Trickle Up Defies Gravity

[francoHFW]

Trickle up....is when the middle class has more purchasing/spending power to clamor for goods and services, which, in turn, spurs the economy and industry...

Trickle down, is a futile expectation that given extra money to conglomerates, these companies will generously give some of their extra funds to create more jobs to address a NON-existent need for more production and to give higher salaries to workers that have jobs in areas where there is no demands for whatever they're producing.

TRICKLE UP DEFIES GRAVITY

Income distribution

{1} 1,365,856 earn more than $388,000 a year

{2} 68,292,856 earn less than $70,000 a year

https://tinyurl.com/yaw8yy3g


TRICKLE DOWN
If the IRS gave tax bracket {1} a $1,000 tax break they in turn could add $13,665,856,000 to the economy but the rich will not add it to the economy, they will put it in the bank to do nothing


TRICKLE UP
If the IRS gave tax bracket {2} a $1,000 tax break they in turn could add $68,292,856,000 to the economy because they will spend it, buying new things from houses to shoes to a new car which adds to the economy making more shoes, the car to a new house.

Now ask yourself; which is best for our economy

( ) Trickle down

( ) Trickle up

The problem with your logic.
Bracket 1 does not need any more money in the bank, they need a new Ferrari.
Bracket 2 probably has 5 credit cards maxed out, won't buy anything new.

PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE....stop pretending you wackos give two shits about the AMERICAN middle class....You want to see policies implemented that directly bypass the true middle class and only have the potential to benefit ShaQuita and Guadalupe at the very bottom...you know this and we know this....stop playing fucking games, come clean and spit it the fuck out.

No Democrat is talking about any more help for the welfare class, racist brainwashed functional moron.

 

[jon_berzerk]

JFK, a rising tide lifts all boats
Obama, a low tide keeps everyone equal for social justice

great slogan for the democrats --LOL

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

but the rich will not add it to the economy, they will put it in the bank to do nothing

Sure, they will, dumb ass, because every rich person got there by sticking all of their money in a savings account earning a .02% APR.

 

[Moonglow]

but the rich will not add it to the economy, they will put it in the bank to do nothing

Sure, they will, dumb ass, because every rich person got there by sticking all of their money in a savings account earning a .02% APR.

They make much more by sharking..

 

[NYcarbineer]

I don't hear too many Republicans running out the 'trickle down' talking point much anymore.

 

[Moonglow]

I don't hear too many Republicans running out the 'trickle down' talking point much anymore.

The foreign banks doing business in the US aren't drunk with Trump happiness...

 

[NYcarbineer]

When you see in the news that a corporation announces massive layoffs, and in response its stock price goes UP,

that is where you should start in learning the difference between the interests of Wall Street and Main Street.

 

[nat4900]

I don't hear too many Republicans running out the 'trickle down' talking point much anymore.

George H.W. Bush's label of "voodoo economics" still rings loud and clear.

 

[Slade3200]

Trickle up is the natural way money flows. The poor and middle class buy goods and pay rent and the “owners”end up with most the cash. It’s an upwards vacuum

Hold on a minute...who provides the poor and middle class with the funds to buy goods and pay rent?
What came first...the chicken or the egg?

The rich and middle class mostly employ the poor and provide them with wages. When you look at how money flows more floats up to the top than down to the poor. It’s the nature of the system. Wouldnt you agree?

 

[Tax Man]

So during the greatest boom in our nation trickle up worked wonderfully.

 

[BrokeLoser]

Trickle up is the natural way money flows. The poor and middle class buy goods and pay rent and the “owners”end up with most the cash. It’s an upwards vacuum

Hold on a minute...who provides the poor and middle class with the funds to buy goods and pay rent?
What came first...the chicken or the egg?

The rich and middle class mostly employ the poor and provide them with wages. When you look at how money flows more floats up to the top than down to the poor. It’s the nature of the system. Wouldnt you agree?

No.
Not doing the practical arithmetic...poor Johnny is paid $30k per year by ABC Corp...how can Johnny send more than he was paid up the “chain”?

