Trickle Up Defies Gravity

[jamesduncan]

TRICKLE UP DEFIES GRAVITY

Income distribution

{1} 1,365,856 earn more than $388,000 a year

{2} 68,292,856 earn less than $70,000 a year

https://tinyurl.com/yaw8yy3g


TRICKLE DOWN
If the IRS gave tax bracket {1} a $1,000 tax break they in turn could add $13,665,856,000 to the economy but the rich will not add it to the economy, they will put it in the bank to do nothing


TRICKLE UP
If the IRS gave tax bracket {2} a $1,000 tax break they in turn could add $68,292,856,000 to the economy because they will spend it, buying new things from houses to shoes to a new car which adds to the economy making more shoes, the car to a new house.

Now ask yourself; which is best for our economy

( ) Trickle down

( ) Trickle up

 

[nat4900]

Trickle up....is when the middle class has more purchasing/spending power to clamor for goods and services, which, in turn, spurs the economy and industry...

Trickle down, is a futile expectation that given extra money to conglomerates, these companies will generously give some of their extra funds to create more jobs to address a NON-existent need for more production and to give higher salaries to workers that have jobs in areas where there is no demands for whatever they're producing.

 

[SSGT Bags]

TRICKLE UP DEFIES GRAVITY

Income distribution

{1} 1,365,856 earn more than $388,000 a year

{2} 68,292,856 earn less than $70,000 a year

https://tinyurl.com/yaw8yy3g


TRICKLE DOWN
If the IRS gave tax bracket {1} a $1,000 tax break they in turn could add $13,665,856,000 to the economy but the rich will not add it to the economy, they will put it in the bank to do nothing


TRICKLE UP
If the IRS gave tax bracket {2} a $1,000 tax break they in turn could add $68,292,856,000 to the economy because they will spend it, buying new things from houses to shoes to a new car which adds to the economy making more shoes, the car to a new house.

Now ask yourself; which is best for our economy

( ) Trickle down

( ) Trickle up

The problem with your logic.
Bracket 1 does not need any more money in the bank, they need a new Ferrari.
Bracket 2 probably has 5 credit cards maxed out, won't buy anything new.

 

[BrokeLoser]

TRICKLE UP DEFIES GRAVITY

Income distribution

{1} 1,365,856 earn more than $388,000 a year

{2} 68,292,856 earn less than $70,000 a year

https://tinyurl.com/yaw8yy3g


TRICKLE DOWN
If the IRS gave tax bracket {1} a $1,000 tax break they in turn could add $13,665,856,000 to the economy but the rich will not add it to the economy, they will put it in the bank to do nothing


TRICKLE UP
If the IRS gave tax bracket {2} a $1,000 tax break they in turn could add $68,292,856,000 to the economy because they will spend it, buying new things from houses to shoes to a new car which adds to the economy making more shoes, the car to a new house.

Now ask yourself; which is best for our economy

( ) Trickle down

( ) Trickle up

For sane folks the principles are simple.
For gimme free shit beggars...not so much.
Most economists agree the primary catalyst in a robust economy is jobs / employment.
Ask yourself this...has a bottom feeder ever given you a job?

 

[BrokeLoser]

Trickle up....is when the middle class has more purchasing/spending power to clamor for goods and services, which, in turn, spurs the economy and industry...

Trickle down, is a futile expectation that given extra money to conglomerates, these companies will generously give some of their extra funds to create more jobs to address a NON-existent need for more production and to give higher salaries to workers that have jobs in areas where there is no demands for whatever they're producing.

TRICKLE UP DEFIES GRAVITY

Income distribution

{1} 1,365,856 earn more than $388,000 a year

{2} 68,292,856 earn less than $70,000 a year

https://tinyurl.com/yaw8yy3g


TRICKLE DOWN
If the IRS gave tax bracket {1} a $1,000 tax break they in turn could add $13,665,856,000 to the economy but the rich will not add it to the economy, they will put it in the bank to do nothing


TRICKLE UP
If the IRS gave tax bracket {2} a $1,000 tax break they in turn could add $68,292,856,000 to the economy because they will spend it, buying new things from houses to shoes to a new car which adds to the economy making more shoes, the car to a new house.

