Transgenderism is a disorder stemming from psychological trauma, says man who had TWO sex changes

"Gender dysphoria is a psychological condition where you are dissatisfied with your gender," he added in an interview with the Daily Mail. "Nobody's ever born a transgender. They're manufactured as a result of something, a developmental childhood issue that has yet to be determined for many people."

"In retrospect, I can see that changing genders, quite frankly, is just pure foolishness."

For Heyer, it began when his grandmother started dressing him in female clothing at a very young age. When Heyer's father found out about this, his adopted brother began to sexually molest him, and his mother began to discipline him so severely that she almost killed him. All of this abuse by those entrusted to his care led Heyer to feel like "a girl trapped in a male's body."


Learn more: Transgenderism is a disorder stemming from psychological trauma, says man who had TWO sex changes
 

If that were true then the civil rights of transgenders are fully protected by the Americans with Disabilities Act
Wrong

Certain specific conditions, such as kleptomania, pedophilia, exhibitionism, voyeurism, etc. are excluded under the definition of "disability" in order to prevent abuse of the statute's purpose.[10][11] Additionally, other specific conditions, such as gender identity disorders, are also excluded under the definition of "disability".[11][12]
 

If that were true then the civil rights of transgenders are fully protected by the Americans with Disabilities Act
Wrong

Certain specific conditions, such as kleptomania, pedophilia, exhibitionism, voyeurism, etc. are excluded under the definition of "disability" in order to prevent abuse of the statute's purpose.[10][11] Additionally, other specific conditions, such as gender identity disorders, are also excluded under the definition of "disability".[11][12]

They might be NOW, but if you had your way transgenderism would be classified as a mental illness.

Social Security PAYS people with mental illness. Want to add all transgenders and gays to your tax bill?
 

If that were true then the civil rights of transgenders are fully protected by the Americans with Disabilities Act
Wrong

Certain specific conditions, such as kleptomania, pedophilia, exhibitionism, voyeurism, etc. are excluded under the definition of "disability" in order to prevent abuse of the statute's purpose.[10][11] Additionally, other specific conditions, such as gender identity disorders, are also excluded under the definition of "disability".[11][12]

So the law says you are wrong.
 
I don't think it's a huge stretch to call it a "disorder", but there are plenty of people who function just fine with "disorders". It doesn't mean those people have to be on disability, or that they can't do their jobs, or that they have to be shunned.

As usual, both ends of this issue are locked into simplistic, binary thought processes.

Which, ironically, might also be considered a disorder.

:tongue:
.
 
I don't think it's a huge stretch to call it a "disorder", but there are plenty of people who function just fine with "disorders". It doesn't mean those people have to be on disability, or that they can't do their jobs, or that they have to be shunned.

As usual, both ends of this issue are locked into simplistic, binary thought processes.

Which, ironically, might also be considered a disorder.

:tongue:
.

No. One side is accepting of people's differences and wishes to see all treated equally. The other thinks those who are different ought to be shunned and tossed aside to suffer as second class citizens.

You side with the latter if you don't firmly state allegiance with the former.

Earmuffs, bitch.
 

If that were true then the civil rights of transgenders are fully protected by the Americans with Disabilities Act
Wrong

Certain specific conditions, such as kleptomania, pedophilia, exhibitionism, voyeurism, etc. are excluded under the definition of "disability" in order to prevent abuse of the statute's purpose.[10][11] Additionally, other specific conditions, such as gender identity disorders, are also excluded under the definition of "disability".[11][12]

They might be NOW, but if you had your way transgenderism would be classified as a mental illness.

Social Security PAYS people with mental illness. Want to add all transgenders and gays to your tax bill?
Nope. Rather put them in graves. Mass one works. Sure once we start using Eugenics again it will work itself out.
This is just another example of the fear, ignorance, stupidity, and hate common to most on the right.

Any efforts on the part of conservatives to disadvantage transgender persons through the force of law will fail as did their efforts to disadvantage gay Americans, and for the same reasons.
I HIGHLY doubt the mentally ill person that wrote the article is a right winger but nice try.
I don't think it's a huge stretch to call it a "disorder", but there are plenty of people who function just fine with "disorders". It doesn't mean those people have to be on disability, or that they can't do their jobs, or that they have to be shunned.

As usual, both ends of this issue are locked into simplistic, binary thought processes.