 

[Slade3200]

Trickle up is the natural way money flows. The poor and middle class buy goods and pay rent and the “owners”end up with most the cash. It’s an upwards vacuum

Hold on a minute...who provides the poor and middle class with the funds to buy goods and pay rent?
What came first...the chicken or the egg?

The rich and middle class mostly employ the poor and provide them with wages. When you look at how money flows more floats up to the top than down to the poor. It’s the nature of the system. Wouldnt you agree?

No.
Not doing the practical arithmetic...poor Johnny is paid $30k per year by ABC Corp...how can Johnny send more than he was paid up the “chain”?

Does ABC Corp make a profit? Where does that profit come from? Look at the big picture. Where does the money flow?

 

[BluesLegend]

TRICKLE UP DEFIES GRAVITY

Income distribution

{1} 1,365,856 earn more than $388,000 a year

{2} 68,292,856 earn less than $70,000 a year

https://tinyurl.com/yaw8yy3g


TRICKLE DOWN
If the IRS gave tax bracket {1} a $1,000 tax break they in turn could add $13,665,856,000 to the economy but the rich will not add it to the economy, they will put it in the bank to do nothing


TRICKLE UP
If the IRS gave tax bracket {2} a $1,000 tax break they in turn could add $68,292,856,000 to the economy because they will spend it, buying new things from houses to shoes to a new car which adds to the economy making more shoes, the car to a new house.

Now ask yourself; which is best for our economy

( ) Trickle down

( ) Trickle up

For sane folks the principles are simple.
For gimme free shit beggars...not so much.
Most economists agree the primary catalyst in a robust economy is jobs / employment.
Ask yourself this...has a bottom feeder ever given you a job?

And the only thing that creates joss is demand. Group 1 getting $1000 does nothing to demand and they are going to hire people just because they have more money. Group 2 getting $1000 will increase demand which will in turn lead to more jobs.

Group 2 will have their $1,000 confiscated by tax and spend liberals and the money will vanish into a black hole.

You are not really a very smart person are you? That's ok, the world needs dumb people too.

My pinky is smarter than you libwit, just the left one I don't need both to top you.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

TRICKLE UP DEFIES GRAVITY

Income distribution

{1} 1,365,856 earn more than $388,000 a year

{2} 68,292,856 earn less than $70,000 a year

https://tinyurl.com/yaw8yy3g


TRICKLE DOWN
If the IRS gave tax bracket {1} a $1,000 tax break they in turn could add $13,665,856,000 to the economy but the rich will not add it to the economy, they will put it in the bank to do nothing


TRICKLE UP
If the IRS gave tax bracket {2} a $1,000 tax break they in turn could add $68,292,856,000 to the economy because they will spend it, buying new things from houses to shoes to a new car which adds to the economy making more shoes, the car to a new house.

Now ask yourself; which is best for our economy

( ) Trickle down

( ) Trickle up

For sane folks the principles are simple.
For gimme free shit beggars...not so much.
Most economists agree the primary catalyst in a robust economy is jobs / employment.
Ask yourself this...has a bottom feeder ever given you a job?

And the only thing that creates joss is demand. Group 1 getting $1000 does nothing to demand and they are going to hire people just because they have more money. Group 2 getting $1000 will increase demand which will in turn lead to more jobs.

Group 2 will have their $1,000 confiscated by tax and spend liberals and the money will vanish into a black hole.

You are not really a very smart person are you? That's ok, the world needs dumb people too.

My pinky is smarter than you libwit, just the left one I don't need both to top you.

Whatever you have to tell yourself to sleep at night, I am good with.

 

[BluesLegend]

For sane folks the principles are simple.
For gimme free shit beggars...not so much.
Most economists agree the primary catalyst in a robust economy is jobs / employment.
Ask yourself this...has a bottom feeder ever given you a job?

And the only thing that creates joss is demand. Group 1 getting $1000 does nothing to demand and they are going to hire people just because they have more money. Group 2 getting $1000 will increase demand which will in turn lead to more jobs.

Group 2 will have their $1,000 confiscated by tax and spend liberals and the money will vanish into a black hole.

You are not really a very smart person are you? That's ok, the world needs dumb people too.

My pinky is smarter than you libwit, just the left one I don't need both to top you.