Now ask yourself; which is best for our economy

( ) Trickle down

( ) Trickle up

The problem with your logic.
Bracket 1 does not need any more money in the bank, they need a new Ferrari.
Bracket 2 probably has 5 credit cards maxed out, won't buy anything new.

PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE....stop pretending you wackos give two shits about the AMERICAN middle class....You want to see policies implemented that directly bypass the true middle class and only have the potential to benefit ShaQuita and Guadalupe at the very bottom...you know this and we know this....stop playing fucking games, come clean and spit it the fuck out.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

JFK, a rising tide lifts all boats
Obama, a low tide keeps everyone equal for social justice

 

[BluesLegend]

The 'rich' don't spend money? What brand of LSD laced crack are you smoking OP? ...

 

[Harpy Eagle]

TRICKLE UP DEFIES GRAVITY

Income distribution

{1} 1,365,856 earn more than $388,000 a year

{2} 68,292,856 earn less than $70,000 a year

https://tinyurl.com/yaw8yy3g


TRICKLE DOWN
If the IRS gave tax bracket {1} a $1,000 tax break they in turn could add $13,665,856,000 to the economy but the rich will not add it to the economy, they will put it in the bank to do nothing


TRICKLE UP
If the IRS gave tax bracket {2} a $1,000 tax break they in turn could add $68,292,856,000 to the economy because they will spend it, buying new things from houses to shoes to a new car which adds to the economy making more shoes, the car to a new house.

Now ask yourself; which is best for our economy

( ) Trickle down

( ) Trickle up

For sane folks the principles are simple.
For gimme free shit beggars...not so much.
Most economists agree the primary catalyst in a robust economy is jobs / employment.
Ask yourself this...has a bottom feeder ever given you a job?

And the only thing that creates jobs is demand. Group 1 getting $1000 does nothing to demand and they are going to hire people just because they have more money. Group 2 getting $1000 will increase demand which will in turn lead to more jobs.

 

[BluesLegend]

TRICKLE UP DEFIES GRAVITY

Income distribution

{1} 1,365,856 earn more than $388,000 a year

{2} 68,292,856 earn less than $70,000 a year

https://tinyurl.com/yaw8yy3g


TRICKLE DOWN
If the IRS gave tax bracket {1} a $1,000 tax break they in turn could add $13,665,856,000 to the economy but the rich will not add it to the economy, they will put it in the bank to do nothing


TRICKLE UP
If the IRS gave tax bracket {2} a $1,000 tax break they in turn could add $68,292,856,000 to the economy because they will spend it, buying new things from houses to shoes to a new car which adds to the economy making more shoes, the car to a new house.

Now ask yourself; which is best for our economy

( ) Trickle down

( ) Trickle up

For sane folks the principles are simple.
For gimme free shit beggars...not so much.
Most economists agree the primary catalyst in a robust economy is jobs / employment.
Ask yourself this...has a bottom feeder ever given you a job?

And the only thing that creates joss is demand. Group 1 getting $1000 does nothing to demand and they are going to hire people just because they have more money. Group 2 getting $1000 will increase demand which will in turn lead to more jobs.

Group 2 will have their $1,000 confiscated by tax and spend liberals and the money will vanish into a black hole.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

TRICKLE UP DEFIES GRAVITY

Income distribution

{1} 1,365,856 earn more than $388,000 a year

{2} 68,292,856 earn less than $70,000 a year

https://tinyurl.com/yaw8yy3g


TRICKLE DOWN
If the IRS gave tax bracket {1} a $1,000 tax break they in turn could add $13,665,856,000 to the economy but the rich will not add it to the economy, they will put it in the bank to do nothing


TRICKLE UP
If the IRS gave tax bracket {2} a $1,000 tax break they in turn could add $68,292,856,000 to the economy because they will spend it, buying new things from houses to shoes to a new car which adds to the economy making more shoes, the car to a new house.

Now ask yourself; which is best for our economy

( ) Trickle down

( ) Trickle up

For sane folks the principles are simple.
For gimme free shit beggars...not so much.
Most economists agree the primary catalyst in a robust economy is jobs / employment.
Ask yourself this...has a bottom feeder ever given you a job?

And the only thing that creates joss is demand. Group 1 getting $1000 does nothing to demand and they are going to hire people just because they have more money. Group 2 getting $1000 will increase demand which will in turn lead to more jobs.