Which, ironically, might also be considered a disorder.

:tongue:
.

No. One side is accepting of people's differences and wishes to see all treated equally. The other thinks those who are different ought to be shunned and tossed aside to suffer as second class citizens.

You side with the latter if you don't firmly state allegiance with the former.

Earmuffs, bitch.
No one side YOURS accepts ANYONE'S made up disease,disorder,sexual problem etc as a true difference and not a mental problem that needs help. You are GULLIBLE. I want those either HELPED or DESTROYED. Simple as that. You people claim to want more money for mental health but don't want to help those ASKING for help as the person the story is about is doing...you make fun of them and rant about equality etc etc etc.
 

If that were true then the civil rights of transgenders are fully protected by the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Which they are anyway. It also means we are no longer obliged to consider their insane demands, or treat their idiotic utterances as anything other than what they are...insane gibberish. It also means we can acknowledge that they are not stable or, for the most part, capable of making healthy choices for themselves or others, and thus should probably be locked up when they try to impose their will on others, or look to harm themselves.
 
I don't think it's a huge stretch to call it a "disorder", but there are plenty of people who function just fine with "disorders". It doesn't mean those people have to be on disability, or that they can't do their jobs, or that they have to be shunned.

As usual, both ends of this issue are locked into simplistic, binary thought processes.

Which, ironically, might also be considered a disorder.

:tongue:
.

No. One side is accepting of people's differences and wishes to see all treated equally. The other thinks those who are different ought to be shunned and tossed aside to suffer as second class citizens.

You side with the latter if you don't firmly state allegiance with the former.

Earmuffs, bitch.
If by different you mean intrusive, disruptive, predatory, salacious, aggressive....well then those of us who are sane are going to seek to remove the pathetic psychopaths and deviants to a place where they can fuck with each other...and spare the rest of us from wasting time trying to protect ourselves from them.
 

If that were true then the civil rights of transgenders are fully protected by the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Which they are anyway. It also means we are no longer obliged to consider their insane demands, or treat their idiotic utterances as anything other than what they are...insane gibberish. It also means we can acknowledge that they are not stable or, for the most part, capable of making healthy choices for themselves or others, and thus should probably be locked up when they try to impose their will on others, or look to harm themselves.

The irony of you trying to pontificate on 'insane gibberish' is really too much to bear.
 

If that were true then the civil rights of transgenders are fully protected by the Americans with Disabilities Act
Wrong

Certain specific conditions, such as kleptomania, pedophilia, exhibitionism, voyeurism, etc. are excluded under the definition of "disability" in order to prevent abuse of the statute's purpose.[10][11] Additionally, other specific conditions, such as gender identity disorders, are also excluded under the definition of "disability".[11][12]

They might be NOW, but if you had your way transgenderism would be classified as a mental illness.

Social Security PAYS people with mental illness. Want to add all transgenders and gays to your tax bill?
Nope. Rather put them in graves. Mass one works. Sure once we start using Eugenics again it will work itself out.
This is just another example of the fear, ignorance, stupidity, and hate common to most on the right.

Any efforts on the part of conservatives to disadvantage transgender persons through the force of law will fail as did their efforts to disadvantage gay Americans, and for the same reasons.
I HIGHLY doubt the mentally ill person that wrote the article is a right winger but nice try.
I don't think it's a huge stretch to call it a "disorder", but there are plenty of people who function just fine with "disorders". It doesn't mean those people have to be on disability, or that they can't do their jobs, or that they have to be shunned.

As usual, both ends of this issue are locked into simplistic, binary thought processes.

Which, ironically, might also be considered a disorder.

:tongue:
.

No. One side is accepting of people's differences and wishes to see all treated equally. The other thinks those who are different ought to be shunned and tossed aside to suffer as second class citizens.

You side with the latter if you don't firmly state allegiance with the former.

Earmuffs, bitch.
No one side YOURS accepts ANYONE'S made up disease,disorder,sexual problem etc as a true difference and not a mental problem that needs help. You are GULLIBLE. I want those either HELPED or DESTROYED. Simple as that. You people claim to want more money for mental health but don't want to help those ASKING for help as the person the story is about is doing...you make fun of them and rant about equality etc etc etc.

He's a hatemonger for the anti-gay media circuit.

