents Obama is exercising his power over, and what his legal argument for doing so is, and the White House is legally required to produce a privilege. If Obama doesn't produce then this will lead to far worse inplications.

Priviledge Logs:
http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/internetDocs/cle/2010-07/PrivilegeLogs.pdf

Grassley: WH must provide Congress with a ‘privilege log’ for Fast and Furious documents Obama’s hiding
Grassley: WH must provide Congress with a
h

He's not "legally" required to provide anything once executive priviledge is evoked.

Or did you forget Cheney's private meetings with Oil Company heads.

Case law protects Obama. Made by the same partisan supremes who hate his guts.

:lol:

Fucking Ironic.
 
Last edited:
This will put Obama on the spot and back him into a corner. What a smart move by Chuck Grassley. A “Privilege Log” details what hidden Fast & Furious documents Obama is exercising his power over, and what his legal argument for doing so is, and the White House is legally required to produce a privilege. If Obama doesn't produce then this will lead to far worse inplications.

Priviledge Logs:
http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/internetDocs/cle/2010-07/PrivilegeLogs.pdf

Grassley: WH must provide Congress with a ‘privilege log’ for Fast and Furious documents Obama’s hiding
Grassley: WH must provide Congress with a
h

He's not "legally" required to provide anything once executive priviledge is evoked.

Or did you forget Cheney's private meetings with Oil Company heads.

Case law protects Obama. Made by the same partisan supremes who hate his guts.

:lol:

Fucking Ironic.

Talk to Nixon.
 
This will put Obama on the spot and back him into a corner. What a smart move by Chuck Grassley. A “Privilege Log” details what hidden Fast & Furious documents Obama is exercising his power over, and what his legal argument for doing so is, and the White House is legally required to produce a privilege. If Obama doesn't produce then this will lead to far worse inplications.

Priviledge Logs:
http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/internetDocs/cle/2010-07/PrivilegeLogs.pdf

Grassley: WH must provide Congress with a ‘privilege log’ for Fast and Furious documents Obama’s hiding
Grassley: WH must provide Congress with a
h

He's not "legally" required to provide anything once executive priviledge is evoked.

Or did you forget Cheney's private meetings with Oil Company heads.

Case law protects Obama. Made by the same partisan supremes who hate his guts.

:lol:

Fucking Ironic.

Talk to Nixon.

Nixon's dead.

And Cheney's case law decision came about long after he died.
 
He's not "legally" required to provide anything once executive priviledge is evoked.

Or did you forget Cheney's private meetings with Oil Company heads.

Case law protects Obama. Made by the same partisan supremes who hate his guts.

:lol:

Fucking Ironic.

Talk to Nixon.

Nixon's dead.

And Cheney's case law decision came about long after he died.

Nixon thought he could use executive privilege for anything but he got fooled obama is toast.
 
This will put Obama on the spot and back him into a corner. What a smart move by Chuck Grassley. A “Privilege Log” details what hidden Fast & Furious documents Obama is exercising his power over, and what his legal argument for doing so is, and the White House is legally required to produce a privilege. If Obama doesn't produce then this will lead to far worse inplications.

Priviledge Logs:
http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/internetDocs/cle/2010-07/PrivilegeLogs.pdf

Grassley: WH must provide Congress with a ‘privilege log’ for Fast and Furious documents Obama’s hiding
Grassley: WH must provide Congress with a
h

It didn't work for Nixon in Watergate--I doubt the executive privilege will work for Obama who is trying to protect either his own ass or that of Eric Holder's.
 
The documents that were turned over were just blacked out on every line, so they turned over paper, but no information.

If obama is protecting an executive communication, then there was executive communication and he was lying, and holder was lying when they both said there weren't any.
 
"Under the President's leadership..." sounds pretty ominous, but I think it had more to do with stroking the O's ego than him knowing any particulars. The documents subpoenaed by Issa should shed a lot of light on the matter.
 
This will put Obama on the spot and back him into a corner. What a smart move by Chuck Grassley. A “Privilege Log” details what hidden Fast & Furious documents Obama is exercising his power over, and what his legal argument for doing so is, and the White House is legally required to produce a privilege. If Obama doesn't produce then this will lead to far worse inplications.

Priviledge Logs:
http://www.ned.uscourts.gov/internetDocs/cle/2010-07/PrivilegeLogs.pdf

Grassley: WH must provide Congress with a ‘privilege log’ for Fast and Furious documents Obama’s hiding
Grassley: WH must provide Congress with a
h

It didn't work for Nixon in Watergate--I doubt the executive privilege will work for Obama who is trying to protect either his own ass or that of Eric Holder's.
When he's protecting Holder he's also protecting his own ass.
 
Grassley is a racist for taking the unprecedented step of asking a black President and AG for documents
 
The documents that were turned over were just blacked out on every line, so they turned over paper, but no information.

If obama is protecting an executive communication, then there was executive communication and he was lying, and holder was lying when they both said there weren't any.

Ah..so this is the first time, evah..that documents turned over by the white house, were redacted?

Redacting documents only started in 2009?
 
The documents that were turned over were just blacked out on every line, so they turned over paper, but no information.

If obama is protecting an executive communication, then there was executive communication and he was lying, and holder was lying when they both said there weren't any.

Ah..so this is the first time, evah..that documents turned over by the white house, were redacted?

Redacting documents only started in 2009?
For fast and the furious yes.
 
The documents that were turned over were just blacked out on every line, so they turned over paper, but no information.

If obama is protecting an executive communication, then there was executive communication and he was lying, and holder was lying when they both said there weren't any.

Ah..so this is the first time, evah..that documents turned over by the white house, were redacted?

Redacting documents only started in 2009?
For fast and the furious yes.

:lol:
 
Nixon's dead.

And Cheney's case law decision came about long after he died.

Nixon thought he could use executive privilege for anything but he got fooled obama is toast.

This is the first time it's been used by Obama.

So under "Bush rules" he'd got 5 more.

I don't give a fuck who used it when and how many times NIXON THOUGHT HE COULD USE IT FOR ANYTHING THE SUPREME COURT SAID NO
 

Forum List

Back
Top