Group 2 will have their $1,000 confiscated by tax and spend liberals and the money will vanish into a black hole.

You are not really a very smart person are you? That's ok, the world needs dumb people too.

 

[jamesduncan]

Ask yourself this...has a bottom feeder ever given you a job?

Yes, I used to work for a bug extermination company

lol

 

[SSGT Bags]

Trickle up....is when the middle class has more purchasing/spending power to clamor for goods and services, which, in turn, spurs the economy and industry...

Trickle down, is a futile expectation that given extra money to conglomerates, these companies will generously give some of their extra funds to create more jobs to address a NON-existent need for more production and to give higher salaries to workers that have jobs in areas where there is no demands for whatever they're producing.

TRICKLE UP DEFIES GRAVITY

Income distribution

{1} 1,365,856 earn more than $388,000 a year

{2} 68,292,856 earn less than $70,000 a year

https://tinyurl.com/yaw8yy3g


TRICKLE DOWN
If the IRS gave tax bracket {1} a $1,000 tax break they in turn could add $13,665,856,000 to the economy but the rich will not add it to the economy, they will put it in the bank to do nothing


TRICKLE UP
If the IRS gave tax bracket {2} a $1,000 tax break they in turn could add $68,292,856,000 to the economy because they will spend it, buying new things from houses to shoes to a new car which adds to the economy making more shoes, the car to a new house.

Now ask yourself; which is best for our economy

( ) Trickle down

( ) Trickle up

The problem with your logic.
Bracket 1 does not need any more money in the bank, they need a new Ferrari.
Bracket 2 probably has 5 credit cards maxed out, won't buy anything new.

PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE....stop pretending you wackos give two shits about the AMERICAN middle class....You want to see policies implemented that directly bypass the true middle class and only have the potential to benefit ShaQuita and Guadalupe at the very bottom...you know this and we know this....stop playing fucking games, come clean and spit it the fuck out.

Your handle says it all! Brokeloser, probably sucking off welfare and depending on winning the lottery for your retirement plan.
47%

 

[SSGT Bags]

TRICKLE UP DEFIES GRAVITY

Income distribution

{1} 1,365,856 earn more than $388,000 a year

{2} 68,292,856 earn less than $70,000 a year

https://tinyurl.com/yaw8yy3g


TRICKLE DOWN
If the IRS gave tax bracket {1} a $1,000 tax break they in turn could add $13,665,856,000 to the economy but the rich will not add it to the economy, they will put it in the bank to do nothing


TRICKLE UP
If the IRS gave tax bracket {2} a $1,000 tax break they in turn could add $68,292,856,000 to the economy because they will spend it, buying new things from houses to shoes to a new car which adds to the economy making more shoes, the car to a new house.

Now ask yourself; which is best for our economy

( ) Trickle down

( ) Trickle up

For sane folks the principles are simple.
For gimme free shit beggars...not so much.
Most economists agree the primary catalyst in a robust economy is jobs / employment.
Ask yourself this...has a bottom feeder ever given you a job?

And the only thing that creates joss is demand. Group 1 getting $1000 does nothing to demand and they are going to hire people just because they have more money. Group 2 getting $1000 will increase demand which will in turn lead to more jobs.

Group 2 will have their $1,000 confiscated by tax and spend liberals and the money will vanish into a black hole.

You are not really a very smart person are you? That's ok, the world needs dumb people too.

Education has ruined a hell of a lot of good truck drivers.

 

[BrokeLoser]

Trickle up....is when the middle class has more purchasing/spending power to clamor for goods and services, which, in turn, spurs the economy and industry...

Trickle down, is a futile expectation that given extra money to conglomerates, these companies will generously give some of their extra funds to create more jobs to address a NON-existent need for more production and to give higher salaries to workers that have jobs in areas where there is no demands for whatever they're producing.

TRICKLE UP DEFIES GRAVITY

Income distribution

{1} 1,365,856 earn more than $388,000 a year

{2} 68,292,856 earn less than $70,000 a year

https://tinyurl.com/yaw8yy3g


TRICKLE DOWN
If the IRS gave tax bracket {1} a $1,000 tax break they in turn could add $13,665,856,000 to the economy but the rich will not add it to the economy, they will put it in the bank to do nothing


TRICKLE UP
If the IRS gave tax bracket {2} a $1,000 tax break they in turn could add $68,292,856,000 to the economy because they will spend it, buying new things from houses to shoes to a new car which adds to the economy making more shoes, the car to a new house.