What The Media Should Know About Walt Heyer And "Transition Regrets"
 
Certain specific conditions, such as kleptomania, pedophilia, exhibitionism, voyeurism, etc. are excluded under the definition of "disability" in order to prevent abuse of the statute's purpose. ...

They might be NOW, but...

If I did not already have the perfect signature... THIS would be my new signature, as it perfectly demonstrates the 'SLIPPERY SLOPE' being intentionally exploited by the Relativists among the Intellectually Less Fortunate Cult.
 
Last edited:

If that were true then the civil rights of transgenders are fully protected by the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Which they are anyway. It also means we are no longer obliged to consider their insane demands, or treat their idiotic utterances as anything other than what they are...insane gibberish. It also means we can acknowledge that they are not stable or, for the most part, capable of making healthy choices for themselves or others, and thus should probably be locked up when they try to impose their will on others, or look to harm themselves.

The irony of you trying to pontificate on 'insane gibberish' is really too much to bear.

There's no irony to be found in contesting your insane gibberish, Gilligan. It's just what needs to be done.
 
Certain specific conditions, such as kleptomania, pedophilia, exhibitionism, voyeurism, etc. are excluded under the definition of "disability" in order to prevent abuse of the statute's purpose. ...

They might be NOW, but

If I did not already have the perfect signature... THIS would be my new signature, as it perfectly demonstrates the 'SLIPPERY SLOPE' being intentionally exploited by the Relativists among the Intellectually Less Fortunate Cult.

You edited my quote and the other person's quote to change the meaning of both.

Nice try.
 

If that were true then the civil rights of transgenders are fully protected by the Americans with Disabilities Act
Wrong

Certain specific conditions, such as kleptomania, pedophilia, exhibitionism, voyeurism, etc. are excluded under the definition of "disability" in order to prevent abuse of the statute's purpose.[10][11] Additionally, other specific conditions, such as gender identity disorders, are also excluded under the definition of "disability".[11][12]

They might be NOW, but if you had your way transgenderism would be classified as a mental illness.

Social Security PAYS people with mental illness. Want to add all transgenders and gays to your tax bill?
Nope. Rather put them in graves. Mass one works. Sure once we start using Eugenics again it will work itself out.
This is just another example of the fear, ignorance, stupidity, and hate common to most on the right.

Any efforts on the part of conservatives to disadvantage transgender persons through the force of law will fail as did their efforts to disadvantage gay Americans, and for the same reasons.
I HIGHLY doubt the mentally ill person that wrote the article is a right winger but nice try.
I don't think it's a huge stretch to call it a "disorder", but there are plenty of people who function just fine with "disorders". It doesn't mean those people have to be on disability, or that they can't do their jobs, or that they have to be shunned.

As usual, both ends of this issue are locked into simplistic, binary thought processes.

Which, ironically, might also be considered a disorder.

:tongue:
.

No. One side is accepting of people's differences and wishes to see all treated equally. The other thinks those who are different ought to be shunned and tossed aside to suffer as second class citizens.

You side with the latter if you don't firmly state allegiance with the former.

Earmuffs, bitch.
No one side YOURS accepts ANYONE'S made up disease,disorder,sexual problem etc as a true difference and not a mental problem that needs help. You are GULLIBLE. I want those either HELPED or DESTROYED. Simple as that. You people claim to want more money for mental health but don't want to help those ASKING for help as the person the story is about is doing...you make fun of them and rant about equality etc etc etc.

He's a hatemonger for the anti-gay media circuit.

What The Media Should Know About Walt Heyer And "Transition Regrets"
He went through the thing TWICE I would say he has up close and personal experience and whatever his view of it is now he has every right to show how and what the disease does to people and why it happens. He is ONLY being attacked because he has come out AGAINST the disease being treated like some kind of normal thing.
 

If that were true then the civil rights of transgenders are fully protected by the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Which they are anyway. It also means we are no longer obliged to consider their insane demands, or treat their idiotic utterances as anything other than what they are...insane gibberish. It also means we can acknowledge that they are not stable or, for the most part, capable of making healthy choices for themselves or others, and thus should probably be locked up when they try to impose their will on others, or look to harm themselves.

The irony of you trying to pontificate on 'insane gibberish' is really too much to bear.

There's no irony to be found in contesting your insane gibberish, Gilligan. It's just what needs to be done.

The American People are steamrolling the nutcases like yourself. Enjoy.
 

Forum List

Back
Top