Whatever you have to tell yourself to sleep at night, I am good with.

We won, you lost, its still funny

 

[Cellblock2429]

TRICKLE UP DEFIES GRAVITY

Income distribution

{1} 1,365,856 earn more than $388,000 a year

{2} 68,292,856 earn less than $70,000 a year

https://tinyurl.com/yaw8yy3g


TRICKLE DOWN
If the IRS gave tax bracket {1} a $1,000 tax break they in turn could add $13,665,856,000 to the economy but the rich will not add it to the economy, they will put it in the bank to do nothing


TRICKLE UP
If the IRS gave tax bracket {2} a $1,000 tax break they in turn could add $68,292,856,000 to the economy because they will spend it, buying new things from houses to shoes to a new car which adds to the economy making more shoes, the car to a new house.

Now ask yourself; which is best for our economy

( ) Trickle down

( ) Trickle up

/——-/ Stupid analogy. Trump is doing both and you have no idea what people will do with their refunds. You’re just making blanket assumptions. Idiot.

 

[Cellblock2429]

View attachment 168686 So during the greatest boom in our nation trickle up worked wonderfully.

/——/ Because Ike was a Great War time General doesn’t mean he understood economics anymore than Milton Freedmond could plan the DDAy invasion.

 

[BrokeLoser]

Trickle up is the natural way money flows. The poor and middle class buy goods and pay rent and the “owners”end up with most the cash. It’s an upwards vacuum

Hold on a minute...who provides the poor and middle class with the funds to buy goods and pay rent?
What came first...the chicken or the egg?

The rich and middle class mostly employ the poor and provide them with wages. When you look at how money flows more floats up to the top than down to the poor. It’s the nature of the system. Wouldnt you agree?

No.
Not doing the practical arithmetic...poor Johnny is paid $30k per year by ABC Corp...how can Johnny send more than he was paid up the “chain”?

Does ABC Corp make a profit? Where does that profit come from? Look at the big picture. Where does the money flow?

Ofcouse ABC Corp makes a profit.
Your point is clear...you somehow believe money originates at the bottom and works its way up...I couldn’t disagree more. Getting real deep...you’d have to go way back to understand where old money originated....there lies your answer....land, livestock, agriculture and ones own blood, sweat and tears.
Looking at Microsoft as a model....one could not and would not be able to consume Microsoft products and or services had Bill Gates not engineered an operating system and built Microsoft....therefore all Microsoft products and services consumed began at Bill Gates. Are you starting to get it yet?

 

[Slade3200]

Trickle up is the natural way money flows. The poor and middle class buy goods and pay rent and the “owners”end up with most the cash. It’s an upwards vacuum

Hold on a minute...who provides the poor and middle class with the funds to buy goods and pay rent?
What came first...the chicken or the egg?

The rich and middle class mostly employ the poor and provide them with wages. When you look at how money flows more floats up to the top than down to the poor. It’s the nature of the system. Wouldnt you agree?

No.
Not doing the practical arithmetic...poor Johnny is paid $30k per year by ABC Corp...how can Johnny send more than he was paid up the “chain”?

Does ABC Corp make a profit? Where does that profit come from? Look at the big picture. Where does the money flow?

Ofcouse ABC Corp makes a profit.
Your point is clear...you somehow believe money originates at the bottom and works its way up...I couldn’t disagree more. Getting real deep...you’d have to go way back to understand where old money originated....there lies your answer....land, livestock, agriculture and ones own blood, sweat and tears.
Looking at Microsoft as a model....one could not and would not be able to consume Microsoft products and or services had Bill Gates not engineered an operating system and built Microsoft....therefore all Microsoft products and services consumed began at Bill Gates. Are you starting to get it yet?

You are putting words in my mouth. I never said that Money originated at the bottom. I said that money flows up to the top. Look at the last two decades. The top earners have sucked up the vast majority of new Money and become richer than ever while the middle class has remained relatively stagnant. Of course the top earners pay wages and employ workers. A % goes down to the bottom and a larger percentage ends up floating to the top. Do you deny this?

 

[Mac1958]

Option #3: Equilibrium

Obviously.