Now ask yourself; which is best for our economy

( ) Trickle down

( ) Trickle up

The problem with your logic.
Bracket 1 does not need any more money in the bank, they need a new Ferrari.
Bracket 2 probably has 5 credit cards maxed out, won't buy anything new.

PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE....stop pretending you wackos give two shits about the AMERICAN middle class....You want to see policies implemented that directly bypass the true middle class and only have the potential to benefit ShaQuita and Guadalupe at the very bottom...you know this and we know this....stop playing fucking games, come clean and spit it the fuck out.

Your handle says it all! Brokeloser, probably sucking off welfare and depending on winning the lottery for your retirement plan.
47%

Haha...that’s it? That’s how you refute my point?
That’s pretty clever...My “handle” could be facetious in nature you know...that probably wouldn’t make any sense in the twisted, confused mind of a LefTard would it? Do you people often degrade yourselves without sarcastic intentions?

 

[Aldo Raine]

TRICKLE UP DEFIES GRAVITY

Income distribution

{1} 1,365,856 earn more than $388,000 a year

{2} 68,292,856 earn less than $70,000 a year

https://tinyurl.com/yaw8yy3g


TRICKLE DOWN
If the IRS gave tax bracket {1} a $1,000 tax break they in turn could add $13,665,856,000 to the economy but the rich will not add it to the economy, they will put it in the bank to do nothing


TRICKLE UP
If the IRS gave tax bracket {2} a $1,000 tax break they in turn could add $68,292,856,000 to the economy because they will spend it, buying new things from houses to shoes to a new car which adds to the economy making more shoes, the car to a new house.

Now ask yourself; which is best for our economy

( ) Trickle down

( ) Trickle up

For sane folks the principles are simple.
For gimme free shit beggars...not so much.
Most economists agree the primary catalyst in a robust economy is jobs / employment.
Ask yourself this...has a bottom feeder ever given you a job?

And the only thing that creates joss is demand. Group 1 getting $1000 does nothing to demand and they are going to hire people just because they have more money. Group 2 getting $1000 will increase demand which will in turn lead to more jobs.

Group 2 will have their $1,000 confiscated by tax and spend liberals and the money will vanish into a black hole.

You are not really a very smart person are you? That's ok, the world needs dumb people too.

Please tell me you didn't just figure out he is a not wit?

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Trickle UP? How silly.

How many jobs are provided by the poor? How many paychecks have they written?

 

[Slade3200]

Trickle up is the natural way money flows. The poor and middle class buy goods and pay rent and the “owners”end up with most the cash. It’s an upwards vacuum

 

[BrokeLoser]

Trickle up is the natural way money flows. The poor and middle class buy goods and pay rent and the “owners”end up with most the cash. It’s an upwards vacuum

Hold on a minute...who provides the poor and middle class with the funds to buy goods and pay rent?
What came first...the chicken or the egg?

 

[dudmuck]

Trickle UP? How silly.

How many jobs are provided by the poor? How many paychecks have they written?

 

[francoHFW]

TRICKLE UP DEFIES GRAVITY

Income distribution

{1} 1,365,856 earn more than $388,000 a year

{2} 68,292,856 earn less than $70,000 a year

https://tinyurl.com/yaw8yy3g


TRICKLE DOWN
If the IRS gave tax bracket {1} a $1,000 tax break they in turn could add $13,665,856,000 to the economy but the rich will not add it to the economy, they will put it in the bank to do nothing


TRICKLE UP
If the IRS gave tax bracket {2} a $1,000 tax break they in turn could add $68,292,856,000 to the economy because they will spend it, buying new things from houses to shoes to a new car which adds to the economy making more shoes, the car to a new house.

Now ask yourself; which is best for our economy

( ) Trickle down

( ) Trickle up

The problem with your logic.
Bracket 1 does not need any more money in the bank, they need a new Ferrari.
Bracket 2 probably has 5 credit cards maxed out, won't buy anything new.

Which also proves that under the Pander to the rich GOP tax rates, the gigantic middle-class and working-class have been ruined. Meanwhile, the rich are so bloated, expecting them to fuel more spending is insane.